Internet Content & Information
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
TWLO vs NFLX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Entertainment
TWLO vs NFLX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Internet Content & Information | Entertainment |
| Market Cap | $29.00B | $374.03B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $5.30B | $45.18B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $104M | $10.98B |
| Gross Margin | 48.8% | 48.5% |
| Operating Margin | 4.7% | 29.5% |
| Forward P/E | 35.3x | 24.8x |
| Total Debt | $1.08B | $14.46B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $682M | $9.03B |
TWLO vs NFLX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Twilio Inc. (TWLO) | 100 | 96.9 | -3.1% |
| Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) | 100 | 210.3 | +110.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TWLO vs NFLX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TWLO is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.51, Low D/E 13.8%, current ratio 4.03x
- +89.7% vs NFLX's -22.4%
NFLX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 0.39
- Rev growth 15.9%, EPS growth 27.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 12.6%
- 8.7% 10Y total return vs TWLO's 5.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 15.9% revenue growth vs TWLO's 13.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (24.8x vs 35.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 24.3% margin vs TWLO's 2.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.39 vs TWLO's 1.51 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +89.7% vs NFLX's -22.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 19.8% ROA vs TWLO's 1.1%, ROIC 29.8% vs 1.6% |
TWLO vs NFLX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
TWLO vs NFLX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — TWLO and NFLX each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NFLX is the larger business by revenue, generating $45.2B annually — 8.5x TWLO's $5.3B. NFLX is the more profitable business, keeping 24.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TWLO's 2.0%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $5.3B | $45.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $415M | $30.1B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $104M | $11.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1.0B | $9.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +48.8% | +48.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +4.7% | +29.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +2.0% | +24.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +19.0% | +20.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +20.0% | +17.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.8% | +31.1% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — TWLO and NFLX each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 34.9x trailing earnings, NFLX trades at a 96% valuation discount to TWLO's 911.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, NFLX's 12.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than TWLO's 75.0x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $29.0B | $374.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $29.4B | $379.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 911.43x | 34.89x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 35.28x | 24.80x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.06x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 74.97x | 12.61x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 5.72x | 8.28x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.91x | 14.32x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 28.07x | 39.53x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NFLX leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NFLX delivers a 41.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $1 for TWLO. TWLO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.14x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NFLX's 0.54x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +1.3% | +41.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.1% | +19.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +1.6% | +29.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +1.9% | +30.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.14x | 0.54x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $399M | $5.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $682M | $9.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.1B | $14.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 17.33x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TWLO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NFLX five years ago would be worth $17,668 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,294 for TWLO. Over the past 12 months, TWLO leads with a +89.7% total return vs NFLX's -22.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TWLO at 51.7% vs NFLX's 38.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +38.3% | -3.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +89.7% | -22.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +249.0% | +166.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -37.1% | +76.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +564.8% | +872.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +51.7% | +38.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — TWLO and NFLX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NFLX is the less volatile stock with a 0.39 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TWLO's 1.51 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TWLO currently trades 95.7% from its 52-week high vs NFLX's 65.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.51x | 0.39x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $200.00 | $134.12 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $91.84 | $75.01 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +95.7% | +65.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 82.8 | 34.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.2M | 44.9M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates TWLO as "Buy" and NFLX as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 31.7% upside for NFLX (target: $116) vs -3.3% for TWLO (target: $185).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $185.17 | $116.29 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 52 | 99 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +3.0% | +2.4% |
NFLX leads in 1 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency). TWLO leads in 1 (Total Returns). 3 tied.
TWLO vs NFLX: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TWLO or NFLX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Netflix, Inc.
(NFLX) is the stronger pick with 15. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 13. 7% for Twilio Inc. (TWLO). Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) offers the better valuation at 34. 9x trailing P/E (24. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Twilio Inc. (TWLO) a "Buy" — based on 52 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TWLO or NFLX?
On trailing P/E, Netflix, Inc.
(NFLX) is the cheapest at 34. 9x versus Twilio Inc. at 911. 4x. On forward P/E, Netflix, Inc. is actually cheaper at 24. 8x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TWLO or NFLX?
Over the past 5 years, Netflix, Inc.
(NFLX) delivered a total return of +76. 7%, compared to -37. 1% for Twilio Inc. (TWLO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NFLX returned +872. 1% versus TWLO's +564. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TWLO or NFLX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Netflix, Inc.
(NFLX) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 39β versus Twilio Inc. 's 1. 51β — meaning TWLO is approximately 288% more volatile than NFLX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Twilio Inc. (TWLO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 14% versus 54% for Netflix, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TWLO or NFLX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Netflix, Inc.
(NFLX) is pulling ahead at 15. 9% versus 13. 7% for Twilio Inc. (TWLO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Twilio Inc. grew EPS 131. 8% year-over-year, compared to 27. 6% for Netflix, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, NFLX leads at 12. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TWLO or NFLX?
Netflix, Inc.
(NFLX) is the more profitable company, earning 24. 3% net margin versus 0. 7% for Twilio Inc. — meaning it keeps 24. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NFLX leads at 29. 5% versus 3. 4% for TWLO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NFLX leads at 48. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TWLO or NFLX more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Netflix, Inc.
(NFLX) trades at 24. 8x forward P/E versus 35. 3x for Twilio Inc. — 10. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NFLX: 31. 7% to $116. 29.
08Which pays a better dividend — TWLO or NFLX?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is TWLO or NFLX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Netflix, Inc.
(NFLX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 39), +872. 1% 10Y return). Twilio Inc. (TWLO) carries a higher beta of 1. 51 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (NFLX: +872. 1%, TWLO: +564. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TWLO and NFLX?
Both stocks operate in the Communication Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: TWLO is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; NFLX is a large-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Revenue Growth > 9%
- Gross Margin > 29%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.