Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
TRST vs NBTB vs CBSH vs FISI vs NFBK
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
TRST vs NBTB vs CBSH vs FISI vs NFBK — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $869M | $2.38B | $7.62B | $697M | $587M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $278M | $867M | $2.14B | $378M | $251M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $61M | $169M | $566M | $75M | $39M |
| Gross Margin | 67.1% | 72.1% | 80.0% | 61.7% | 49.1% |
| Operating Margin | 29.2% | 25.3% | 34.2% | 24.2% | 16.1% |
| Forward P/E | 17.1x | 10.9x | 12.8x | 8.9x | 10.4x |
| Total Debt | $193M | $327M | $3.00B | $334M | $760M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $51M | $185M | $803M | $109M | $168M |
TRST vs NBTB vs CBSH vs FISI vs NFBK — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| TrustCo Bank Corp NY (TRST) | 100 | 155.7 | +55.7% |
| NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) | 100 | 145.6 | +45.6% |
| Commerce Bancshares… (CBSH) | 100 | 103.9 | +3.9% |
| Financial Instituti… (FISI) | 100 | 200.2 | +100.2% |
| Northfield Bancorp,… (NFBK) | 100 | 128.5 | +28.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TRST vs NBTB vs CBSH vs FISI vs NFBK
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TRST ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +60.1% vs CBSH's -16.3%
NBTB is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 0.88, yield 3.1%
- 104.0% 10Y total return vs TRST's 99.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.88, Low D/E 17.3%, current ratio 1.60x
- Beta 0.88, yield 3.1%, current ratio 1.60x
CBSH is the clearest fit if your priority is bank quality.
- NIM 3.4% vs NFBK's 2.0%
- Beta 0.67 vs FISI's 1.00
FISI has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure and valuation efficiency.
- Rev growth 43.1%, EPS growth 231.3%
- PEG 0.94 vs TRST's 4.72
- 43.1% NII/revenue growth vs CBSH's 2.2%
- Lower P/E (8.9x vs 12.8x), PEG 0.94 vs 1.13
NFBK is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and efficiency is your priority.
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs NBTB's 0.5% (lower = leaner)
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs NBTB's 0.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 43.1% NII/revenue growth vs CBSH's 2.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.9x vs 12.8x), PEG 0.94 vs 1.13 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs NBTB's 0.5% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.67 vs FISI's 1.00 | |
| Dividends | 3.1% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs NFBK's 3.7% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +60.1% vs CBSH's -16.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs NBTB's 0.5% |
TRST vs NBTB vs CBSH vs FISI vs NFBK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
TRST vs NBTB vs CBSH vs FISI vs NFBK — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CBSH leads in 2 of 6 categories
FISI leads 1 • TRST leads 0 • NBTB leads 0 • NFBK leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CBSH leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CBSH is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.1B annually — 8.5x NFBK's $251M. CBSH is the more profitable business, keeping 26.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NFBK's 11.9%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $278M | $867M | $2.1B | $378M | $251M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $90M | $241M | $796M | $97M | $61M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $61M | $169M | $566M | $75M | $39M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $46M | $225M | $570M | $16M | $42M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +67.1% | +72.1% | +80.0% | +61.7% | +49.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +29.2% | +25.3% | +34.2% | +24.2% | +16.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +22.0% | +19.5% | +26.5% | +19.8% | +11.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +16.4% | +25.2% | +27.7% | +3.6% | +11.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +44.1% | +39.5% | +1.0% | +118.9% | +68.8% |
Valuation Metrics
FISI leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.8x trailing earnings, FISI trades at a 50% valuation discount to NFBK's 19.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), FISI offers better value at 1.04x vs TRST's 4.16x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $869M | $2.4B | $7.6B | $697M | $587M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.0B | $2.5B | $9.8B | $923M | $1.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 15.10x | 13.69x | 12.72x | 9.81x | 19.50x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 17.09x | 10.94x | 12.76x | 8.87x | 10.40x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 4.16x | 1.95x | 1.13x | 1.04x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 11.27x | 10.46x | 12.75x | 10.10x | 24.17x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.12x | 2.74x | 3.56x | 1.84x | 2.34x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.31x | 1.22x | 1.89x | 1.14x | 0.83x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 19.00x | 10.87x | 12.87x | 51.25x | 19.60x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CBSH leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CBSH delivers a 15.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $15 in annual profit, vs $5 for NFBK. NBTB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NFBK's 1.08x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TRST scores 7/9 vs FISI's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +8.9% | +9.5% | +15.3% | +12.3% | +5.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.0% | +1.1% | +1.7% | +1.2% | +0.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.2% | +7.9% | +8.4% | +7.7% | +2.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.8% | +2.4% | +2.3% | +2.6% | +2.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 7 | 6 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.28x | 0.17x | 0.79x | 0.53x | 1.08x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $142M | $142M | $2.2B | $225M | $592M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $51M | $185M | $803M | $109M | $168M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $193M | $327M | $3.0B | $334M | $760M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.90x | 1.05x | 1.97x | 0.69x | 0.46x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — TRST and FISI each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TRST five years ago would be worth $14,898 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,657 for CBSH. Over the past 12 months, TRST leads with a +60.1% total return vs CBSH's -16.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FISI at 35.1% vs CBSH's 5.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +19.8% | +10.5% | -0.1% | +15.9% | +26.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +60.1% | +8.6% | -16.3% | +38.2% | +28.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +90.4% | +55.7% | +18.9% | +146.3% | +65.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +49.0% | +33.5% | -13.4% | +28.8% | +1.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +99.2% | +104.0% | +101.4% | +67.9% | +20.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +24.0% | +15.9% | +5.9% | +35.1% | +18.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — TRST and CBSH each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CBSH is the less volatile stock with a 0.67 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FISI's 1.00 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TRST currently trades 99.7% from its 52-week high vs CBSH's 78.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.75x | 0.88x | 0.67x | 1.00x | 0.90x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $49.21 | $46.92 | $66.35 | $35.70 | $14.21 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $30.17 | $39.20 | $46.99 | $24.41 | $9.90 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.7% | +97.2% | +78.2% | +99.2% | +98.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 63.0 | 56.2 | 61.2 | 63.2 | 57.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 110K | 237K | 1.2M | 109K | 257K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — NBTB and CBSH and NFBK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: TRST as "Hold", NBTB as "Hold", CBSH as "Hold", FISI as "Hold", NFBK as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 12.7% upside for CBSH (target: $59) vs 0.9% for NBTB (target: $46). For income investors, NFBK offers the higher dividend yield at 3.73% vs CBSH's 2.08%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $46.00 | $58.50 | $36.00 | $14.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 3 | 10 | 15 | 6 | 9 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.1% | +3.1% | +2.1% | +3.4% | +3.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 8 | 12 | 12 | 1 | 10 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.51 | $1.43 | $1.08 | $1.22 | $0.52 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +4.4% | +0.4% | +2.7% | +1.6% | +3.2% |
CBSH leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). FISI leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.
TRST vs NBTB vs CBSH vs FISI vs NFBK: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TRST or NBTB or CBSH or FISI or NFBK a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Financial Institutions, Inc.
(FISI) is the stronger pick with 43. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 2% for Commerce Bancshares, Inc. (CBSH). Financial Institutions, Inc. (FISI) offers the better valuation at 9. 8x trailing P/E (8. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate TrustCo Bank Corp NY (TRST) a "Hold" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TRST or NBTB or CBSH or FISI or NFBK?
On trailing P/E, Financial Institutions, Inc.
(FISI) is the cheapest at 9. 8x versus Northfield Bancorp, Inc. at 19. 5x. On forward P/E, Financial Institutions, Inc. is actually cheaper at 8. 9x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Financial Institutions, Inc. wins at 0. 94x versus TrustCo Bank Corp NY's 4. 72x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TRST or NBTB or CBSH or FISI or NFBK?
Over the past 5 years, TrustCo Bank Corp NY (TRST) delivered a total return of +49.
0%, compared to -13. 4% for Commerce Bancshares, Inc. (CBSH). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NBTB returned +104. 0% versus NFBK's +20. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TRST or NBTB or CBSH or FISI or NFBK?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Commerce Bancshares, Inc.
(CBSH) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 67β versus Financial Institutions, Inc. 's 1. 00β — meaning FISI is approximately 49% more volatile than CBSH relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 108% for Northfield Bancorp, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TRST or NBTB or CBSH or FISI or NFBK?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Financial Institutions, Inc.
(FISI) is pulling ahead at 43. 1% versus 2. 2% for Commerce Bancshares, Inc. (CBSH). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Financial Institutions, Inc. grew EPS 231. 3% year-over-year, compared to -16. 3% for Northfield Bancorp, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TRST or NBTB or CBSH or FISI or NFBK?
Commerce Bancshares, Inc.
(CBSH) is the more profitable company, earning 26. 5% net margin versus 11. 9% for Northfield Bancorp, Inc. — meaning it keeps 26. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CBSH leads at 34. 2% versus 16. 1% for NFBK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CBSH leads at 80. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TRST or NBTB or CBSH or FISI or NFBK more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Financial Institutions, Inc. (FISI) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 94x versus TrustCo Bank Corp NY's 4. 72x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Financial Institutions, Inc. (FISI) trades at 8. 9x forward P/E versus 17. 1x for TrustCo Bank Corp NY — 8. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CBSH: 12. 7% to $58. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — TRST or NBTB or CBSH or FISI or NFBK?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Northfield Bancorp, Inc. (NFBK) offers the highest yield at 3. 7%, versus 2. 1% for Commerce Bancshares, Inc. (CBSH).
09Is TRST or NBTB or CBSH or FISI or NFBK better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Commerce Bancshares, Inc.
(CBSH) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 67), 2. 1% yield, +101. 4% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CBSH: +101. 4%, FISI: +67. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TRST and NBTB and CBSH and FISI and NFBK?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: TRST is a small-cap deep-value stock; NBTB is a small-cap deep-value stock; CBSH is a small-cap deep-value stock; FISI is a small-cap high-growth stock; NFBK is a small-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.