Hardware, Equipment & Parts
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
WBX vs TSLA vs GM vs BLNK
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Auto - Manufacturers
Auto - Manufacturers
Engineering & Construction
WBX vs TSLA vs GM vs BLNK — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Hardware, Equipment & Parts | Auto - Manufacturers | Auto - Manufacturers | Engineering & Construction |
| Market Cap | $32M | $1.55T | $70.70B | $91M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $148M | $97.88B | $184.62B | $106M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-126M | $3.88B | $2.54B | $-126M |
| Gross Margin | 32.3% | 19.1% | 6.1% | 26.0% |
| Operating Margin | -83.5% | 5.0% | 1.3% | -119.5% |
| Forward P/E | — | 213.0x | 6.2x | — |
| Total Debt | $198M | $8.38B | $130.28B | $11M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $4M | $16.51B | $20.95B | $42M |
WBX vs TSLA vs GM vs BLNK — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Apr 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wallbox N.V. (WBX) | 100 | 1.5 | -98.5% |
| Tesla, Inc. (TSLA) | 100 | 174.1 | +74.1% |
| General Motors Comp… (GM) | 100 | 137.0 | +37.0% |
| Blink Charging Co. (BLNK) | 100 | 2.2 | -97.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: WBX vs TSLA vs GM vs BLNK
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
WBX is the clearest fit if your priority is growth.
- -0.1% revenue growth vs BLNK's -11.2%
TSLA is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 28.6% 10Y total return vs GM's 180.2%
- 4.0% margin vs BLNK's -118.7%
- 2.9% ROA vs BLNK's -66.7%, ROIC 4.5% vs -109.7%
GM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 1.07, yield 0.9%
- Rev growth -1.3%, EPS growth -48.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 5.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.07, current ratio 1.17x
- Beta 1.07, yield 0.9%, current ratio 1.17x
BLNK lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -0.1% revenue growth vs BLNK's -11.2% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 4.0% margin vs BLNK's -118.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.07 vs BLNK's 2.96 | |
| Dividends | 0.9% yield; 4-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +73.8% vs WBX's -59.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 2.9% ROA vs BLNK's -66.7%, ROIC 4.5% vs -109.7% |
WBX vs TSLA vs GM vs BLNK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
WBX vs TSLA vs GM vs BLNK — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
TSLA leads in 3 of 6 categories
GM leads 2 • WBX leads 0 • BLNK leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TSLA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GM is the larger business by revenue, generating $184.6B annually — 1736.0x BLNK's $106M. TSLA is the more profitable business, keeping 4.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BLNK's -118.7%. On growth, TSLA holds the edge at +15.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $148M | $97.9B | $184.6B | $106M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$110M | $9.5B | $15.5B | -$115M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$126M | $3.9B | $2.5B | -$126M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$39M | $7.0B | $12.5B | -$47M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +32.3% | +19.1% | +6.1% | +26.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -83.5% | +5.0% | +1.3% | -119.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -84.9% | +4.0% | +1.4% | -118.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -26.1% | +7.2% | +6.8% | -44.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -21.4% | +15.8% | -0.9% | +11.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +49.6% | +11.9% | -15.2% | +99.9% |
Valuation Metrics
GM leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 24.0x trailing earnings, GM trades at a 94% valuation discount to TSLA's 381.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, GM's 10.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than TSLA's 146.4x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $32M | $1.55T | $70.7B | $91M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $225M | $1.54T | $180.0B | $60M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.38x | 381.31x | 23.98x | -0.40x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 212.96x | 6.22x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 9.84x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 146.35x | 10.29x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.19x | 16.30x | 0.38x | 0.73x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 17.53x | 1.21x | 0.67x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 248.44x | 6.38x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
TSLA leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TSLA delivers a 4.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $5 in annual profit, vs $-183 for WBX. BLNK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.09x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GM's 2.06x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TSLA scores 6/9 vs BLNK's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -182.7% | +4.8% | +3.8% | -131.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -47.3% | +2.9% | +0.9% | -66.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -38.4% | +4.5% | +1.3% | -109.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -91.9% | +4.4% | +1.6% | -77.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 | 6 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.10x | 2.06x | 0.09x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $193M | -$8.1B | $109.3B | -$31M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $4M | $16.5B | $20.9B | $42M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $198M | $8.4B | $130.3B | $11M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -4.94x | 17.04x | 2.60x | -9064.60x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TSLA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TSLA five years ago would be worth $18,375 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $152 for WBX. Over the past 12 months, GM leads with a +73.8% total return vs WBX's -59.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TSLA at 33.8% vs WBX's -64.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +25.1% | -6.0% | -3.0% | +7.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -59.6% | +49.1% | +73.8% | +4.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -95.6% | +139.7% | +137.4% | -88.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.5% | +83.7% | +35.9% | -97.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.5% | +2856.3% | +180.2% | -97.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -64.8% | +33.8% | +33.4% | -51.9% |
Risk & Volatility
GM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GM is the less volatile stock with a 1.07 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BLNK's 2.96 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GM currently trades 89.5% from its 52-week high vs BLNK's 29.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.10x | 2.06x | 1.07x | 2.96x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $8.00 | $498.83 | $87.62 | $2.65 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.30 | $271.00 | $44.97 | $0.45 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +38.0% | +82.6% | +89.5% | +29.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.1 | 59.3 | 55.4 | 66.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 18K | 61.6M | 6.7M | 2.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: WBX as "Buy", TSLA as "Hold", GM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 31.6% upside for WBX (target: $4) vs 9.4% for TSLA (target: $450). GM is the only dividend payer here at 0.86% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $4.00 | $450.45 | $91.75 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | 81 | 51 | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +0.9% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 4 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $0.68 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +8.5% | 0.0% |
TSLA leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). GM leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Risk & Volatility).
WBX vs TSLA vs GM vs BLNK: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is WBX or TSLA or GM or BLNK a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Wallbox N.
V. (WBX) is the stronger pick with -0. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -11. 2% for Blink Charging Co. (BLNK). General Motors Company (GM) offers the better valuation at 24. 0x trailing P/E (6. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Wallbox N. V. (WBX) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — WBX or TSLA or GM or BLNK?
On trailing P/E, General Motors Company (GM) is the cheapest at 24.
0x versus Tesla, Inc. at 381. 3x. On forward P/E, General Motors Company is actually cheaper at 6. 2x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — WBX or TSLA or GM or BLNK?
Over the past 5 years, Tesla, Inc.
(TSLA) delivered a total return of +83. 7%, compared to -98. 5% for Wallbox N. V. (WBX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TSLA returned +28. 6% versus WBX's -98. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — WBX or TSLA or GM or BLNK?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), General Motors Company (GM) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
07β versus Blink Charging Co. 's 2. 96β — meaning BLNK is approximately 175% more volatile than GM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Blink Charging Co. (BLNK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 9% versus 2% for General Motors Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — WBX or TSLA or GM or BLNK?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Wallbox N.
V. (WBX) is pulling ahead at -0. 1% versus -11. 2% for Blink Charging Co. (BLNK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Blink Charging Co. grew EPS 38. 9% year-over-year, compared to -1020. 8% for Wallbox N. V.. Over a 3-year CAGR, BLNK leads at 82. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — WBX or TSLA or GM or BLNK?
Tesla, Inc.
(TSLA) is the more profitable company, earning 4. 0% net margin versus -159. 2% for Blink Charging Co. — meaning it keeps 4. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TSLA leads at 4. 6% versus -160. 6% for BLNK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BLNK leads at 31. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is WBX or TSLA or GM or BLNK more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, General Motors Company (GM) trades at 6.
2x forward P/E versus 213. 0x for Tesla, Inc. — 206. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for WBX: 31. 6% to $4. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — WBX or TSLA or GM or BLNK?
In this comparison, GM (0.
9% yield) pays a dividend. WBX, TSLA, BLNK do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is WBX or TSLA or GM or BLNK better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, General Motors Company (GM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.
07), 0. 9% yield, +180. 2% 10Y return). Blink Charging Co. (BLNK) carries a higher beta of 2. 96 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (GM: +180. 2%, BLNK: -97. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between WBX and TSLA and GM and BLNK?
These companies operate in different sectors (WBX (Technology) and TSLA (Consumer Cyclical) and GM (Consumer Cyclical) and BLNK (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
GM pays a dividend while WBX, TSLA, BLNK do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.