Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
TRMK vs HOPE vs IBCP vs CVBF vs BANR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
TRMK vs HOPE vs IBCP vs CVBF vs BANR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $2.64B | $1.60B | $690M | $2.79B | $2.20B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.12B | $968M | $315M | $643M | $819M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $224M | $59M | $69M | $209M | $195M |
| Gross Margin | 71.0% | 48.6% | 69.6% | 79.9% | 79.0% |
| Operating Margin | 25.5% | 8.3% | 25.8% | 43.8% | 29.5% |
| Forward P/E | 11.5x | 11.7x | 9.4x | 14.3x | 10.4x |
| Total Debt | $1.12B | $396M | $117M | $991M | $373M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $668M | $560M | $52M | $108M | $183M |
TRMK vs HOPE vs IBCP vs CVBF vs BANR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Trustmark Corporati… (TRMK) | 100 | 188.1 | +88.1% |
| Hope Bancorp, Inc. (HOPE) | 100 | 131.6 | +31.6% |
| Independent Bank Co… (IBCP) | 100 | 242.5 | +142.5% |
| CVB Financial Corp. (CVBF) | 100 | 105.3 | +5.3% |
| Banner Corporation (BANR) | 100 | 173.0 | +73.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TRMK vs HOPE vs IBCP vs CVBF vs BANR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TRMK has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure.
- Rev growth 34.8%, EPS growth 1.9%
- 34.8% NII/revenue growth vs HOPE's -3.2%
- +31.7% vs BANR's +7.9%
HOPE is the clearest fit if your priority is dividends.
- 4.4% yield, vs IBCP's 3.1%
IBCP is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 11 yrs, beta 0.83, yield 3.1%
- 181.9% 10Y total return vs TRMK's 127.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.83, Low D/E 23.2%, current ratio 370.62x
- Beta 0.83, yield 3.1%, current ratio 370.62x
CVBF is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and efficiency is your priority.
- Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs BANR's 0.5% (lower = leaner)
- Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs BANR's 0.5%
BANR ranks third and is worth considering specifically for valuation efficiency and bank quality.
- PEG 0.90 vs CVBF's 4.49
- NIM 3.6% vs HOPE's 2.5%
- Lower P/E (10.4x vs 14.3x), PEG 0.90 vs 4.49
- Beta 0.80 vs HOPE's 1.10
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 34.8% NII/revenue growth vs HOPE's -3.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.4x vs 14.3x), PEG 0.90 vs 4.49 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs BANR's 0.5% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.80 vs HOPE's 1.10 | |
| Dividends | 4.4% yield, vs IBCP's 3.1% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +31.7% vs BANR's +7.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs BANR's 0.5% |
TRMK vs HOPE vs IBCP vs CVBF vs BANR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
TRMK vs HOPE vs IBCP vs CVBF vs BANR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
IBCP leads in 3 of 6 categories
CVBF leads 1 • TRMK leads 0 • HOPE leads 0 • BANR leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CVBF leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TRMK is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.1B annually — 3.6x IBCP's $315M. CVBF is the more profitable business, keeping 32.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to HOPE's 6.0%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.1B | $968M | $315M | $643M | $819M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $323M | $84M | $89M | $294M | $253M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $224M | $59M | $69M | $209M | $195M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $230M | $147M | $70M | $217M | $248M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +71.0% | +48.6% | +69.6% | +79.9% | +79.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +25.5% | +8.3% | +25.8% | +43.8% | +29.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +20.0% | +6.0% | +21.7% | +32.5% | +23.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +20.7% | +15.6% | +22.2% | +33.8% | +30.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +5.4% | +35.0% | +2.3% | +11.1% | +11.2% |
Valuation Metrics
IBCP leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.3x trailing earnings, IBCP trades at a 62% valuation discount to HOPE's 27.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), BANR offers better value at 0.99x vs CVBF's 4.25x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.6B | $1.6B | $690M | $2.8B | $2.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.1B | $1.4B | $755M | $3.7B | $2.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 12.10x | 27.15x | 10.25x | 13.51x | 11.52x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 11.46x | 11.67x | 9.44x | 14.26x | 10.37x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.50x | — | 1.95x | 4.25x | 0.99x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.47x | 17.14x | 9.28x | 13.04x | 9.47x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.35x | 1.65x | 2.19x | 4.34x | 2.69x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.28x | 0.70x | 1.39x | 1.22x | 1.15x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 11.36x | 10.55x | 9.83x | 12.83x | 8.88x |
Profitability & Efficiency
IBCP leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
IBCP delivers a 14.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $14 in annual profit, vs $3 for HOPE. HOPE carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TRMK's 0.53x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), IBCP scores 8/9 vs CVBF's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +10.8% | +2.6% | +14.2% | +9.3% | +10.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.2% | +0.3% | +1.3% | +1.4% | +1.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.1% | +2.3% | +10.2% | +6.8% | +7.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.2% | +0.9% | +2.6% | +9.3% | +10.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 6 | 8 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.53x | 0.17x | 0.23x | 0.43x | 0.19x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $448M | -$164M | $65M | $883M | $190M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $668M | $560M | $52M | $108M | $183M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.1B | $396M | $117M | $991M | $373M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.75x | 0.17x | 0.91x | 2.12x | 1.11x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
IBCP leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in IBCP five years ago would be worth $16,340 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $9,845 for HOPE. Over the past 12 months, TRMK leads with a +31.7% total return vs BANR's +7.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors IBCP at 30.8% vs BANR's 16.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +15.1% | +15.0% | +5.9% | +11.1% | +5.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +31.7% | +27.9% | +11.2% | +12.4% | +7.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +110.9% | +74.3% | +123.9% | +87.6% | +56.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +48.4% | -1.5% | +63.4% | +13.5% | +30.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +127.7% | +18.3% | +181.9% | +68.0% | +101.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +28.2% | +20.3% | +30.8% | +23.3% | +16.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — TRMK and BANR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BANR is the less volatile stock with a 0.80 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HOPE's 1.10 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TRMK currently trades 97.3% from its 52-week high vs IBCP's 89.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.94x | 1.10x | 0.83x | 0.94x | 0.80x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $45.99 | $13.02 | $37.39 | $21.48 | $69.83 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $33.39 | $9.44 | $29.63 | $17.95 | $57.05 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +97.3% | +95.9% | +89.6% | +95.6% | +93.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 51.8 | 54.2 | 43.0 | 50.8 | 52.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 396K | 901K | 177K | 1.6M | 296K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — HOPE and IBCP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: TRMK as "Hold", HOPE as "Hold", IBCP as "Hold", CVBF as "Hold", BANR as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 20.5% upside for CVBF (target: $25) vs 1.7% for TRMK (target: $46). For income investors, HOPE offers the higher dividend yield at 4.40% vs TRMK's 2.16%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $45.50 | $14.50 | $38.00 | $24.75 | $70.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 9 | 6 | 7 | 16 | 13 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.2% | +4.4% | +3.1% | +4.0% | +3.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 0 | 11 | 4 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.97 | $0.55 | $1.03 | $0.82 | $1.96 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +3.0% | 0.0% | +1.8% | +2.9% | +1.6% |
IBCP leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). CVBF leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.
TRMK vs HOPE vs IBCP vs CVBF vs BANR: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TRMK or HOPE or IBCP or CVBF or BANR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) is the stronger pick with 34.
8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 2% for Hope Bancorp, Inc. (HOPE). Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) offers the better valuation at 10. 3x trailing P/E (9. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) a "Hold" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TRMK or HOPE or IBCP or CVBF or BANR?
On trailing P/E, Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) is the cheapest at 10.
3x versus Hope Bancorp, Inc. at 27. 2x. On forward P/E, Independent Bank Corporation is actually cheaper at 9. 4x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Banner Corporation wins at 0. 90x versus CVB Financial Corp. 's 4. 49x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TRMK or HOPE or IBCP or CVBF or BANR?
Over the past 5 years, Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) delivered a total return of +63.
4%, compared to -1. 5% for Hope Bancorp, Inc. (HOPE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IBCP returned +181. 9% versus HOPE's +18. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TRMK or HOPE or IBCP or CVBF or BANR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Banner Corporation (BANR) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
80β versus Hope Bancorp, Inc. 's 1. 10β — meaning HOPE is approximately 38% more volatile than BANR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Hope Bancorp, Inc. (HOPE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 53% for Trustmark Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TRMK or HOPE or IBCP or CVBF or BANR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) is pulling ahead at 34.
8% versus -3. 2% for Hope Bancorp, Inc. (HOPE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Banner Corporation grew EPS 15. 6% year-over-year, compared to -43. 9% for Hope Bancorp, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TRMK or HOPE or IBCP or CVBF or BANR?
CVB Financial Corp.
(CVBF) is the more profitable company, earning 32. 5% net margin versus 6. 0% for Hope Bancorp, Inc. — meaning it keeps 32. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CVBF leads at 43. 8% versus 8. 3% for HOPE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CVBF leads at 79. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TRMK or HOPE or IBCP or CVBF or BANR more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Banner Corporation (BANR) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 90x versus CVB Financial Corp. 's 4. 49x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) trades at 9. 4x forward P/E versus 14. 3x for CVB Financial Corp. — 4. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CVBF: 20. 5% to $24. 75.
08Which pays a better dividend — TRMK or HOPE or IBCP or CVBF or BANR?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Hope Bancorp, Inc. (HOPE) offers the highest yield at 4. 4%, versus 2. 2% for Trustmark Corporation (TRMK).
09Is TRMK or HOPE or IBCP or CVBF or BANR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
83), 3. 1% yield, +181. 9% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (IBCP: +181. 9%, HOPE: +18. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TRMK and HOPE and IBCP and CVBF and BANR?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: TRMK is a small-cap high-growth stock; HOPE is a small-cap income-oriented stock; IBCP is a small-cap deep-value stock; CVBF is a small-cap deep-value stock; BANR is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.