REIT - Office
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
VNO vs WELL vs SPG vs EQR vs AVB
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Healthcare Facilities
REIT - Retail
REIT - Residential
REIT - Residential
VNO vs WELL vs SPG vs EQR vs AVB — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Office | REIT - Healthcare Facilities | REIT - Retail | REIT - Residential | REIT - Residential |
| Market Cap | $6.03B | $149.25B | $65.50B | $24.68B | $25.85B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.81B | $11.63B | $6.36B | $3.12B | $3.04B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $795M | $1.43B | $4.61B | $954M | $1.05B |
| Gross Margin | 73.2% | 39.1% | 85.7% | 46.3% | 67.0% |
| Operating Margin | 13.3% | 4.4% | 49.9% | 28.5% | 30.1% |
| Forward P/E | 376.9x | 78.4x | 30.3x | 50.6x | 37.7x |
| Total Debt | $7.89B | $21.38B | $29.94B | $8.78B | $9.33B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $841M | $5.03B | $823M | $56M | $187M |
VNO vs WELL vs SPG vs EQR vs AVB — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vornado Realty Trust (VNO) | 100 | 88.5 | -11.5% |
| Welltower Inc. (WELL) | 100 | 420.4 | +320.4% |
| Simon Property Grou… (SPG) | 100 | 349.1 | +249.1% |
| Equity Residential (EQR) | 100 | 108.8 | +8.8% |
| AvalonBay Communiti… (AVB) | 100 | 119.1 | +19.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: VNO vs WELL vs SPG vs EQR vs AVB
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
VNO lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
WELL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 223.1% 10Y total return vs AVB's 31.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.13, Low D/E 49.5%, current ratio 5.34x
- Beta 0.13, yield 1.3%, current ratio 5.34x
- 35.8% FFO/revenue growth vs VNO's 1.3%
SPG is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and valuation efficiency is your priority.
- Rev growth 6.7%, EPS growth 94.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 6.3%
- PEG 0.96 vs EQR's 9.94
- Lower P/E (30.3x vs 37.7x), PEG 0.96 vs 8.06
- 72.5% margin vs WELL's 12.3%
EQR ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 8 yrs, beta 0.38, yield 4.1%
- 4.1% yield, 8-year raise streak, vs VNO's 2.3%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
Among these 5 stocks, AVB doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 35.8% FFO/revenue growth vs VNO's 1.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (30.3x vs 37.7x), PEG 0.96 vs 8.06 | |
| Quality / Margins | 72.5% margin vs WELL's 12.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.13 vs VNO's 1.19, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 4.1% yield, 8-year raise streak, vs VNO's 2.3%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +42.7% vs VNO's -15.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.4% ROA vs WELL's 2.3%, ROIC 7.6% vs 0.5% |
VNO vs WELL vs SPG vs EQR vs AVB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
VNO vs WELL vs SPG vs EQR vs AVB — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
SPG leads in 2 of 6 categories
WELL leads 2 • VNO leads 1 • EQR leads 1 • AVB leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SPG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WELL is the larger business by revenue, generating $11.6B annually — 6.4x VNO's $1.8B. SPG is the more profitable business, keeping 72.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to WELL's 12.3%. On growth, WELL holds the edge at +40.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.8B | $11.6B | $6.4B | $3.1B | $3.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $719M | $2.8B | $4.7B | $1.9B | $1.8B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $795M | $1.4B | $4.6B | $954M | $1.1B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1.3B | $2.5B | $2.3B | $1.3B | $1.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +73.2% | +39.1% | +85.7% | +46.3% | +67.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +13.3% | +4.4% | +49.9% | +28.5% | +30.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +44.0% | +12.3% | +72.5% | +30.6% | +34.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +69.4% | +21.9% | +35.4% | +42.7% | +49.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -0.5% | +40.3% | +13.2% | +2.5% | +3.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -127.9% | +22.5% | +3.6% | -64.2% | -40.9% |
Valuation Metrics
VNO leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 7.6x trailing earnings, VNO trades at a 95% valuation discount to WELL's 153.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), SPG offers better value at 0.45x vs AVB's 5.37x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $6.0B | $149.2B | $65.5B | $24.7B | $25.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $13.1B | $165.6B | $94.6B | $33.4B | $35.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 7.63x | 153.25x | 14.24x | 22.63x | 25.14x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 376.94x | 78.42x | 30.29x | 50.61x | 37.72x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.45x | 4.44x | 5.37x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 17.34x | 66.40x | 20.31x | 15.61x | 19.15x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.33x | 13.99x | 10.29x | 7.96x | 8.51x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.90x | 3.35x | 9.79x | 2.24x | 2.23x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 4.79x | 52.41x | — | 19.13x | 18.28x |
Profitability & Efficiency
SPG leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SPG delivers a 68.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $69 in annual profit, vs $3 for WELL. WELL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.49x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SPG's 4.47x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), VNO scores 7/9 vs AVB's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +11.8% | +3.5% | +68.8% | +8.4% | +8.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +6.4% | +2.3% | +11.4% | +4.6% | +4.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +1.4% | +0.5% | +7.6% | +4.2% | +3.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +1.8% | +0.6% | +9.1% | +5.7% | +4.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 7 | 5 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.16x | 0.49x | 4.47x | 0.77x | 0.79x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $7.0B | $16.3B | $29.1B | $8.7B | $9.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $841M | $5.0B | $823M | $56M | $187M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $7.9B | $21.4B | $29.9B | $8.8B | $9.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.63x | 0.26x | 3.26x | 5.58x | 5.07x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
WELL leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in WELL five years ago would be worth $30,234 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,238 for VNO. Over the past 12 months, WELL leads with a +42.7% total return vs VNO's -15.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WELL at 42.5% vs AVB's 4.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -4.2% | +14.3% | +10.7% | +8.4% | +3.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -15.7% | +42.7% | +30.1% | -2.7% | -7.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +145.3% | +189.5% | +109.2% | +17.5% | +14.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -17.6% | +202.3% | +91.4% | +6.7% | +12.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -34.5% | +223.1% | +28.9% | +29.3% | +31.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +34.9% | +42.5% | +27.9% | +5.5% | +4.6% |
Risk & Volatility
WELL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
WELL is the less volatile stock with a 0.13 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than VNO's 1.19 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WELL currently trades 97.0% from its 52-week high vs VNO's 73.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.19x | 0.13x | 0.61x | 0.38x | 0.48x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $43.37 | $219.59 | $208.28 | $71.80 | $209.86 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $24.57 | $142.65 | $155.44 | $57.58 | $160.09 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +73.9% | +97.0% | +96.7% | +91.7% | +88.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 68.9 | 60.2 | 61.2 | 69.8 | 71.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.0M | 2.6M | 1.4M | 2.4M | 940K |
Analyst Outlook
EQR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: VNO as "Hold", WELL as "Buy", SPG as "Hold", EQR as "Hold", AVB as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 17.0% upside for VNO (target: $38) vs -2.2% for SPG (target: $197). For income investors, EQR offers the higher dividend yield at 4.09% vs WELL's 1.30%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $37.50 | $226.50 | $197.00 | $70.15 | $191.70 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 28 | 34 | 37 | 46 | 42 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.3% | +1.3% | — | +4.1% | +3.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 2 | 2 | 8 | 3 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.74 | $2.76 | — | $2.69 | $6.99 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.8% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +1.1% | +1.9% |
SPG leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). WELL leads in 2 (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility).
VNO vs WELL vs SPG vs EQR vs AVB: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is VNO or WELL or SPG or EQR or AVB a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Welltower Inc.
(WELL) is the stronger pick with 35. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 3% for Vornado Realty Trust (VNO). Vornado Realty Trust (VNO) offers the better valuation at 7. 6x trailing P/E (376. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Welltower Inc. (WELL) a "Buy" — based on 34 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — VNO or WELL or SPG or EQR or AVB?
On trailing P/E, Vornado Realty Trust (VNO) is the cheapest at 7.
6x versus Welltower Inc. at 153. 3x. On forward P/E, Simon Property Group, Inc. is actually cheaper at 30. 3x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Simon Property Group, Inc. wins at 0. 96x versus Equity Residential's 9. 94x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — VNO or WELL or SPG or EQR or AVB?
Over the past 5 years, Welltower Inc.
(WELL) delivered a total return of +202. 3%, compared to -17. 6% for Vornado Realty Trust (VNO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WELL returned +223. 1% versus VNO's -34. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — VNO or WELL or SPG or EQR or AVB?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Welltower Inc.
(WELL) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 13β versus Vornado Realty Trust's 1. 19β — meaning VNO is approximately 792% more volatile than WELL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Welltower Inc. (WELL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 49% versus 4% for Simon Property Group, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — VNO or WELL or SPG or EQR or AVB?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Welltower Inc.
(WELL) is pulling ahead at 35. 8% versus 1. 3% for Vornado Realty Trust (VNO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Vornado Realty Trust grew EPS 104. 0% year-over-year, compared to -11. 5% for Welltower Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, WELL leads at 22. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — VNO or WELL or SPG or EQR or AVB?
Simon Property Group, Inc.
(SPG) is the more profitable company, earning 72. 5% net margin versus 8. 8% for Welltower Inc. — meaning it keeps 72. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SPG leads at 49. 9% versus 3. 3% for WELL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — VNO leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is VNO or WELL or SPG or EQR or AVB more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Simon Property Group, Inc. (SPG) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 96x versus Equity Residential's 9. 94x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Simon Property Group, Inc. (SPG) trades at 30. 3x forward P/E versus 376. 9x for Vornado Realty Trust — 346. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for VNO: 17. 0% to $37. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — VNO or WELL or SPG or EQR or AVB?
In this comparison, EQR (4.
1% yield), AVB (3. 8% yield), VNO (2. 3% yield), WELL (1. 3% yield) pay a dividend. SPG does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is VNO or WELL or SPG or EQR or AVB better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Welltower Inc.
(WELL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 13), 1. 3% yield, +223. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (WELL: +223. 1%, VNO: -34. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between VNO and WELL and SPG and EQR and AVB?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: VNO is a small-cap deep-value stock; WELL is a mid-cap high-growth stock; SPG is a mid-cap deep-value stock; EQR is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; AVB is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. VNO, WELL, EQR, AVB pay a dividend while SPG does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.