Staffing & Employment Services
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
UPWK vs HIMS vs TDOC vs FVRR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Equipment & Services
Medical - Healthcare Information Services
Internet Content & Information
UPWK vs HIMS vs TDOC vs FVRR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Staffing & Employment Services | Medical - Equipment & Services | Medical - Healthcare Information Services | Internet Content & Information |
| Market Cap | $1.38B | $6.63B | $1.26B | $422M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $595M | $2.35B | $2.51B | $429M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $109M | $128M | $-171M | $29M |
| Gross Margin | 103.0% | 69.7% | 65.6% | 81.3% |
| Operating Margin | 20.7% | 4.6% | -7.6% | 2.9% |
| Forward P/E | 7.4x | 51.5x | — | 5.7x |
| Total Debt | $381M | $1.12B | $1.04B | $5M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $298M | $229M | $781M | $129M |
UPWK vs HIMS vs TDOC vs FVRR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Upwork Inc. (UPWK) | 100 | 85.3 | -14.7% |
| Hims & Hers Health,… (HIMS) | 100 | 258.4 | +158.4% |
| Teladoc Health, Inc. (TDOC) | 100 | 4.0 | -96.0% |
| Fiverr Internationa… (FVRR) | 100 | 18.0 | -82.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: UPWK vs HIMS vs TDOC vs FVRR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
UPWK has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in quality and efficiency.
- 18.3% margin vs TDOC's -6.8%
- 8.5% ROA vs TDOC's -5.9%, ROIC 14.3% vs -11.5%
HIMS is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 59.0%, EPS growth -3.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 64.5%
- 161.9% 10Y total return vs UPWK's -49.9%
- 59.0% revenue growth vs TDOC's -1.5%
TDOC is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +1.5% vs FVRR's -59.7%
FVRR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- beta 0.97
- Lower volatility, beta 0.97, Low D/E 1.2%, current ratio 1.94x
- Beta 0.97, current ratio 1.94x
- Better valuation composite
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 59.0% revenue growth vs TDOC's -1.5% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 18.3% margin vs TDOC's -6.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.97 vs HIMS's 2.40, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +1.5% vs FVRR's -59.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 8.5% ROA vs TDOC's -5.9%, ROIC 14.3% vs -11.5% |
UPWK vs HIMS vs TDOC vs FVRR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
UPWK vs HIMS vs TDOC vs FVRR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
UPWK leads in 1 of 6 categories
TDOC leads 1 • HIMS leads 1 • FVRR leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
UPWK leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TDOC is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.5B annually — 5.9x FVRR's $429M. UPWK is the more profitable business, keeping 18.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TDOC's -6.8%. On growth, HIMS holds the edge at +28.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $595M | $2.3B | $2.5B | $429M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $150M | $164M | $42M | $26M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $109M | $128M | -$171M | $29M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $224M | $73M | $251M | $103M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +103.0% | +69.7% | +65.6% | +81.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +20.7% | +4.6% | -7.6% | +2.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +18.3% | +5.5% | -6.8% | +6.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +37.7% | +3.1% | +10.0% | +24.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -100.0% | +28.4% | -2.5% | -1.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +29.6% | -27.3% | +32.1% | +9.7% |
Valuation Metrics
TDOC leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.8x trailing earnings, UPWK trades at a 75% valuation discount to HIMS's 50.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, UPWK's 9.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than HIMS's 42.7x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.4B | $6.6B | $1.3B | $422M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.5B | $7.5B | $1.5B | $299M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 12.78x | 50.32x | -6.11x | 20.98x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 7.37x | 51.51x | — | 5.68x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.66x | 42.68x | 15.13x | 22.11x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.76x | 2.82x | 0.50x | 0.98x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.35x | 12.25x | 0.89x | 1.06x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 5.71x | 89.61x | 4.40x | 4.06x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — UPWK and FVRR each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HIMS delivers a 23.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $24 in annual profit, vs $-12 for TDOC. FVRR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HIMS's 2.07x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FVRR scores 8/9 vs HIMS's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +17.9% | +23.7% | -12.4% | +7.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +8.5% | +6.0% | -5.9% | +3.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +14.3% | +10.7% | -11.5% | -0.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +16.2% | +10.9% | -10.0% | -0.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 4 | 6 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.60x | 2.07x | 0.75x | 0.01x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $83M | $892M | $259M | -$124M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $298M | $229M | $781M | $129M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $381M | $1.1B | $1.0B | $5M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 146.13x | — | -8.76x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
HIMS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HIMS five years ago would be worth $23,764 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $461 for TDOC. Over the past 12 months, TDOC leads with a +1.5% total return vs FVRR's -59.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HIMS at 29.4% vs TDOC's -35.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -46.5% | -23.2% | -1.3% | -40.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -34.8% | -51.0% | +1.5% | -59.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +32.0% | +116.6% | -73.3% | -58.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -74.8% | +137.6% | -95.4% | -93.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -49.9% | +161.9% | -41.1% | -70.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +9.7% | +29.4% | -35.6% | -25.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — TDOC and FVRR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FVRR is the less volatile stock with a 0.97 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HIMS's 2.40 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TDOC currently trades 71.2% from its 52-week high vs FVRR's 34.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.16x | 2.40x | 1.91x | 0.97x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $22.84 | $70.43 | $9.77 | $34.13 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $10.02 | $13.74 | $4.40 | $9.67 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +46.5% | +36.4% | +71.2% | +34.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 35.0 | 54.5 | 74.1 | 52.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3.4M | 34.9M | 5.5M | 924K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: UPWK as "Buy", HIMS as "Hold", TDOC as "Hold", FVRR as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 118.1% upside for UPWK (target: $23) vs 8.9% for TDOC (target: $8).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $23.14 | $29.67 | $7.58 | $16.83 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 23 | 19 | 42 | 17 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +9.8% | +1.4% | 0.0% | +7.7% |
UPWK leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). TDOC leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
UPWK vs HIMS vs TDOC vs FVRR: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is UPWK or HIMS or TDOC or FVRR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Hims & Hers Health, Inc.
(HIMS) is the stronger pick with 59. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 5% for Teladoc Health, Inc. (TDOC). Upwork Inc. (UPWK) offers the better valuation at 12. 8x trailing P/E (7. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Upwork Inc. (UPWK) a "Buy" — based on 23 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — UPWK or HIMS or TDOC or FVRR?
On trailing P/E, Upwork Inc.
(UPWK) is the cheapest at 12. 8x versus Hims & Hers Health, Inc. at 50. 3x. On forward P/E, Fiverr International Ltd. is actually cheaper at 5. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — UPWK or HIMS or TDOC or FVRR?
Over the past 5 years, Hims & Hers Health, Inc.
(HIMS) delivered a total return of +137. 6%, compared to -95. 4% for Teladoc Health, Inc. (TDOC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HIMS returned +161. 9% versus FVRR's -70. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — UPWK or HIMS or TDOC or FVRR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Fiverr International Ltd.
(FVRR) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 97β versus Hims & Hers Health, Inc. 's 2. 40β — meaning HIMS is approximately 148% more volatile than FVRR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Fiverr International Ltd. (FVRR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 2% for Hims & Hers Health, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — UPWK or HIMS or TDOC or FVRR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Hims & Hers Health, Inc.
(HIMS) is pulling ahead at 59. 0% versus -1. 5% for Teladoc Health, Inc. (TDOC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Teladoc Health, Inc. grew EPS 80. 6% year-over-year, compared to -45. 4% for Upwork Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, HIMS leads at 64. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — UPWK or HIMS or TDOC or FVRR?
Upwork Inc.
(UPWK) is the more profitable company, earning 14. 7% net margin versus -7. 9% for Teladoc Health, Inc. — meaning it keeps 14. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: UPWK leads at 16. 4% versus -10. 4% for TDOC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FVRR leads at 80. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is UPWK or HIMS or TDOC or FVRR more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Fiverr International Ltd.
(FVRR) trades at 5. 7x forward P/E versus 51. 5x for Hims & Hers Health, Inc. — 45. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for UPWK: 118. 1% to $23. 14.
08Which pays a better dividend — UPWK or HIMS or TDOC or FVRR?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is UPWK or HIMS or TDOC or FVRR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Fiverr International Ltd.
(FVRR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 97)). Teladoc Health, Inc. (TDOC) carries a higher beta of 1. 91 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (FVRR: -70. 6%, TDOC: -41. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between UPWK and HIMS and TDOC and FVRR?
These companies operate in different sectors (UPWK (Industrials) and HIMS (Healthcare) and TDOC (Healthcare) and FVRR (Communication Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: UPWK is a small-cap deep-value stock; HIMS is a small-cap high-growth stock; TDOC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FVRR is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.