Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

TZOO vs NFLX vs DIS vs TRIP vs CMCSA

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
TZOO
Travelzoo

Advertising Agencies

Communication ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$102M
5Y Perf.+52.6%
NFLX
Netflix, Inc.

Entertainment

Communication ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$374.00B
5Y Perf.+110.3%
DIS
The Walt Disney Company

Entertainment

Communication ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$192.60B
5Y Perf.-7.3%
TRIP
Tripadvisor, Inc.

Travel Services

Consumer CyclicalNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.31B
5Y Perf.-41.8%
CMCSA
Comcast Corporation

Telecommunications Services

Communication ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$95.62B
5Y Perf.-33.7%

TZOO vs NFLX vs DIS vs TRIP vs CMCSA — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
TZOO logoTZOO
NFLX logoNFLX
DIS logoDIS
TRIP logoTRIP
CMCSA logoCMCSA
IndustryAdvertising AgenciesEntertainmentEntertainmentTravel ServicesTelecommunications Services
Market Cap$102M$374.00B$192.60B$1.31B$95.62B
Revenue (TTM)$93M$45.18B$97.26B$1.88B$125.28B
Net Income (TTM)$4M$10.98B$11.22B$19M$18.60B
Gross Margin79.4%48.5%37.2%66.2%61.7%
Operating Margin7.1%29.5%15.5%3.7%15.3%
Forward P/E13.4x24.8x16.5x7.7x7.4x
Total Debt$10M$14.46B$44.88B$1.24B$110.44B
Cash & Equiv.$10M$9.03B$5.70B$1.03B$9.48B

TZOO vs NFLX vs DIS vs TRIP vs CMCSALong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

TZOO
NFLX
DIS
TRIP
CMCSA
StockMay 20May 26Return
Travelzoo (TZOO)100152.6+52.6%
Netflix, Inc. (NFLX)100210.3+110.3%
The Walt Disney Com… (DIS)10092.7-7.3%
Tripadvisor, Inc. (TRIP)10058.2-41.8%
Comcast Corporation (CMCSA)10066.3-33.7%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: TZOO vs NFLX vs DIS vs TRIP vs CMCSA

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: NFLX and CMCSA are tied at the top with 3 categories each (5-stock set) — the right choice depends on your priorities. Comcast Corporation is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and capital preservation and lower volatility. DIS also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
TZOO
Travelzoo
The Value Angle

TZOO lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: communication services exposure
NFLX
Netflix, Inc.
The Growth Play

NFLX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 15.9%, EPS growth 27.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 12.6%
  • 8.8% 10Y total return vs TZOO's 18.8%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.39, Low D/E 54.3%, current ratio 1.19x
  • 15.9% revenue growth vs CMCSA's -0.0%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
DIS
The Walt Disney Company
The Momentum Pick

DIS ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.

  • +7.7% vs TZOO's -30.2%
Best for: momentum
TRIP
Tripadvisor, Inc.
The Value Angle

Among these 5 stocks, TRIP doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: consumer cyclical exposure
CMCSA
Comcast Corporation
The Income Pick

CMCSA is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and valuation efficiency is your priority.

  • Dividend streak 18 yrs, beta 0.21, yield 5.1%
  • PEG 0.40 vs NFLX's 0.75
  • Beta 0.21, yield 5.1%, current ratio 0.88x
  • Lower P/E (7.4x vs 7.7x)
Best for: income & stability and valuation efficiency
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthNFLX logoNFLX15.9% revenue growth vs CMCSA's -0.0%
ValueCMCSA logoCMCSALower P/E (7.4x vs 7.7x)
Quality / MarginsNFLX logoNFLX24.3% margin vs TRIP's 1.0%
Stability / SafetyCMCSA logoCMCSABeta 0.21 vs TRIP's 1.90, lower leverage
DividendsCMCSA logoCMCSA5.1% yield, 18-year raise streak, vs DIS's 0.9%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)DIS logoDIS+7.7% vs TZOO's -30.2%
Efficiency (ROA)NFLX logoNFLX19.8% ROA vs TRIP's 0.7%, ROIC 29.8% vs 7.4%

TZOO vs NFLX vs DIS vs TRIP vs CMCSA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

TZOOTravelzoo
FY 2025
JFC Travel Group Co.
100.0%$6M
NFLXNetflix, Inc.
FY 2024
Streaming
100.0%$39.0B
DISThe Walt Disney Company
FY 2025
Admission
20.7%$11.7B
Advertising
19.6%$11.1B
Retail and wholesale sales of merchandise, food and beverage
17.0%$9.6B
Resort and vacations
16.3%$9.2B
Other Revenue
8.3%$4.7B
License
6.8%$3.9B
TV/SVOD distribution licensing
6.7%$3.8B
Other (1)
4.6%$2.6B
TRIPTripadvisor, Inc.
FY 2024
Other Operating Segment
100.0%$45M
CMCSAComcast Corporation
FY 2025
Residential Connectivity And Platforms Segment
57.2%$70.7B
Media Segment
21.9%$27.1B
Studios Segment
9.1%$11.3B
Business Services Connectivity Segment
8.3%$10.2B
Theme Parks
8.0%$9.8B
Corporate and Other
2.5%$3.1B
Intersegment Eliminations
-6.9%$-8,535,000,000

TZOO vs NFLX vs DIS vs TRIP vs CMCSA — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLNFLXLAGGINGTRIP

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

NFLX leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

CMCSA is the larger business by revenue, generating $125.3B annually — 1349.2x TZOO's $93M. NFLX is the more profitable business, keeping 24.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TRIP's 1.0%. On growth, NFLX holds the edge at +17.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricTZOO logoTZOOTravelzooNFLX logoNFLXNetflix, Inc.DIS logoDISThe Walt Disney C…TRIP logoTRIPTripadvisor, Inc.CMCSA logoCMCSAComcast Corporati…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$93M$45.2B$97.3B$1.9B$125.3B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$7M$30.1B$20.5B$166M$35.4B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$4M$11.0B$11.2B$19M$18.6B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$6M$9.5B$7.1B$198M$18.1B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+79.4%+48.5%+37.2%+66.2%+61.7%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+7.1%+29.5%+15.5%+3.7%+15.3%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+4.3%+24.3%+11.5%+1.0%+14.8%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+6.7%+20.9%+7.3%+10.5%+14.5%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+4.9%+17.6%+6.5%-3.9%+5.3%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-11.5%+31.1%-29.8%-2.6%-32.6%
NFLX leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

CMCSA leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 4.9x trailing earnings, CMCSA trades at a 87% valuation discount to TRIP's 36.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), CMCSA offers better value at 0.26x vs NFLX's 1.06x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricTZOO logoTZOOTravelzooNFLX logoNFLXNetflix, Inc.DIS logoDISThe Walt Disney C…TRIP logoTRIPTripadvisor, Inc.CMCSA logoCMCSAComcast Corporati…
Market CapShares × price$102M$374.0B$192.6B$1.3B$95.6B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$102M$379.4B$231.8B$1.5B$196.6B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS22.78x34.89x15.87x36.23x4.87x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.13.42x24.80x16.53x7.66x7.44x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.06x0.26x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple14.19x12.61x12.10x8.77x5.33x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue1.11x8.28x2.04x0.69x0.77x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share14.32x1.72x2.28x0.98x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF18.25x39.53x19.11x8.02x4.37x
CMCSA leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

TZOO leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

TZOO delivers a 4.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $5 in annual profit, vs $3 for TRIP. DIS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.39x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TRIP's 1.92x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), DIS scores 8/9 vs TZOO's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricTZOO logoTZOOTravelzooNFLX logoNFLXNetflix, Inc.DIS logoDISThe Walt Disney C…TRIP logoTRIPTripadvisor, Inc.CMCSA logoCMCSAComcast Corporati…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+4.9%+41.3%+9.8%+2.9%+19.5%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+8.5%+19.8%+5.6%+0.7%+6.9%
ROICReturn on invested capital+29.8%+6.9%+7.4%+8.2%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+47.2%+30.5%+8.5%+4.5%+8.9%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–957867
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.54x0.39x1.92x1.13x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$172,000$5.4B$39.2B$202M$101.0B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$10M$9.0B$5.7B$1.0B$9.5B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$10M$14.5B$44.9B$1.2B$110.4B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense17.33x9.95x4.17x6.84x
TZOO leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

NFLX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in NFLX five years ago would be worth $17,519 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,542 for TRIP. Over the past 12 months, DIS leads with a +7.7% total return vs TZOO's -30.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NFLX at 38.6% vs TRIP's -11.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricTZOO logoTZOOTravelzooNFLX logoNFLXNetflix, Inc.DIS logoDISThe Walt Disney C…TRIP logoTRIPTripadvisor, Inc.CMCSA logoCMCSAComcast Corporati…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+34.8%-3.0%-2.8%-23.3%-8.9%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-30.2%-23.6%+7.7%-21.8%-19.9%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+22.1%+166.5%+8.0%-30.5%-26.4%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-46.5%+75.2%-39.8%-74.6%-45.2%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+18.8%+875.3%+11.8%-76.7%+15.4%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+6.9%+38.6%+2.6%-11.4%-9.7%
NFLX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — DIS and CMCSA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

CMCSA is the less volatile stock with a 0.21 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TRIP's 1.90 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. DIS currently trades 87.2% from its 52-week high vs TRIP's 55.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricTZOO logoTZOOTravelzooNFLX logoNFLXNetflix, Inc.DIS logoDISThe Walt Disney C…TRIP logoTRIPTripadvisor, Inc.CMCSA logoCMCSAComcast Corporati…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.30x0.39x0.90x1.90x0.21x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$15.48$134.12$124.69$20.16$36.66
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$4.71$75.01$92.19$9.01$25.75
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+60.3%+65.8%+87.2%+55.7%+71.6%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10062.535.364.452.537.8
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded257K44.0M9.1M3.4M28.4M
Evenly matched — DIS and CMCSA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

CMCSA leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: TZOO as "Buy", NFLX as "Buy", DIS as "Buy", TRIP as "Hold", CMCSA as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 31.8% upside for NFLX (target: $116) vs 7.1% for TZOO (target: $10). For income investors, CMCSA offers the higher dividend yield at 5.13% vs DIS's 0.92%.

MetricTZOO logoTZOOTravelzooNFLX logoNFLXNetflix, Inc.DIS logoDISThe Walt Disney C…TRIP logoTRIPTripadvisor, Inc.CMCSA logoCMCSAComcast Corporati…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$10.00$116.29$139.50$13.56$31.87
# AnalystsCovering analysts599635660
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.9%+5.1%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises1118
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$1.00$1.35
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+12.8%+2.4%+1.8%+39.9%+7.5%
CMCSA leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

NFLX leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). CMCSA leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.

Best OverallNetflix, Inc. (NFLX)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

TZOO vs NFLX vs DIS vs TRIP vs CMCSA: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is TZOO or NFLX or DIS or TRIP or CMCSA a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Netflix, Inc.

(NFLX) is the stronger pick with 15. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 0% for Comcast Corporation (CMCSA). Comcast Corporation (CMCSA) offers the better valuation at 4. 9x trailing P/E (7. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Travelzoo (TZOO) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — TZOO or NFLX or DIS or TRIP or CMCSA?

On trailing P/E, Comcast Corporation (CMCSA) is the cheapest at 4.

9x versus Tripadvisor, Inc. at 36. 2x. On forward P/E, Comcast Corporation is actually cheaper at 7. 4x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Comcast Corporation wins at 0. 40x versus Netflix, Inc. 's 0. 75x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — TZOO or NFLX or DIS or TRIP or CMCSA?

Over the past 5 years, Netflix, Inc.

(NFLX) delivered a total return of +75. 2%, compared to -74. 6% for Tripadvisor, Inc. (TRIP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NFLX returned +875. 3% versus TRIP's -76. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — TZOO or NFLX or DIS or TRIP or CMCSA?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Comcast Corporation (CMCSA) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

21β versus Tripadvisor, Inc. 's 1. 90β — meaning TRIP is approximately 809% more volatile than CMCSA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, The Walt Disney Company (DIS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 39% versus 192% for Tripadvisor, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — TZOO or NFLX or DIS or TRIP or CMCSA?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Netflix, Inc.

(NFLX) is pulling ahead at 15. 9% versus -0. 0% for Comcast Corporation (CMCSA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Tripadvisor, Inc. grew EPS 798. 6% year-over-year, compared to -61. 3% for Travelzoo. Over a 3-year CAGR, NFLX leads at 12. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — TZOO or NFLX or DIS or TRIP or CMCSA?

Netflix, Inc.

(NFLX) is the more profitable company, earning 24. 3% net margin versus 2. 1% for Tripadvisor, Inc. — meaning it keeps 24. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NFLX leads at 29. 5% versus 4. 2% for TRIP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TZOO leads at 80. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is TZOO or NFLX or DIS or TRIP or CMCSA more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Comcast Corporation (CMCSA) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 40x versus Netflix, Inc. 's 0. 75x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Comcast Corporation (CMCSA) trades at 7. 4x forward P/E versus 24. 8x for Netflix, Inc. — 17. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NFLX: 31. 8% to $116. 29.

08

Which pays a better dividend — TZOO or NFLX or DIS or TRIP or CMCSA?

In this comparison, CMCSA (5.

1% yield), DIS (0. 9% yield) pay a dividend. TZOO, NFLX, TRIP do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is TZOO or NFLX or DIS or TRIP or CMCSA better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Comcast Corporation (CMCSA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

21), 5. 1% yield). Tripadvisor, Inc. (TRIP) carries a higher beta of 1. 90 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CMCSA: +15. 4%, TRIP: -76. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between TZOO and NFLX and DIS and TRIP and CMCSA?

These companies operate in different sectors (TZOO (Communication Services) and NFLX (Communication Services) and DIS (Communication Services) and TRIP (Consumer Cyclical) and CMCSA (Communication Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: TZOO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NFLX is a large-cap high-growth stock; DIS is a mid-cap deep-value stock; TRIP is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CMCSA is a mid-cap deep-value stock. DIS, CMCSA pay a dividend while TZOO, NFLX, TRIP do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

TZOO

Quality Business

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 47%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

NFLX

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 8%
  • Net Margin > 14%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

DIS

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 6%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

TRIP

Quality Business

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 39%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CMCSA

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 8%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform TZOO and NFLX and DIS and TRIP and CMCSA on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(TZOO: 4.9% · NFLX: 17.6%)
Net Margin>
%
(TZOO: 4.3% · NFLX: 24.3%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(TZOO: 22.8x · NFLX: 34.9x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.