Advertising Agencies
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
TZOO vs NFLX vs DIS vs TRIP vs CMCSA
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Entertainment
Entertainment
Travel Services
Telecommunications Services
TZOO vs NFLX vs DIS vs TRIP vs CMCSA — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Advertising Agencies | Entertainment | Entertainment | Travel Services | Telecommunications Services |
| Market Cap | $102M | $374.00B | $192.60B | $1.31B | $95.62B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $93M | $45.18B | $97.26B | $1.88B | $125.28B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $4M | $10.98B | $11.22B | $19M | $18.60B |
| Gross Margin | 79.4% | 48.5% | 37.2% | 66.2% | 61.7% |
| Operating Margin | 7.1% | 29.5% | 15.5% | 3.7% | 15.3% |
| Forward P/E | 13.4x | 24.8x | 16.5x | 7.7x | 7.4x |
| Total Debt | $10M | $14.46B | $44.88B | $1.24B | $110.44B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $10M | $9.03B | $5.70B | $1.03B | $9.48B |
TZOO vs NFLX vs DIS vs TRIP vs CMCSA — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Travelzoo (TZOO) | 100 | 152.6 | +52.6% |
| Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) | 100 | 210.3 | +110.3% |
| The Walt Disney Com… (DIS) | 100 | 92.7 | -7.3% |
| Tripadvisor, Inc. (TRIP) | 100 | 58.2 | -41.8% |
| Comcast Corporation (CMCSA) | 100 | 66.3 | -33.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TZOO vs NFLX vs DIS vs TRIP vs CMCSA
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TZOO lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
NFLX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 15.9%, EPS growth 27.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 12.6%
- 8.8% 10Y total return vs TZOO's 18.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.39, Low D/E 54.3%, current ratio 1.19x
- 15.9% revenue growth vs CMCSA's -0.0%
DIS ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +7.7% vs TZOO's -30.2%
Among these 5 stocks, TRIP doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
CMCSA is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and valuation efficiency is your priority.
- Dividend streak 18 yrs, beta 0.21, yield 5.1%
- PEG 0.40 vs NFLX's 0.75
- Beta 0.21, yield 5.1%, current ratio 0.88x
- Lower P/E (7.4x vs 7.7x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 15.9% revenue growth vs CMCSA's -0.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.4x vs 7.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 24.3% margin vs TRIP's 1.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.21 vs TRIP's 1.90, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 5.1% yield, 18-year raise streak, vs DIS's 0.9%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +7.7% vs TZOO's -30.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 19.8% ROA vs TRIP's 0.7%, ROIC 29.8% vs 7.4% |
TZOO vs NFLX vs DIS vs TRIP vs CMCSA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
TZOO vs NFLX vs DIS vs TRIP vs CMCSA — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
NFLX leads in 2 of 6 categories
CMCSA leads 2 • TZOO leads 1 • DIS leads 0 • TRIP leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NFLX leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CMCSA is the larger business by revenue, generating $125.3B annually — 1349.2x TZOO's $93M. NFLX is the more profitable business, keeping 24.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TRIP's 1.0%. On growth, NFLX holds the edge at +17.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $93M | $45.2B | $97.3B | $1.9B | $125.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $7M | $30.1B | $20.5B | $166M | $35.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $4M | $11.0B | $11.2B | $19M | $18.6B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $6M | $9.5B | $7.1B | $198M | $18.1B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +79.4% | +48.5% | +37.2% | +66.2% | +61.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +7.1% | +29.5% | +15.5% | +3.7% | +15.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +4.3% | +24.3% | +11.5% | +1.0% | +14.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +6.7% | +20.9% | +7.3% | +10.5% | +14.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +4.9% | +17.6% | +6.5% | -3.9% | +5.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -11.5% | +31.1% | -29.8% | -2.6% | -32.6% |
Valuation Metrics
CMCSA leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 4.9x trailing earnings, CMCSA trades at a 87% valuation discount to TRIP's 36.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), CMCSA offers better value at 0.26x vs NFLX's 1.06x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $102M | $374.0B | $192.6B | $1.3B | $95.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $102M | $379.4B | $231.8B | $1.5B | $196.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 22.78x | 34.89x | 15.87x | 36.23x | 4.87x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 13.42x | 24.80x | 16.53x | 7.66x | 7.44x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.06x | — | — | 0.26x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 14.19x | 12.61x | 12.10x | 8.77x | 5.33x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.11x | 8.28x | 2.04x | 0.69x | 0.77x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 14.32x | 1.72x | 2.28x | 0.98x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 18.25x | 39.53x | 19.11x | 8.02x | 4.37x |
Profitability & Efficiency
TZOO leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TZOO delivers a 4.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $5 in annual profit, vs $3 for TRIP. DIS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.39x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TRIP's 1.92x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), DIS scores 8/9 vs TZOO's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +4.9% | +41.3% | +9.8% | +2.9% | +19.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +8.5% | +19.8% | +5.6% | +0.7% | +6.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +29.8% | +6.9% | +7.4% | +8.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +47.2% | +30.5% | +8.5% | +4.5% | +8.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 7 | 8 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.54x | 0.39x | 1.92x | 1.13x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $172,000 | $5.4B | $39.2B | $202M | $101.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $10M | $9.0B | $5.7B | $1.0B | $9.5B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $10M | $14.5B | $44.9B | $1.2B | $110.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 17.33x | 9.95x | 4.17x | 6.84x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NFLX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NFLX five years ago would be worth $17,519 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,542 for TRIP. Over the past 12 months, DIS leads with a +7.7% total return vs TZOO's -30.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NFLX at 38.6% vs TRIP's -11.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +34.8% | -3.0% | -2.8% | -23.3% | -8.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -30.2% | -23.6% | +7.7% | -21.8% | -19.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +22.1% | +166.5% | +8.0% | -30.5% | -26.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -46.5% | +75.2% | -39.8% | -74.6% | -45.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +18.8% | +875.3% | +11.8% | -76.7% | +15.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +6.9% | +38.6% | +2.6% | -11.4% | -9.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — DIS and CMCSA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CMCSA is the less volatile stock with a 0.21 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TRIP's 1.90 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. DIS currently trades 87.2% from its 52-week high vs TRIP's 55.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.30x | 0.39x | 0.90x | 1.90x | 0.21x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $15.48 | $134.12 | $124.69 | $20.16 | $36.66 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $4.71 | $75.01 | $92.19 | $9.01 | $25.75 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +60.3% | +65.8% | +87.2% | +55.7% | +71.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 62.5 | 35.3 | 64.4 | 52.5 | 37.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 257K | 44.0M | 9.1M | 3.4M | 28.4M |
Analyst Outlook
CMCSA leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: TZOO as "Buy", NFLX as "Buy", DIS as "Buy", TRIP as "Hold", CMCSA as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 31.8% upside for NFLX (target: $116) vs 7.1% for TZOO (target: $10). For income investors, CMCSA offers the higher dividend yield at 5.13% vs DIS's 0.92%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $10.00 | $116.29 | $139.50 | $13.56 | $31.87 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | 99 | 63 | 56 | 60 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +0.9% | — | +5.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 1 | 1 | 18 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $1.00 | — | $1.35 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +12.8% | +2.4% | +1.8% | +39.9% | +7.5% |
NFLX leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). CMCSA leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
TZOO vs NFLX vs DIS vs TRIP vs CMCSA: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TZOO or NFLX or DIS or TRIP or CMCSA a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Netflix, Inc.
(NFLX) is the stronger pick with 15. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 0% for Comcast Corporation (CMCSA). Comcast Corporation (CMCSA) offers the better valuation at 4. 9x trailing P/E (7. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Travelzoo (TZOO) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TZOO or NFLX or DIS or TRIP or CMCSA?
On trailing P/E, Comcast Corporation (CMCSA) is the cheapest at 4.
9x versus Tripadvisor, Inc. at 36. 2x. On forward P/E, Comcast Corporation is actually cheaper at 7. 4x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Comcast Corporation wins at 0. 40x versus Netflix, Inc. 's 0. 75x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TZOO or NFLX or DIS or TRIP or CMCSA?
Over the past 5 years, Netflix, Inc.
(NFLX) delivered a total return of +75. 2%, compared to -74. 6% for Tripadvisor, Inc. (TRIP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NFLX returned +875. 3% versus TRIP's -76. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TZOO or NFLX or DIS or TRIP or CMCSA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Comcast Corporation (CMCSA) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
21β versus Tripadvisor, Inc. 's 1. 90β — meaning TRIP is approximately 809% more volatile than CMCSA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, The Walt Disney Company (DIS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 39% versus 192% for Tripadvisor, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TZOO or NFLX or DIS or TRIP or CMCSA?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Netflix, Inc.
(NFLX) is pulling ahead at 15. 9% versus -0. 0% for Comcast Corporation (CMCSA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Tripadvisor, Inc. grew EPS 798. 6% year-over-year, compared to -61. 3% for Travelzoo. Over a 3-year CAGR, NFLX leads at 12. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TZOO or NFLX or DIS or TRIP or CMCSA?
Netflix, Inc.
(NFLX) is the more profitable company, earning 24. 3% net margin versus 2. 1% for Tripadvisor, Inc. — meaning it keeps 24. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NFLX leads at 29. 5% versus 4. 2% for TRIP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TZOO leads at 80. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TZOO or NFLX or DIS or TRIP or CMCSA more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Comcast Corporation (CMCSA) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 40x versus Netflix, Inc. 's 0. 75x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Comcast Corporation (CMCSA) trades at 7. 4x forward P/E versus 24. 8x for Netflix, Inc. — 17. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NFLX: 31. 8% to $116. 29.
08Which pays a better dividend — TZOO or NFLX or DIS or TRIP or CMCSA?
In this comparison, CMCSA (5.
1% yield), DIS (0. 9% yield) pay a dividend. TZOO, NFLX, TRIP do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is TZOO or NFLX or DIS or TRIP or CMCSA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Comcast Corporation (CMCSA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
21), 5. 1% yield). Tripadvisor, Inc. (TRIP) carries a higher beta of 1. 90 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CMCSA: +15. 4%, TRIP: -76. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TZOO and NFLX and DIS and TRIP and CMCSA?
These companies operate in different sectors (TZOO (Communication Services) and NFLX (Communication Services) and DIS (Communication Services) and TRIP (Consumer Cyclical) and CMCSA (Communication Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: TZOO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NFLX is a large-cap high-growth stock; DIS is a mid-cap deep-value stock; TRIP is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CMCSA is a mid-cap deep-value stock. DIS, CMCSA pay a dividend while TZOO, NFLX, TRIP do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.