Diversified Utilities
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
UTL vs YORW vs MSEX vs ARTNA vs NEE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Regulated Water
Regulated Water
Regulated Water
Regulated Electric
UTL vs YORW vs MSEX vs ARTNA vs NEE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Diversified Utilities | Regulated Water | Regulated Water | Regulated Water | Regulated Electric |
| Market Cap | $913M | $427M | $958M | $330M | $194.14B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $582M | $-18M | $199M | $113M | $27.93B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $56M | $21M | $44M | $23M | $8.18B |
| Gross Margin | 40.1% | 54.8% | 33.3% | 43.2% | 47.8% |
| Operating Margin | 19.1% | 35.8% | 28.1% | 28.0% | 29.5% |
| Forward P/E | 15.5x | 18.5x | 20.5x | 16.0x | 23.0x |
| Total Debt | $939M | $232M | $419M | $183M | $95.62B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $16M | $1K | $3M | $52K | $2.81B |
UTL vs YORW vs MSEX vs ARTNA vs NEE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Unitil Corporation (UTL) | 100 | 105.4 | +5.4% |
| The York Water Comp… (YORW) | 100 | 66.7 | -33.3% |
| Middlesex Water Com… (MSEX) | 100 | 76.0 | -24.0% |
| Artesian Resources … (ARTNA) | 100 | 91.3 | -8.7% |
| NextEra Energy, Inc. (NEE) | 100 | 145.7 | +45.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: UTL vs YORW vs MSEX vs ARTNA vs NEE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
UTL ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value.
- Lower P/E (15.5x vs 16.0x), PEG 2.33 vs 3.72
YORW lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
Among these 5 stocks, MSEX doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
ARTNA is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Dividend streak 31 yrs, beta 0.06, yield 3.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.06, Low D/E 73.1%, current ratio 0.64x
- Beta 0.06, yield 3.8%, current ratio 0.64x
- Beta 0.06 vs NEE's 0.19, lower leverage
NEE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 11.0%, EPS growth -2.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 9.4%
- 265.3% 10Y total return vs UTL's 65.8%
- PEG 1.33 vs MSEX's 12.79
- 11.0% revenue growth vs MSEX's 1.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 11.0% revenue growth vs MSEX's 1.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (15.5x vs 16.0x), PEG 2.33 vs 3.72 | |
| Quality / Margins | 29.3% margin vs UTL's 9.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.06 vs NEE's 0.19, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.8% yield, 31-year raise streak, vs NEE's 2.4% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +39.7% vs MSEX's -11.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 3.9% ROA vs UTL's 2.7%, ROIC 4.1% vs 5.4% |
UTL vs YORW vs MSEX vs ARTNA vs NEE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
UTL vs YORW vs MSEX vs ARTNA vs NEE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ARTNA leads in 2 of 6 categories
UTL leads 1 • NEE leads 1 • YORW leads 0 • MSEX leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — YORW and NEE each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NEE and YORW operate at a comparable scale, with $27.9B and -$18M in trailing revenue. NEE is the more profitable business, keeping 29.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to UTL's 9.6%. On growth, UTL holds the edge at +27.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $582M | -$18M | $199M | $113M | $27.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $201M | $42M | $81M | $45M | $15.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $56M | $21M | $44M | $23M | $8.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$145M | -$30M | -$19M | $4M | -$3.8B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +40.1% | +54.8% | +33.3% | +43.2% | +47.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +19.1% | +35.8% | +28.1% | +28.0% | +29.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +9.6% | +25.9% | +22.1% | +20.2% | +29.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -24.8% | -24.3% | -9.7% | +3.3% | -13.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +27.0% | -100.0% | +10.0% | +4.3% | +7.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +9.5% | +32.0% | -100.0% | +8.1% | +160.0% |
Valuation Metrics
UTL leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.5x trailing earnings, ARTNA trades at a 49% valuation discount to NEE's 28.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), NEE offers better value at 1.63x vs MSEX's 13.66x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $913M | $427M | $958M | $330M | $194.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.8B | $659M | $1.4B | $512M | $286.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 17.09x | 21.31x | 21.85x | 14.50x | 28.30x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 15.52x | 18.51x | 20.46x | 16.02x | 23.02x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 2.56x | 11.70x | 13.66x | 3.37x | 1.63x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.67x | 15.71x | 15.82x | 10.37x | 18.70x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.70x | 5.51x | 4.92x | 2.92x | 7.07x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.46x | 1.78x | 1.89x | 1.32x | 2.93x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
ARTNA leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NEE delivers a 12.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $9 for YORW. ARTNA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.73x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to UTL's 1.54x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ARTNA scores 5/9 vs YORW's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +9.4% | +8.9% | +9.1% | +9.3% | +12.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.7% | +3.2% | +3.2% | +2.8% | +3.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.4% | +4.6% | +4.7% | +6.3% | +4.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +6.2% | +4.4% | +4.4% | +4.5% | +4.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.54x | 0.97x | 0.85x | 0.73x | 1.44x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $923M | $232M | $416M | $183M | $92.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $16M | $1,000 | $3M | $52,000 | $2.8B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $939M | $232M | $419M | $183M | $95.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.50x | 1.92x | 4.33x | 4.10x | 1.99x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NEE leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NEE five years ago would be worth $13,740 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,954 for YORW. Over the past 12 months, NEE leads with a +39.7% total return vs MSEX's -11.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NEE at 9.3% vs ARTNA's -13.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +4.6% | -5.9% | +3.3% | +3.0% | +15.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -8.5% | -6.7% | -11.8% | -3.4% | +39.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -1.8% | -24.9% | -25.0% | -35.2% | +30.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +4.2% | -30.5% | -28.6% | -5.4% | +37.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +65.8% | +26.5% | +63.3% | +49.8% | +265.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -0.6% | -9.1% | -9.1% | -13.5% | +9.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — MSEX and NEE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MSEX is the less volatile stock with a -0.08 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NEE's 0.19 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NEE currently trades 94.3% from its 52-week high vs MSEX's 82.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.07x | 0.10x | -0.08x | 0.06x | 0.19x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $58.02 | $34.30 | $62.18 | $35.03 | $98.75 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $44.61 | $28.26 | $44.17 | $30.50 | $63.88 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +87.5% | +86.4% | +82.9% | +91.5% | +94.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 43.8 | 37.8 | 45.6 | 46.8 | 48.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 125K | 174K | 158K | 69K | 8.4M |
Analyst Outlook
ARTNA leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: UTL as "Hold", YORW as "Hold", MSEX as "Buy", ARTNA as "Buy", NEE as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 12.3% upside for UTL (target: $57) vs 3.8% for MSEX (target: $54). For income investors, ARTNA offers the higher dividend yield at 3.84% vs NEE's 2.41%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $57.00 | — | $53.50 | — | $99.11 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 9 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 36 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.4% | +3.0% | +2.7% | +3.8% | +2.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 13 | 31 | 21 | 31 | 30 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.71 | $0.88 | $1.37 | $1.23 | $2.24 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
ARTNA leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Analyst Outlook). UTL leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
UTL vs YORW vs MSEX vs ARTNA vs NEE: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is UTL or YORW or MSEX or ARTNA or NEE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, NextEra Energy, Inc.
(NEE) is the stronger pick with 11. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 5% for Middlesex Water Company (MSEX). Artesian Resources Corporation (ARTNA) offers the better valuation at 14. 5x trailing P/E (16. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Middlesex Water Company (MSEX) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — UTL or YORW or MSEX or ARTNA or NEE?
On trailing P/E, Artesian Resources Corporation (ARTNA) is the cheapest at 14.
5x versus NextEra Energy, Inc. at 28. 3x. On forward P/E, Unitil Corporation is actually cheaper at 15. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: NextEra Energy, Inc. wins at 1. 33x versus Middlesex Water Company's 12. 79x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — UTL or YORW or MSEX or ARTNA or NEE?
Over the past 5 years, NextEra Energy, Inc.
(NEE) delivered a total return of +37. 4%, compared to -30. 5% for The York Water Company (YORW). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NEE returned +265. 3% versus YORW's +26. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — UTL or YORW or MSEX or ARTNA or NEE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Middlesex Water Company (MSEX) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
08β versus NextEra Energy, Inc. 's 0. 19β — meaning NEE is approximately -346% more volatile than MSEX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Artesian Resources Corporation (ARTNA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 73% versus 154% for Unitil Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — UTL or YORW or MSEX or ARTNA or NEE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), NextEra Energy, Inc.
(NEE) is pulling ahead at 11. 0% versus 1. 5% for Middlesex Water Company (MSEX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Artesian Resources Corporation grew EPS 11. 6% year-over-year, compared to -4. 5% for Middlesex Water Company. Over a 3-year CAGR, NEE leads at 9. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — UTL or YORW or MSEX or ARTNA or NEE?
The York Water Company (YORW) is the more profitable company, earning 25.
9% net margin versus 9. 4% for Unitil Corporation — meaning it keeps 25. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: YORW leads at 35. 8% versus 18. 9% for UTL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NEE leads at 62. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is UTL or YORW or MSEX or ARTNA or NEE more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, NextEra Energy, Inc. (NEE) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 33x versus Middlesex Water Company's 12. 79x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, Unitil Corporation (UTL) trades at 15. 5x forward P/E versus 23. 0x for NextEra Energy, Inc. — 7. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for UTL: 12. 3% to $57. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — UTL or YORW or MSEX or ARTNA or NEE?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Artesian Resources Corporation (ARTNA) offers the highest yield at 3. 8%, versus 2. 4% for NextEra Energy, Inc. (NEE).
09Is UTL or YORW or MSEX or ARTNA or NEE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Middlesex Water Company (MSEX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
08), 2. 7% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MSEX: +63. 3%, YORW: +26. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between UTL and YORW and MSEX and ARTNA and NEE?
Both stocks operate in the Utilities sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: UTL is a small-cap deep-value stock; YORW is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MSEX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ARTNA is a small-cap deep-value stock; NEE is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.