TXO
TXO Partners, L.P.
Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
Market Cap$691M
5Y Perf.-44.2%
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
TXO vs XOM vs SLB vs HAL vs NOV
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
XOM
Exxon Mobil Corporation
Oil & Gas Integrated
Market Cap$620.85B
5Y Perf.+26.3%
SLB
SLB N.V.
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
Market Cap$79.62B
5Y Perf.-6.9%
HAL
Halliburton Company
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
Market Cap$32.68B
5Y Perf.-5.1%
NOV
NOV Inc.
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
Market Cap$6.96B
5Y Perf.-21.0%
TXO vs XOM vs SLB vs HAL vs NOV — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | TXO | XOM | SLB | HAL | NOV |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | Oil & Gas Integrated | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services |
| Market Cap | $691M | $620.85B | $79.62B | $32.68B | $6.96B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $355M | $323.90B | $35.71B | $22.17B | $8.69B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-98M | $28.84B | $3.35B | $1.54B | $91M |
| Gross Margin | -4.5% | 21.7% | 18.2% | 15.3% | 19.5% |
| Operating Margin | -14.5% | 10.5% | 15.3% | 11.3% | 5.3% |
| Forward P/E | 21.0x | 14.8x | 19.8x | 16.8x | 21.7x |
| Total Debt | $291M | $43.54B | $12.31B | $8.13B | $2.34B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $9M | $10.68B | $3.04B | $2.21B | $1.55B |
TXO vs XOM vs SLB vs HAL vs NOV — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
TXO
XOM
SLB
HAL
NOV
| Stock | Jan 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| TXO Partners, L.P. (TXO) | 100 | 55.8 | -44.2% |
| Exxon Mobil Corpora… (XOM) | 100 | 126.3 | +26.3% |
| SLB N.V. (SLB) | 100 | 93.1 | -6.9% |
| Halliburton Company (HAL) | 100 | 94.9 | -5.1% |
| NOV Inc. (NOV) | 100 | 79.0 | -21.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TXO vs XOM vs SLB vs HAL vs NOV
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: TXO leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and capital preservation and lower volatility. SLB N.V. is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and operational efficiency and capital deployment. XOM and HAL also each lead in at least one category. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
TXO
TXO Partners, L.P.
The Income Pick
TXO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.05, yield 16.3%
- Rev growth 45.5%, EPS growth -166.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 18.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.05, Low D/E 32.0%, current ratio 0.62x
- Beta 0.05, yield 16.3%, current ratio 0.62x
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
XOM
Exxon Mobil Corporation
The Long-Run Compounder
XOM ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding.
- 105.0% 10Y total return vs HAL's 16.2%
- Lower P/E (14.8x vs 16.8x)
Best for: long-term compounding
SLB
SLB N.V.
The Quality Compounder
SLB is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and efficiency is your priority.
- 9.4% margin vs TXO's -27.7%
- 6.5% ROA vs TXO's -7.7%, ROIC 12.1% vs 1.7%
Best for: quality and efficiency
HAL
Halliburton Company
The Momentum Pick
HAL is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +105.6% vs TXO's -16.4%
Best for: momentum
NOV
NOV Inc.
The Income Angle
Among these 5 stocks, NOV doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
Best for: energy exposure
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | TXO | 45.5% revenue growth vs XOM's -4.5% |
| Value | XOM | Lower P/E (14.8x vs 16.8x) |
| Quality / Margins | SLB | 9.4% margin vs TXO's -27.7% |
| Stability / Safety | TXO | Beta 0.05 vs NOV's 1.01, lower leverage |
| Dividends | TXO | 16.3% yield, vs XOM's 2.7% |
| Momentum (1Y) | HAL | +105.6% vs TXO's -16.4% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | SLB | 6.5% ROA vs TXO's -7.7%, ROIC 12.1% vs 1.7% |
TXO vs XOM vs SLB vs HAL vs NOV — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2025
FY 2025
FY 2025
FY 2025
FY 2025
TXO vs XOM vs SLB vs HAL vs NOV — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLSLBLAGGINGNOV
Who Leads Where
SLB leads in 2 of 6 categories
TXO leads 1 • XOM leads 1 • HAL leads 0 • NOV leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓NOVNOV Inc.
0leads
HALHalliburton Company
0leads
XOMExxon Mobil Corporati…
1leads
TXOTXO Partners, L.P.
1leads
SLBSLB N.V.
2leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs TXOvs XOMMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
SLB4/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
TXO3/6
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
SLB3/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
XOM4/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
Tied
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SLB leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
XOM is the larger business by revenue, generating $323.9B annually — 911.4x TXO's $355M. SLB is the more profitable business, keeping 9.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TXO's -27.7%. On growth, SLB holds the edge at +5.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | TXOTXO Partners, L.P. | XOMExxon Mobil Corpo… | SLBSLB N.V. | HALHalliburton Compa… | NOVNOV Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $355M | $323.9B | $35.7B | $22.2B | $8.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $48M | $59.9B | $7.4B | $3.4B | $725M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$98M | $28.8B | $3.4B | $1.5B | $91M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$144M | $23.6B | $4.8B | $1.7B | $734M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -4.5% | +21.7% | +18.2% | +15.3% | +19.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -14.5% | +10.5% | +15.3% | +11.3% | +5.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -27.7% | +8.9% | +9.4% | +6.9% | +1.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -40.4% | +7.3% | +13.4% | +7.6% | +8.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -66.5% | -1.3% | +5.0% | -0.3% | -2.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -24.4% | -11.0% | -31.2% | +129.2% | -73.7% |
SLB leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
TXO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 21.9x trailing earnings, XOM trades at a 56% valuation discount to NOV's 49.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, TXO's 8.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SLB's 12.1x.
| Metric | TXOTXO Partners, L.P. | XOMExxon Mobil Corpo… | SLBSLB N.V. | HALHalliburton Compa… | NOVNOV Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $691M | $620.8B | $79.6B | $32.7B | $7.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $972M | $653.7B | $88.9B | $38.6B | $7.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -29.07x | 21.86x | 22.57x | 26.09x | 49.49x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 21.01x | 14.79x | 19.79x | 16.85x | 21.73x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 8.18x | 10.91x | 12.07x | 11.37x | 8.43x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.68x | 1.92x | 2.23x | 1.47x | 0.80x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.68x | 2.37x | 2.89x | 3.13x | 1.14x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 26.29x | 16.60x | 19.55x | 8.06x |
TXO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SLB leads this category, winning 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HAL delivers a 14.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $15 in annual profit, vs $-12 for TXO. XOM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.16x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HAL's 0.77x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HAL scores 5/9 vs XOM's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | TXOTXO Partners, L.P. | XOMExxon Mobil Corpo… | SLBSLB N.V. | HALHalliburton Compa… | NOVNOV Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -12.2% | +10.7% | +13.9% | +14.6% | +1.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -7.7% | +6.4% | +6.5% | +6.1% | +0.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +1.7% | +8.6% | +12.1% | +10.2% | +5.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.1% | +8.9% | +14.3% | +11.6% | +6.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.32x | 0.16x | 0.45x | 0.77x | 0.37x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $282M | $32.9B | $9.3B | $5.9B | $788M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $9M | $10.7B | $3.0B | $2.2B | $1.6B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $291M | $43.5B | $12.3B | $8.1B | $2.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -1.67x | 69.44x | 9.40x | 9.19x | 5.82x |
SLB leads this category, winning 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
XOM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in XOM five years ago would be worth $26,464 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,500 for TXO. Over the past 12 months, HAL leads with a +105.6% total return vs TXO's -16.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors XOM at 13.2% vs TXO's -5.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | TXOTXO Partners, L.P. | XOMExxon Mobil Corpo… | SLBSLB N.V. | HALHalliburton Compa… | NOVNOV Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +16.5% | +20.3% | +32.7% | +32.8% | +18.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -16.4% | +43.9% | +61.8% | +105.6% | +67.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -15.1% | +44.9% | +20.8% | +37.4% | +29.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -15.0% | +164.6% | +80.6% | +82.6% | +19.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -15.0% | +105.0% | -9.2% | +16.2% | -31.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -5.3% | +13.2% | +6.5% | +11.2% | +8.9% |
XOM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — XOM and SLB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
XOM is the less volatile stock with a -0.15 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NOV's 1.01 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SLB currently trades 92.7% from its 52-week high vs TXO's 69.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | TXOTXO Partners, L.P. | XOMExxon Mobil Corpo… | SLBSLB N.V. | HALHalliburton Compa… | NOVNOV Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.05x | -0.15x | 0.87x | 0.57x | 1.01x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $17.90 | $176.41 | $57.20 | $42.46 | $20.93 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $10.12 | $101.19 | $31.64 | $19.22 | $11.65 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +69.8% | +83.0% | +92.7% | +92.2% | +92.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 51.4 | 42.4 | 57.9 | 55.7 | 55.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 205K | 18.9M | 16.3M | 15.0M | 4.8M |
Evenly matched — XOM and SLB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — TXO and XOM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: TXO as "Strong Buy", XOM as "Hold", SLB as "Buy", HAL as "Buy", NOV as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 44.0% upside for TXO (target: $18) vs -5.2% for HAL (target: $37). For income investors, TXO offers the higher dividend yield at 16.30% vs HAL's 1.76%.
| Metric | TXOTXO Partners, L.P. | XOMExxon Mobil Corpo… | SLBSLB N.V. | HALHalliburton Compa… | NOVNOV Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Strong Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $18.00 | $160.43 | $56.95 | $37.08 | $19.38 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | 55 | 66 | 64 | 58 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +16.3% | +2.7% | +2.0% | +1.8% | +2.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 26 | 4 | 4 | 5 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $2.04 | $4.00 | $1.08 | $0.69 | $0.51 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +3.3% | +3.0% | +3.1% | +4.5% |
Evenly matched — TXO and XOM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
SLB leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). TXO leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
Best OverallSLB N.V. (SLB)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
TXO vs XOM vs SLB vs HAL vs NOV: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TXO or XOM or SLB or HAL or NOV a better buy right now?
For growth investors, TXO Partners, L.
P. (TXO) is the stronger pick with 45. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -4. 5% for Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM). Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) offers the better valuation at 21. 9x trailing P/E (14. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate TXO Partners, L. P. (TXO) a "Strong Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TXO or XOM or SLB or HAL or NOV?
On trailing P/E, Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) is the cheapest at 21.
9x versus NOV Inc. at 49. 5x. On forward P/E, Exxon Mobil Corporation is actually cheaper at 14. 8x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TXO or XOM or SLB or HAL or NOV?
Over the past 5 years, Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) delivered a total return of +164.
6%, compared to -15. 0% for TXO Partners, L. P. (TXO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: XOM returned +105. 0% versus NOV's -31. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TXO or XOM or SLB or HAL or NOV?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
15β versus NOV Inc. 's 1. 01β — meaning NOV is approximately -789% more volatile than XOM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 16% versus 77% for Halliburton Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TXO or XOM or SLB or HAL or NOV?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), TXO Partners, L.
P. (TXO) is pulling ahead at 45. 5% versus -4. 5% for Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Exxon Mobil Corporation grew EPS -14. 5% year-over-year, compared to -166. 2% for TXO Partners, L. P.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TXO leads at 18. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TXO or XOM or SLB or HAL or NOV?
SLB N.
V. (SLB) is the more profitable company, earning 9. 4% net margin versus -5. 3% for TXO Partners, L. P. — meaning it keeps 9. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SLB leads at 15. 3% versus 5. 4% for TXO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — XOM leads at 21. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TXO or XOM or SLB or HAL or NOV more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) trades at 14.
8x forward P/E versus 21. 7x for NOV Inc. — 6. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TXO: 44. 0% to $18. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — TXO or XOM or SLB or HAL or NOV?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
TXO Partners, L. P. (TXO) offers the highest yield at 16. 3%, versus 1. 8% for Halliburton Company (HAL).
09Is TXO or XOM or SLB or HAL or NOV better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
15), 2. 7% yield, +105. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (XOM: +105. 0%, NOV: -31. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TXO and XOM and SLB and HAL and NOV?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: TXO is a small-cap high-growth stock; XOM is a large-cap quality compounder stock; SLB is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; HAL is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; NOV is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
Revenue Growth>
%
(TXO: -66.5% · XOM: -1.3%)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.