Financial - Capital Markets
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
UCFIW vs GFAI vs BYFC vs HFBL vs BRCC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Security & Protection Services
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Packaged Foods
UCFIW vs GFAI vs BYFC vs HFBL vs BRCC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Financial - Capital Markets | Security & Protection Services | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Packaged Foods |
| Market Cap | — | $10M | $93M | $60M | $150M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $11M | $72M | $63M | $32M | $418M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $4M | $-24M | $-25M | $5M | $-9M |
| Gross Margin | 66.5% | 15.1% | 51.9% | 63.9% | 33.9% |
| Operating Margin | 48.8% | -27.4% | -38.8% | 14.4% | -4.3% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | — | 15.4x | — |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $3M | $153M | $4M | $30M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $41M | $22M | $11M | $16M | $4M |
UCFIW vs GFAI vs BYFC vs HFBL vs BRCC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Guardforce AI Co., … (GFAI) | 100 | 0.5 | -99.5% |
| Broadway Financial … (BYFC) | 100 | 51.6 | -48.4% |
| Home Federal Bancor… (HFBL) | 100 | 112.4 | +12.4% |
| BRC Inc. (BRCC) | 100 | 13.1 | -86.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: UCFIW vs GFAI vs BYFC vs HFBL vs BRCC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
UCFIW is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and efficiency is your priority.
- 35.2% margin vs BYFC's -39.3%
- 7.9% ROA vs GFAI's -50.2%, ROIC 38.4% vs -41.6%
Among these 5 stocks, GFAI doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
BYFC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.01, yield 3.5%
- Beta 0.01, yield 3.5%, current ratio 0.03x
- Better valuation composite
- Beta 0.01 vs GFAI's 2.36
HFBL ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 108.3% 10Y total return vs UCFIW's 27.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.24, Low D/E 7.2%, current ratio 0.10x
- NIM 3.1% vs UCFIW's 0.1%
- +53.5% vs GFAI's -58.2%
BRCC is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 1.7%, EPS growth -213.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 9.7%
- 1.7% revenue growth vs BYFC's -3.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 1.7% revenue growth vs BYFC's -3.8% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 35.2% margin vs BYFC's -39.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.01 vs GFAI's 2.36 | |
| Dividends | 3.5% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs HFBL's 2.7%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +53.5% vs GFAI's -58.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 7.9% ROA vs GFAI's -50.2%, ROIC 38.4% vs -41.6% |
UCFIW vs GFAI vs BYFC vs HFBL vs BRCC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
UCFIW vs GFAI vs BYFC vs HFBL vs BRCC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
UCFIW leads in 2 of 6 categories
GFAI leads 1 • BYFC leads 1 • HFBL leads 0 • BRCC leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
UCFIW leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BRCC is the larger business by revenue, generating $418M annually — 36.8x UCFIW's $11M. UCFIW is the more profitable business, keeping 35.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BYFC's -39.3%. On growth, BRCC holds the edge at +21.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $11M | $72M | $63M | $32M | $418M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | — | -$12M | -$24M | $8M | -$6M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | — | -$24M | -$25M | $5M | -$9M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | — | -$6M | -$13,000 | $8M | -$2M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +66.5% | +15.1% | +51.9% | +63.9% | +33.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +48.8% | -27.4% | -38.8% | +14.4% | -4.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +35.2% | -32.9% | -39.3% | +12.0% | -2.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +3.7% | -8.8% | -0.0% | +16.8% | -0.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +3.6% | — | — | +21.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +38.9% | -46.8% | +63.6% | +101.1% |
Valuation Metrics
GFAI leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | — | $10M | $93M | $60M | $150M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | — | -$9M | $235M | $48M | $176M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | — | -0.87x | -3.08x | 15.43x | -9.92x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 4.64x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | 7.90x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 0.28x | 1.47x | 1.85x | 0.38x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 0.16x | 0.33x | 1.09x | 1.81x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | 11.02x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
UCFIW leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
UCFIW delivers a 37.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $37 in annual profit, vs $-70 for GFAI. HFBL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.07x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BYFC's 0.58x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HFBL scores 8/9 vs BRCC's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +37.0% | -69.7% | -9.1% | +9.3% | -14.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +7.9% | -50.2% | -1.9% | +0.8% | -4.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +38.4% | -41.6% | -3.7% | +5.9% | -15.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +51.3% | -19.1% | -5.6% | +8.0% | -17.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 6 | 5 | 8 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.08x | 0.58x | 0.07x | 0.44x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$41M | -$19M | $142M | -$12M | $25M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $41M | $22M | $11M | $16M | $4M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $3M | $153M | $4M | $30M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -167.24x | -0.87x | 0.61x | -2.80x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — BYFC and HFBL each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HFBL five years ago would be worth $13,261 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $45 for GFAI. Over the past 12 months, HFBL leads with a +53.5% total return vs GFAI's -58.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BYFC at 9.4% vs GFAI's -55.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | — | -28.2% | +30.7% | +10.7% | +15.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +27.8% | -58.2% | +52.6% | +53.5% | -27.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +27.8% | -91.1% | +30.9% | +24.2% | -74.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +27.8% | -99.5% | -39.3% | +32.6% | -86.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +27.8% | -99.5% | -35.2% | +108.3% | -86.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +8.5% | -55.4% | +9.4% | +7.5% | -36.5% |
Risk & Volatility
BYFC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BYFC is the less volatile stock with a 0.01 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GFAI's 2.36 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BYFC currently trades 98.0% from its 52-week high vs GFAI's 30.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | — | 2.36x | 0.01x | 0.24x | 1.65x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $0.16 | $1.50 | $10.15 | $20.71 | $2.10 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.06 | $0.38 | $5.60 | $12.32 | $0.60 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +56.3% | +30.7% | +98.0% | +93.9% | +61.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | — | 45.9 | 80.7 | 59.2 | 68.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 148K | 305K | 3K | 2K | 753K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — BYFC and HFBL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
For income investors, BYFC offers the higher dividend yield at 3.50% vs HFBL's 2.71%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — | — | — | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | — | — | $2.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — | — | — | 11 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +3.5% | +2.7% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 2 | 11 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $0.35 | $0.53 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | — | 0.0% | 0.0% | +1.8% | 0.0% |
UCFIW leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). GFAI leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
UCFIW vs GFAI vs BYFC vs HFBL vs BRCC: Key Questions Answered
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is UCFIW or GFAI or BYFC or HFBL or BRCC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, BRC Inc.
(BRCC) is the stronger pick with 1. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 8% for Broadway Financial Corporation (BYFC). Home Federal Bancorp, Inc. of Louisiana (HFBL) offers the better valuation at 15. 4x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate BRC Inc. (BRCC) a "Hold" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — UCFIW or GFAI or BYFC or HFBL or BRCC?
Over the past 5 years, Home Federal Bancorp, Inc.
of Louisiana (HFBL) delivered a total return of +32. 6%, compared to -99. 5% for Guardforce AI Co. , Limited (GFAI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HFBL returned +108. 3% versus GFAI's -99. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — UCFIW or GFAI or BYFC or HFBL or BRCC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Broadway Financial Corporation (BYFC) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
01β versus Guardforce AI Co. , Limited's 2. 36β — meaning GFAI is approximately 28361% more volatile than BYFC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Home Federal Bancorp, Inc. of Louisiana (HFBL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 7% versus 58% for Broadway Financial Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — UCFIW or GFAI or BYFC or HFBL or BRCC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), BRC Inc.
(BRCC) is pulling ahead at 1. 7% versus -3. 8% for Broadway Financial Corporation (BYFC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Guardforce AI Co. , Limited grew EPS 88. 3% year-over-year, compared to -81. 8% for Broadway Financial Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, BRCC leads at 9. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — UCFIW or GFAI or BYFC or HFBL or BRCC?
CN Healthy Food Tech Group Corp.
(UCFIW) is the more profitable company, earning 35. 2% net margin versus -39. 3% for Broadway Financial Corporation — meaning it keeps 35. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: UCFIW leads at 48. 8% versus -38. 8% for BYFC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — UCFIW leads at 66. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — UCFIW or GFAI or BYFC or HFBL or BRCC?
In this comparison, BYFC (3.
5% yield), HFBL (2. 7% yield) pay a dividend. UCFIW, GFAI, BRCC do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is UCFIW or GFAI or BYFC or HFBL or BRCC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Broadway Financial Corporation (BYFC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
01), 3. 5% yield). Guardforce AI Co. , Limited (GFAI) carries a higher beta of 2. 36 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (BYFC: -35. 2%, GFAI: -99. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between UCFIW and GFAI and BYFC and HFBL and BRCC?
These companies operate in different sectors (UCFIW (Financial Services) and GFAI (Industrials) and BYFC (Financial Services) and HFBL (Financial Services) and BRCC (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: UCFIW is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GFAI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BYFC is a small-cap income-oriented stock; HFBL is a small-cap deep-value stock; BRCC is a small-cap quality compounder stock. BYFC, HFBL pay a dividend while UCFIW, GFAI, BRCC do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.