Software - Application
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
UPLD vs ALKT vs HUBS vs MANH vs PCTY
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Application
Software - Application
Software - Application
Software - Application
UPLD vs ALKT vs HUBS vs MANH vs PCTY — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Software - Application | Software - Application | Software - Application | Software - Application |
| Market Cap | $29M | $1.87B | $12.58B | $8.50B | $5.93B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $202M | $472M | $3.30B | $1.10B | $1.73B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-14M | $-50M | $100M | $217M | $258M |
| Gross Margin | 75.9% | 57.4% | 83.7% | 55.6% | 69.3% |
| Operating Margin | 5.2% | -9.3% | 1.9% | 25.6% | 21.3% |
| Forward P/E | — | 21.7x | 19.6x | 26.8x | 14.0x |
| Total Debt | $235M | $354M | $485M | $112M | $218M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $29M | $63M | $882M | $329M | $398M |
UPLD vs ALKT vs HUBS vs MANH vs PCTY — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Apr 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Upland Software, In… (UPLD) | 100 | 2.0 | -98.0% |
| Alkami Technology, … (ALKT) | 100 | 36.5 | -63.5% |
| HubSpot, Inc. (HUBS) | 100 | 46.4 | -53.6% |
| Manhattan Associate… (MANH) | 100 | 104.6 | +4.6% |
| Paylocity Holding C… (PCTY) | 100 | 56.5 | -43.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: UPLD vs ALKT vs HUBS vs MANH vs PCTY
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
UPLD lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
ALKT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth.
- 32.9% revenue growth vs UPLD's -21.1%
HUBS is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 19.2%, EPS growth 8.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 21.8%
- 469.1% 10Y total return vs PCTY's 218.2%
MANH carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.10
- 19.7% margin vs ALKT's -10.6%
- -21.9% vs HUBS's -62.0%
- 28.0% ROA vs ALKT's -5.9%, ROIC 236.8% vs -8.6%
PCTY is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night and valuation efficiency is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.43, Low D/E 17.7%, current ratio 1.14x
- PEG 0.50 vs MANH's 1.25
- Beta 0.43, current ratio 1.14x
- Lower P/E (14.0x vs 26.8x), PEG 0.50 vs 1.25
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 32.9% revenue growth vs UPLD's -21.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (14.0x vs 26.8x), PEG 0.50 vs 1.25 | |
| Quality / Margins | 19.7% margin vs ALKT's -10.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.43 vs UPLD's 1.88, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | -21.9% vs HUBS's -62.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 28.0% ROA vs ALKT's -5.9%, ROIC 236.8% vs -8.6% |
UPLD vs ALKT vs HUBS vs MANH vs PCTY — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
UPLD vs ALKT vs HUBS vs MANH vs PCTY — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
MANH leads in 4 of 6 categories
UPLD leads 1 • ALKT leads 0 • HUBS leads 0 • PCTY leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MANH leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HUBS is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.3B annually — 16.3x UPLD's $202M. MANH is the more profitable business, keeping 19.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ALKT's -10.6%. On growth, ALKT holds the edge at +28.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $202M | $472M | $3.3B | $1.1B | $1.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $33M | -$12M | $166M | $288M | $394M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$14M | -$50M | $100M | $217M | $258M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $22M | $44M | $712M | $380M | $470M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +75.9% | +57.4% | +83.7% | +55.6% | +69.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +5.2% | -9.3% | +1.9% | +25.6% | +21.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -7.1% | -10.6% | +3.0% | +19.7% | +14.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +10.9% | +9.4% | +21.6% | +34.5% | +27.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -23.5% | +28.9% | +23.4% | +7.4% | +10.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +90.7% | -22.7% | +2.5% | -3.5% | +26.7% |
Valuation Metrics
UPLD leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 27.1x trailing earnings, PCTY trades at a 90% valuation discount to HUBS's 284.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), PCTY offers better value at 0.96x vs MANH's 1.86x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $29M | $1.9B | $12.6B | $8.5B | $5.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $234M | $2.2B | $12.2B | $8.3B | $5.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.62x | -37.89x | 284.08x | 39.88x | 27.14x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 21.69x | 19.61x | 26.79x | 14.05x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 1.86x | 0.96x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 4.81x | — | 69.24x | 28.67x | 14.25x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.13x | 4.20x | 4.02x | 7.86x | 3.72x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.34x | 5.00x | 6.29x | 27.85x | 5.00x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 1.17x | 45.09x | 17.77x | 22.74x | 17.31x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MANH leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MANH delivers a 78.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $78 in annual profit, vs $-29 for UPLD. PCTY carries lower financial leverage with a 0.18x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to UPLD's 2.91x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PCTY scores 8/9 vs ALKT's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -29.2% | -14.0% | +5.0% | +78.2% | +22.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -3.4% | -5.9% | +2.7% | +28.0% | +4.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.0% | -8.6% | +0.4% | +2.4% | +26.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +4.6% | -9.3% | +0.5% | +76.3% | +23.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 3 | 6 | 6 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.91x | 0.98x | 0.23x | 0.36x | 0.18x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $206M | $290M | -$397M | -$216M | -$180M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $29M | $63M | $882M | $329M | $398M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $235M | $354M | $485M | $112M | $218M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.41x | -3.73x | 4753.07x | — | 23.29x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MANH leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MANH five years ago would be worth $10,805 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $220 for UPLD. Over the past 12 months, MANH leads with a -21.9% total return vs HUBS's -62.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ALKT at 12.2% vs UPLD's -34.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -35.2% | -23.1% | -36.1% | -14.2% | -25.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -58.5% | -37.8% | -62.0% | -21.9% | -40.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -71.6% | +41.1% | -45.1% | -15.3% | -37.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.8% | -54.9% | -52.1% | +8.1% | -35.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -86.1% | -59.5% | +469.1% | +145.1% | +218.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -34.3% | +12.2% | -18.1% | -5.4% | -14.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — MANH and PCTY each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PCTY is the less volatile stock with a 0.43 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than UPLD's 1.88 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MANH currently trades 58.1% from its 52-week high vs UPLD's 24.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.88x | 1.30x | 1.18x | 1.10x | 0.43x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $3.91 | $31.66 | $682.57 | $247.22 | $201.97 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.50 | $14.11 | $187.45 | $119.06 | $92.99 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +24.9% | +55.1% | +35.8% | +58.1% | +54.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 70.5 | 50.9 | 51.1 | 50.6 | 45.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 393K | 1.9M | 1.5M | 678K | 733K |
Analyst Outlook
MANH leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ALKT as "Buy", HUBS as "Buy", MANH as "Buy", PCTY as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 54.0% upside for PCTY (target: $168) vs 26.2% for ALKT (target: $22).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $22.00 | $360.89 | $197.25 | $168.08 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 12 | 47 | 15 | 41 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 | — | 2 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.5% | 0.0% | +4.0% | +3.7% | +2.5% |
MANH leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). UPLD leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
UPLD vs ALKT vs HUBS vs MANH vs PCTY: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is UPLD or ALKT or HUBS or MANH or PCTY a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Alkami Technology, Inc.
(ALKT) is the stronger pick with 32. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -21. 1% for Upland Software, Inc. (UPLD). Paylocity Holding Corporation (PCTY) offers the better valuation at 27. 1x trailing P/E (14. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Alkami Technology, Inc. (ALKT) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — UPLD or ALKT or HUBS or MANH or PCTY?
On trailing P/E, Paylocity Holding Corporation (PCTY) is the cheapest at 27.
1x versus HubSpot, Inc. at 284. 1x. On forward P/E, Paylocity Holding Corporation is actually cheaper at 14. 0x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Paylocity Holding Corporation wins at 0. 50x versus Manhattan Associates, Inc. 's 1. 25x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — UPLD or ALKT or HUBS or MANH or PCTY?
Over the past 5 years, Manhattan Associates, Inc.
(MANH) delivered a total return of +8. 1%, compared to -97. 8% for Upland Software, Inc. (UPLD). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HUBS returned +469. 1% versus UPLD's -86. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — UPLD or ALKT or HUBS or MANH or PCTY?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Paylocity Holding Corporation (PCTY) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
43β versus Upland Software, Inc. 's 1. 88β — meaning UPLD is approximately 338% more volatile than PCTY relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Paylocity Holding Corporation (PCTY) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 18% versus 3% for Upland Software, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — UPLD or ALKT or HUBS or MANH or PCTY?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Alkami Technology, Inc.
(ALKT) is pulling ahead at 32. 9% versus -21. 1% for Upland Software, Inc. (UPLD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: HubSpot, Inc. grew EPS 863. 0% year-over-year, compared to -12. 2% for Alkami Technology, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ALKT leads at 29. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — UPLD or ALKT or HUBS or MANH or PCTY?
Manhattan Associates, Inc.
(MANH) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 3% net margin versus -17. 9% for Upland Software, Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MANH leads at 26. 1% versus -12. 1% for ALKT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HUBS leads at 83. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is UPLD or ALKT or HUBS or MANH or PCTY more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Paylocity Holding Corporation (PCTY) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 50x versus Manhattan Associates, Inc. 's 1. 25x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Paylocity Holding Corporation (PCTY) trades at 14. 0x forward P/E versus 26. 8x for Manhattan Associates, Inc. — 12. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PCTY: 54. 0% to $168. 08.
08Which pays a better dividend — UPLD or ALKT or HUBS or MANH or PCTY?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is UPLD or ALKT or HUBS or MANH or PCTY better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Paylocity Holding Corporation (PCTY) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
43), +218. 2% 10Y return). Upland Software, Inc. (UPLD) carries a higher beta of 1. 88 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (PCTY: +218. 2%, UPLD: -86. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between UPLD and ALKT and HUBS and MANH and PCTY?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: UPLD is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ALKT is a small-cap high-growth stock; HUBS is a mid-cap high-growth stock; MANH is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PCTY is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.