TSCO vs WINA

For growth investors, Winmark Corporation (WINA) is the stronger pick with 5.

9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 4. 3% for Tractor Supply Company (TSCO). Tractor Supply Company (TSCO) offers the better valuation at 15. 9x trailing P/E (15. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Tractor Supply Company (TSCO) a "Buy" — based on 50 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Tractor Supply Company (TSCO) is the cheapest at 15.

9x versus Winmark Corporation at 32. 9x. On forward P/E, Tractor Supply Company is actually cheaper at 15. 3x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Tractor Supply Company wins at 1. 52x versus Winmark Corporation's 3. 96x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.

Over the past 5 years, Winmark Corporation (WINA) delivered a total return of +115.

2%, compared to -6. 0% for Tractor Supply Company (TSCO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WINA returned +363. 8% versus TSCO's +102. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Tractor Supply Company (TSCO) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

57β versus Winmark Corporation's 0. 79β — meaning WINA is approximately 38% more volatile than TSCO relative to the S&P 500.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Winmark Corporation (WINA) is pulling ahead at 5.

9% versus 4. 3% for Tractor Supply Company (TSCO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Winmark Corporation grew EPS 3. 8% year-over-year, compared to 1. 0% for Tractor Supply Company. Over a 3-year CAGR, TSCO leads at 3. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Winmark Corporation (WINA) is the more profitable company, earning 48.

4% net margin versus 7. 1% for Tractor Supply Company — meaning it keeps 48. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: WINA leads at 63. 4% versus 9. 5% for TSCO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — WINA leads at 96. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Tractor Supply Company (TSCO) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 52x versus Winmark Corporation's 3. 96x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Tractor Supply Company (TSCO) trades at 15. 3x forward P/E versus 31. 3x for Winmark Corporation — 16. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TSCO: 72. 3% to $56. 27.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Winmark Corporation (WINA) offers the highest yield at 3. 6%, versus 2. 8% for Tractor Supply Company (TSCO).

For long-horizon retirement investors, Tractor Supply Company (TSCO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

57), 2. 8% yield, +102. 7% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (TSCO: +102. 7%, WINA: +363. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: TSCO is a mid-cap deep-value stock; WINA is a small-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.