Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
TRMK vs HOPE vs IBCP vs CVBF
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
TRMK vs HOPE vs IBCP vs CVBF — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $2.64B | $1.60B | $690M | $2.79B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.12B | $968M | $315M | $643M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $224M | $59M | $69M | $209M |
| Gross Margin | 71.0% | 48.6% | 69.6% | 79.9% |
| Operating Margin | 25.5% | 8.3% | 25.8% | 43.8% |
| Forward P/E | 11.5x | 11.7x | 9.4x | 14.3x |
| Total Debt | $1.12B | $396M | $117M | $991M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $668M | $560M | $52M | $108M |
TRMK vs HOPE vs IBCP vs CVBF — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Trustmark Corporati… (TRMK) | 100 | 188.1 | +88.1% |
| Hope Bancorp, Inc. (HOPE) | 100 | 131.6 | +31.6% |
| Independent Bank Co… (IBCP) | 100 | 242.5 | +142.5% |
| CVB Financial Corp. (CVBF) | 100 | 105.3 | +5.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TRMK vs HOPE vs IBCP vs CVBF
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TRMK has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure and valuation efficiency.
- Rev growth 34.8%, EPS growth 1.9%
- PEG 1.42 vs CVBF's 4.49
- NIM 3.4% vs HOPE's 2.5%
- 34.8% NII/revenue growth vs HOPE's -3.2%
HOPE is the clearest fit if your priority is dividends.
- 4.4% yield, vs IBCP's 3.1%
IBCP is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Dividend streak 11 yrs, beta 0.83, yield 3.1%
- 181.9% 10Y total return vs TRMK's 127.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.83, Low D/E 23.2%, current ratio 370.62x
- Beta 0.83, yield 3.1%, current ratio 370.62x
CVBF is the clearest fit if your priority is quality and efficiency.
- Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs TRMK's 0.5% (lower = leaner)
- Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs TRMK's 0.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 34.8% NII/revenue growth vs HOPE's -3.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.4x vs 14.3x), PEG 1.79 vs 4.49 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs TRMK's 0.5% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.83 vs HOPE's 1.10 | |
| Dividends | 4.4% yield, vs IBCP's 3.1% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +31.7% vs IBCP's +11.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs TRMK's 0.5% |
TRMK vs HOPE vs IBCP vs CVBF — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
TRMK vs HOPE vs IBCP vs CVBF — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
IBCP leads in 3 of 6 categories
CVBF leads 1 • TRMK leads 0 • HOPE leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CVBF leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TRMK is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.1B annually — 3.6x IBCP's $315M. CVBF is the more profitable business, keeping 32.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to HOPE's 6.0%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.1B | $968M | $315M | $643M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $323M | $84M | $89M | $294M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $224M | $59M | $69M | $209M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $230M | $147M | $70M | $217M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +71.0% | +48.6% | +69.6% | +79.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +25.5% | +8.3% | +25.8% | +43.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +20.0% | +6.0% | +21.7% | +32.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +20.7% | +15.6% | +22.2% | +33.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +5.4% | +35.0% | +2.3% | +11.1% |
Valuation Metrics
IBCP leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.3x trailing earnings, IBCP trades at a 62% valuation discount to HOPE's 27.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), TRMK offers better value at 1.50x vs CVBF's 4.25x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.6B | $1.6B | $690M | $2.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.1B | $1.4B | $755M | $3.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 12.10x | 27.15x | 10.25x | 13.51x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 11.46x | 11.67x | 9.44x | 14.26x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.50x | — | 1.95x | 4.25x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.47x | 17.14x | 9.28x | 13.04x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.35x | 1.65x | 2.19x | 4.34x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.28x | 0.70x | 1.39x | 1.22x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 11.36x | 10.55x | 9.83x | 12.83x |
Profitability & Efficiency
IBCP leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
IBCP delivers a 14.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $14 in annual profit, vs $3 for HOPE. HOPE carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TRMK's 0.53x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), IBCP scores 8/9 vs CVBF's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +10.8% | +2.6% | +14.2% | +9.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.2% | +0.3% | +1.3% | +1.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.1% | +2.3% | +10.2% | +6.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.2% | +0.9% | +2.6% | +9.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 6 | 8 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.53x | 0.17x | 0.23x | 0.43x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $448M | -$164M | $65M | $883M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $668M | $560M | $52M | $108M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.1B | $396M | $117M | $991M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.75x | 0.17x | 0.91x | 2.12x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
IBCP leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in IBCP five years ago would be worth $16,340 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $9,845 for HOPE. Over the past 12 months, TRMK leads with a +31.7% total return vs IBCP's +11.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors IBCP at 30.8% vs HOPE's 20.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +15.1% | +15.0% | +5.9% | +11.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +31.7% | +27.9% | +11.2% | +12.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +110.9% | +74.3% | +123.9% | +87.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +48.4% | -1.5% | +63.4% | +13.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +127.7% | +18.3% | +181.9% | +68.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +28.2% | +20.3% | +30.8% | +23.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — TRMK and IBCP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
IBCP is the less volatile stock with a 0.83 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HOPE's 1.10 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TRMK currently trades 97.3% from its 52-week high vs IBCP's 89.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.94x | 1.10x | 0.83x | 0.94x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $45.99 | $13.02 | $37.39 | $21.48 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $33.39 | $9.44 | $29.63 | $17.95 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +97.3% | +95.9% | +89.6% | +95.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 51.8 | 54.2 | 43.0 | 50.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 396K | 901K | 177K | 1.6M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — HOPE and IBCP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: TRMK as "Hold", HOPE as "Hold", IBCP as "Hold", CVBF as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 20.5% upside for CVBF (target: $25) vs 1.7% for TRMK (target: $46). For income investors, HOPE offers the higher dividend yield at 4.40% vs TRMK's 2.16%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $45.50 | $14.50 | $38.00 | $24.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 9 | 6 | 7 | 16 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.2% | +4.4% | +3.1% | +4.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 0 | 11 | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.97 | $0.55 | $1.03 | $0.82 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +3.0% | 0.0% | +1.8% | +2.9% |
IBCP leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). CVBF leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.
TRMK vs HOPE vs IBCP vs CVBF: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TRMK or HOPE or IBCP or CVBF a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) is the stronger pick with 34.
8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 2% for Hope Bancorp, Inc. (HOPE). Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) offers the better valuation at 10. 3x trailing P/E (9. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) a "Hold" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TRMK or HOPE or IBCP or CVBF?
On trailing P/E, Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) is the cheapest at 10.
3x versus Hope Bancorp, Inc. at 27. 2x. On forward P/E, Independent Bank Corporation is actually cheaper at 9. 4x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Trustmark Corporation wins at 1. 42x versus CVB Financial Corp. 's 4. 49x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TRMK or HOPE or IBCP or CVBF?
Over the past 5 years, Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) delivered a total return of +63.
4%, compared to -1. 5% for Hope Bancorp, Inc. (HOPE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IBCP returned +181. 9% versus HOPE's +18. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TRMK or HOPE or IBCP or CVBF?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
83β versus Hope Bancorp, Inc. 's 1. 10β — meaning HOPE is approximately 33% more volatile than IBCP relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Hope Bancorp, Inc. (HOPE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 53% for Trustmark Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TRMK or HOPE or IBCP or CVBF?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) is pulling ahead at 34.
8% versus -3. 2% for Hope Bancorp, Inc. (HOPE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: CVB Financial Corp. grew EPS 5. 6% year-over-year, compared to -43. 9% for Hope Bancorp, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TRMK or HOPE or IBCP or CVBF?
CVB Financial Corp.
(CVBF) is the more profitable company, earning 32. 5% net margin versus 6. 0% for Hope Bancorp, Inc. — meaning it keeps 32. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CVBF leads at 43. 8% versus 8. 3% for HOPE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CVBF leads at 79. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TRMK or HOPE or IBCP or CVBF more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 42x versus CVB Financial Corp. 's 4. 49x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) trades at 9. 4x forward P/E versus 14. 3x for CVB Financial Corp. — 4. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CVBF: 20. 5% to $24. 75.
08Which pays a better dividend — TRMK or HOPE or IBCP or CVBF?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Hope Bancorp, Inc. (HOPE) offers the highest yield at 4. 4%, versus 2. 2% for Trustmark Corporation (TRMK).
09Is TRMK or HOPE or IBCP or CVBF better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
83), 3. 1% yield, +181. 9% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (IBCP: +181. 9%, HOPE: +18. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TRMK and HOPE and IBCP and CVBF?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: TRMK is a small-cap high-growth stock; HOPE is a small-cap income-oriented stock; IBCP is a small-cap deep-value stock; CVBF is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.