Software - Infrastructure
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
WEX vs FLYW vs PAYO vs PRTH vs V
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Information Technology Services
Software - Infrastructure
Software - Infrastructure
Financial - Credit Services
WEX vs FLYW vs PAYO vs PRTH vs V — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Infrastructure | Information Technology Services | Software - Infrastructure | Software - Infrastructure | Financial - Credit Services |
| Market Cap | $5.00B | $2.12B | $1.74B | $451M | $616.45B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.70B | $188.60B | $1.07B | $953M | $40.00B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $310M | $12.54B | $72M | $56M | $22.24B |
| Gross Margin | 57.4% | 0.2% | 61.9% | 21.4% | 80.4% |
| Operating Margin | 24.7% | 5.7% | 11.7% | 14.8% | 60.0% |
| Forward P/E | 7.4x | 49.5x | 20.4x | 5.8x | 24.6x |
| Total Debt | $4.86B | $0.00 | $72M | $1.05B | $25.17B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $906M | $330M | $416M | $77M | $20.15B |
WEX vs FLYW vs PAYO vs PRTH vs V — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| WEX Inc. (WEX) | 100 | 73.6 | -26.4% |
| Flywire Corporation (FLYW) | 100 | 51.6 | -48.4% |
| Payoneer Global Inc. (PAYO) | 100 | 50.6 | -49.4% |
| Priority Technology… (PRTH) | 100 | 71.1 | -28.9% |
| Visa Inc. (V) | 100 | 141.4 | +41.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: WEX vs FLYW vs PAYO vs PRTH vs V
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
WEX lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
FLYW is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 26.6%, EPS growth 391.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 29.1%
- 26.6% revenue growth vs WEX's 1.2%
- +62.7% vs PAYO's -17.9%
Among these 5 stocks, PAYO doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
PRTH ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value.
- Lower P/E (5.8x vs 24.6x)
V carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.68, yield 0.7%
- 329.1% 10Y total return vs WEX's 60.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.68, Low D/E 66.4%, current ratio 1.08x
- Beta 0.68, yield 0.7%, current ratio 1.08x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 26.6% revenue growth vs WEX's 1.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (5.8x vs 24.6x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 50.1% margin vs PRTH's 5.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.68 vs PRTH's 2.12 | |
| Dividends | 0.7% yield; 15-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +62.7% vs PAYO's -17.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 22.7% ROA vs PAYO's 0.9%, ROIC 29.2% vs 30.7% |
WEX vs FLYW vs PAYO vs PRTH vs V — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
WEX vs FLYW vs PAYO vs PRTH vs V — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
V leads in 3 of 6 categories
PRTH leads 1 • WEX leads 0 • FLYW leads 0 • PAYO leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
V leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FLYW is the larger business by revenue, generating $188.6B annually — 197.9x PRTH's $953M. V is the more profitable business, keeping 50.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PRTH's 5.8%. On growth, FLYW holds the edge at +1408.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.7B | $188.6B | $1.1B | $953M | $40.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $952M | $10.8B | $208M | $204M | $27.6B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $310M | $12.5B | $72M | $56M | $22.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $460M | -$15.8B | $215M | $75M | $21.2B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +57.4% | +0.2% | +61.9% | +21.4% | +80.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +24.7% | +5.7% | +11.7% | +14.8% | +60.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +11.5% | +6.6% | +6.8% | +5.8% | +50.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +17.0% | -8.4% | +20.2% | +7.9% | +53.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +5.8% | +1408.6% | +6.1% | +8.8% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +22.7% | +4.0% | +20.0% | +3.1% | +35.3% |
Valuation Metrics
PRTH leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 8.1x trailing earnings, PRTH trades at a 95% valuation discount to FLYW's 161.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, PRTH's 6.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than FLYW's 47.8x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $5.0B | $2.1B | $1.7B | $451M | $616.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $9.0B | $1.8B | $1.4B | $1.4B | $621.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 17.03x | 161.18x | 26.63x | 8.10x | 31.50x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 7.43x | 49.50x | 20.42x | 5.78x | 24.59x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | 1.99x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 8.89x | 47.80x | 7.36x | 6.95x | 24.65x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.88x | 3.40x | 1.66x | 0.47x | 15.41x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.20x | 2.71x | 2.71x | — | 16.66x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 15.94x | 21.41x | 8.44x | 6.01x | 28.57x |
Profitability & Efficiency
V leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
V delivers a 58.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $59 in annual profit, vs $6 for FLYW. PAYO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.10x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to WEX's 3.94x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FLYW scores 6/9 vs V's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +27.0% | +5.9% | +10.0% | — | +58.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.1% | +4.3% | +0.9% | +2.6% | +22.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +9.6% | +2.1% | +30.7% | +13.4% | +29.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +13.4% | +1.3% | +14.9% | +16.0% | +36.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 3.94x | — | 0.10x | — | 0.66x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $4.0B | -$330M | -$343M | $969M | $5.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $906M | $330M | $416M | $77M | $20.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $4.9B | $0 | $72M | $1.0B | $25.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.76x | 1.84x | 17.23x | 1.51x | 26.72x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — FLYW and PRTH and V each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in V five years ago would be worth $14,262 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,020 for PAYO. Over the past 12 months, FLYW leads with a +62.7% total return vs PAYO's -17.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PRTH at 14.6% vs FLYW's -15.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -2.8% | +27.6% | -7.0% | +3.6% | -7.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +19.0% | +62.7% | -17.9% | -10.4% | -7.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -18.2% | -40.1% | -9.0% | +50.5% | +41.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -26.5% | -49.5% | -49.8% | -15.9% | +42.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +60.9% | -49.5% | -47.7% | -43.8% | +329.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -6.5% | -15.7% | -3.1% | +14.6% | +12.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — FLYW and V each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
V is the less volatile stock with a 0.68 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PRTH's 2.12 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FLYW currently trades 98.2% from its 52-week high vs PRTH's 62.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.16x | 1.32x | 1.65x | 2.12x | 0.68x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $186.85 | $18.05 | $7.67 | $8.89 | $375.51 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $120.03 | $9.79 | $4.08 | $4.44 | $293.89 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +77.2% | +98.2% | +66.0% | +62.0% | +85.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 38.0 | 83.0 | 45.1 | 53.4 | 53.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 518K | 1.9M | 3.5M | 252K | 6.9M |
Analyst Outlook
V leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: WEX as "Hold", FLYW as "Buy", PAYO as "Buy", PRTH as "Buy", V as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 99.6% upside for PRTH (target: $11) vs -1.3% for FLYW (target: $18). V is the only dividend payer here at 0.73% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $177.67 | $17.50 | $7.50 | $11.00 | $362.45 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 32 | 19 | 10 | 5 | 61 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | +0.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | — | — | 3 | 15 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | $2.36 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +16.0% | +3.7% | +10.0% | +2.3% | +2.2% |
V leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). PRTH leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
WEX vs FLYW vs PAYO vs PRTH vs V: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is WEX or FLYW or PAYO or PRTH or V a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Flywire Corporation (FLYW) is the stronger pick with 26.
6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 2% for WEX Inc. (WEX). Priority Technology Holdings, Inc. (PRTH) offers the better valuation at 8. 1x trailing P/E (5. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Flywire Corporation (FLYW) a "Buy" — based on 19 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — WEX or FLYW or PAYO or PRTH or V?
On trailing P/E, Priority Technology Holdings, Inc.
(PRTH) is the cheapest at 8. 1x versus Flywire Corporation at 161. 2x. On forward P/E, Priority Technology Holdings, Inc. is actually cheaper at 5. 8x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — WEX or FLYW or PAYO or PRTH or V?
Over the past 5 years, Visa Inc.
(V) delivered a total return of +42. 6%, compared to -49. 8% for Payoneer Global Inc. (PAYO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: V returned +329. 1% versus FLYW's -49. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — WEX or FLYW or PAYO or PRTH or V?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Visa Inc.
(V) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 68β versus Priority Technology Holdings, Inc. 's 2. 12β — meaning PRTH is approximately 212% more volatile than V relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Payoneer Global Inc. (PAYO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 10% versus 4% for WEX Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — WEX or FLYW or PAYO or PRTH or V?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Flywire Corporation (FLYW) is pulling ahead at 26.
6% versus 1. 2% for WEX Inc. (WEX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Flywire Corporation grew EPS 391. 1% year-over-year, compared to -38. 7% for Payoneer Global Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, FLYW leads at 29. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — WEX or FLYW or PAYO or PRTH or V?
Visa Inc.
(V) is the more profitable company, earning 50. 1% net margin versus 2. 2% for Flywire Corporation — meaning it keeps 50. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: V leads at 60. 0% versus 1. 8% for FLYW. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — V leads at 80. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is WEX or FLYW or PAYO or PRTH or V more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Priority Technology Holdings, Inc.
(PRTH) trades at 5. 8x forward P/E versus 49. 5x for Flywire Corporation — 43. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PRTH: 99. 6% to $11. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — WEX or FLYW or PAYO or PRTH or V?
In this comparison, V (0.
7% yield) pays a dividend. WEX, FLYW, PAYO, PRTH do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is WEX or FLYW or PAYO or PRTH or V better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Visa Inc.
(V) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 68), 0. 7% yield, +329. 1% 10Y return). Priority Technology Holdings, Inc. (PRTH) carries a higher beta of 2. 12 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (V: +329. 1%, PRTH: -43. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between WEX and FLYW and PAYO and PRTH and V?
These companies operate in different sectors (WEX (Technology) and FLYW (Technology) and PAYO (Technology) and PRTH (Technology) and V (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: WEX is a small-cap deep-value stock; FLYW is a small-cap high-growth stock; PAYO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PRTH is a small-cap deep-value stock; V is a large-cap quality compounder stock. V pays a dividend while WEX, FLYW, PAYO, PRTH do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.