Tobacco
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
UVV vs MO vs PM vs BTI vs DIOD
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Tobacco
Tobacco
Tobacco
Semiconductors
UVV vs MO vs PM vs BTI vs DIOD — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Tobacco | Tobacco | Tobacco | Tobacco | Semiconductors |
| Market Cap | $1.34B | $117.32B | $265.78B | $129.16B | $5.34B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.05B | $21.82B | $41.49B | $51.78B | $1.48B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $85M | $8.05B | $11.10B | $-10.75B | $66M |
| Gross Margin | 18.1% | 67.8% | 67.3% | 82.5% | 31.2% |
| Operating Margin | 11.1% | 50.7% | 36.8% | -26.8% | 2.4% |
| Forward P/E | 12.9x | 12.4x | 20.3x | 16.5x | 50.0x |
| Total Debt | $1.10B | $25.71B | $48.84B | $36.95B | $96M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $260M | $4.48B | $4.87B | $5.30B | $367M |
UVV vs MO vs PM vs BTI vs DIOD — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Universal Corporati… (UVV) | 100 | 122.3 | +22.3% |
| Altria Group, Inc. (MO) | 100 | 179.7 | +79.7% |
| Philip Morris Inter… (PM) | 100 | 232.5 | +132.5% |
| British American To… (BTI) | 100 | 148.6 | +48.6% |
| Diodes Incorporated (DIOD) | 100 | 238.6 | +138.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: UVV vs MO vs PM vs BTI vs DIOD
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
UVV lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
MO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for valuation efficiency.
- PEG 1.09 vs PM's 2.87
- Lower P/E (12.4x vs 50.0x)
- 36.9% margin vs BTI's -20.8%
- 5.9% yield, 16-year raise streak, vs BTI's 5.3%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
PM is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 7.3%, EPS growth 60.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 8.6%
- 118.5% 10Y total return vs DIOD's 5.1%
BTI ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 23 yrs, beta 0.24, yield 5.3%
- Beta 0.24, yield 5.3%, current ratio 0.76x
- Beta 0.24 vs DIOD's 2.11
DIOD is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 2.11, Low D/E 4.9%, current ratio 3.32x
- 13.0% revenue growth vs BTI's -5.2%
- +199.8% vs UVV's -2.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 13.0% revenue growth vs BTI's -5.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (12.4x vs 50.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 36.9% margin vs BTI's -20.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.24 vs DIOD's 2.11 | |
| Dividends | 5.9% yield, 16-year raise streak, vs BTI's 5.3%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +199.8% vs UVV's -2.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 23.5% ROA vs BTI's -9.7%, ROIC 60.4% vs 2.4% |
UVV vs MO vs PM vs BTI vs DIOD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
UVV vs MO vs PM vs BTI vs DIOD — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
MO leads in 1 of 6 categories
UVV leads 1 • DIOD leads 1 • PM leads 0 • BTI leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MO leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BTI is the larger business by revenue, generating $51.8B annually — 34.9x DIOD's $1.5B. MO is the more profitable business, keeping 36.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BTI's -20.8%. On growth, MO holds the edge at +20.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.1B | $21.8B | $41.5B | $51.8B | $1.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $270M | $11.3B | $17.2B | -$9.5B | $179M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $85M | $8.1B | $11.1B | -$10.7B | $66M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $53M | $8.6B | $10.7B | $18.7B | $137M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +18.1% | +67.8% | +67.3% | +82.5% | +31.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +11.1% | +50.7% | +36.8% | -26.8% | +2.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +4.2% | +36.9% | +26.7% | -20.8% | +4.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +2.6% | +39.5% | +25.7% | +36.1% | +9.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -100.0% | +20.1% | +9.1% | -2.2% | +15.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -44.3% | +106.3% | -9.3% | +2.0% | +22.2% |
Valuation Metrics
UVV leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.3x trailing earnings, UVV trades at a 82% valuation discount to DIOD's 81.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), MO offers better value at 1.50x vs PM's 3.32x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.3B | $117.3B | $265.8B | $129.2B | $5.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.2B | $138.5B | $309.7B | $172.2B | $5.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 14.26x | 17.07x | 23.49x | 32.23x | 81.15x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 12.93x | 12.42x | 20.31x | 16.49x | 49.97x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 2.49x | 1.50x | 3.32x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.20x | 9.04x | 18.30x | 21.71x | 28.28x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.46x | 5.83x | 6.54x | 3.67x | 3.60x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.90x | — | — | 1.95x | 2.78x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 5.08x | 12.93x | 24.92x | 9.99x | 38.93x |
Profitability & Efficiency
DIOD leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
UVV delivers a 5.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $6 in annual profit, vs $-23 for BTI. DIOD carries lower financial leverage with a 0.05x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BTI's 0.74x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PM scores 7/9 vs UVV's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +5.6% | — | — | -22.8% | +3.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.2% | +23.5% | +16.2% | -9.7% | +2.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.6% | +60.4% | +33.2% | +2.4% | +1.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +10.9% | +57.6% | +36.1% | +2.7% | +1.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 | 7 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.74x | — | — | 0.74x | 0.05x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $844M | $21.2B | $44.0B | $31.7B | -$272M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $260M | $4.5B | $4.9B | $5.3B | $367M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.1B | $25.7B | $48.8B | $37.0B | $96M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.89x | 10.68x | 10.25x | 3.79x | 31.24x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — PM and DIOD each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PM five years ago would be worth $20,328 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,930 for UVV. Over the past 12 months, DIOD leads with a +199.8% total return vs UVV's -2.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PM at 25.0% vs UVV's 6.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +5.6% | +24.3% | +7.3% | +6.8% | +125.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -2.7% | +23.0% | +1.3% | +40.9% | +199.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +19.1% | +76.5% | +95.5% | +93.6% | +37.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +19.3% | +81.0% | +103.3% | +90.7% | +60.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +48.9% | +66.0% | +118.5% | +42.6% | +505.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +6.0% | +20.9% | +25.0% | +24.6% | +11.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — MO and DIOD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MO is the less volatile stock with a -0.29 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than DIOD's 2.11 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. DIOD currently trades 99.6% from its 52-week high vs UVV's 80.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -0.04x | -0.29x | -0.07x | 0.24x | 2.11x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $67.33 | $74.56 | $191.30 | $63.22 | $116.49 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $49.96 | $54.70 | $142.11 | $40.12 | $37.97 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +80.1% | +94.1% | +89.1% | +94.2% | +99.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 56.6 | 67.7 | 57.0 | 56.2 | 78.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 190K | 9.1M | 4.6M | 4.4M | 520K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — MO and BTI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: UVV as "Buy", MO as "Buy", PM as "Buy", BTI as "Buy", DIOD as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 10.0% upside for PM (target: $188) vs -36.2% for DIOD (target: $74). For income investors, MO offers the higher dividend yield at 5.91% vs PM's 3.25%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $68.50 | $187.60 | $40.00 | $74.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | 26 | 25 | 18 | 13 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +5.9% | +5.9% | +3.2% | +5.3% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 13 | 16 | 16 | 23 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $3.17 | $4.15 | $5.54 | $2.34 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.9% | 0.0% | +0.8% | +0.6% |
MO leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). UVV leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.
UVV vs MO vs PM vs BTI vs DIOD: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is UVV or MO or PM or BTI or DIOD a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Diodes Incorporated (DIOD) is the stronger pick with 13.
0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 2% for British American Tobacco p. l. c. (BTI). Universal Corporation (UVV) offers the better valuation at 14. 3x trailing P/E (12. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Universal Corporation (UVV) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — UVV or MO or PM or BTI or DIOD?
On trailing P/E, Universal Corporation (UVV) is the cheapest at 14.
3x versus Diodes Incorporated at 81. 2x. On forward P/E, Altria Group, Inc. is actually cheaper at 12. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Altria Group, Inc. wins at 1. 09x versus Philip Morris International Inc. 's 2. 87x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — UVV or MO or PM or BTI or DIOD?
Over the past 5 years, Philip Morris International Inc.
(PM) delivered a total return of +103. 3%, compared to +19. 3% for Universal Corporation (UVV). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: DIOD returned +505. 7% versus BTI's +42. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — UVV or MO or PM or BTI or DIOD?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Altria Group, Inc.
(MO) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 29β versus Diodes Incorporated's 2. 11β — meaning DIOD is approximately -834% more volatile than MO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Diodes Incorporated (DIOD) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 74% for British American Tobacco p. l. c. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — UVV or MO or PM or BTI or DIOD?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Diodes Incorporated (DIOD) is pulling ahead at 13.
0% versus -5. 2% for British American Tobacco p. l. c. (BTI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: British American Tobacco p. l. c. grew EPS 121. 0% year-over-year, compared to -37. 2% for Altria Group, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, UVV leads at 11. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — UVV or MO or PM or BTI or DIOD?
Altria Group, Inc.
(MO) is the more profitable company, earning 34. 5% net margin versus 3. 2% for Universal Corporation — meaning it keeps 34. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MO leads at 74. 8% versus 2. 4% for DIOD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MO leads at 86. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is UVV or MO or PM or BTI or DIOD more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Altria Group, Inc. (MO) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 09x versus Philip Morris International Inc. 's 2. 87x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, Altria Group, Inc. (MO) trades at 12. 4x forward P/E versus 50. 0x for Diodes Incorporated — 37. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PM: 10. 0% to $187. 60.
08Which pays a better dividend — UVV or MO or PM or BTI or DIOD?
In this comparison, MO (5.
9% yield), UVV (5. 9% yield), BTI (5. 3% yield), PM (3. 2% yield) pay a dividend. DIOD does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is UVV or MO or PM or BTI or DIOD better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Altria Group, Inc.
(MO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 29), 5. 9% yield). Diodes Incorporated (DIOD) carries a higher beta of 2. 11 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MO: +66. 0%, DIOD: +505. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between UVV and MO and PM and BTI and DIOD?
These companies operate in different sectors (UVV (Consumer Defensive) and MO (Consumer Defensive) and PM (Consumer Defensive) and BTI (Consumer Defensive) and DIOD (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: UVV is a small-cap deep-value stock; MO is a mid-cap deep-value stock; PM is a large-cap income-oriented stock; BTI is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; DIOD is a small-cap quality compounder stock. UVV, MO, PM, BTI pay a dividend while DIOD does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.