Software - Application
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
VS vs GFAI vs BCO vs SKLZ vs ARMK
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Security & Protection Services
Security & Protection Services
Electronic Gaming & Multimedia
Specialty Business Services
VS vs GFAI vs BCO vs SKLZ vs ARMK — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Security & Protection Services | Security & Protection Services | Electronic Gaming & Multimedia | Specialty Business Services |
| Market Cap | $6M | $10M | $4.44B | $109M | $11.84B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3M | $72M | $5.39B | $104M | $18.79B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-2M | $-24M | $180M | $-70M | $317M |
| Gross Margin | 99.2% | 15.1% | 26.1% | 87.5% | 7.0% |
| Operating Margin | -87.2% | -27.4% | 10.7% | -68.3% | 4.2% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 11.7x | — | 20.3x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $3M | $4.93B | $129M | $5.72B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $4M | $22M | $2.27B | $195M | $639M |
VS vs GFAI vs BCO vs SKLZ vs ARMK — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jan 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Versus Systems Inc. (VS) | 100 | 0.1 | -99.9% |
| Guardforce AI Co., … (GFAI) | 100 | 0.5 | -99.5% |
| The Brink's Company (BCO) | 100 | 158.2 | +58.2% |
| Skillz Inc. (SKLZ) | 100 | 1.3 | -98.7% |
| Aramark (ARMK) | 100 | 182.1 | +82.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: VS vs GFAI vs BCO vs SKLZ vs ARMK
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
VS lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
Among these 5 stocks, GFAI doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
BCO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 6 yrs, beta 1.10, yield 0.9%
- 293.0% 10Y total return vs ARMK's 97.1%
- Beta 1.10, yield 0.9%, current ratio 1.51x
- Lower P/E (11.7x vs 20.3x)
SKLZ is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth and momentum is your priority.
- 9.5% revenue growth vs VS's -77.1%
- +34.7% vs GFAI's -53.2%
ARMK ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 6.4%, EPS growth 23.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 10.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.71, current ratio 0.99x
- Beta 0.71 vs SKLZ's 2.57
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 9.5% revenue growth vs VS's -77.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (11.7x vs 20.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 3.3% margin vs SKLZ's -67.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.71 vs SKLZ's 2.57 | |
| Dividends | 0.9% yield, 6-year raise streak, vs ARMK's 0.9%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +34.7% vs GFAI's -53.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 2.5% ROA vs GFAI's -50.2%, ROIC 14.3% vs -41.6% |
VS vs GFAI vs BCO vs SKLZ vs ARMK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
VS vs GFAI vs BCO vs SKLZ vs ARMK — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
BCO leads in 4 of 6 categories
ARMK leads 2 • VS leads 0 • GFAI leads 0 • SKLZ leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BCO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ARMK is the larger business by revenue, generating $18.8B annually — 6300.8x VS's $3M. BCO is the more profitable business, keeping 3.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SKLZ's -67.4%. On growth, SKLZ holds the edge at +53.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3M | $72M | $5.4B | $104M | $18.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$3M | -$12M | $797M | -$70M | $1.3B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$2M | -$24M | $180M | -$70M | $317M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$2M | -$6M | $544M | -$70M | $257M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +99.2% | +15.1% | +26.1% | +87.5% | +7.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -87.2% | -27.4% | +10.7% | -68.3% | +4.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -57.9% | -32.9% | +3.3% | -67.4% | +1.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -74.6% | -8.8% | +10.1% | -67.3% | +1.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -100.0% | +3.6% | +10.3% | +53.8% | +6.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +49.4% | +38.9% | -35.3% | -24.7% | -7.7% |
Valuation Metrics
BCO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 22.9x trailing earnings, BCO trades at a 38% valuation discount to ARMK's 36.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, BCO's 8.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ARMK's 13.3x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $6M | $10M | $4.4B | $109M | $11.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3M | -$9M | $7.1B | $43M | $16.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.77x | -0.89x | 22.93x | -1.55x | 36.93x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 11.73x | — | 20.26x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.38x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 8.01x | — | 13.35x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 100.66x | 0.28x | 0.84x | 1.04x | 0.64x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.88x | 0.16x | 11.14x | 0.97x | 3.81x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 10.17x | — | 26.06x |
Profitability & Efficiency
BCO leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BCO delivers a 45.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $46 in annual profit, vs $-70 for GFAI. GFAI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.08x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BCO's 12.10x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ARMK scores 7/9 vs VS's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -40.4% | -69.7% | +45.6% | -52.5% | +9.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -40.4% | -50.2% | +2.5% | -21.8% | +2.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -19.4% | -41.6% | +14.3% | -148.3% | +7.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -136.0% | -19.1% | +12.1% | -34.0% | +8.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 6 | 6 | 4 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.08x | 12.10x | 1.15x | 1.81x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$4M | -$19M | $2.7B | -$66M | $5.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $4M | $22M | $2.3B | $195M | $639M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $3M | $4.9B | $129M | $5.7B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -167.24x | 3.90x | -7.08x | 2.20x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ARMK leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ARMK five years ago would be worth $17,052 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6 for VS. Over the past 12 months, SKLZ leads with a +34.7% total return vs GFAI's -53.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ARMK at 23.3% vs GFAI's -60.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -0.8% | -26.3% | -7.3% | +58.3% | +23.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -38.0% | -53.2% | +19.4% | +34.7% | +19.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -87.9% | -93.8% | +75.3% | -42.7% | +87.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.9% | -99.5% | +39.3% | -97.8% | +70.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.7% | -99.5% | +293.0% | -96.5% | +97.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -50.5% | -60.4% | +20.6% | -16.9% | +23.3% |
Risk & Volatility
ARMK leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ARMK is the less volatile stock with a 0.71 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SKLZ's 2.57 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ARMK currently trades 96.1% from its 52-week high vs GFAI's 31.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.88x | 2.31x | 1.10x | 2.57x | 0.71x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.83 | $1.50 | $136.37 | $20.00 | $46.88 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.75 | $0.38 | $80.10 | $2.23 | $35.07 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +43.8% | +31.5% | +79.0% | +34.9% | +96.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 55.5 | 47.0 | 52.0 | 54.4 | 62.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 81K | 378K | 543K | 1.2M | 2.2M |
Analyst Outlook
BCO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: BCO as "Buy", SKLZ as "Hold", ARMK as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 931.5% upside for SKLZ (target: $72) vs 4.7% for ARMK (target: $47). For income investors, BCO offers the higher dividend yield at 0.93% vs ARMK's 0.92%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $163.00 | $72.00 | $47.20 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — | 9 | 7 | 24 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +0.9% | — | +0.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 6 | — | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $1.00 | — | $0.41 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +4.7% | +8.5% | +1.2% |
BCO leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). ARMK leads in 2 (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility).
VS vs GFAI vs BCO vs SKLZ vs ARMK: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is VS or GFAI or BCO or SKLZ or ARMK a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Skillz Inc.
(SKLZ) is the stronger pick with 9. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -77. 1% for Versus Systems Inc. (VS). The Brink's Company (BCO) offers the better valuation at 22. 9x trailing P/E (11. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate The Brink's Company (BCO) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — VS or GFAI or BCO or SKLZ or ARMK?
On trailing P/E, The Brink's Company (BCO) is the cheapest at 22.
9x versus Aramark at 36. 9x. On forward P/E, The Brink's Company is actually cheaper at 11. 7x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — VS or GFAI or BCO or SKLZ or ARMK?
Over the past 5 years, Aramark (ARMK) delivered a total return of +70.
5%, compared to -99. 9% for Versus Systems Inc. (VS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BCO returned +293. 0% versus VS's -99. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — VS or GFAI or BCO or SKLZ or ARMK?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Aramark (ARMK) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
71β versus Skillz Inc. 's 2. 57β — meaning SKLZ is approximately 263% more volatile than ARMK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Guardforce AI Co. , Limited (GFAI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 8% versus 12% for The Brink's Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — VS or GFAI or BCO or SKLZ or ARMK?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Skillz Inc.
(SKLZ) is pulling ahead at 9. 5% versus -77. 1% for Versus Systems Inc. (VS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Guardforce AI Co. , Limited grew EPS 88. 3% year-over-year, compared to -67. 0% for Skillz Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ARMK leads at 10. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — VS or GFAI or BCO or SKLZ or ARMK?
The Brink's Company (BCO) is the more profitable company, earning 3.
8% net margin versus -70. 6% for Versus Systems Inc. — meaning it keeps 3. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BCO leads at 11. 3% versus -79. 2% for VS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SKLZ leads at 87. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is VS or GFAI or BCO or SKLZ or ARMK more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, The Brink's Company (BCO) trades at 11.
7x forward P/E versus 20. 3x for Aramark — 8. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SKLZ: 931. 5% to $72. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — VS or GFAI or BCO or SKLZ or ARMK?
In this comparison, BCO (0.
9% yield), ARMK (0. 9% yield) pay a dividend. VS, GFAI, SKLZ do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is VS or GFAI or BCO or SKLZ or ARMK better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Aramark (ARMK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
71), 0. 9% yield). Guardforce AI Co. , Limited (GFAI) carries a higher beta of 2. 31 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ARMK: +97. 1%, GFAI: -99. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between VS and GFAI and BCO and SKLZ and ARMK?
These companies operate in different sectors (VS (Technology) and GFAI (Industrials) and BCO (Industrials) and SKLZ (Technology) and ARMK (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
BCO, ARMK pay a dividend while VS, GFAI, SKLZ do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.