Software - Application
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
UBER vs ABNB vs BKNG vs LYFT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Travel Services
Travel Services
Software - Application
UBER vs ABNB vs BKNG vs LYFT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Travel Services | Travel Services | Software - Application |
| Market Cap | $162.94B | $85.05B | $130.43B | $5.70B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $53.69B | $11.94B | $27.69B | $6.32B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $8.54B | $2.63B | $6.15B | $2.84B |
| Gross Margin | 41.0% | 83.0% | 100.0% | 41.5% |
| Operating Margin | 11.7% | 22.6% | 34.3% | -3.0% |
| Forward P/E | 23.5x | 28.2x | 16.0x | 23.9x |
| Total Debt | $13.47B | $2.00B | $19.29B | $1.35B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $7.74B | $6.56B | $17.20B | $1.84B |
UBER vs ABNB vs BKNG vs LYFT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Dec 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Uber Technologies, … (UBER) | 100 | 155.2 | +55.2% |
| Airbnb, Inc. (ABNB) | 100 | 95.3 | -4.7% |
| Booking Holdings In… (BKNG) | 100 | 188.9 | +88.9% |
| Lyft, Inc. (LYFT) | 100 | 29.0 | -71.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: UBER vs ABNB vs BKNG vs LYFT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
UBER is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 18.3%, EPS growth 3.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 17.7%
- 18.3% revenue growth vs LYFT's 9.2%
ABNB is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +15.0% vs BKNG's -17.7%
BKNG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.74, yield 0.9%
- 243.4% 10Y total return vs UBER's 90.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.74, current ratio 1.33x
- Beta 0.74, yield 0.9%, current ratio 1.33x
LYFT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and efficiency is your priority.
- 45.0% margin vs UBER's 15.9%
- 31.5% ROA vs ABNB's 11.4%, ROIC -7.1% vs 51.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 18.3% revenue growth vs LYFT's 9.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (16.0x vs 28.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 45.0% margin vs UBER's 15.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.74 vs ABNB's 1.33 | |
| Dividends | 0.9% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +15.0% vs BKNG's -17.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 31.5% ROA vs ABNB's 11.4%, ROIC -7.1% vs 51.0% |
UBER vs ABNB vs BKNG vs LYFT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
UBER vs ABNB vs BKNG vs LYFT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
LYFT leads in 2 of 6 categories
BKNG leads 1 • UBER leads 0 • ABNB leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BKNG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
UBER is the larger business by revenue, generating $53.7B annually — 8.5x LYFT's $6.3B. LYFT is the more profitable business, keeping 45.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to UBER's 15.9%. On growth, BKNG holds the edge at +16.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $53.7B | $11.9B | $27.7B | $6.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $7.0B | $2.8B | $10.2B | -$57M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $8.5B | $2.6B | $6.2B | $2.8B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $9.8B | $4.6B | $9.0B | $1.1B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +41.0% | +83.0% | +100.0% | +41.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +11.7% | +22.6% | +34.3% | -3.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +15.9% | +22.0% | +22.2% | +45.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +18.3% | +38.2% | +32.6% | +18.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +14.5% | +9.7% | +16.2% | +2.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -84.3% | +3.8% | +2.4% | -100.0% |
Valuation Metrics
LYFT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 2.1x trailing earnings, LYFT trades at a 94% valuation discount to ABNB's 34.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, BKNG's 13.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ABNB's 31.6x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $162.9B | $85.0B | $130.4B | $5.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $168.7B | $80.5B | $132.5B | $5.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 16.74x | 34.71x | 25.43x | 2.09x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 23.50x | 28.23x | 16.04x | 23.87x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.16x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 26.72x | 31.64x | 13.19x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.13x | 6.95x | 4.85x | 0.90x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 5.98x | 10.63x | — | 1.82x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 16.69x | 18.31x | 14.35x | 5.11x |
Profitability & Efficiency
LYFT leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
LYFT delivers a 86.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $87 in annual profit, vs $31 for ABNB. ABNB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.24x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to UBER's 0.48x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), UBER scores 7/9 vs LYFT's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +32.1% | +30.6% | — | +86.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +14.2% | +11.4% | +21.1% | +31.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +13.6% | +51.0% | — | -7.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +12.5% | +26.3% | +75.4% | -6.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 6 | 6 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.48x | 0.24x | — | 0.41x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $5.7B | -$4.6B | $2.1B | -$1.6B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $7.7B | $6.6B | $17.2B | $1.8B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $13.5B | $2.0B | $19.3B | $1.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 20.93x | — | 7.21x | 80.43x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — UBER and ABNB and BKNG each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BKNG five years ago would be worth $18,830 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,857 for LYFT. Over the past 12 months, ABNB leads with a +15.0% total return vs BKNG's -17.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors UBER at 26.8% vs ABNB's 3.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -4.5% | +5.2% | -20.8% | -28.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -7.8% | +15.0% | -17.7% | +10.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +103.9% | +11.3% | +62.6% | +66.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +69.7% | -9.0% | +88.3% | -71.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +90.4% | -3.3% | +243.4% | -81.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +26.8% | +3.6% | +17.6% | +18.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ABNB and BKNG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BKNG is the less volatile stock with a 0.74 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ABNB's 1.33 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ABNB currently trades 95.0% from its 52-week high vs BKNG's 3.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.09x | 1.33x | 0.74x | 1.29x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $101.99 | $147.25 | $5129.83 | $25.54 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $68.46 | $110.81 | $150.62 | $12.31 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +77.6% | +95.0% | +3.3% | +55.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 44.7 | 55.9 | 41.5 | 50.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 15.8M | 3.5M | 8.9M | 15.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: UBER as "Buy", ABNB as "Hold", BKNG as "Buy", LYFT as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 37.7% upside for BKNG (target: $232) vs 4.0% for ABNB (target: $145). BKNG is the only dividend payer here at 0.91% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $104.88 | $145.44 | $231.72 | $19.21 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 61 | 44 | 71 | 59 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +0.9% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 2 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $1.53 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +4.0% | 0.0% | +4.9% | +8.8% |
LYFT leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). BKNG leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.
UBER vs ABNB vs BKNG vs LYFT: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is UBER or ABNB or BKNG or LYFT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Uber Technologies, Inc.
(UBER) is the stronger pick with 18. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 9. 2% for Lyft, Inc. (LYFT). Lyft, Inc. (LYFT) offers the better valuation at 2. 1x trailing P/E (23. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Uber Technologies, Inc. (UBER) a "Buy" — based on 61 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — UBER or ABNB or BKNG or LYFT?
On trailing P/E, Lyft, Inc.
(LYFT) is the cheapest at 2. 1x versus Airbnb, Inc. at 34. 7x. On forward P/E, Booking Holdings Inc. is actually cheaper at 16. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — UBER or ABNB or BKNG or LYFT?
Over the past 5 years, Booking Holdings Inc.
(BKNG) delivered a total return of +88. 3%, compared to -71. 4% for Lyft, Inc. (LYFT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BKNG returned +243. 4% versus LYFT's -81. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — UBER or ABNB or BKNG or LYFT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Booking Holdings Inc.
(BKNG) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 74β versus Airbnb, Inc. 's 1. 33β — meaning ABNB is approximately 79% more volatile than BKNG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Airbnb, Inc. (ABNB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 24% versus 48% for Uber Technologies, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — UBER or ABNB or BKNG or LYFT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Uber Technologies, Inc.
(UBER) is pulling ahead at 18. 3% versus 9. 2% for Lyft, Inc. (LYFT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Lyft, Inc. grew EPS 122. 6% year-over-year, compared to -4. 2% for Booking Holdings Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, UBER leads at 17. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — UBER or ABNB or BKNG or LYFT?
Lyft, Inc.
(LYFT) is the more profitable company, earning 45. 0% net margin versus 19. 3% for Uber Technologies, Inc. — meaning it keeps 45. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BKNG leads at 34. 5% versus -3. 0% for LYFT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BKNG leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is UBER or ABNB or BKNG or LYFT more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Booking Holdings Inc.
(BKNG) trades at 16. 0x forward P/E versus 28. 2x for Airbnb, Inc. — 12. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BKNG: 37. 7% to $231. 72.
08Which pays a better dividend — UBER or ABNB or BKNG or LYFT?
In this comparison, BKNG (0.
9% yield) pays a dividend. UBER, ABNB, LYFT do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is UBER or ABNB or BKNG or LYFT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Booking Holdings Inc.
(BKNG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 74), 0. 9% yield, +243. 4% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (BKNG: +243. 4%, LYFT: -81. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between UBER and ABNB and BKNG and LYFT?
These companies operate in different sectors (UBER (Technology) and ABNB (Consumer Cyclical) and BKNG (Consumer Cyclical) and LYFT (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: UBER is a mid-cap high-growth stock; ABNB is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; BKNG is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; LYFT is a small-cap deep-value stock. BKNG pays a dividend while UBER, ABNB, LYFT do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.