Specialty Retail
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
W vs ZG
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Internet Content & Information
W vs ZG — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Specialty Retail | Internet Content & Information |
| Market Cap | $8.71B | $10.65B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $12.66B | $2.69B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-305M | $61M |
| Gross Margin | 30.1% | 73.3% |
| Operating Margin | 1.1% | 0.4% |
| Forward P/E | 23.6x | 19.8x |
| Total Debt | $4.07B | $536M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.48B | $773M |
W vs ZG — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wayfair Inc. (W) | 100 | 38.6 | -61.4% |
| Zillow Group, Inc. … (ZG) | 100 | 76.0 | -24.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: W vs ZG
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
W is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 67.0% 10Y total return vs ZG's 61.3%
- +117.4% vs ZG's -33.7%
ZG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 1.32
- Rev growth 15.5%, EPS growth 118.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 9.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.32, Low D/E 11.0%, current ratio 3.13x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 15.5% revenue growth vs W's 5.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (19.8x vs 23.6x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 2.3% margin vs W's -2.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.32 vs W's 2.85 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +117.4% vs ZG's -33.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 1.1% ROA vs W's -9.6% |
W vs ZG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
W vs ZG — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ZG leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
W is the larger business by revenue, generating $12.7B annually — 4.7x ZG's $2.7B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 2.3% (ZG) to -2.4% (W). On growth, ZG holds the edge at +18.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $12.7B | $2.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $428M | $227M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$305M | $61M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $456M | $333M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +30.1% | +73.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +1.1% | +0.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -2.4% | +2.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +3.6% | +12.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +7.4% | +18.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +10.1% | +5.1% |
Valuation Metrics
W leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, W's 35.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ZG's 39.9x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $8.7B | $10.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $11.3B | $10.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -27.36x | 486.63x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 23.63x | 19.80x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 35.11x | 39.91x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.70x | 4.12x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 2.29x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 18.78x | 45.34x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ZG leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | +1.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -9.6% | +1.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | -0.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +1.4% | -0.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.11x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2.6B | -$237M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.5B | $773M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $4.1B | $536M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.63x | 5.22x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
W leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ZG five years ago would be worth $3,688 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,167 for W. Over the past 12 months, W leads with a +117.4% total return vs ZG's -33.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors W at 18.3% vs ZG's -2.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -37.9% | -32.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +117.4% | -33.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +65.6% | -7.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -78.3% | -63.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +67.0% | +61.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +18.3% | -2.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — W and ZG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ZG is the less volatile stock with a 1.32 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than W's 2.85 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. W currently trades 55.2% from its 52-week high vs ZG's 48.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.85x | 1.32x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $119.98 | $90.22 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $29.75 | $39.14 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +55.2% | +48.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 38.6 | 51.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3.6M | 1.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates W as "Buy" and ZG as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 60.5% upside for ZG (target: $71) vs 51.2% for W (target: $100).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $100.07 | $70.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 57 | 49 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +6.3% |
ZG leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). W leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). 1 tied.
W vs ZG: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is W or ZG a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Zillow Group, Inc.
Class A (ZG) is the stronger pick with 15. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 1% for Wayfair Inc. (W). Zillow Group, Inc. Class A (ZG) offers the better valuation at 486. 6x trailing P/E (19. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Wayfair Inc. (W) a "Buy" — based on 57 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — W or ZG?
On forward P/E, Zillow Group, Inc.
Class A is actually cheaper at 19. 8x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — W or ZG?
Over the past 5 years, Zillow Group, Inc.
Class A (ZG) delivered a total return of -63. 1%, compared to -78. 3% for Wayfair Inc. (W). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: W returned +67. 0% versus ZG's +61. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — W or ZG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Zillow Group, Inc.
Class A (ZG) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 32β versus Wayfair Inc. 's 2. 85β — meaning W is approximately 116% more volatile than ZG relative to the S&P 500.
05Which is growing faster — W or ZG?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Zillow Group, Inc.
Class A (ZG) is pulling ahead at 15. 5% versus 5. 1% for Wayfair Inc. (W). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Zillow Group, Inc. Class A grew EPS 118. 9% year-over-year, compared to 39. 5% for Wayfair Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ZG leads at 9. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — W or ZG?
Zillow Group, Inc.
Class A (ZG) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 9% net margin versus -2. 5% for Wayfair Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: W leads at 0. 1% versus -1. 2% for ZG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ZG leads at 74. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is W or ZG more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Zillow Group, Inc.
Class A (ZG) trades at 19. 8x forward P/E versus 23. 6x for Wayfair Inc. — 3. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ZG: 60. 5% to $70. 67.
08Which pays a better dividend — W or ZG?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is W or ZG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Zillow Group, Inc.
Class A (ZG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding. Wayfair Inc. (W) carries a higher beta of 2. 85 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ZG: +61. 3%, W: +67. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between W and ZG?
These companies operate in different sectors (W (Consumer Cyclical) and ZG (Communication Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: W is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ZG is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Revenue Growth > 9%
- Gross Margin > 44%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.