Auto - Recreational Vehicles
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
VEEE vs HZO vs MBUU vs ONEW
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Specialty Retail
Auto - Recreational Vehicles
Auto - Recreational Vehicles
VEEE vs HZO vs MBUU vs ONEW — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Auto - Recreational Vehicles | Specialty Retail | Auto - Recreational Vehicles | Auto - Recreational Vehicles |
| Market Cap | $342K | $724M | $473M | $198M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $15M | $2.24B | $826M | $1.88B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-9M | $-64M | $-5M | $-110M |
| Gross Margin | 3.1% | 32.7% | 15.4% | 22.5% |
| Operating Margin | -60.5% | -0.6% | 0.1% | 3.4% |
| Forward P/E | — | 45.0x | 20.9x | 20.8x |
| Total Debt | $542K | $1.25B | $25M | $964M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1M | $170M | $37M | $52M |
VEEE vs HZO vs MBUU vs ONEW — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jul 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Twin Vee Powercats … (VEEE) | 100 | 3.5 | -96.5% |
| MarineMax, Inc. (HZO) | 100 | 61.1 | -38.9% |
| Malibu Boats, Inc. (MBUU) | 100 | 30.4 | -69.6% |
| OneWater Marine Inc. (ONEW) | 100 | 25.4 | -74.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: VEEE vs HZO vs MBUU vs ONEW
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
VEEE is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.41, Low D/E 4.0%, current ratio 2.18x
- Beta 0.41, current ratio 2.18x
- Beta 0.41 vs HZO's 2.09, lower leverage
HZO is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 78.6% 10Y total return vs MBUU's 76.9%
- +56.7% vs VEEE's -93.2%
MBUU is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.71
- -0.6% margin vs VEEE's -59.9%
- -0.7% ROA vs VEEE's -45.1%, ROIC 3.2% vs -44.0%
ONEW carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 5.6%, EPS growth -17.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 2.4%
- 5.6% revenue growth vs HZO's -5.0%
- Lower P/E (20.8x vs 20.9x)
- 0.1% yield; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 5.6% revenue growth vs HZO's -5.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (20.8x vs 20.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | -0.6% margin vs VEEE's -59.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.41 vs HZO's 2.09, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.1% yield; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +56.7% vs VEEE's -93.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -0.7% ROA vs VEEE's -45.1%, ROIC 3.2% vs -44.0% |
VEEE vs HZO vs MBUU vs ONEW — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
VEEE vs HZO vs MBUU vs ONEW — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
MBUU leads in 1 of 6 categories
HZO leads 1 • VEEE leads 0 • ONEW leads 0 • 4 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — HZO and ONEW each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HZO is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.2B annually — 147.8x VEEE's $15M. MBUU is the more profitable business, keeping -0.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to VEEE's -59.9%. On growth, VEEE holds the edge at +9.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $15M | $2.2B | $826M | $1.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$7M | $11M | $11M | $87M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$9M | -$64M | -$5M | -$110M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$2M | $169M | $40M | $41M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +3.1% | +32.7% | +15.4% | +22.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -60.5% | -0.6% | +0.1% | +3.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -59.9% | -2.8% | -0.6% | -5.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -11.7% | +7.6% | +4.8% | +2.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +9.8% | -16.5% | +3.1% | +1.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -24.8% | -185.7% | -118.2% | +42.0% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — VEEE and ONEW each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, MBUU's 7.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ONEW's 13.3x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $342,018 | $724M | $473M | $198M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$548,017 | $1.8B | $461M | $1.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.04x | -22.98x | 33.42x | -1.65x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 44.98x | 20.89x | 20.77x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 11.81x | 7.64x | 13.26x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.02x | 0.31x | 0.59x | 0.11x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.03x | 0.76x | 0.96x | 0.66x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 60.62x | 16.53x | 2.51x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MBUU leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MBUU delivers a -1.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-1 in annual profit, vs $-56 for VEEE. VEEE carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ONEW's 3.38x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MBUU scores 7/9 vs ONEW's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -55.7% | -6.7% | -1.0% | -33.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -45.1% | -2.6% | -0.7% | -7.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -44.0% | +3.8% | +3.2% | +3.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -45.2% | +6.8% | +3.6% | +7.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 | 7 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.04x | 1.31x | 0.05x | 3.38x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$890,035 | $1.1B | -$12M | $912M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1M | $170M | $37M | $52M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $541,543 | $1.2B | $25M | $964M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -203.95x | 0.71x | 1.84x | -1.63x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
HZO leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HZO five years ago would be worth $5,007 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $232 for VEEE. Over the past 12 months, HZO leads with a +56.7% total return vs VEEE's -93.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HZO at 4.6% vs VEEE's -50.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -90.2% | +36.5% | -11.2% | +10.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -93.2% | +56.7% | -14.7% | -1.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -87.9% | +14.4% | -56.4% | -57.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.7% | -49.9% | -70.0% | -74.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.7% | +78.6% | +76.9% | -9.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -50.5% | +4.6% | -24.2% | -24.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — VEEE and HZO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
VEEE is the less volatile stock with a 0.41 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HZO's 2.09 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HZO currently trades 99.1% from its 52-week high vs VEEE's 1.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.41x | 2.09x | 1.71x | 1.98x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $344.10 | $33.15 | $39.65 | $17.92 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.48 | $20.52 | $23.84 | $8.12 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +1.9% | +99.1% | +64.1% | +66.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 33.5 | 61.2 | 50.0 | 59.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 331K | 344K | 336K | 147K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — HZO and MBUU each lead in 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: HZO as "Buy", MBUU as "Buy", ONEW as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 28.9% upside for MBUU (target: $33) vs -0.6% for HZO (target: $33). ONEW is the only dividend payer here at 0.15% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $32.67 | $32.75 | $14.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 17 | 16 | 9 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +0.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $0.02 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +3.8% | +7.6% | 0.0% |
MBUU leads in 1 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency). HZO leads in 1 (Total Returns). 4 tied.
VEEE vs HZO vs MBUU vs ONEW: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is VEEE or HZO or MBUU or ONEW a better buy right now?
For growth investors, OneWater Marine Inc.
(ONEW) is the stronger pick with 5. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 0% for MarineMax, Inc. (HZO). Malibu Boats, Inc. (MBUU) offers the better valuation at 33. 4x trailing P/E (20. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate MarineMax, Inc. (HZO) a "Buy" — based on 17 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — VEEE or HZO or MBUU or ONEW?
On forward P/E, OneWater Marine Inc.
is actually cheaper at 20. 8x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — VEEE or HZO or MBUU or ONEW?
Over the past 5 years, MarineMax, Inc.
(HZO) delivered a total return of -49. 9%, compared to -97. 7% for Twin Vee Powercats Co. (VEEE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HZO returned +78. 6% versus VEEE's -97. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — VEEE or HZO or MBUU or ONEW?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Twin Vee Powercats Co.
(VEEE) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 41β versus MarineMax, Inc. 's 2. 09β — meaning HZO is approximately 416% more volatile than VEEE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Twin Vee Powercats Co. (VEEE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 3% for OneWater Marine Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — VEEE or HZO or MBUU or ONEW?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), OneWater Marine Inc.
(ONEW) is pulling ahead at 5. 6% versus -5. 0% for MarineMax, Inc. (HZO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Malibu Boats, Inc. grew EPS 127. 7% year-over-year, compared to -1751. 3% for OneWater Marine Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ONEW leads at 2. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — VEEE or HZO or MBUU or ONEW?
Malibu Boats, Inc.
(MBUU) is the more profitable company, earning 1. 8% net margin versus -58. 1% for Twin Vee Powercats Co. — meaning it keeps 1. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HZO leads at 4. 5% versus -55. 1% for VEEE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HZO leads at 32. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is VEEE or HZO or MBUU or ONEW more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, OneWater Marine Inc.
(ONEW) trades at 20. 8x forward P/E versus 45. 0x for MarineMax, Inc. — 24. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MBUU: 28. 9% to $32. 75.
08Which pays a better dividend — VEEE or HZO or MBUU or ONEW?
In this comparison, ONEW (0.
1% yield) pays a dividend. VEEE, HZO, MBUU do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is VEEE or HZO or MBUU or ONEW better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Twin Vee Powercats Co.
(VEEE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 41)). OneWater Marine Inc. (ONEW) carries a higher beta of 1. 98 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (VEEE: -97. 7%, ONEW: -9. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between VEEE and HZO and MBUU and ONEW?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.