REIT - Retail
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
WHLRD vs WELL vs VTR vs WHLR vs NXRT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Healthcare Facilities
REIT - Healthcare Facilities
REIT - Retail
REIT - Residential
WHLRD vs WELL vs VTR vs WHLR vs NXRT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Retail | REIT - Healthcare Facilities | REIT - Healthcare Facilities | REIT - Retail | REIT - Residential |
| Market Cap | $4.14B | $143.86B | $40.14B | $376M | $737M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $99M | $11.63B | $6.13B | $99M | $252M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $12M | $1.43B | $260M | $6M | $-32M |
| Gross Margin | 66.8% | 39.1% | -4.3% | 56.8% | 91.1% |
| Operating Margin | 36.7% | 4.4% | 13.4% | 34.9% | 11.5% |
| Forward P/E | — | 71.5x | 131.4x | — | — |
| Total Debt | $484M | $21.38B | $13.22B | $484M | $1.56B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $24M | $5.03B | $741M | $24M | $14M |
WHLRD vs WELL vs VTR vs WHLR vs NXRT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheeler Real Estate… (WHLRD) | 100 | 322.9 | +222.9% |
| Welltower Inc. (WELL) | 100 | 396.8 | +296.8% |
| Ventas, Inc. (VTR) | 100 | 230.5 | +130.5% |
| Wheeler Real Estate… (WHLR) | 100 | 0.0 | -100.0% |
| NexPoint Residentia… (NXRT) | 100 | 82.2 | -17.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: WHLRD vs WELL vs VTR vs WHLR vs NXRT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
WHLRD is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night and defensive is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.13, current ratio 8.91x
- Beta 0.13, yield 0.2%, current ratio 8.91x
- Beta 0.13 vs WHLR's 1.99
WELL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 240.1% 10Y total return vs NXRT's 205.6%
- 35.8% FFO/revenue growth vs WHLR's -4.9%
- Better valuation composite
- 12.3% margin vs NXRT's -12.7%
VTR is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 18.5%, EPS growth 184.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 12.2%
Among these 5 stocks, WHLR doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
NXRT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 0.59, yield 7.3%
- 7.3% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs WHLRD's 0.2%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 35.8% FFO/revenue growth vs WHLR's -4.9% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 12.3% margin vs NXRT's -12.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.13 vs WHLR's 1.99 | |
| Dividends | 7.3% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs WHLRD's 0.2%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +36.1% vs WHLR's -99.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 2.3% ROA vs NXRT's -1.7%, ROIC 0.5% vs 1.1% |
WHLRD vs WELL vs VTR vs WHLR vs NXRT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
WHLRD vs WELL vs VTR vs WHLR vs NXRT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
NXRT leads in 2 of 6 categories
WHLRD leads 1 • WELL leads 1 • VTR leads 1 • WHLR leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — WELL and NXRT each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WELL is the larger business by revenue, generating $11.6B annually — 117.0x WHLR's $99M. WELL is the more profitable business, keeping 12.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NXRT's -12.7%. On growth, WELL holds the edge at +40.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $99M | $11.6B | $6.1B | $99M | $252M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $61M | $2.8B | $2.3B | $58M | $125M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $12M | $1.4B | $260M | $6M | -$32M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $4M | $2.5B | $1.4B | $4M | $79M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +66.8% | +39.1% | -4.3% | +56.8% | +91.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +36.7% | +4.4% | +13.4% | +34.9% | +11.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +11.9% | +12.3% | +4.2% | +5.9% | -12.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +4.0% | +21.9% | +22.4% | +4.3% | +31.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -8.8% | +40.3% | +22.0% | -0.1% | +0.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -100.0% | +22.5% | 0.0% | +99.4% | 0.0% |
Valuation Metrics
NXRT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 147.7x trailing earnings, WELL trades at a 6% valuation discount to VTR's 156.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, WHLR's 15.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than WHLRD's 77.4x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4.1B | $143.9B | $40.1B | $376M | $737M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4.6B | $160.2B | $52.6B | $837M | $2.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.08x | 147.72x | 156.33x | -0.03x | -23.06x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 71.48x | 131.37x | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 77.44x | 64.24x | 23.85x | 15.30x | 18.44x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 41.27x | 13.49x | 6.88x | 3.79x | 2.93x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 43.75x | 3.23x | 3.10x | 1.17x | 2.46x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 1028.93x | 50.51x | 30.49x | 17.82x | 8.82x |
Profitability & Efficiency
WHLRD leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
WHLRD delivers a 12.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $-10 for NXRT. WELL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.49x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NXRT's 5.18x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), WELL scores 7/9 vs NXRT's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +12.5% | +3.5% | +2.1% | +6.3% | -10.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.9% | +2.3% | +1.0% | +1.0% | -1.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.8% | +0.5% | +2.5% | +4.2% | +1.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +6.0% | +0.6% | +3.2% | +5.2% | +1.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 7 | 6 | 7 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 5.11x | 0.49x | 1.05x | 5.11x | 5.18x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $460M | $16.3B | $12.5B | $460M | $1.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $24M | $5.0B | $741M | $24M | $14M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $484M | $21.4B | $13.2B | $484M | $1.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.44x | 0.26x | 1.40x | 1.48x | 0.47x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
WELL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in WELL five years ago would be worth $28,460 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $0 for WHLR. Over the past 12 months, WELL leads with a +36.1% total return vs WHLR's -99.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WHLRD at 43.0% vs WHLR's -99.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +0.6% | +10.6% | +9.8% | -93.9% | +0.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +13.2% | +36.1% | +34.7% | -99.7% | -9.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +192.2% | +191.8% | +108.6% | -100.0% | -15.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +112.3% | +184.6% | +63.9% | -100.0% | -28.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +72.7% | +240.1% | +62.6% | +100.2% | +205.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +43.0% | +42.9% | +27.8% | -99.0% | -5.3% |
Risk & Volatility
VTR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
VTR is the less volatile stock with a -0.01 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than WHLR's 1.99 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. VTR currently trades 92.7% from its 52-week high vs WHLR's 0.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.13x | 0.15x | -0.01x | 1.99x | 0.59x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $42.00 | $221.68 | $91.06 | $904.50 | $35.22 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $32.26 | $148.60 | $61.76 | $0.88 | $23.79 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +92.3% | +92.6% | +92.7% | +0.1% | +82.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 53.3 | 44.8 | 43.7 | 35.6 | 61.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 795 | 2.4M | 3.6M | 1.1M | 185K |
Analyst Outlook
NXRT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: WHLRD as "Buy", WELL as "Buy", VTR as "Buy", WHLR as "Buy", NXRT as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 16.5% upside for WELL (target: $239) vs -7.1% for NXRT (target: $27). For income investors, NXRT offers the higher dividend yield at 7.25% vs WHLRD's 0.16%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $239.11 | $96.25 | — | $27.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | 34 | 32 | 5 | 10 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.2% | +1.3% | +2.2% | — | +7.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 12 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.06 | $2.76 | $1.86 | — | $2.11 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +1.0% |
NXRT leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). WHLRD leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.
WHLRD vs WELL vs VTR vs WHLR vs NXRT: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is WHLRD or WELL or VTR or WHLR or NXRT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Welltower Inc.
(WELL) is the stronger pick with 35. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -4. 9% for Wheeler Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. (WHLR). Welltower Inc. (WELL) offers the better valuation at 147. 7x trailing P/E (71. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Wheeler Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. (WHLRD) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — WHLRD or WELL or VTR or WHLR or NXRT?
On trailing P/E, Welltower Inc.
(WELL) is the cheapest at 147. 7x versus Ventas, Inc. at 156. 3x. On forward P/E, Welltower Inc. is actually cheaper at 71. 5x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — WHLRD or WELL or VTR or WHLR or NXRT?
Over the past 5 years, Welltower Inc.
(WELL) delivered a total return of +184. 6%, compared to -100. 0% for Wheeler Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. (WHLR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WELL returned +240. 1% versus VTR's +62. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — WHLRD or WELL or VTR or WHLR or NXRT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Ventas, Inc.
(VTR) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 01β versus Wheeler Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. 's 1. 99β — meaning WHLR is approximately -15902% more volatile than VTR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Welltower Inc. (WELL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 49% versus 5% for NexPoint Residential Trust, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — WHLRD or WELL or VTR or WHLR or NXRT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Welltower Inc.
(WELL) is pulling ahead at 35. 8% versus -4. 9% for Wheeler Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. (WHLR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Ventas, Inc. grew EPS 184. 2% year-over-year, compared to -30. 8% for NexPoint Residential Trust, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, WELL leads at 22. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — WHLRD or WELL or VTR or WHLR or NXRT?
Wheeler Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc.
(WHLR) is the more profitable company, earning 8. 8% net margin versus -12. 7% for NexPoint Residential Trust, Inc. — meaning it keeps 8. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: WHLRD leads at 36. 4% versus 3. 3% for WELL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NXRT leads at 84. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is WHLRD or WELL or VTR or WHLR or NXRT more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Welltower Inc.
(WELL) trades at 71. 5x forward P/E versus 131. 4x for Ventas, Inc. — 59. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for WELL: 16. 5% to $239. 11.
08Which pays a better dividend — WHLRD or WELL or VTR or WHLR or NXRT?
In this comparison, NXRT (7.
3% yield), VTR (2. 2% yield), WELL (1. 3% yield), WHLRD (0. 2% yield) pay a dividend. WHLR does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is WHLRD or WELL or VTR or WHLR or NXRT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Ventas, Inc.
(VTR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 01), 2. 2% yield). Wheeler Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. (WHLR) carries a higher beta of 1. 99 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (VTR: +62. 6%, WHLR: +100. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between WHLRD and WELL and VTR and WHLR and NXRT?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: WHLRD is a small-cap quality compounder stock; WELL is a mid-cap high-growth stock; VTR is a mid-cap high-growth stock; WHLR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NXRT is a small-cap income-oriented stock. WELL, VTR, NXRT pay a dividend while WHLRD, WHLR do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.