UWMC vs ICE vs CME vs RKT

For growth investors, UWM Holdings Corporation (UWMC) is the stronger pick with 65.

8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 6. 4% for CME Group Inc. (CME). CME Group Inc. (CME) offers the better valuation at 25. 7x trailing P/E (23. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. (ICE) a "Buy" — based on 36 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, CME Group Inc.

(CME) is the cheapest at 25. 7x versus UWM Holdings Corporation at 28. 2x. On forward P/E, UWM Holdings Corporation is actually cheaper at 8. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: CME Group Inc. wins at 1. 71x versus Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. 's 2. 19x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.

Over the past 5 years, CME Group Inc.

(CME) delivered a total return of +64. 5%, compared to -22. 7% for UWM Holdings Corporation (UWMC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CME returned +284. 9% versus UWMC's -41. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), CME Group Inc.

(CME) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 30β versus Rocket Companies, Inc. 's 1. 77β — meaning RKT is approximately -682% more volatile than CME relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, CME Group Inc. (CME) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 13% versus 9% for UWM Holdings Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), UWM Holdings Corporation (UWMC) is pulling ahead at 65.

8% versus 6. 4% for CME Group Inc. (CME). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. grew EPS 20. 7% year-over-year, compared to -123. 8% for Rocket Companies, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

CME Group Inc.

(CME) is the more profitable company, earning 62. 0% net margin versus -1. 0% for Rocket Companies, Inc. — meaning it keeps 62. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CME leads at 64. 9% versus 8. 7% for RKT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RKT leads at 91. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, CME Group Inc. (CME) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 71x versus Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. 's 2. 19x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, UWM Holdings Corporation (UWMC) trades at 8. 0x forward P/E versus 23. 5x for CME Group Inc. — 15. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for UWMC: 76. 9% to $5. 98.

In this comparison, UWMC (100.

0% yield), CME (3. 8% yield), ICE (1. 2% yield) pay a dividend. RKT does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, CME Group Inc.

(CME) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 30), 3. 8% yield, +284. 9% 10Y return). Rocket Companies, Inc. (RKT) carries a higher beta of 1. 77 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CME: +284. 9%, RKT: -20. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: UWMC is a small-cap high-growth stock; ICE is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; CME is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; RKT is a mid-cap high-growth stock. UWMC, ICE, CME pay a dividend while RKT does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.