Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

VIOT vs SNBR vs AMZN vs CSIQ vs JKS

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
VIOT
Viomi Technology Co., Ltd

Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances

Consumer CyclicalNASDAQ • CN
Market Cap$102M
5Y Perf.-80.8%
SNBR
Sleep Number Corporation

Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances

Consumer CyclicalNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$65M
5Y Perf.-90.9%
AMZN
Amazon.com, Inc.

Specialty Retail

Consumer CyclicalNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.93T
5Y Perf.+123.3%
CSIQ
Canadian Solar Inc.

Solar

EnergyNASDAQ • CA
Market Cap$1.34B
5Y Perf.+6.7%
JKS
JinkoSolar Holding Co., Ltd.

Solar

EnergyNYSE • CN
Market Cap$322M
5Y Perf.+55.3%

VIOT vs SNBR vs AMZN vs CSIQ vs JKS — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
VIOT logoVIOT
SNBR logoSNBR
AMZN logoAMZN
CSIQ logoCSIQ
JKS logoJKS
IndustryFurnishings, Fixtures & AppliancesFurnishings, Fixtures & AppliancesSpecialty RetailSolarSolar
Market Cap$102M$65M$2.93T$1.34B$322M
Revenue (TTM)$2.52B$1M$742.78B$5.60B$75.16B
Net Income (TTM)$126M$-132K$90.80B$-104M$-2.52B
Gross Margin25.8%59.0%50.6%18.3%7.3%
Operating Margin4.2%-3.3%11.5%0.1%-8.2%
Forward P/E3.6x31.4x
Total Debt$159M$354M$152.99B$7.68B$53.16B
Cash & Equiv.$1.03B$2M$86.81B$1.91B$22.95B

VIOT vs SNBR vs AMZN vs CSIQ vs JKSLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

VIOT
SNBR
AMZN
CSIQ
JKS
StockMay 20May 26Return
Viomi Technology Co… (VIOT)10019.2-80.8%
Sleep Number Corpor… (SNBR)1009.1-90.9%
Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN)100223.3+123.3%
Canadian Solar Inc. (CSIQ)100106.7+6.7%
JinkoSolar Holding … (JKS)100155.3+55.3%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: VIOT vs SNBR vs AMZN vs CSIQ vs JKS

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: AMZN leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. Viomi Technology Co., Ltd is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and capital preservation and lower volatility. CSIQ and JKS also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
VIOT
Viomi Technology Co., Ltd
The Income Pick

VIOT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.

  • Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.97
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.97, Low D/E 11.0%, current ratio 2.07x
  • Beta 0.97, current ratio 2.07x
  • Better valuation composite
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
SNBR
Sleep Number Corporation
The Consumer Cyclical Pick

Among these 5 stocks, SNBR doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: consumer cyclical exposure
AMZN
Amazon.com, Inc.
The Growth Play

AMZN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 12.4%, EPS growth 29.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 11.7%
  • 7.0% 10Y total return vs JKS's 47.0%
  • 12.4% revenue growth vs SNBR's -99.9%
  • 12.2% margin vs SNBR's -9.4%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
CSIQ
Canadian Solar Inc.
The Momentum Pick

CSIQ ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.

  • +117.8% vs SNBR's -62.6%
Best for: momentum
JKS
JinkoSolar Holding Co., Ltd.
The Income Pick

JKS is the clearest fit if your priority is dividends.

  • 22.4% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Best for: dividends
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthAMZN logoAMZN12.4% revenue growth vs SNBR's -99.9%
ValueVIOT logoVIOTBetter valuation composite
Quality / MarginsAMZN logoAMZN12.2% margin vs SNBR's -9.4%
Stability / SafetyVIOT logoVIOTBeta 0.97 vs SNBR's 2.89
DividendsJKS logoJKS22.4% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)CSIQ logoCSIQ+117.8% vs SNBR's -62.6%
Efficiency (ROA)AMZN logoAMZN11.5% ROA vs JKS's -2.0%, ROIC 14.7% vs -9.2%

VIOT vs SNBR vs AMZN vs CSIQ vs JKS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

VIOTViomi Technology Co., Ltd
FY 2024
Product
54.3%$2.1B
Sale Of Home Water Solutions
38.5%$1.5B
Sale Of Consumables
7.1%$278M
Service
0.1%$6M
SNBRSleep Number Corporation
FY 2025
Reportable Segment
100.0%$1.4B
AMZNAmazon.com, Inc.
FY 2025
Online Stores
37.6%$269.3B
Third-Party Seller Services
24.0%$172.2B
Amazon Web Services
18.0%$128.7B
Advertising Services
9.6%$68.6B
Subscription Services
6.9%$49.6B
Physical Stores
3.1%$22.6B
Other Services
0.8%$5.9B
CSIQCanadian Solar Inc.
FY 2024
Electricity
100.0%$85M
JKSJinkoSolar Holding Co., Ltd.
FY 2025
Sales of Other Solar Materials
100.0%$3.0B

VIOT vs SNBR vs AMZN vs CSIQ vs JKS — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLVIOTLAGGINGJKS

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

VIOT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

AMZN is the larger business by revenue, generating $742.8B annually — 526231.7x SNBR's $1M. AMZN is the more profitable business, keeping 12.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SNBR's -9.4%. On growth, VIOT holds the edge at +42.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricVIOT logoVIOTViomi Technology …SNBR logoSNBRSleep Number Corp…AMZN logoAMZNAmazon.com, Inc.CSIQ logoCSIQCanadian Solar In…JKS logoJKSJinkoSolar Holdin…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$2.5B$1M$742.8B$5.6B$75.2B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$152M$72M$155.9B$284M-$3.8B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$126M-$132,000$90.8B-$104M-$2.5B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$0-$21M-$2.5B-$1.7B$0
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+25.8%+59.0%+50.6%+18.3%+7.3%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+4.2%-3.3%+11.5%+0.1%-8.2%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+5.0%-9.4%+12.2%-1.9%-3.4%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+32.4%-14.6%-0.3%-29.6%-3.5%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+42.1%-3.8%+16.6%-20.0%-34.1%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+19.0%-11.2%+74.8%-3.7%-33.5%
VIOT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

VIOT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 3.2x trailing earnings, VIOT trades at a 92% valuation discount to AMZN's 38.0x P/E.

MetricVIOT logoVIOTViomi Technology …SNBR logoSNBRSleep Number Corp…AMZN logoAMZNAmazon.com, Inc.CSIQ logoCSIQCanadian Solar In…JKS logoJKSJinkoSolar Holdin…
Market CapShares × price$102M$65M$2.93T$1.3B$322M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash-$25M$418M$3.00T$7.1B$4.8B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS3.17x-0.49x38.03x-12.94x-0.50x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.3.57x31.41x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.36x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple-0.78x20.58x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.33x46.16x4.09x0.24x0.03x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.32x7.18x0.32x0.08x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF1.01x381.09x
VIOT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

AMZN leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

AMZN delivers a 23.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $23 in annual profit, vs $-8 for JKS. VIOT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.11x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JKS's 1.93x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), VIOT scores 7/9 vs CSIQ's 1/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricVIOT logoVIOTViomi Technology …SNBR logoSNBRSleep Number Corp…AMZN logoAMZNAmazon.com, Inc.CSIQ logoCSIQCanadian Solar In…JKS logoJKSJinkoSolar Holdin…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+8.1%+23.3%-2.5%-7.7%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+4.3%-0.0%+11.5%-0.7%-2.0%
ROICReturn on invested capital+13.8%-0.0%+14.7%-0.2%-9.2%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+10.3%+15.3%-0.3%-10.3%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–972613
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.11x0.37x1.80x1.93x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$867M$353M$66.2B$5.8B$30.2B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$1.0B$2M$86.8B$1.9B$23.0B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$159M$354M$153.0B$7.7B$53.2B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-780.16x39.96x0.02x-2.92x
AMZN leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

AMZN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in AMZN five years ago would be worth $17,094 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $254 for SNBR. Over the past 12 months, CSIQ leads with a +117.8% total return vs SNBR's -62.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AMZN at 37.1% vs SNBR's -50.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricVIOT logoVIOTViomi Technology …SNBR logoSNBRSleep Number Corp…AMZN logoAMZNAmazon.com, Inc.CSIQ logoCSIQCanadian Solar In…JKS logoJKSJinkoSolar Holdin…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-42.2%-66.8%+20.4%-21.1%-12.1%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-17.3%-62.6%+42.0%+117.8%+38.7%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+25.9%-87.9%+157.7%-45.9%-39.2%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-83.6%-97.5%+70.9%-46.3%-4.8%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-86.5%-88.3%+702.2%+29.8%+47.0%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+8.0%-50.6%+37.1%-18.5%-15.3%
AMZN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — VIOT and AMZN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

VIOT is the less volatile stock with a 0.97 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SNBR's 2.89 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AMZN currently trades 97.9% from its 52-week high vs SNBR's 20.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricVIOT logoVIOTViomi Technology …SNBR logoSNBRSleep Number Corp…AMZN logoAMZNAmazon.com, Inc.CSIQ logoCSIQCanadian Solar In…JKS logoJKSJinkoSolar Holdin…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.97x2.89x1.50x2.28x1.39x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$4.33$13.94$278.56$34.59$31.88
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.92$1.07$188.82$8.93$17.41
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+22.9%+20.4%+97.9%+58.0%+77.0%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10040.553.874.265.849.4
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded267K2.8M45.2M2.6M608K
Evenly matched — VIOT and AMZN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Analyst consensus: VIOT as "Buy", SNBR as "Hold", AMZN as "Buy", CSIQ as "Buy", JKS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 250.9% upside for SNBR (target: $10) vs -2.3% for JKS (target: $24). JKS is the only dividend payer here at 22.37% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricVIOT logoVIOTViomi Technology …SNBR logoSNBRSleep Number Corp…AMZN logoAMZNAmazon.com, Inc.CSIQ logoCSIQCanadian Solar In…JKS logoJKSJinkoSolar Holdin…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyHoldBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$10.00$306.77$33.50$24.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts211943322
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+22.4%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises000
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$37.37
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+0.6%+1.9%0.0%+5.2%+0.2%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

VIOT leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). AMZN leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). 1 tied.

Best OverallViomi Technology Co., Ltd (VIOT)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

VIOT vs SNBR vs AMZN vs CSIQ vs JKS: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is VIOT or SNBR or AMZN or CSIQ or JKS a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Amazon.

com, Inc. (AMZN) is the stronger pick with 12. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -99. 9% for Sleep Number Corporation (SNBR). Viomi Technology Co. , Ltd (VIOT) offers the better valuation at 3. 2x trailing P/E (3. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Viomi Technology Co. , Ltd (VIOT) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — VIOT or SNBR or AMZN or CSIQ or JKS?

On trailing P/E, Viomi Technology Co.

, Ltd (VIOT) is the cheapest at 3. 2x versus Amazon. com, Inc. at 38. 0x. On forward P/E, Viomi Technology Co. , Ltd is actually cheaper at 3. 6x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — VIOT or SNBR or AMZN or CSIQ or JKS?

Over the past 5 years, Amazon.

com, Inc. (AMZN) delivered a total return of +70. 9%, compared to -97. 5% for Sleep Number Corporation (SNBR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AMZN returned +702. 2% versus SNBR's -88. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — VIOT or SNBR or AMZN or CSIQ or JKS?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Viomi Technology Co.

, Ltd (VIOT) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 97β versus Sleep Number Corporation's 2. 89β — meaning SNBR is approximately 197% more volatile than VIOT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Viomi Technology Co. , Ltd (VIOT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 11% versus 193% for JinkoSolar Holding Co. , Ltd. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — VIOT or SNBR or AMZN or CSIQ or JKS?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Amazon.

com, Inc. (AMZN) is pulling ahead at 12. 4% versus -99. 9% for Sleep Number Corporation (SNBR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Viomi Technology Co. , Ltd grew EPS 273. 2% year-over-year, compared to -1540. 3% for JinkoSolar Holding Co. , Ltd.. Over a 3-year CAGR, AMZN leads at 11. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — VIOT or SNBR or AMZN or CSIQ or JKS?

Amazon.

com, Inc. (AMZN) is the more profitable company, earning 10. 8% net margin versus -9. 4% for Sleep Number Corporation — meaning it keeps 10. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AMZN leads at 11. 2% versus -11. 1% for JKS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SNBR leads at 59. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is VIOT or SNBR or AMZN or CSIQ or JKS more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Viomi Technology Co.

, Ltd (VIOT) trades at 3. 6x forward P/E versus 31. 4x for Amazon. com, Inc. — 27. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SNBR: 250. 9% to $10. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — VIOT or SNBR or AMZN or CSIQ or JKS?

In this comparison, JKS (22.

4% yield) pays a dividend. VIOT, SNBR, AMZN, CSIQ do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is VIOT or SNBR or AMZN or CSIQ or JKS better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, JinkoSolar Holding Co.

, Ltd. (JKS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (22. 4% yield). Sleep Number Corporation (SNBR) carries a higher beta of 2. 89 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (JKS: +47. 0%, SNBR: -88. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between VIOT and SNBR and AMZN and CSIQ and JKS?

These companies operate in different sectors (VIOT (Consumer Cyclical) and SNBR (Consumer Cyclical) and AMZN (Consumer Cyclical) and CSIQ (Energy) and JKS (Energy)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: VIOT is a small-cap deep-value stock; SNBR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; AMZN is a mega-cap quality compounder stock; CSIQ is a small-cap quality compounder stock; JKS is a small-cap income-oriented stock. JKS pays a dividend while VIOT, SNBR, AMZN, CSIQ do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

VIOT

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 21%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SNBR

Quality Business

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 35%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

AMZN

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 8%
  • Net Margin > 7%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CSIQ

Quality Business

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

JKS

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Dividend Yield > 8.9%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform VIOT and SNBR and AMZN and CSIQ and JKS on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(VIOT: 42.1% · SNBR: -382.0%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.