Internet Content & Information
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
TWLO vs ZCMD vs BAND vs CNET vs BTBT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Healthcare Information Services
Software - Infrastructure
Advertising Agencies
Financial - Capital Markets
TWLO vs ZCMD vs BAND vs CNET vs BTBT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Internet Content & Information | Medical - Healthcare Information Services | Software - Infrastructure | Advertising Agencies | Financial - Capital Markets |
| Market Cap | $29.86B | $7M | $1.56B | $2M | $589M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $5.30B | $27M | $209.36B | $6M | $164M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $104M | $-7M | $4.11B | $-2M | $137M |
| Gross Margin | 48.8% | 51.0% | 37.3% | 4.8% | 61.9% |
| Operating Margin | 4.7% | -24.0% | -2.2% | -31.7% | 16.8% |
| Forward P/E | 36.3x | — | 27.4x | — | 9.2x |
| Total Debt | $1.08B | $26K | $701M | $122K | $14M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $682M | $8M | $103M | $812K | $95M |
TWLO vs ZCMD vs BAND vs CNET vs BTBT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Twilio Inc. (TWLO) | 100 | 99.7 | -0.3% |
| Zhongchao Inc. (ZCMD) | 100 | 1.3 | -98.7% |
| Bandwidth Inc. (BAND) | 100 | 43.9 | -56.1% |
| ZW Data Action Tech… (CNET) | 100 | 3.9 | -96.1% |
| Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) | 100 | 191.6 | +91.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TWLO vs ZCMD vs BAND vs CNET vs BTBT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TWLO is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 13.7%, EPS growth 131.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 9.8%
- 5.8% 10Y total return vs BAND's 143.3%
ZCMD is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.21, Low D/E 0.1%, current ratio 11.11x
- Beta 1.21, current ratio 11.11x
BAND is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if momentum is your priority.
- +253.6% vs ZCMD's -77.5%
CNET ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.18
- Beta 1.18 vs BTBT's 3.37
BTBT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth and value.
- 264.6% NII/revenue growth vs CNET's -49.5%
- Better valuation composite
- 17.3% margin vs CNET's -33.4%
- 0.3% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 264.6% NII/revenue growth vs CNET's -49.5% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 17.3% margin vs CNET's -33.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.18 vs BTBT's 3.37 | |
| Dividends | 0.3% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +253.6% vs ZCMD's -77.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 19.0% ROA vs ZCMD's -27.7%, ROIC 6.5% vs -30.1% |
TWLO vs ZCMD vs BAND vs CNET vs BTBT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
TWLO vs ZCMD vs BAND vs CNET vs BTBT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
BAND leads in 3 of 6 categories
BTBT leads 2 • TWLO leads 0 • ZCMD leads 0 • CNET leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BTBT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BAND is the larger business by revenue, generating $209.4B annually — 33954.5x CNET's $6M. BTBT is the more profitable business, keeping 17.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CNET's -33.4%. On growth, BAND holds the edge at +1197.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $5.3B | $27M | $209.4B | $6M | $164M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $415M | -$6M | -$4.6B | -$2M | $166M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $104M | -$7M | $4.1B | -$2M | $137M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1.0B | -$4M | $1.8B | -$2M | -$448M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +48.8% | +51.0% | +37.3% | +4.8% | +61.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +4.7% | -24.0% | -2.2% | -31.7% | +16.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +2.0% | -25.5% | +2.0% | -33.4% | +17.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +19.0% | -14.0% | +0.8% | -27.3% | -65.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +20.0% | -23.2% | +1197.2% | -47.0% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.8% | -20.3% | +39.8% | +95.7% | +2.8% |
Valuation Metrics
BAND leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.2x trailing earnings, BTBT trades at a 99% valuation discount to TWLO's 938.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, BTBT's 8.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than TWLO's 77.2x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $29.9B | $7M | $1.6B | $2M | $589M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $30.3B | -$1M | $2.2B | $1M | $508M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 938.43x | -1.15x | -113.15x | -0.38x | 9.15x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 36.33x | — | 27.36x | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 77.16x | — | 50.39x | — | 8.49x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 5.89x | 0.60x | 2.07x | 0.12x | 3.60x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.03x | 0.32x | 3.65x | 0.38x | 0.56x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 28.91x | 9.90x | 0.02x | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
BTBT leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BTBT delivers a 21.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $21 in annual profit, vs $-60 for CNET. ZCMD carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BAND's 1.75x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TWLO scores 7/9 vs BAND's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +1.3% | -30.5% | +4.0% | -60.3% | +21.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.1% | -27.7% | +1.7% | -21.3% | +19.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +1.6% | -30.1% | -1.2% | -64.7% | +6.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +1.9% | -26.3% | -1.6% | -73.5% | +8.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.14x | 0.00x | 1.75x | 0.03x | 0.03x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $399M | -$8M | $598M | -$690,000 | -$81M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $682M | $8M | $103M | $812,000 | $95M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.1B | $26,083 | $701M | $122,000 | $14M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — | -10.30x | — | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BAND leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TWLO five years ago would be worth $6,416 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $146 for ZCMD. Over the past 12 months, BAND leads with a +253.6% total return vs ZCMD's -77.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BAND at 62.7% vs ZCMD's -70.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +42.4% | -44.8% | +242.2% | -44.4% | -10.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +90.3% | -77.5% | +253.6% | -55.1% | -9.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +259.4% | -97.5% | +330.6% | -89.0% | -19.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -35.8% | -98.5% | -61.3% | -97.9% | -84.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +584.5% | -99.3% | +143.3% | -97.8% | -60.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +53.2% | -70.9% | +62.7% | -52.1% | -7.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — BAND and CNET each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CNET is the less volatile stock with a 1.18 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BTBT's 3.37 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BAND currently trades 98.8% from its 52-week high vs ZCMD's 17.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.51x | 1.21x | 1.86x | 1.18x | 3.37x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $201.39 | $12.18 | $49.25 | $2.78 | $4.55 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $91.84 | $0.43 | $12.57 | $0.57 | $1.25 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +97.9% | +17.5% | +98.8% | +25.2% | +40.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 78.4 | 60.4 | 90.4 | 50.7 | 69.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.2M | 15K | 670K | 11K | 18.5M |
Analyst Outlook
BAND leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: TWLO as "Buy", BAND as "Buy", BTBT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 173.2% upside for BTBT (target: $5) vs -6.0% for TWLO (target: $185). BTBT is the only dividend payer here at 0.31% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | — | Buy | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $185.17 | — | $46.00 | — | $5.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 52 | — | 15 | — | 2 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | +0.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | $0.01 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.9% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
BAND leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). BTBT leads in 2 (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.
TWLO vs ZCMD vs BAND vs CNET vs BTBT: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TWLO or ZCMD or BAND or CNET or BTBT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Bit Digital, Inc.
(BTBT) is the stronger pick with 264. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -49. 5% for ZW Data Action Technologies Inc. (CNET). Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) offers the better valuation at 9. 2x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Twilio Inc. (TWLO) a "Buy" — based on 52 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TWLO or ZCMD or BAND or CNET or BTBT?
On trailing P/E, Bit Digital, Inc.
(BTBT) is the cheapest at 9. 2x versus Twilio Inc. at 938. 4x. On forward P/E, Bandwidth Inc. is actually cheaper at 27. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TWLO or ZCMD or BAND or CNET or BTBT?
Over the past 5 years, Twilio Inc.
(TWLO) delivered a total return of -35. 8%, compared to -98. 5% for Zhongchao Inc. (ZCMD). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TWLO returned +584. 5% versus ZCMD's -99. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TWLO or ZCMD or BAND or CNET or BTBT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), ZW Data Action Technologies Inc.
(CNET) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 18β versus Bit Digital, Inc. 's 3. 37β — meaning BTBT is approximately 186% more volatile than CNET relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Zhongchao Inc. (ZCMD) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 175% for Bandwidth Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TWLO or ZCMD or BAND or CNET or BTBT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Bit Digital, Inc.
(BTBT) is pulling ahead at 264. 6% versus -49. 5% for ZW Data Action Technologies Inc. (CNET). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Bit Digital, Inc. grew EPS 225. 0% year-over-year, compared to -124. 1% for ZW Data Action Technologies Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TWLO leads at 9. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TWLO or ZCMD or BAND or CNET or BTBT?
Bit Digital, Inc.
(BTBT) is the more profitable company, earning 17. 3% net margin versus -55. 5% for Zhongchao Inc. — meaning it keeps 17. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BTBT leads at 16. 8% versus -54. 4% for ZCMD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BTBT leads at 61. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TWLO or ZCMD or BAND or CNET or BTBT more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Bandwidth Inc.
(BAND) trades at 27. 4x forward P/E versus 36. 3x for Twilio Inc. — 9. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BTBT: 173. 2% to $5. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — TWLO or ZCMD or BAND or CNET or BTBT?
In this comparison, BTBT (0.
3% yield) pays a dividend. TWLO, ZCMD, BAND, CNET do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is TWLO or ZCMD or BAND or CNET or BTBT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Twilio Inc.
(TWLO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+584. 5% 10Y return). Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) carries a higher beta of 3. 37 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TWLO: +584. 5%, BTBT: -60. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TWLO and ZCMD and BAND and CNET and BTBT?
These companies operate in different sectors (TWLO (Communication Services) and ZCMD (Healthcare) and BAND (Technology) and CNET (Communication Services) and BTBT (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: TWLO is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; ZCMD is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BAND is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CNET is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BTBT is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Revenue Growth > 9%
- Gross Margin > 29%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.