Medical - Diagnostics & Research
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
TWST vs NTLA vs ILMN vs EDIT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Medical - Diagnostics & Research
Biotechnology
TWST vs NTLA vs ILMN vs EDIT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Diagnostics & Research | Biotechnology | Medical - Diagnostics & Research | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $3.65B | $1.62B | $21.07B | $297M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $409M | $68M | $4.39B | $0.00 |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-81M | $-413M | $853M | $-160M |
| Gross Margin | 52.1% | -25.6% | 67.1% | — |
| Operating Margin | -33.9% | -6.5% | 20.9% | — |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 26.8x | — |
| Total Debt | $137M | $93M | $2.55B | $18M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $183M | $155M | $1.42B | $147M |
TWST vs NTLA vs ILMN vs EDIT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Twist Bioscience Co… (TWST) | 100 | 154.3 | +54.3% |
| Intellia Therapeuti… (NTLA) | 100 | 78.3 | -21.7% |
| Illumina, Inc. (ILMN) | 100 | 39.3 | -60.7% |
| Editas Medicine, In… (EDIT) | 100 | 11.2 | -88.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TWST vs NTLA vs ILMN vs EDIT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TWST is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 20.3%, EPS growth 63.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 22.8%
- 318.1% 10Y total return vs ILMN's 0.7%
- 20.3% revenue growth vs EDIT's -100.0%
NTLA is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 2.37, Low D/E 13.9%, current ratio 5.08x
- Beta 2.37, current ratio 5.08x
ILMN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability.
- beta 1.23
- 19.4% margin vs NTLA's -6.1%
- Beta 1.23 vs EDIT's 2.52
- 13.4% ROA vs EDIT's -74.2%
EDIT is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +127.8% vs TWST's +78.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 20.3% revenue growth vs EDIT's -100.0% | |
| Quality / Margins | 19.4% margin vs NTLA's -6.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.23 vs EDIT's 2.52 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +127.8% vs TWST's +78.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.4% ROA vs EDIT's -74.2% |
TWST vs NTLA vs ILMN vs EDIT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
TWST vs NTLA vs ILMN vs EDIT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ILMN leads in 3 of 6 categories
TWST leads 1 • NTLA leads 0 • EDIT leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ILMN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ILMN and EDIT operate at a comparable scale, with $4.4B and $0 in trailing revenue. ILMN is the more profitable business, keeping 19.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NTLA's -6.1%. On growth, NTLA holds the edge at +78.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $409M | $68M | $4.4B | $0 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$115M | -$431M | $1.1B | $0 |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$81M | -$413M | $853M | -$160M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$95M | -$396M | $989M | -$166M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +52.1% | -25.6% | +67.1% | — |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -33.9% | -6.5% | +20.9% | — |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -19.8% | -6.1% | +19.4% | — |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -23.2% | -5.8% | +22.5% | — |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +19.3% | +78.8% | +4.8% | -151.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -7.6% | +34.6% | +6.1% | +105.5% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — TWST and NTLA and ILMN each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.6B | $1.6B | $21.1B | $297M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.6B | $1.6B | $22.2B | $168M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -45.03x | -3.60x | 25.45x | -1.68x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 26.77x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 6.01x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 19.58x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 9.68x | 23.93x | 4.86x | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 7.40x | 2.21x | 7.95x | 9.85x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 22.63x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
ILMN leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ILMN delivers a 32.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $33 in annual profit, vs $-5 for EDIT. NTLA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.14x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ILMN's 0.94x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ILMN scores 8/9 vs EDIT's 1/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -17.5% | -56.6% | +32.8% | -5.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -12.5% | -45.2% | +13.4% | -74.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -26.9% | -44.0% | +16.8% | — |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -24.9% | -48.5% | +17.6% | — |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 | 8 | 1 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.29x | 0.14x | 0.94x | 0.66x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$46M | -$62M | $1.1B | -$129M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $183M | $155M | $1.4B | $147M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $137M | $93M | $2.6B | $18M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — | 12.09x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TWST leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TWST five years ago would be worth $5,015 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $888 for EDIT. Over the past 12 months, EDIT leads with a +127.8% total return vs TWST's +78.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TWST at 63.5% vs EDIT's -32.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +80.7% | +48.9% | +3.2% | +47.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +78.6% | +88.1% | +81.7% | +127.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +336.9% | -68.3% | -27.1% | -68.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -49.9% | -79.8% | -62.8% | -91.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +318.1% | -42.9% | +0.7% | -90.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +63.5% | -31.8% | -10.0% | -32.0% |
Risk & Volatility
ILMN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ILMN is the less volatile stock with a 1.23 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than EDIT's 2.52 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ILMN currently trades 89.2% from its 52-week high vs NTLA's 48.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.47x | 2.37x | 1.23x | 2.52x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $66.00 | $28.25 | $155.53 | $4.54 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $23.30 | $6.83 | $73.86 | $1.29 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +88.7% | +48.5% | +89.2% | +66.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 57.0 | 50.4 | 65.2 | 57.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.2M | 5.3M | 1.5M | 1.6M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: TWST as "Buy", NTLA as "Buy", ILMN as "Buy", EDIT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 98.0% upside for EDIT (target: $6) vs -15.4% for TWST (target: $50).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $49.50 | $20.88 | $147.38 | $6.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 13 | 39 | 50 | 25 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.0% | 0.0% | +3.5% | 0.0% |
ILMN leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). TWST leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.
TWST vs NTLA vs ILMN vs EDIT: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TWST or NTLA or ILMN or EDIT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Twist Bioscience Corporation (TWST) is the stronger pick with 20.
3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Editas Medicine, Inc. (EDIT). Illumina, Inc. (ILMN) offers the better valuation at 25. 5x trailing P/E (26. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Twist Bioscience Corporation (TWST) a "Buy" — based on 13 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — TWST or NTLA or ILMN or EDIT?
Over the past 5 years, Twist Bioscience Corporation (TWST) delivered a total return of -49.
9%, compared to -91. 1% for Editas Medicine, Inc. (EDIT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TWST returned +318. 1% versus EDIT's -90. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — TWST or NTLA or ILMN or EDIT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Illumina, Inc.
(ILMN) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 23β versus Editas Medicine, Inc. 's 2. 52β — meaning EDIT is approximately 104% more volatile than ILMN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Intellia Therapeutics, Inc. (NTLA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 14% versus 94% for Illumina, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — TWST or NTLA or ILMN or EDIT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Twist Bioscience Corporation (TWST) is pulling ahead at 20.
3% versus -100. 0% for Editas Medicine, Inc. (EDIT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Illumina, Inc. grew EPS 170. 9% year-over-year, compared to 27. 4% for Intellia Therapeutics, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TWST leads at 22. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — TWST or NTLA or ILMN or EDIT?
Illumina, Inc.
(ILMN) is the more profitable company, earning 19. 6% net margin versus -609. 9% for Intellia Therapeutics, Inc. — meaning it keeps 19. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ILMN leads at 19. 9% versus -651. 7% for NTLA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NTLA leads at 76. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is TWST or NTLA or ILMN or EDIT more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for EDIT: 98.
0% to $6. 00.
07Which pays a better dividend — TWST or NTLA or ILMN or EDIT?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is TWST or NTLA or ILMN or EDIT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Illumina, Inc.
(ILMN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 23)). Editas Medicine, Inc. (EDIT) carries a higher beta of 2. 52 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ILMN: +0. 7%, EDIT: -90. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between TWST and NTLA and ILMN and EDIT?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: TWST is a small-cap high-growth stock; NTLA is a small-cap high-growth stock; ILMN is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; EDIT is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.