Medical - Diagnostics & Research
Compare Stocks
3 / 10Stock Comparison
TWST vs ILMN vs PACB
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Diagnostics & Research
Medical - Devices
TWST vs ILMN vs PACB — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Diagnostics & Research | Medical - Diagnostics & Research | Medical - Devices |
| Market Cap | $3.65B | $21.07B | $498M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $409M | $4.39B | $160M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-81M | $853M | $-546M |
| Gross Margin | 52.1% | 67.1% | 28.2% |
| Operating Margin | -33.9% | 20.9% | -346.1% |
| Forward P/E | — | 26.8x | — |
| Total Debt | $137M | $2.55B | $759M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $183M | $1.42B | $64M |
TWST vs ILMN vs PACB — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Twist Bioscience Co… (TWST) | 100 | 154.3 | +54.3% |
| Illumina, Inc. (ILMN) | 100 | 39.3 | -60.7% |
| Pacific Biosciences… (PACB) | 100 | 46.9 | -53.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TWST vs ILMN vs PACB
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TWST is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 20.3%, EPS growth 63.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 22.8%
- 318.1% 10Y total return vs ILMN's 0.7%
- 20.3% revenue growth vs ILMN's -0.8%
ILMN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 1.23
- Lower volatility, beta 1.23, Low D/E 93.8%, current ratio 2.08x
- 19.4% margin vs PACB's -341.5%
PACB is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.
- Beta 2.43, current ratio 6.89x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 20.3% revenue growth vs ILMN's -0.8% | |
| Quality / Margins | 19.4% margin vs PACB's -341.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.23 vs TWST's 2.47 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 3 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +81.7% vs PACB's +46.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.4% ROA vs PACB's -66.8%, ROIC 16.8% vs -45.8% |
TWST vs ILMN vs PACB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
TWST vs ILMN vs PACB — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ILMN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ILMN is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.4B annually — 27.4x PACB's $160M. ILMN is the more profitable business, keeping 19.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PACB's -3.4%. On growth, TWST holds the edge at +19.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $409M | $4.4B | $160M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$115M | $1.1B | -$169M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$81M | $853M | -$546M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$95M | $989M | -$124M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +52.1% | +67.1% | +28.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -33.9% | +20.9% | -3.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -19.8% | +19.4% | -3.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -23.2% | +22.5% | -77.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +19.3% | +4.8% | +13.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -7.6% | +6.1% | — |
Valuation Metrics
TWST leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.6B | $21.1B | $498M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.6B | $22.2B | $1.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -45.03x | 25.45x | -0.91x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 26.77x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 6.01x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 19.58x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 9.68x | 4.86x | 3.11x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 7.40x | 7.95x | 92.53x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 22.63x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
ILMN leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ILMN delivers a 32.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $33 in annual profit, vs $-11 for PACB. TWST carries lower financial leverage with a 0.29x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PACB's 141.98x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ILMN scores 8/9 vs PACB's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -17.5% | +32.8% | -11.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -12.5% | +13.4% | -66.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -26.9% | +16.8% | -45.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -24.9% | +17.6% | -58.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 8 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.29x | 0.94x | 141.98x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$46M | $1.1B | $696M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $183M | $1.4B | $64M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $137M | $2.6B | $759M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 12.09x | -77.95x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TWST leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TWST five years ago would be worth $5,015 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $663 for PACB. Over the past 12 months, ILMN leads with a +81.7% total return vs PACB's +46.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TWST at 63.5% vs PACB's -48.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +80.7% | +3.2% | -10.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +78.6% | +81.7% | +46.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +336.9% | -27.1% | -86.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -49.9% | -62.8% | -93.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +318.1% | +0.7% | -81.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +63.5% | -10.0% | -48.7% |
Risk & Volatility
ILMN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ILMN is the less volatile stock with a 1.23 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TWST's 2.47 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ILMN currently trades 89.2% from its 52-week high vs PACB's 60.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.47x | 1.23x | 2.43x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $66.00 | $155.53 | $2.73 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $23.30 | $73.86 | $0.85 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +88.7% | +89.2% | +60.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 57.0 | 65.2 | 60.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.2M | 1.5M | 5.9M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: TWST as "Buy", ILMN as "Buy", PACB as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 6.3% upside for ILMN (target: $147) vs -39.4% for PACB (target: $1).
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $49.50 | $147.38 | $1.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 13 | 50 | 18 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.0% | +3.5% | 0.0% |
ILMN leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). TWST leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns).
TWST vs ILMN vs PACB: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TWST or ILMN or PACB a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Twist Bioscience Corporation (TWST) is the stronger pick with 20.
3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 8% for Illumina, Inc. (ILMN). Illumina, Inc. (ILMN) offers the better valuation at 25. 5x trailing P/E (26. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Twist Bioscience Corporation (TWST) a "Buy" — based on 13 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — TWST or ILMN or PACB?
Over the past 5 years, Twist Bioscience Corporation (TWST) delivered a total return of -49.
9%, compared to -93. 4% for Pacific Biosciences of California, Inc. (PACB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TWST returned +318. 1% versus PACB's -81. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — TWST or ILMN or PACB?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Illumina, Inc.
(ILMN) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 23β versus Twist Bioscience Corporation's 2. 47β — meaning TWST is approximately 100% more volatile than ILMN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Twist Bioscience Corporation (TWST) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 29% versus 142% for Pacific Biosciences of California, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — TWST or ILMN or PACB?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Twist Bioscience Corporation (TWST) is pulling ahead at 20.
3% versus -0. 8% for Illumina, Inc. (ILMN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Illumina, Inc. grew EPS 170. 9% year-over-year, compared to -70. 1% for Pacific Biosciences of California, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TWST leads at 22. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — TWST or ILMN or PACB?
Illumina, Inc.
(ILMN) is the more profitable company, earning 19. 6% net margin versus -341. 5% for Pacific Biosciences of California, Inc. — meaning it keeps 19. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ILMN leads at 19. 9% versus -348. 5% for PACB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ILMN leads at 66. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is TWST or ILMN or PACB more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ILMN: 6.
3% to $147. 38.
07Which pays a better dividend — TWST or ILMN or PACB?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is TWST or ILMN or PACB better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Illumina, Inc.
(ILMN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 23)). Pacific Biosciences of California, Inc. (PACB) carries a higher beta of 2. 43 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ILMN: +0. 7%, PACB: -81. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between TWST and ILMN and PACB?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: TWST is a small-cap high-growth stock; ILMN is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; PACB is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.