Medical - Diagnostics & Research
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
TWST vs ILMN vs PACB vs TMO vs BEAM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Diagnostics & Research
Medical - Devices
Medical - Diagnostics & Research
Biotechnology
TWST vs ILMN vs PACB vs TMO vs BEAM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Diagnostics & Research | Medical - Diagnostics & Research | Medical - Devices | Medical - Diagnostics & Research | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $3.65B | $21.07B | $498M | $176.36B | $3.23B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $409M | $4.39B | $160M | $45.20B | $132M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-81M | $853M | $-546M | $6.86B | $-65M |
| Gross Margin | 52.1% | 67.1% | 28.2% | 39.4% | -64.2% |
| Operating Margin | -33.9% | 20.9% | -346.1% | 17.8% | -281.0% |
| Forward P/E | — | 26.8x | — | 19.1x | — |
| Total Debt | $137M | $2.55B | $759M | $40.85B | $294M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $183M | $1.42B | $64M | $9.86B | $295M |
TWST vs ILMN vs PACB vs TMO vs BEAM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Twist Bioscience Co… (TWST) | 100 | 154.3 | +54.3% |
| Illumina, Inc. (ILMN) | 100 | 39.3 | -60.7% |
| Pacific Biosciences… (PACB) | 100 | 46.9 | -53.1% |
| Thermo Fisher Scien… (TMO) | 100 | 135.9 | +35.9% |
| Beam Therapeutics I… (BEAM) | 100 | 123.2 | +23.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TWST vs ILMN vs PACB vs TMO vs BEAM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TWST is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 318.1% 10Y total return vs TMO's 229.1%
ILMN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for valuation efficiency.
- PEG 6.33 vs TMO's 9.05
- Better valuation composite
- 19.4% margin vs PACB's -341.5%
- 13.4% ROA vs PACB's -66.8%, ROIC 16.8% vs -45.8%
Among these 5 stocks, PACB doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
TMO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.
- Dividend streak 8 yrs, beta 1.10, yield 0.4%
- Beta 1.10 vs TWST's 2.47
- 0.4% yield; 8-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
BEAM ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 120.0%, EPS growth 82.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 31.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 2.14, Low D/E 23.7%, current ratio 13.09x
- Beta 2.14, current ratio 13.09x
- 120.0% revenue growth vs ILMN's -0.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 120.0% revenue growth vs ILMN's -0.8% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 19.4% margin vs PACB's -341.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.10 vs TWST's 2.47 | |
| Dividends | 0.4% yield; 8-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +93.9% vs TMO's +16.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.4% ROA vs PACB's -66.8%, ROIC 16.8% vs -45.8% |
TWST vs ILMN vs PACB vs TMO vs BEAM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
TWST vs ILMN vs PACB vs TMO vs BEAM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ILMN leads in 2 of 6 categories
TWST leads 1 • PACB leads 0 • TMO leads 0 • BEAM leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ILMN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TMO is the larger business by revenue, generating $45.2B annually — 341.7x BEAM's $132M. ILMN is the more profitable business, keeping 19.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PACB's -3.4%. On growth, TWST holds the edge at +19.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $409M | $4.4B | $160M | $45.2B | $132M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$115M | $1.1B | -$169M | $10.5B | -$355M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$81M | $853M | -$546M | $6.9B | -$65M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$95M | $989M | -$124M | $6.7B | -$384M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +52.1% | +67.1% | +28.2% | +39.4% | -64.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -33.9% | +20.9% | -3.5% | +17.8% | -2.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -19.8% | +19.4% | -3.4% | +15.2% | -49.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -23.2% | +22.5% | -77.4% | +14.9% | -2.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +19.3% | +4.8% | +13.8% | +6.2% | -100.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -7.6% | +6.1% | — | +11.3% | +26.6% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — ILMN and TMO each lead in 2 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 25.5x trailing earnings, ILMN trades at a 5% valuation discount to TMO's 26.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), ILMN offers better value at 6.01x vs TMO's 12.67x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.6B | $21.1B | $498M | $176.4B | $3.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.6B | $22.2B | $1.2B | $207.4B | $3.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -45.03x | 25.45x | -0.91x | 26.75x | -38.85x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 26.77x | — | 19.11x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 6.01x | — | 12.67x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 19.58x | — | 19.04x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 9.68x | 4.86x | 3.11x | 3.96x | 23.14x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 7.40x | 7.95x | 92.53x | 3.34x | 2.51x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 22.63x | — | 28.02x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
ILMN leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ILMN delivers a 32.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $33 in annual profit, vs $-11 for PACB. BEAM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.24x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PACB's 141.98x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ILMN scores 8/9 vs PACB's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -17.5% | +32.8% | -11.2% | +13.2% | -5.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -12.5% | +13.4% | -66.8% | +6.4% | -4.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -26.9% | +16.8% | -45.8% | +7.5% | -31.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -24.9% | +17.6% | -58.0% | +9.1% | -33.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 8 | 3 | 6 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.29x | 0.94x | 141.98x | 0.76x | 0.24x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$46M | $1.1B | $696M | $31.0B | -$1M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $183M | $1.4B | $64M | $9.9B | $295M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $137M | $2.6B | $759M | $40.9B | $294M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 12.09x | -77.95x | 5.89x | 1.08x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TWST leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TMO five years ago would be worth $10,283 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $663 for PACB. Over the past 12 months, BEAM leads with a +93.9% total return vs TMO's +16.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TWST at 63.5% vs PACB's -48.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +80.7% | +3.2% | -10.3% | -19.8% | +16.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +78.6% | +81.7% | +46.0% | +16.8% | +93.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +336.9% | -27.1% | -86.5% | -11.7% | -5.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -49.9% | -62.8% | -93.4% | +2.8% | -55.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +318.1% | +0.7% | -81.3% | +229.1% | +67.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +63.5% | -10.0% | -48.7% | -4.0% | -1.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ILMN and TMO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TMO is the less volatile stock with a 1.10 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TWST's 2.47 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ILMN currently trades 89.2% from its 52-week high vs PACB's 60.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.47x | 1.23x | 2.43x | 1.10x | 2.14x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $66.00 | $155.53 | $2.73 | $643.99 | $36.44 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $23.30 | $73.86 | $0.85 | $385.46 | $15.35 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +88.7% | +89.2% | +60.4% | +73.7% | +86.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 57.0 | 65.2 | 60.2 | 43.1 | 60.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.2M | 1.5M | 5.9M | 1.9M | 2.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: TWST as "Buy", ILMN as "Buy", PACB as "Buy", TMO as "Buy", BEAM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 38.0% upside for TMO (target: $655) vs -39.4% for PACB (target: $1). TMO is the only dividend payer here at 0.36% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $49.50 | $147.38 | $1.00 | $654.67 | $40.83 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 13 | 50 | 18 | 42 | 27 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +0.4% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | 8 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $1.69 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.0% | +3.5% | 0.0% | +1.7% | 0.0% |
ILMN leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). TWST leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
TWST vs ILMN vs PACB vs TMO vs BEAM: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TWST or ILMN or PACB or TMO or BEAM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Beam Therapeutics Inc.
(BEAM) is the stronger pick with 120. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 8% for Illumina, Inc. (ILMN). Illumina, Inc. (ILMN) offers the better valuation at 25. 5x trailing P/E (26. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Twist Bioscience Corporation (TWST) a "Buy" — based on 13 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TWST or ILMN or PACB or TMO or BEAM?
On trailing P/E, Illumina, Inc.
(ILMN) is the cheapest at 25. 5x versus Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. at 26. 8x. On forward P/E, Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. is actually cheaper at 19. 1x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Illumina, Inc. wins at 6. 33x versus Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. 's 9. 05x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TWST or ILMN or PACB or TMO or BEAM?
Over the past 5 years, Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.
(TMO) delivered a total return of +2. 8%, compared to -93. 4% for Pacific Biosciences of California, Inc. (PACB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TWST returned +318. 1% versus PACB's -81. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TWST or ILMN or PACB or TMO or BEAM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.
(TMO) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 10β versus Twist Bioscience Corporation's 2. 47β — meaning TWST is approximately 126% more volatile than TMO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Beam Therapeutics Inc. (BEAM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 24% versus 142% for Pacific Biosciences of California, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TWST or ILMN or PACB or TMO or BEAM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Beam Therapeutics Inc.
(BEAM) is pulling ahead at 120. 0% versus -0. 8% for Illumina, Inc. (ILMN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Illumina, Inc. grew EPS 170. 9% year-over-year, compared to -70. 1% for Pacific Biosciences of California, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, BEAM leads at 31. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TWST or ILMN or PACB or TMO or BEAM?
Illumina, Inc.
(ILMN) is the more profitable company, earning 19. 6% net margin versus -341. 5% for Pacific Biosciences of California, Inc. — meaning it keeps 19. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ILMN leads at 19. 9% versus -348. 5% for PACB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BEAM leads at 84. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TWST or ILMN or PACB or TMO or BEAM more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Illumina, Inc. (ILMN) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 6. 33x versus Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. 's 9. 05x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. (TMO) trades at 19. 1x forward P/E versus 26. 8x for Illumina, Inc. — 7. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TMO: 38. 0% to $654. 67.
08Which pays a better dividend — TWST or ILMN or PACB or TMO or BEAM?
In this comparison, TMO (0.
4% yield) pays a dividend. TWST, ILMN, PACB, BEAM do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is TWST or ILMN or PACB or TMO or BEAM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.
(TMO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 10), +229. 1% 10Y return). Pacific Biosciences of California, Inc. (PACB) carries a higher beta of 2. 43 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TMO: +229. 1%, PACB: -81. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TWST and ILMN and PACB and TMO and BEAM?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: TWST is a small-cap high-growth stock; ILMN is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; PACB is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TMO is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; BEAM is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.