UOKA vs DOUG vs COMP vs HOUS

For growth investors, Compass, Inc.

(COMP) is the stronger pick with 23. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -66. 6% for MDJM Ltd (UOKA). Douglas Elliman Inc. (DOUG) offers the better valuation at 12. 2x trailing P/E (20. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Douglas Elliman Inc. (DOUG) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On forward P/E, Douglas Elliman Inc.

is actually cheaper at 20. 7x.

Over the past 5 years, Anywhere Real Estate Inc.

(HOUS) delivered a total return of -1. 7%, compared to -100. 0% for MDJM Ltd (UOKA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HOUS returned -33. 9% versus UOKA's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Compass, Inc.

(COMP) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 79β versus MDJM Ltd's 2. 28β — meaning UOKA is approximately 27% more volatile than COMP relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Douglas Elliman Inc. (DOUG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 56% versus 195% for Anywhere Real Estate Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Compass, Inc.

(COMP) is pulling ahead at 23. 7% versus -66. 6% for MDJM Ltd (UOKA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Douglas Elliman Inc. grew EPS 118. 7% year-over-year, compared to -117. 1% for MDJM Ltd. Over a 3-year CAGR, COMP leads at 5. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Douglas Elliman Inc.

(DOUG) is the more profitable company, earning 1. 5% net margin versus -65. 9% for MDJM Ltd — meaning it keeps 1. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HOUS leads at 1. 1% versus -57. 7% for UOKA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — UOKA leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, Douglas Elliman Inc.

(DOUG) trades at 20. 7x forward P/E versus 53. 5x for Compass, Inc. — 32. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for COMP: 63. 3% to $14. 29.

In this comparison, HOUS (0.

2% yield) pays a dividend. UOKA, DOUG, COMP do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Compass, Inc.

(COMP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding. MDJM Ltd (UOKA) carries a higher beta of 2. 28 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (COMP: -56. 6%, UOKA: -100. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

These companies operate in different sectors (UOKA (Real Estate) and DOUG (Real Estate) and COMP (Technology) and HOUS (Real Estate)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: UOKA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; DOUG is a small-cap deep-value stock; COMP is a small-cap high-growth stock; HOUS is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.