Auto - Recreational Vehicles
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
VEEE vs BC vs MBUU vs MCFT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Auto - Recreational Vehicles
Auto - Recreational Vehicles
Auto - Recreational Vehicles
VEEE vs BC vs MBUU vs MCFT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Auto - Recreational Vehicles | Auto - Recreational Vehicles | Auto - Recreational Vehicles | Auto - Recreational Vehicles |
| Market Cap | $342K | $5.26B | $473M | $417M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $15M | $5.52B | $826M | $298M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-9M | $-137M | $-5M | $11M |
| Gross Margin | 3.1% | 18.0% | 15.4% | 23.1% |
| Operating Margin | -60.5% | 5.2% | 0.1% | 3.7% |
| Forward P/E | — | 19.0x | 20.9x | 17.0x |
| Total Debt | $542K | $2.43B | $25M | $0.00 |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1M | $275M | $37M | $29M |
VEEE vs BC vs MBUU vs MCFT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jul 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Twin Vee Powercats … (VEEE) | 100 | 3.5 | -96.5% |
| Brunswick Corporati… (BC) | 100 | 77.3 | -22.7% |
| Malibu Boats, Inc. (MBUU) | 100 | 30.4 | -69.6% |
| MasterCraft Boat Ho… (MCFT) | 100 | 96.2 | -3.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: VEEE vs BC vs MBUU vs MCFT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
VEEE is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Rev growth 3.0%, EPS growth 60.3%, 3Y rev CAGR -22.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.41, Low D/E 4.0%, current ratio 2.18x
- Beta 0.41, current ratio 2.18x
- 3.0% revenue growth vs MCFT's -22.5%
BC is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 13 yrs, beta 1.69, yield 2.1%
- 2.1% yield; 13-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend
- +79.7% vs VEEE's -93.2%
MBUU lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
MCFT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 121.5% 10Y total return vs BC's 96.4%
- Lower P/E (17.0x vs 20.9x)
- 3.7% margin vs VEEE's -59.9%
- 4.2% ROA vs VEEE's -45.1%, ROIC 4.4% vs -44.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 3.0% revenue growth vs MCFT's -22.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (17.0x vs 20.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 3.7% margin vs VEEE's -59.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.41 vs MBUU's 1.71, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.1% yield; 13-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +79.7% vs VEEE's -93.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.2% ROA vs VEEE's -45.1%, ROIC 4.4% vs -44.0% |
VEEE vs BC vs MBUU vs MCFT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
VEEE vs BC vs MBUU vs MCFT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
MCFT leads in 1 of 6 categories
BC leads 1 • VEEE leads 0 • MBUU leads 0 • 4 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — BC and MCFT each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BC is the larger business by revenue, generating $5.5B annually — 363.8x VEEE's $15M. MCFT is the more profitable business, keeping 3.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to VEEE's -59.9%. On growth, BC holds the edge at +12.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $15M | $5.5B | $826M | $298M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$7M | $511M | $11M | $14M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$9M | -$137M | -$5M | $11M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$2M | $341M | $40M | $25M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +3.1% | +18.0% | +15.4% | +23.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -60.5% | +5.2% | +0.1% | +3.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -59.9% | -2.5% | -0.6% | +3.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -11.7% | +6.2% | +4.8% | +8.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +9.8% | +12.8% | +3.1% | +3.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -24.8% | +6.7% | -118.2% | -2.6% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — VEEE and BC each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 33.4x trailing earnings, MBUU trades at a 44% valuation discount to MCFT's 59.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, MBUU's 7.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than BC's 29.3x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $342,018 | $5.3B | $473M | $417M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$548,017 | $7.4B | $461M | $388M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.04x | -38.82x | 33.42x | 59.63x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 18.98x | 20.89x | 16.98x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 29.31x | 7.64x | 18.67x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.02x | 0.98x | 0.59x | 1.47x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.03x | 3.26x | 0.96x | 2.31x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 13.27x | 16.53x | 15.81x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MCFT leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MCFT delivers a 5.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $6 in annual profit, vs $-56 for VEEE. VEEE carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BC's 1.49x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MBUU scores 7/9 vs BC's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -55.7% | -5.1% | -1.0% | +5.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -45.1% | -2.5% | -0.7% | +4.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -44.0% | -0.8% | +3.2% | +4.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -45.2% | -1.0% | +3.6% | +5.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.04x | 1.49x | 0.05x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$890,035 | $2.2B | -$12M | -$29M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1M | $275M | $37M | $29M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $541,543 | $2.4B | $25M | $0 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -203.95x | 4.34x | 1.84x | 100.99x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — BC and MCFT each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MCFT five years ago would be worth $8,619 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $232 for VEEE. Over the past 12 months, BC leads with a +79.7% total return vs VEEE's -93.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BC at 1.2% vs VEEE's -50.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -90.2% | +7.0% | -11.2% | +35.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -93.2% | +79.7% | -14.7% | +45.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -87.9% | +3.8% | -56.4% | -11.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.7% | -23.5% | -70.0% | -13.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.7% | +96.4% | +76.9% | +121.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -50.5% | +1.2% | -24.2% | -4.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — VEEE and MCFT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
VEEE is the less volatile stock with a 0.41 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MBUU's 1.71 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MCFT currently trades 96.8% from its 52-week high vs VEEE's 1.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.41x | 1.69x | 1.71x | 1.25x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $344.10 | $90.23 | $39.65 | $26.49 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.48 | $45.52 | $23.84 | $16.46 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +1.9% | +89.5% | +64.1% | +96.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 33.5 | 57.6 | 50.0 | 62.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 331K | 886K | 336K | 146K |
Analyst Outlook
BC leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: BC as "Buy", MBUU as "Buy", MCFT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 28.9% upside for MBUU (target: $33) vs -3.8% for MCFT (target: $25). BC is the only dividend payer here at 2.12% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $88.78 | $32.75 | $24.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 31 | 16 | 10 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +2.1% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 13 | 1 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.71 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.5% | +7.6% | +2.3% |
MCFT leads in 1 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency). BC leads in 1 (Analyst Outlook). 4 tied.
VEEE vs BC vs MBUU vs MCFT: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is VEEE or BC or MBUU or MCFT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Twin Vee Powercats Co.
(VEEE) is the stronger pick with 3. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -22. 5% for MasterCraft Boat Holdings, Inc. (MCFT). Malibu Boats, Inc. (MBUU) offers the better valuation at 33. 4x trailing P/E (20. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Brunswick Corporation (BC) a "Buy" — based on 31 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — VEEE or BC or MBUU or MCFT?
On trailing P/E, Malibu Boats, Inc.
(MBUU) is the cheapest at 33. 4x versus MasterCraft Boat Holdings, Inc. at 59. 6x. On forward P/E, MasterCraft Boat Holdings, Inc. is actually cheaper at 17. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — VEEE or BC or MBUU or MCFT?
Over the past 5 years, MasterCraft Boat Holdings, Inc.
(MCFT) delivered a total return of -13. 8%, compared to -97. 7% for Twin Vee Powercats Co. (VEEE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MCFT returned +121. 5% versus VEEE's -97. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — VEEE or BC or MBUU or MCFT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Twin Vee Powercats Co.
(VEEE) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 41β versus Malibu Boats, Inc. 's 1. 71β — meaning MBUU is approximately 323% more volatile than VEEE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Twin Vee Powercats Co. (VEEE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 149% for Brunswick Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — VEEE or BC or MBUU or MCFT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Twin Vee Powercats Co.
(VEEE) is pulling ahead at 3. 0% versus -22. 5% for MasterCraft Boat Holdings, Inc. (MCFT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Malibu Boats, Inc. grew EPS 127. 7% year-over-year, compared to -207. 8% for Brunswick Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, BC leads at -7. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — VEEE or BC or MBUU or MCFT?
MasterCraft Boat Holdings, Inc.
(MCFT) is the more profitable company, earning 2. 5% net margin versus -58. 1% for Twin Vee Powercats Co. — meaning it keeps 2. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MCFT leads at 4. 0% versus -55. 1% for VEEE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BC leads at 24. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is VEEE or BC or MBUU or MCFT more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, MasterCraft Boat Holdings, Inc.
(MCFT) trades at 17. 0x forward P/E versus 20. 9x for Malibu Boats, Inc. — 3. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MBUU: 28. 9% to $32. 75.
08Which pays a better dividend — VEEE or BC or MBUU or MCFT?
In this comparison, BC (2.
1% yield) pays a dividend. VEEE, MBUU, MCFT do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is VEEE or BC or MBUU or MCFT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Twin Vee Powercats Co.
(VEEE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 41)). Malibu Boats, Inc. (MBUU) carries a higher beta of 1. 71 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (VEEE: -97. 7%, MBUU: +76. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between VEEE and BC and MBUU and MCFT?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
BC pays a dividend while VEEE, MBUU, MCFT do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.