Consulting Services
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
TRU vs VRSK vs MSCI vs MCO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Consulting Services
Financial - Data & Stock Exchanges
Financial - Data & Stock Exchanges
TRU vs VRSK vs MSCI vs MCO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Consulting Services | Consulting Services | Financial - Data & Stock Exchanges | Financial - Data & Stock Exchanges |
| Market Cap | $14.07B | $22.89B | $42.83B | $81.04B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $4.73B | $3.10B | $3.13B | $7.72B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $705M | $910M | $1.32B | $2.50B |
| Gross Margin | 52.7% | 67.4% | 82.4% | 68.2% |
| Operating Margin | 18.1% | 44.9% | 54.7% | 44.8% |
| Forward P/E | 15.3x | 22.9x | 30.0x | 27.4x |
| Total Debt | $5.16B | $5.04B | $6.31B | $7.35B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $854M | $2.18B | $515M | $2.38B |
TRU vs VRSK vs MSCI vs MCO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| TransUnion (TRU) | 100 | 84.5 | -15.5% |
| Verisk Analytics, I… (VRSK) | 100 | 101.2 | +1.2% |
| MSCI Inc. (MSCI) | 100 | 178.9 | +78.9% |
| Moody's Corporation (MCO) | 100 | 170.9 | +70.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TRU vs VRSK vs MSCI vs MCO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TRU is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 9.4%, EPS growth 60.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 7.2%
- Lower P/E (15.3x vs 27.4x), PEG 2.87 vs 3.51
VRSK plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
MSCI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 11 yrs, beta 0.61, yield 1.2%
- 7.2% 10Y total return vs MCO's 409.5%
- PEG 1.77 vs MCO's 3.51
- Beta 0.61, yield 1.2%, current ratio 0.90x
MCO is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.86, current ratio 1.74x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 9.7% NII/revenue growth vs VRSK's 6.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (15.3x vs 27.4x), PEG 2.87 vs 3.51 | |
| Quality / Margins | 38.4% margin vs TRU's 14.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.61 vs TRU's 1.36 | |
| Dividends | 1.2% yield, 11-year raise streak, vs MCO's 0.9% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +7.8% vs VRSK's -43.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 24.0% ROA vs TRU's 6.2%, ROIC 34.9% vs 7.3% |
TRU vs VRSK vs MSCI vs MCO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
TRU vs VRSK vs MSCI vs MCO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
MSCI leads in 1 of 6 categories
TRU leads 1 • VRSK leads 0 • MCO leads 0 • 4 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MSCI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MCO is the larger business by revenue, generating $7.7B annually — 2.5x VRSK's $3.1B. MSCI is the more profitable business, keeping 38.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TRU's 14.9%. On growth, TRU holds the edge at +13.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $4.7B | $3.1B | $3.1B | $7.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.4B | $1.7B | $2.0B | $4.0B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $705M | $910M | $1.3B | $2.5B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $697M | $1.1B | $1.5B | $3.0B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +52.7% | +67.4% | +82.4% | +68.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +18.1% | +44.9% | +54.7% | +44.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +14.9% | +29.3% | +38.4% | +31.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +14.7% | +36.3% | +49.4% | +33.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +13.7% | +3.9% | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +172.0% | +4.8% | +49.1% | +7.8% |
Valuation Metrics
TRU leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 26.9x trailing earnings, VRSK trades at a 29% valuation discount to MSCI's 37.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), MSCI offers better value at 2.23x vs TRU's 5.91x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $14.1B | $22.9B | $42.8B | $81.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $18.4B | $25.7B | $48.6B | $86.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 31.44x | 26.92x | 37.81x | 33.44x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 15.28x | 22.85x | 29.99x | 27.37x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 5.91x | 3.16x | 2.23x | 4.29x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 12.83x | 15.34x | 25.17x | 21.86x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.08x | 7.45x | 13.67x | 10.50x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.16x | 78.44x | — | 19.56x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 21.27x | 19.20x | 27.65x | 31.47x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — VRSK and MSCI each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
VRSK delivers a 4.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $4 in annual profit, vs $15 for TRU. TRU carries lower financial leverage with a 1.13x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to VRSK's 16.26x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MCO scores 9/9 vs VRSK's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +15.1% | +4.4% | — | +64.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +6.2% | +16.7% | +24.0% | +16.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.3% | +33.0% | +34.9% | +22.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +8.6% | +39.6% | +44.3% | +27.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 5 | 8 | 9 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.13x | 16.26x | — | 1.75x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $4.3B | $2.9B | $5.8B | $5.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $854M | $2.2B | $515M | $2.4B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $5.2B | $5.0B | $6.3B | $7.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.61x | 7.87x | 7.67x | 17.22x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — MSCI and MCO each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MCO five years ago would be worth $14,141 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,067 for TRU. Over the past 12 months, MSCI leads with a +7.8% total return vs VRSK's -43.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MCO at 15.2% vs VRSK's -5.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -12.3% | -20.7% | +4.5% | -8.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -13.9% | -43.0% | +7.8% | -1.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +13.9% | -14.5% | +28.6% | +52.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -29.3% | +1.8% | +27.9% | +41.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +142.0% | +137.1% | +720.9% | +409.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +4.4% | -5.1% | +8.7% | +15.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — VRSK and MSCI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
VRSK is the less volatile stock with a -0.04 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TRU's 1.36 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MSCI currently trades 93.9% from its 52-week high vs VRSK's 54.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.36x | -0.04x | 0.61x | 0.86x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $99.39 | $322.92 | $626.28 | $546.88 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $65.23 | $161.70 | $501.08 | $402.28 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +73.4% | +54.1% | +93.9% | +83.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 47.2 | 39.5 | 54.6 | 48.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.3M | 1.9M | 520K | 1.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — MSCI and MCO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: TRU as "Buy", VRSK as "Hold", MSCI as "Buy", MCO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 32.4% upside for VRSK (target: $231) vs 14.6% for MSCI (target: $674). For income investors, MSCI offers the higher dividend yield at 1.22% vs TRU's 0.63%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $94.88 | $231.25 | $674.33 | $544.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 26 | 25 | 27 | 32 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.6% | +1.0% | +1.2% | +0.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 7 | 11 | 22 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.46 | $1.81 | $7.20 | $3.90 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.4% | +2.7% | +5.8% | +2.1% |
MSCI leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). TRU leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 4 tied.
TRU vs VRSK vs MSCI vs MCO: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TRU or VRSK or MSCI or MCO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, MSCI Inc.
(MSCI) is the stronger pick with 9. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 6. 6% for Verisk Analytics, Inc. (VRSK). Verisk Analytics, Inc. (VRSK) offers the better valuation at 26. 9x trailing P/E (22. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate TransUnion (TRU) a "Buy" — based on 26 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TRU or VRSK or MSCI or MCO?
On trailing P/E, Verisk Analytics, Inc.
(VRSK) is the cheapest at 26. 9x versus MSCI Inc. at 37. 8x. On forward P/E, TransUnion is actually cheaper at 15. 3x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: MSCI Inc. wins at 1. 77x versus Moody's Corporation's 3. 51x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TRU or VRSK or MSCI or MCO?
Over the past 5 years, Moody's Corporation (MCO) delivered a total return of +41.
4%, compared to -29. 3% for TransUnion (TRU). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MSCI returned +720. 9% versus VRSK's +137. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TRU or VRSK or MSCI or MCO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Verisk Analytics, Inc.
(VRSK) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 04β versus TransUnion's 1. 36β — meaning TRU is approximately -3899% more volatile than VRSK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, TransUnion (TRU) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 113% versus 16% for Verisk Analytics, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TRU or VRSK or MSCI or MCO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), MSCI Inc.
(MSCI) is pulling ahead at 9. 7% versus 6. 6% for Verisk Analytics, Inc. (VRSK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: TransUnion grew EPS 60. 0% year-over-year, compared to -3. 3% for Verisk Analytics, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TRU leads at 7. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TRU or VRSK or MSCI or MCO?
MSCI Inc.
(MSCI) is the more profitable company, earning 38. 4% net margin versus 10. 0% for TransUnion — meaning it keeps 38. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MSCI leads at 54. 7% versus 18. 7% for TRU. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MSCI leads at 82. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TRU or VRSK or MSCI or MCO more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, MSCI Inc. (MSCI) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 77x versus Moody's Corporation's 3. 51x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, TransUnion (TRU) trades at 15. 3x forward P/E versus 30. 0x for MSCI Inc. — 14. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for VRSK: 32. 4% to $231. 25.
08Which pays a better dividend — TRU or VRSK or MSCI or MCO?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
MSCI Inc. (MSCI) offers the highest yield at 1. 2%, versus 0. 6% for TransUnion (TRU).
09Is TRU or VRSK or MSCI or MCO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Verisk Analytics, Inc.
(VRSK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 04), 1. 0% yield, +137. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (VRSK: +137. 1%, TRU: +142. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TRU and VRSK and MSCI and MCO?
These companies operate in different sectors (TRU (Industrials) and VRSK (Industrials) and MSCI (Financial Services) and MCO (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.