Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

TRUP vs HIFS vs LMND vs NBTB vs ROOT

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
TRUP
Trupanion, Inc.

Insurance - Specialty

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.11B
5Y Perf.-64.2%
HIFS
Hingham Institution for Savings

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$626M
5Y Perf.+42.1%
LMND
Lemonade, Inc.

Insurance - Property & Casualty

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$4.18B
5Y Perf.+8.2%
NBTB
NBT Bancorp Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.35B
5Y Perf.+64.6%
ROOT
Root, Inc.

Insurance - Property & Casualty

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$798M
5Y Perf.-86.8%

TRUP vs HIFS vs LMND vs NBTB vs ROOT — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
TRUP logoTRUP
HIFS logoHIFS
LMND logoLMND
NBTB logoNBTB
ROOT logoROOT
IndustryInsurance - SpecialtyBanks - RegionalInsurance - Property & CasualtyBanks - RegionalInsurance - Property & Casualty
Market Cap$1.11B$626M$4.18B$2.35B$798M
Revenue (TTM)$1.48B$217M$821M$867M$1.56B
Net Income (TTM)$26M$45M$-139M$169M$56M
Gross Margin38.6%30.1%47.6%72.1%17.9%
Operating Margin1.3%16.8%-16.3%25.3%4.1%
Forward P/E49.5x20.4x10.8x29.0x
Total Debt$112M$1.50B$182M$327M$201M
Cash & Equiv.$138M$352M$385M$185M$690M

TRUP vs HIFS vs LMND vs NBTB vs ROOTLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

TRUP
HIFS
LMND
NBTB
ROOT
StockOct 20May 26Return
Trupanion, Inc. (TRUP)10035.8-64.2%
Hingham Institution… (HIFS)100142.1+42.1%
Lemonade, Inc. (LMND)100108.2+8.2%
NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB)100164.6+64.6%
Root, Inc. (ROOT)10013.2-86.8%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: TRUP vs HIFS vs LMND vs NBTB vs ROOT

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: NBTB leads in 4 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Lemonade, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and recent price momentum and sentiment. ROOT also leads in specific categories worth noting. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
TRUP
Trupanion, Inc.
The Insurance Play

TRUP lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: financial services exposure
HIFS
Hingham Institution for Savings
The Banking Pick

HIFS is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.

  • 142.5% 10Y total return vs NBTB's 102.2%
Best for: long-term compounding
LMND
Lemonade, Inc.
The Insurance Pick

LMND is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth and momentum is your priority.

  • 40.2% revenue growth vs NBTB's 10.4%
  • +78.2% vs ROOT's -59.3%
Best for: growth and momentum
NBTB
NBT Bancorp Inc.
The Banking Pick

NBTB carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 0.89, yield 3.2%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.89, Low D/E 17.3%, current ratio 1.60x
  • Beta 0.89, yield 3.2%, current ratio 1.60x
  • NIM 3.1% vs HIFS's 1.0%
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
ROOT
Root, Inc.
The Insurance Pick

ROOT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 29.0%, EPS growth 22.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 69.6%
  • 3.7% ROA vs LMND's -7.4%
Best for: growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthLMND logoLMND40.2% revenue growth vs NBTB's 10.4%
ValueNBTB logoNBTBBetter valuation composite
Quality / MarginsNBTB logoNBTB19.5% margin vs LMND's -16.9%
Stability / SafetyNBTB logoNBTBBeta 0.89 vs LMND's 2.75, lower leverage
DividendsNBTB logoNBTB3.2% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs HIFS's 0.9%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)LMND logoLMND+78.2% vs ROOT's -59.3%
Efficiency (ROA)ROOT logoROOT3.7% ROA vs LMND's -7.4%

TRUP vs HIFS vs LMND vs NBTB vs ROOT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

TRUPTrupanion, Inc.
FY 2025
Subscription business
68.7%$989M
Other Operating Segment
31.3%$450M
HIFSHingham Institution for Savings

Segment breakdown not available.

LMNDLemonade, Inc.
FY 2025
Reportable Segment
100.0%$738M
NBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.
FY 2025
Insurance Revenue
100.0%$18M
ROOTRoot, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

TRUP vs HIFS vs LMND vs NBTB vs ROOT — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLNBTBLAGGINGLMND

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

NBTB leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

ROOT is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.6B annually — 7.2x HIFS's $217M. NBTB is the more profitable business, keeping 19.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LMND's -16.9%. On growth, LMND holds the edge at +55.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricTRUP logoTRUPTrupanion, Inc.HIFS logoHIFSHingham Instituti…LMND logoLMNDLemonade, Inc.NBTB logoNBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.ROOT logoROOTRoot, Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$1.5B$217M$821M$867M$1.6B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$35M$62M-$121M$241M$73M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$26M$45M-$139M$169M$56M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$75M$30M$20M$225M$181M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+38.6%+30.1%+47.6%+72.1%+17.9%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+1.3%+16.8%-16.3%+25.3%+4.1%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+1.7%+13.0%-16.9%+19.5%+3.6%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+5.1%+5.4%+2.4%+25.2%+11.6%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+12.3%+55.0%+12.6%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+4.2%+195.1%+45.3%+39.5%+95.3%
NBTB leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

ROOT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 13.5x trailing earnings, NBTB trades at a 76% valuation discount to TRUP's 56.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, ROOT's 5.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than HIFS's 47.5x.

MetricTRUP logoTRUPTrupanion, Inc.HIFS logoHIFSHingham Instituti…LMND logoLMNDLemonade, Inc.NBTB logoNBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.ROOT logoROOTRoot, Inc.
Market CapShares × price$1.1B$626M$4.2B$2.4B$798M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$1.1B$1.8B$4.0B$2.5B$309M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS56.87x22.33x-23.67x13.53x25.41x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.49.53x20.43x10.80x29.04x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.92x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple28.68x47.53x10.35x5.88x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.77x2.88x5.67x2.71x0.53x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share2.90x1.46x7.33x1.21x2.47x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF14.75x53.27x10.75x4.15x
ROOT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

Evenly matched — TRUP and NBTB and ROOT each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.

ROOT delivers a 15.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $15 in annual profit, vs $-27 for LMND. NBTB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HIFS's 3.47x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NBTB scores 7/9 vs LMND's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricTRUP logoTRUPTrupanion, Inc.HIFS logoHIFSHingham Instituti…LMND logoLMNDLemonade, Inc.NBTB logoNBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.ROOT logoROOTRoot, Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+6.9%+9.8%-26.5%+9.5%+15.4%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+2.9%+1.0%-7.4%+1.1%+3.7%
ROICReturn on invested capital+5.1%+1.4%-36.8%+7.9%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+4.6%+2.2%-22.7%+2.4%+3.8%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–965476
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.29x3.47x0.34x0.17x0.51x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$26M$1.1B-$203M$142M-$489M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$138M$352M$385M$185M$690M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$112M$1.5B$182M$327M$201M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense2.74x0.44x1.05x1.86x
Evenly matched — TRUP and NBTB and ROOT each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

Evenly matched — NBTB and ROOT each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in NBTB five years ago would be worth $12,989 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,043 for ROOT. Over the past 12 months, LMND leads with a +78.2% total return vs ROOT's -59.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ROOT at 117.4% vs TRUP's 0.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricTRUP logoTRUPTrupanion, Inc.HIFS logoHIFSHingham Instituti…LMND logoLMNDLemonade, Inc.NBTB logoNBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.ROOT logoROOTRoot, Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-31.2%+6.3%-28.3%+9.3%-19.7%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-42.6%+14.4%+78.2%+9.0%-59.3%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+0.2%+61.9%+234.7%+54.1%+927.3%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-69.3%-1.9%-31.2%+29.9%-69.6%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+68.9%+142.5%-21.6%+102.2%-88.3%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+0.1%+17.4%+49.6%+15.5%+117.4%
Evenly matched — NBTB and ROOT each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

NBTB leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

NBTB is the less volatile stock with a 0.89 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LMND's 2.75 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NBTB currently trades 96.1% from its 52-week high vs ROOT's 34.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricTRUP logoTRUPTrupanion, Inc.HIFS logoHIFSHingham Instituti…LMND logoLMNDLemonade, Inc.NBTB logoNBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.ROOT logoROOTRoot, Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.97x1.25x2.75x0.89x2.30x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$57.89$338.00$99.90$46.92$162.99
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$23.80$220.76$28.71$39.20$40.91
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+44.2%+84.9%+54.5%+96.1%+34.9%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10043.751.036.357.356.6
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded367K51K1.9M236K330K
NBTB leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

NBTB leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: TRUP as "Buy", LMND as "Buy", NBTB as "Hold", ROOT as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 48.5% upside for TRUP (target: $38) vs 2.1% for NBTB (target: $46). For income investors, NBTB offers the higher dividend yield at 3.17% vs HIFS's 0.87%.

MetricTRUP logoTRUPTrupanion, Inc.HIFS logoHIFSHingham Instituti…LMND logoLMNDLemonade, Inc.NBTB logoNBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.ROOT logoROOTRoot, Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyHoldHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$38.00$72.67$46.00$75.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts15151014
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.9%+3.2%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises1012
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$2.50$1.43
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%0.0%+0.4%0.0%
NBTB leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

NBTB leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Risk & Volatility). ROOT leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.

Best OverallNBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

TRUP vs HIFS vs LMND vs NBTB vs ROOT: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is TRUP or HIFS or LMND or NBTB or ROOT a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Lemonade, Inc.

(LMND) is the stronger pick with 40. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 10. 4% for NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB). NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) offers the better valuation at 13. 5x trailing P/E (10. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Trupanion, Inc. (TRUP) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — TRUP or HIFS or LMND or NBTB or ROOT?

On trailing P/E, NBT Bancorp Inc.

(NBTB) is the cheapest at 13. 5x versus Trupanion, Inc. at 56. 9x. On forward P/E, NBT Bancorp Inc. is actually cheaper at 10. 8x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — TRUP or HIFS or LMND or NBTB or ROOT?

Over the past 5 years, NBT Bancorp Inc.

(NBTB) delivered a total return of +29. 9%, compared to -69. 6% for Root, Inc. (ROOT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HIFS returned +142. 5% versus ROOT's -88. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — TRUP or HIFS or LMND or NBTB or ROOT?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), NBT Bancorp Inc.

(NBTB) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 89β versus Lemonade, Inc. 's 2. 75β — meaning LMND is approximately 210% more volatile than NBTB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 3% for Hingham Institution for Savings — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — TRUP or HIFS or LMND or NBTB or ROOT?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Lemonade, Inc.

(LMND) is pulling ahead at 40. 2% versus 10. 4% for NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Trupanion, Inc. grew EPS 295. 7% year-over-year, compared to 6. 8% for Hingham Institution for Savings. Over a 3-year CAGR, ROOT leads at 69. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — TRUP or HIFS or LMND or NBTB or ROOT?

NBT Bancorp Inc.

(NBTB) is the more profitable company, earning 19. 5% net margin versus -22. 4% for Lemonade, Inc. — meaning it keeps 19. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NBTB leads at 25. 3% versus -21. 8% for LMND. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NBTB leads at 72. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is TRUP or HIFS or LMND or NBTB or ROOT more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, NBT Bancorp Inc.

(NBTB) trades at 10. 8x forward P/E versus 49. 5x for Trupanion, Inc. — 38. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TRUP: 48. 5% to $38. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — TRUP or HIFS or LMND or NBTB or ROOT?

In this comparison, NBTB (3.

2% yield), HIFS (0. 9% yield) pay a dividend. TRUP, LMND, ROOT do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is TRUP or HIFS or LMND or NBTB or ROOT better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, NBT Bancorp Inc.

(NBTB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 89), 3. 2% yield, +102. 2% 10Y return). Root, Inc. (ROOT) carries a higher beta of 2. 30 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (NBTB: +102. 2%, ROOT: -88. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between TRUP and HIFS and LMND and NBTB and ROOT?

Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: TRUP is a small-cap quality compounder stock; HIFS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; LMND is a small-cap high-growth stock; NBTB is a small-cap deep-value stock; ROOT is a small-cap high-growth stock. HIFS, NBTB pay a dividend while TRUP, LMND, ROOT do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

TRUP

Quality Business

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 6%
  • Gross Margin > 23%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

HIFS

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 7%
  • Net Margin > 7%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

LMND

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 27%
  • Gross Margin > 28%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

NBTB

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 11%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ROOT

Quality Business

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 6%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform TRUP and HIFS and LMND and NBTB and ROOT on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(TRUP: 12.3% · HIFS: 14.1%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(TRUP: 56.9x · HIFS: 22.3x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.