Compare Stocks

4 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

TWST vs NTLA vs ILMN vs EDIT

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
TWST
Twist Bioscience Corporation

Medical - Diagnostics & Research

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$3.65B
5Y Perf.+54.3%
NTLA
Intellia Therapeutics, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.62B
5Y Perf.-21.7%
ILMN
Illumina, Inc.

Medical - Diagnostics & Research

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$21.07B
5Y Perf.-60.7%
EDIT
Editas Medicine, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$297M
5Y Perf.-88.8%

TWST vs NTLA vs ILMN vs EDIT — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
TWST logoTWST
NTLA logoNTLA
ILMN logoILMN
EDIT logoEDIT
IndustryMedical - Diagnostics & ResearchBiotechnologyMedical - Diagnostics & ResearchBiotechnology
Market Cap$3.65B$1.62B$21.07B$297M
Revenue (TTM)$409M$68M$4.39B$0.00
Net Income (TTM)$-81M$-413M$853M$-160M
Gross Margin52.1%-25.6%67.1%
Operating Margin-33.9%-6.5%20.9%
Forward P/E26.8x
Total Debt$137M$93M$2.55B$18M
Cash & Equiv.$183M$155M$1.42B$147M

TWST vs NTLA vs ILMN vs EDITLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

TWST
NTLA
ILMN
EDIT
StockMay 20May 26Return
Twist Bioscience Co… (TWST)100154.3+54.3%
Intellia Therapeuti… (NTLA)10078.3-21.7%
Illumina, Inc. (ILMN)10039.3-60.7%
Editas Medicine, In… (EDIT)10011.2-88.8%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: TWST vs NTLA vs ILMN vs EDIT

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: ILMN leads in 3 of 6 categories, making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. Twist Bioscience Corporation is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion. EDIT also leads in specific categories worth noting. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
TWST
Twist Bioscience Corporation
The Growth Play

TWST is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.

  • Rev growth 20.3%, EPS growth 63.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 22.8%
  • 318.1% 10Y total return vs ILMN's 0.7%
  • 20.3% revenue growth vs EDIT's -100.0%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
NTLA
Intellia Therapeutics, Inc.
The Defensive Pick

NTLA is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.

  • Lower volatility, beta 2.37, Low D/E 13.9%, current ratio 5.08x
  • Beta 2.37, current ratio 5.08x
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and defensive
ILMN
Illumina, Inc.
The Income Pick

ILMN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability.

  • beta 1.23
  • 19.4% margin vs NTLA's -6.1%
  • Beta 1.23 vs EDIT's 2.52
  • 13.4% ROA vs EDIT's -74.2%
Best for: income & stability
EDIT
Editas Medicine, Inc.
The Momentum Pick

EDIT is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.

  • +127.8% vs TWST's +78.6%
Best for: momentum
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthTWST logoTWST20.3% revenue growth vs EDIT's -100.0%
Quality / MarginsILMN logoILMN19.4% margin vs NTLA's -6.1%
Stability / SafetyILMN logoILMNBeta 1.23 vs EDIT's 2.52
DividendsTieNone of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)EDIT logoEDIT+127.8% vs TWST's +78.6%
Efficiency (ROA)ILMN logoILMN13.4% ROA vs EDIT's -74.2%

TWST vs NTLA vs ILMN vs EDIT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

TWSTTwist Bioscience Corporation
FY 2025
Ngs Tools
55.3%$208M
Synthetic Genes
30.2%$114M
Antibody Discovery
6.2%$23M
Oligo Pools
5.4%$20M
Dna And Biopharma Libraries
3.0%$11M
NTLAIntellia Therapeutics, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

ILMNIllumina, Inc.
FY 2025
Sequencing
91.8%$4.0B
Microarray
8.2%$358M
EDITEditas Medicine, Inc.
FY 2025
Reportable Segment
100.0%$41M

TWST vs NTLA vs ILMN vs EDIT — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLILMNLAGGINGEDIT

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

ILMN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

ILMN and EDIT operate at a comparable scale, with $4.4B and $0 in trailing revenue. ILMN is the more profitable business, keeping 19.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NTLA's -6.1%. On growth, NTLA holds the edge at +78.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricTWST logoTWSTTwist Bioscience …NTLA logoNTLAIntellia Therapeu…ILMN logoILMNIllumina, Inc.EDIT logoEDITEditas Medicine, …
RevenueTrailing 12 months$409M$68M$4.4B$0
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$115M-$431M$1.1B$0
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$81M-$413M$853M-$160M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$95M-$396M$989M-$166M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+52.1%-25.6%+67.1%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-33.9%-6.5%+20.9%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-19.8%-6.1%+19.4%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-23.2%-5.8%+22.5%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+19.3%+78.8%+4.8%-151.6%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-7.6%+34.6%+6.1%+105.5%
ILMN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — TWST and NTLA and ILMN each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.
MetricTWST logoTWSTTwist Bioscience …NTLA logoNTLAIntellia Therapeu…ILMN logoILMNIllumina, Inc.EDIT logoEDITEditas Medicine, …
Market CapShares × price$3.6B$1.6B$21.1B$297M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$3.6B$1.6B$22.2B$168M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-45.03x-3.60x25.45x-1.68x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.26.77x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate6.01x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple19.58x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue9.68x23.93x4.86x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share7.40x2.21x7.95x9.85x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF22.63x
Evenly matched — TWST and NTLA and ILMN each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

ILMN leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.

ILMN delivers a 32.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $33 in annual profit, vs $-5 for EDIT. NTLA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.14x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ILMN's 0.94x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ILMN scores 8/9 vs EDIT's 1/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricTWST logoTWSTTwist Bioscience …NTLA logoNTLAIntellia Therapeu…ILMN logoILMNIllumina, Inc.EDIT logoEDITEditas Medicine, …
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-17.5%-56.6%+32.8%-5.2%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-12.5%-45.2%+13.4%-74.2%
ROICReturn on invested capital-26.9%-44.0%+16.8%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-24.9%-48.5%+17.6%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–94481
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.29x0.14x0.94x0.66x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$46M-$62M$1.1B-$129M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$183M$155M$1.4B$147M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$137M$93M$2.6B$18M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense12.09x
ILMN leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

TWST leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in TWST five years ago would be worth $5,015 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $888 for EDIT. Over the past 12 months, EDIT leads with a +127.8% total return vs TWST's +78.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TWST at 63.5% vs EDIT's -32.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricTWST logoTWSTTwist Bioscience …NTLA logoNTLAIntellia Therapeu…ILMN logoILMNIllumina, Inc.EDIT logoEDITEditas Medicine, …
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+80.7%+48.9%+3.2%+47.8%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+78.6%+88.1%+81.7%+127.8%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+336.9%-68.3%-27.1%-68.5%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-49.9%-79.8%-62.8%-91.1%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+318.1%-42.9%+0.7%-90.0%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+63.5%-31.8%-10.0%-32.0%
TWST leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

ILMN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

ILMN is the less volatile stock with a 1.23 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than EDIT's 2.52 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ILMN currently trades 89.2% from its 52-week high vs NTLA's 48.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricTWST logoTWSTTwist Bioscience …NTLA logoNTLAIntellia Therapeu…ILMN logoILMNIllumina, Inc.EDIT logoEDITEditas Medicine, …
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5002.47x2.37x1.23x2.52x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$66.00$28.25$155.53$4.54
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$23.30$6.83$73.86$1.29
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+88.7%+48.5%+89.2%+66.7%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10057.050.465.257.5
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded1.2M5.3M1.5M1.6M
ILMN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Analyst consensus: TWST as "Buy", NTLA as "Buy", ILMN as "Buy", EDIT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 98.0% upside for EDIT (target: $6) vs -15.4% for TWST (target: $50).

MetricTWST logoTWSTTwist Bioscience …NTLA logoNTLAIntellia Therapeu…ILMN logoILMNIllumina, Inc.EDIT logoEDITEditas Medicine, …
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$49.50$20.88$147.38$6.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts13395025
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+0.0%0.0%+3.5%0.0%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

ILMN leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). TWST leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.

Best OverallIllumina, Inc. (ILMN)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

TWST vs NTLA vs ILMN vs EDIT: Key Questions Answered

9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is TWST or NTLA or ILMN or EDIT a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Twist Bioscience Corporation (TWST) is the stronger pick with 20.

3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Editas Medicine, Inc. (EDIT). Illumina, Inc. (ILMN) offers the better valuation at 25. 5x trailing P/E (26. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Twist Bioscience Corporation (TWST) a "Buy" — based on 13 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which is the better long-term investment — TWST or NTLA or ILMN or EDIT?

Over the past 5 years, Twist Bioscience Corporation (TWST) delivered a total return of -49.

9%, compared to -91. 1% for Editas Medicine, Inc. (EDIT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TWST returned +318. 1% versus EDIT's -90. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

03

Which is safer — TWST or NTLA or ILMN or EDIT?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Illumina, Inc.

(ILMN) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 23β versus Editas Medicine, Inc. 's 2. 52β — meaning EDIT is approximately 104% more volatile than ILMN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Intellia Therapeutics, Inc. (NTLA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 14% versus 94% for Illumina, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

04

Which is growing faster — TWST or NTLA or ILMN or EDIT?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Twist Bioscience Corporation (TWST) is pulling ahead at 20.

3% versus -100. 0% for Editas Medicine, Inc. (EDIT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Illumina, Inc. grew EPS 170. 9% year-over-year, compared to 27. 4% for Intellia Therapeutics, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TWST leads at 22. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

05

Which has better profit margins — TWST or NTLA or ILMN or EDIT?

Illumina, Inc.

(ILMN) is the more profitable company, earning 19. 6% net margin versus -609. 9% for Intellia Therapeutics, Inc. — meaning it keeps 19. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ILMN leads at 19. 9% versus -651. 7% for NTLA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NTLA leads at 76. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

06

Is TWST or NTLA or ILMN or EDIT more undervalued right now?

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for EDIT: 98.

0% to $6. 00.

07

Which pays a better dividend — TWST or NTLA or ILMN or EDIT?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

08

Is TWST or NTLA or ILMN or EDIT better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Illumina, Inc.

(ILMN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 23)). Editas Medicine, Inc. (EDIT) carries a higher beta of 2. 52 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ILMN: +0. 7%, EDIT: -90. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

09

What are the main differences between TWST and NTLA and ILMN and EDIT?

Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: TWST is a small-cap high-growth stock; NTLA is a small-cap high-growth stock; ILMN is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; EDIT is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

TWST

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 9%
  • Gross Margin > 31%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

NTLA

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 39%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ILMN

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 11%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

EDIT

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform TWST and NTLA and ILMN and EDIT on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(TWST: 19.3% · NTLA: 78.8%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.