Internet Content & Information
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
WB vs RDDT vs PINS vs SNAP vs META
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Internet Content & Information
Internet Content & Information
Internet Content & Information
Internet Content & Information
WB vs RDDT vs PINS vs SNAP vs META — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Internet Content & Information | Internet Content & Information | Internet Content & Information | Internet Content & Information | Internet Content & Information |
| Market Cap | $1.33B | $31.40B | $14.34B | $10.11B | $1.56T |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.76B | $2.47B | $4.37B | $6.10B | $214.96B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $372M | $708M | $334M | $-410M | $70.59B |
| Gross Margin | 78.2% | 91.4% | 79.9% | 55.8% | 81.9% |
| Operating Margin | 29.2% | 25.1% | 6.3% | -6.8% | 41.2% |
| Forward P/E | 5.2x | 40.0x | 11.8x | — | 20.4x |
| Total Debt | $1.91B | $23M | $262M | $4.70B | $83.90B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.89B | $954M | $969M | $1.03B | $35.87B |
WB vs RDDT vs PINS vs SNAP vs META — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Mar 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Weibo Corporation (WB) | 100 | 93.1 | -6.9% |
| Reddit, Inc. (RDDT) | 100 | 332.4 | +232.4% |
| Pinterest, Inc. (PINS) | 100 | 62.2 | -37.8% |
| Snap Inc. (SNAP) | 100 | 52.1 | -47.9% |
| Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) | 100 | 127.0 | +27.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: WB vs RDDT vs PINS vs SNAP vs META
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
WB carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.93, yield 8.7%
- Beta 0.93, yield 8.7%, current ratio 3.61x
- Lower P/E (5.2x vs 20.4x)
- Beta 0.93 vs SNAP's 2.14, lower leverage
RDDT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 69.4%, EPS growth 197.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 48.9%
- 69.4% revenue growth vs WB's -0.3%
- +55.3% vs SNAP's -26.4%
- 23.1% ROA vs SNAP's -5.4%, ROIC 18.4% vs -6.9%
PINS is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.27, Low D/E 5.5%, current ratio 7.64x
Among these 5 stocks, SNAP doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
META ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding.
- 421.2% 10Y total return vs RDDT's 225.0%
- 32.8% margin vs SNAP's -6.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 69.4% revenue growth vs WB's -0.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (5.2x vs 20.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 32.8% margin vs SNAP's -6.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.93 vs SNAP's 2.14, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 8.7% yield, vs META's 0.3%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +55.3% vs SNAP's -26.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 23.1% ROA vs SNAP's -5.4%, ROIC 18.4% vs -6.9% |
WB vs RDDT vs PINS vs SNAP vs META — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
WB vs RDDT vs PINS vs SNAP vs META — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
RDDT leads in 3 of 6 categories
WB leads 1 • PINS leads 0 • SNAP leads 0 • META leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RDDT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
META is the larger business by revenue, generating $215.0B annually — 121.9x WB's $1.8B. META is the more profitable business, keeping 32.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SNAP's -6.7%. On growth, RDDT holds the edge at +69.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.8B | $2.5B | $4.4B | $6.1B | $215.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $535M | $633M | $294M | -$291M | $109.3B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $372M | $708M | $334M | -$410M | $70.6B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $0 | $869M | $1.2B | $609M | $48.3B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +78.2% | +91.4% | +79.9% | +55.8% | +81.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +29.2% | +25.1% | +6.3% | -6.8% | +41.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +21.1% | +28.6% | +7.6% | -6.7% | +32.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +33.0% | +35.1% | +27.6% | +10.0% | +22.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +1.6% | +69.1% | +17.8% | +12.1% | +33.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +11.9% | +6.2% | -10.3% | +39.2% | +62.4% |
Valuation Metrics
WB leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 7.3x trailing earnings, WB trades at a 88% valuation discount to RDDT's 62.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, WB's 2.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than RDDT's 66.5x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.3B | $31.4B | $14.3B | $10.1B | $1.56T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.3B | $30.5B | $13.6B | $13.8B | $1.61T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 7.29x | 62.57x | 35.37x | -22.17x | 26.26x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 5.22x | 40.02x | 11.84x | — | 20.36x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | 1.43x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 2.37x | 66.53x | 39.51x | — | 15.81x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.76x | 14.26x | 3.40x | 1.70x | 7.78x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.63x | 11.31x | 3.13x | 4.51x | 7.31x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 2.30x | 45.89x | 11.46x | 23.12x | 33.90x |
Profitability & Efficiency
RDDT leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
META delivers a 33.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $33 in annual profit, vs $-19 for SNAP. RDDT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SNAP's 2.06x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), WB scores 7/9 vs META's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +10.3% | +25.5% | +7.8% | -18.9% | +33.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +5.7% | +23.1% | +6.3% | -5.4% | +20.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +10.3% | +18.4% | +6.1% | -6.9% | +27.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +9.0% | +17.2% | +6.4% | -8.1% | +29.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 7 | 6 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.53x | 0.01x | 0.06x | 2.06x | 0.39x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $15M | -$930M | -$707M | $3.7B | $48.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.9B | $954M | $969M | $1.0B | $35.9B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.9B | $23M | $262M | $4.7B | $83.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 5.11x | — | 23.20x | -7.67x | 78.84x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
RDDT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in RDDT five years ago would be worth $32,502 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,094 for SNAP. Over the past 12 months, RDDT leads with a +55.3% total return vs SNAP's -26.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors RDDT at 48.1% vs SNAP's -10.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -13.9% | -32.2% | -18.8% | -26.4% | -5.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +7.8% | +55.3% | -21.1% | -26.4% | +3.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -28.6% | +225.0% | -0.1% | -28.9% | +166.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -75.9% | +225.0% | -64.0% | -89.1% | +94.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -46.4% | +225.0% | -11.6% | -75.6% | +421.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -10.6% | +48.1% | -0.0% | -10.8% | +38.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — WB and META each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
WB is the less volatile stock with a 0.93 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SNAP's 2.14 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. META currently trades 77.5% from its 52-week high vs PINS's 54.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.93x | 1.79x | 1.27x | 2.14x | 1.59x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $12.96 | $282.95 | $39.93 | $10.41 | $796.25 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $8.10 | $94.89 | $13.84 | $3.81 | $520.26 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +65.3% | +57.9% | +54.0% | +57.5% | +77.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 43.6 | 58.4 | 60.2 | 61.6 | 42.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.1M | 4.5M | 16.1M | 49.1M | 15.6M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — WB and META each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: WB as "Buy", RDDT as "Buy", PINS as "Buy", SNAP as "Hold", META as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 103.1% upside for WB (target: $17) vs 17.5% for PINS (target: $25). For income investors, WB offers the higher dividend yield at 8.66% vs META's 0.34%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $17.18 | $228.11 | $25.36 | $7.89 | $821.80 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 22 | 26 | 47 | 72 | 60 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +8.7% | — | — | — | +0.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — | — | — | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.73 | — | — | — | $2.07 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +6.5% | +27.2% | +1.7% |
RDDT leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). WB leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
WB vs RDDT vs PINS vs SNAP vs META: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is WB or RDDT or PINS or SNAP or META a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Reddit, Inc.
(RDDT) is the stronger pick with 69. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 3% for Weibo Corporation (WB). Weibo Corporation (WB) offers the better valuation at 7. 3x trailing P/E (5. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Weibo Corporation (WB) a "Buy" — based on 22 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — WB or RDDT or PINS or SNAP or META?
On trailing P/E, Weibo Corporation (WB) is the cheapest at 7.
3x versus Reddit, Inc. at 62. 6x. On forward P/E, Weibo Corporation is actually cheaper at 5. 2x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — WB or RDDT or PINS or SNAP or META?
Over the past 5 years, Reddit, Inc.
(RDDT) delivered a total return of +225. 0%, compared to -89. 1% for Snap Inc. (SNAP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: META returned +421. 2% versus SNAP's -75. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — WB or RDDT or PINS or SNAP or META?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Weibo Corporation (WB) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
93β versus Snap Inc. 's 2. 14β — meaning SNAP is approximately 131% more volatile than WB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Reddit, Inc. (RDDT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 2% for Snap Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — WB or RDDT or PINS or SNAP or META?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Reddit, Inc.
(RDDT) is pulling ahead at 69. 4% versus -0. 3% for Weibo Corporation (WB). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Reddit, Inc. grew EPS 197. 4% year-over-year, compared to -77. 2% for Pinterest, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, RDDT leads at 48. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — WB or RDDT or PINS or SNAP or META?
Meta Platforms, Inc.
(META) is the more profitable company, earning 30. 1% net margin versus -7. 8% for Snap Inc. — meaning it keeps 30. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: META leads at 41. 4% versus -9. 0% for SNAP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RDDT leads at 91. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is WB or RDDT or PINS or SNAP or META more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Weibo Corporation (WB) trades at 5.
2x forward P/E versus 40. 0x for Reddit, Inc. — 34. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for WB: 103. 1% to $17. 18.
08Which pays a better dividend — WB or RDDT or PINS or SNAP or META?
In this comparison, WB (8.
7% yield), META (0. 3% yield) pay a dividend. RDDT, PINS, SNAP do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is WB or RDDT or PINS or SNAP or META better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Weibo Corporation (WB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
93), 8. 7% yield). Snap Inc. (SNAP) carries a higher beta of 2. 14 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (WB: -46. 4%, SNAP: -75. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between WB and RDDT and PINS and SNAP and META?
Both stocks operate in the Communication Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: WB is a small-cap deep-value stock; RDDT is a mid-cap high-growth stock; PINS is a mid-cap high-growth stock; SNAP is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; META is a mega-cap high-growth stock. WB pays a dividend while RDDT, PINS, SNAP, META do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Net Margin > 12%
- Dividend Yield > 3.4%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.