Software - Application
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
WBTN vs IZEA vs SNAP vs PINS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Internet Content & Information
Internet Content & Information
Internet Content & Information
WBTN vs IZEA vs SNAP vs PINS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Internet Content & Information | Internet Content & Information | Internet Content & Information |
| Market Cap | $1.73B | $80M | $10.11B | $14.34B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.38B | $31M | $6.10B | $4.37B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-412M | $42K | $-410M | $334M |
| Gross Margin | 23.3% | 48.1% | 55.8% | 79.9% |
| Operating Margin | -4.3% | -6.0% | -6.8% | 6.3% |
| Forward P/E | — | 1917.4x | — | 11.8x |
| Total Debt | $24M | $9K | $4.70B | $262M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $582M | $51M | $1.03B | $969M |
WBTN vs IZEA vs SNAP vs PINS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| WEBTOON Entertainme… (WBTN) | 100 | 57.9 | -42.1% |
| IZEA Worldwide, Inc. (IZEA) | 100 | 187.7 | +87.7% |
| Snap Inc. (SNAP) | 100 | 36.0 | -64.0% |
| Pinterest, Inc. (PINS) | 100 | 49.0 | -51.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: WBTN vs IZEA vs SNAP vs PINS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
WBTN plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
IZEA is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- beta 0.45
- Lower volatility, beta 0.45, Low D/E 0.0%, current ratio 6.44x
- Beta 0.45, current ratio 6.44x
- Beta 0.45 vs SNAP's 2.14, lower leverage
SNAP lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
PINS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 15.8%, EPS growth -77.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 14.6%
- -11.6% 10Y total return vs WBTN's -42.6%
- 15.8% revenue growth vs IZEA's -12.9%
- Better valuation composite
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 15.8% revenue growth vs IZEA's -12.9% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 7.6% margin vs WBTN's -29.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.45 vs SNAP's 2.14, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +126.2% vs SNAP's -26.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.3% ROA vs WBTN's -21.9%, ROIC 6.1% vs -5.1% |
WBTN vs IZEA vs SNAP vs PINS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
WBTN vs IZEA vs SNAP vs PINS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
PINS leads in 2 of 6 categories
IZEA leads 2 • WBTN leads 1 • SNAP leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PINS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SNAP is the larger business by revenue, generating $6.1B annually — 195.2x IZEA's $31M. PINS is the more profitable business, keeping 7.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to WBTN's -29.8%. On growth, PINS holds the edge at +17.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.4B | $31M | $6.1B | $4.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$24M | -$1M | -$291M | $294M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$412M | $42,326 | -$410M | $334M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $4M | $2M | $609M | $1.2B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +23.3% | +48.1% | +55.8% | +79.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -4.3% | -6.0% | -6.8% | +6.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -29.8% | +0.1% | -6.7% | +7.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +0.3% | +6.1% | +10.0% | +27.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -6.3% | -44.9% | +12.1% | +17.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.3% | +76.0% | +39.2% | -10.3% |
Valuation Metrics
WBTN leads this category, winning 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 35.4x trailing earnings, PINS trades at a 98% valuation discount to IZEA's 1917.4x P/E.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.7B | $80M | $10.1B | $14.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.2B | $29M | $13.8B | $13.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -4.97x | 1917.39x | -22.17x | 35.37x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | 11.84x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | 39.51x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.25x | 2.56x | 1.70x | 3.40x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.40x | 1.65x | 4.51x | 3.13x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 480.10x | 32.93x | 23.12x | 11.46x |
Profitability & Efficiency
PINS leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
PINS delivers a 7.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $8 in annual profit, vs $-28 for WBTN. IZEA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SNAP's 2.06x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), IZEA scores 7/9 vs WBTN's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -27.7% | +0.1% | -18.9% | +7.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -21.9% | +0.1% | -5.4% | +6.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -5.1% | -124.5% | -6.9% | +6.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -3.9% | -3.8% | -8.1% | +6.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 7 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.02x | 0.00x | 2.06x | 0.06x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$558M | -$51M | $3.7B | -$707M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $582M | $51M | $1.0B | $969M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $24M | $9,106 | $4.7B | $262M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -730.78x | -290.31x | -7.67x | 23.20x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
IZEA leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in WBTN five years ago would be worth $5,743 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,094 for SNAP. Over the past 12 months, IZEA leads with a +126.2% total return vs SNAP's -26.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors IZEA at 21.5% vs WBTN's -16.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | 0.0% | -3.5% | -26.4% | -18.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +42.7% | +126.2% | -26.4% | -21.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -42.6% | +79.3% | -28.9% | -0.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -42.6% | -68.9% | -89.1% | -64.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -42.6% | -83.6% | -75.6% | -11.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -16.9% | +21.5% | -10.8% | -0.0% |
Risk & Volatility
IZEA leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
IZEA is the less volatile stock with a 0.45 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SNAP's 2.14 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. IZEA currently trades 75.3% from its 52-week high vs PINS's 54.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.10x | 0.45x | 2.14x | 1.27x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $22.47 | $5.86 | $10.41 | $39.93 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $7.83 | $1.79 | $3.81 | $13.84 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +58.8% | +75.3% | +57.5% | +54.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 66.6 | 61.9 | 61.6 | 60.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 342K | 62K | 49.1M | 16.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: WBTN as "Buy", SNAP as "Hold", PINS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 31.8% upside for SNAP (target: $8) vs 6.0% for WBTN (target: $14).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | — | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $14.00 | — | $7.89 | $25.36 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | — | 72 | 47 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.9% | +27.2% | +6.5% |
PINS leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). IZEA leads in 2 (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility).
WBTN vs IZEA vs SNAP vs PINS: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is WBTN or IZEA or SNAP or PINS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Pinterest, Inc.
(PINS) is the stronger pick with 15. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -12. 9% for IZEA Worldwide, Inc. (IZEA). Pinterest, Inc. (PINS) offers the better valuation at 35. 4x trailing P/E (11. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate WEBTOON Entertainment Inc. Common stock (WBTN) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — WBTN or IZEA or SNAP or PINS?
On trailing P/E, Pinterest, Inc.
(PINS) is the cheapest at 35. 4x versus IZEA Worldwide, Inc. at 1917. 4x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — WBTN or IZEA or SNAP or PINS?
Over the past 5 years, WEBTOON Entertainment Inc.
Common stock (WBTN) delivered a total return of -42. 6%, compared to -89. 1% for Snap Inc. (SNAP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PINS returned -11. 6% versus IZEA's -83. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — WBTN or IZEA or SNAP or PINS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), IZEA Worldwide, Inc.
(IZEA) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 45β versus Snap Inc. 's 2. 14β — meaning SNAP is approximately 380% more volatile than IZEA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, IZEA Worldwide, Inc. (IZEA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 2% for Snap Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — WBTN or IZEA or SNAP or PINS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Pinterest, Inc.
(PINS) is pulling ahead at 15. 8% versus -12. 9% for IZEA Worldwide, Inc. (IZEA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: IZEA Worldwide, Inc. grew EPS 100. 2% year-over-year, compared to -119. 8% for WEBTOON Entertainment Inc. Common stock. Over a 3-year CAGR, PINS leads at 14. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — WBTN or IZEA or SNAP or PINS?
Pinterest, Inc.
(PINS) is the more profitable company, earning 9. 9% net margin versus -29. 3% for WEBTOON Entertainment Inc. Common stock — meaning it keeps 9. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PINS leads at 7. 6% versus -9. 0% for SNAP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PINS leads at 80. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is WBTN or IZEA or SNAP or PINS more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SNAP: 31.
8% to $7. 89.
08Which pays a better dividend — WBTN or IZEA or SNAP or PINS?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is WBTN or IZEA or SNAP or PINS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, IZEA Worldwide, Inc.
(IZEA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 45)). Snap Inc. (SNAP) carries a higher beta of 2. 14 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (IZEA: -83. 6%, SNAP: -75. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between WBTN and IZEA and SNAP and PINS?
These companies operate in different sectors (WBTN (Technology) and IZEA (Communication Services) and SNAP (Unknown) and PINS (Communication Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: WBTN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; IZEA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SNAP is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; PINS is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.