REIT - Retail
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
WHLRD vs WMT vs KR vs DLTR vs DG
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Discount Stores
Grocery Stores
Discount Stores
Discount Stores
WHLRD vs WMT vs KR vs DLTR vs DG — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Retail | Discount Stores | Grocery Stores | Discount Stores | Discount Stores |
| Market Cap | $4.14B | $922.64B | $39.33B | $22.67B | $24.31B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $99M | $725.30B | $147.64B | $19.75B | $42.72B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $12M | $23.06B | $1.02B | $1.29B | $1.51B |
| Gross Margin | 66.8% | 25.0% | 22.3% | 36.7% | 30.7% |
| Operating Margin | 36.7% | 4.2% | 1.3% | 8.5% | 5.2% |
| Forward P/E | — | 39.9x | 11.9x | 17.5x | 15.3x |
| Total Debt | $484M | $67.09B | $24.68B | $4.62B | $15.72B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $24M | $10.73B | $3.33B | $718M | $1.14B |
WHLRD vs WMT vs KR vs DLTR vs DG — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheeler Real Estate… (WHLRD) | 100 | 322.9 | +222.9% |
| Walmart Inc. (WMT) | 100 | 289.9 | +189.9% |
| The Kroger Co. (KR) | 100 | 183.6 | +83.6% |
| Dollar Tree, Inc. (DLTR) | 100 | 125.6 | +25.6% |
| Dollar General Corp… (DG) | 100 | 58.0 | -42.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: WHLRD vs WMT vs KR vs DLTR vs DG
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
WHLRD ranks third and is worth considering specifically for defensive.
- Beta 0.13, yield 0.2%, current ratio 8.91x
- 11.9% margin vs KR's 0.7%
WMT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Dividend streak 37 yrs, beta 0.05, yield 0.8%
- 423.1% 10Y total return vs KR's 97.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.05, Low D/E 63.2%, current ratio 0.79x
- PEG 3.62 vs DLTR's 17.36
KR is the clearest fit if your priority is dividends.
- 2.2% yield, 21-year raise streak, vs WMT's 0.8%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
DLTR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 10.4%, EPS growth 142.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 8.0%
- 10.4% revenue growth vs WHLRD's -4.0%
- +28.5% vs KR's -5.1%
- 9.5% ROA vs WHLRD's 1.9%, ROIC 13.2% vs 4.8%
Among these 5 stocks, DG doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 10.4% revenue growth vs WHLRD's -4.0% | |
| Value | PEG 3.62 vs 17.36 | |
| Quality / Margins | 11.9% margin vs KR's 0.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.05 vs DLTR's 0.83, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.2% yield, 21-year raise streak, vs WMT's 0.8%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +28.5% vs KR's -5.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 9.5% ROA vs WHLRD's 1.9%, ROIC 13.2% vs 4.8% |
WHLRD vs WMT vs KR vs DLTR vs DG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
WHLRD vs WMT vs KR vs DLTR vs DG — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
WHLRD leads in 1 of 6 categories
KR leads 1 • DLTR leads 1 • WMT leads 1 • DG leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WHLRD leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WMT is the larger business by revenue, generating $725.3B annually — 7293.5x WHLRD's $99M. WHLRD is the more profitable business, keeping 11.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to KR's 0.7%. On growth, WMT holds the edge at +7.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $99M | $725.3B | $147.6B | $19.7B | $42.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $61M | $41.4B | $5.5B | $2.0B | $3.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $12M | $23.1B | $1.0B | $1.3B | $1.5B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $4M | $12.6B | $3.5B | $1.6B | $3.1B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +66.8% | +25.0% | +22.3% | +36.7% | +30.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +36.7% | +4.2% | +1.3% | +8.5% | +5.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +11.9% | +3.2% | +0.7% | +6.5% | +3.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +4.0% | +1.7% | +2.4% | +7.9% | +7.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -8.8% | +7.3% | +1.2% | +7.2% | +5.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -100.0% | +19.6% | +50.0% | +9.3% | +121.8% |
Valuation Metrics
KR leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 16.1x trailing earnings, DG trades at a 62% valuation discount to WMT's 42.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), WMT offers better value at 3.85x vs DLTR's 19.48x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4.1B | $922.6B | $39.3B | $22.7B | $24.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4.6B | $979.0B | $60.7B | $26.6B | $38.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.08x | 42.40x | 40.36x | 19.60x | 16.14x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 39.87x | 11.86x | 17.46x | 15.27x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 3.85x | — | 19.48x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 77.44x | 22.24x | 10.44x | 11.83x | 11.97x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 41.27x | 1.29x | 0.27x | 1.17x | 0.57x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 43.75x | 8.74x | 6.86x | 6.40x | 2.87x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 1028.93x | 61.83x | 11.74x | 16.22x | 10.16x |
Profitability & Efficiency
DLTR leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
DLTR delivers a 35.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $36 in annual profit, vs $13 for WHLRD. WMT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.63x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to WHLRD's 5.11x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), DLTR scores 9/9 vs KR's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +12.5% | +22.7% | +13.0% | +35.9% | +18.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.9% | +8.1% | +2.0% | +9.5% | +4.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.8% | +14.4% | +5.0% | +13.2% | +7.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +6.0% | +17.5% | +5.5% | +15.7% | +9.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 9 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 5.11x | 0.63x | 4.16x | 1.23x | 1.85x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $460M | $56.4B | $21.3B | $3.9B | $14.6B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $24M | $10.7B | $3.3B | $718M | $1.1B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $484M | $67.1B | $24.7B | $4.6B | $15.7B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.44x | 11.70x | 2.59x | 21.39x | 9.56x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
WMT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in WMT five years ago would be worth $25,389 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,041 for DG. Over the past 12 months, DLTR leads with a +28.5% total return vs KR's -5.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WHLRD at 43.0% vs DG's -16.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +0.6% | +3.1% | -0.2% | -8.8% | -18.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +13.2% | +20.2% | -5.1% | +28.5% | +16.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +192.2% | +143.2% | +43.6% | -15.9% | -42.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +112.3% | +153.9% | +82.1% | +17.8% | -39.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +72.7% | +423.1% | +97.9% | +28.6% | +42.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +43.0% | +34.5% | +12.8% | -5.6% | -16.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — WHLRD and KR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KR is the less volatile stock with a -0.66 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than DLTR's 0.83 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WHLRD currently trades 92.3% from its 52-week high vs DG's 69.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.13x | 0.05x | -0.66x | 0.83x | 0.59x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $42.00 | $135.16 | $76.58 | $142.40 | $158.23 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $32.26 | $93.43 | $58.60 | $84.71 | $95.11 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +92.3% | +85.6% | +81.2% | +81.8% | +69.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 53.3 | 32.7 | 38.3 | 70.8 | 48.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 795 | 18.2M | 5.0M | 3.6M | 2.9M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — WMT and KR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: WHLRD as "Buy", WMT as "Buy", KR as "Buy", DLTR as "Buy", DG as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 26.9% upside for DG (target: $140) vs 7.2% for DLTR (target: $125). For income investors, KR offers the higher dividend yield at 2.17% vs WHLRD's 0.16%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $139.44 | $74.60 | $124.87 | $140.26 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | 66 | 44 | 49 | 50 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.2% | +0.8% | +2.2% | — | +2.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 37 | 21 | 3 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.06 | $0.94 | $1.35 | — | $2.35 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.9% | +6.9% | +6.8% | 0.0% |
WHLRD leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). KR leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
WHLRD vs WMT vs KR vs DLTR vs DG: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is WHLRD or WMT or KR or DLTR or DG a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Dollar Tree, Inc.
(DLTR) is the stronger pick with 10. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -4. 0% for Wheeler Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. (WHLRD). Dollar General Corporation (DG) offers the better valuation at 16. 1x trailing P/E (15. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Wheeler Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. (WHLRD) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — WHLRD or WMT or KR or DLTR or DG?
On trailing P/E, Dollar General Corporation (DG) is the cheapest at 16.
1x versus Walmart Inc. at 42. 4x. On forward P/E, The Kroger Co. is actually cheaper at 11. 9x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Walmart Inc. wins at 3. 62x versus Dollar Tree, Inc. 's 17. 36x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — WHLRD or WMT or KR or DLTR or DG?
Over the past 5 years, Walmart Inc.
(WMT) delivered a total return of +153. 9%, compared to -39. 6% for Dollar General Corporation (DG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WMT returned +423. 1% versus DLTR's +28. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — WHLRD or WMT or KR or DLTR or DG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Kroger Co.
(KR) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 66β versus Dollar Tree, Inc. 's 0. 83β — meaning DLTR is approximately -225% more volatile than KR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Walmart Inc. (WMT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 63% versus 5% for Wheeler Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — WHLRD or WMT or KR or DLTR or DG?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Dollar Tree, Inc.
(DLTR) is pulling ahead at 10. 4% versus -4. 0% for Wheeler Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. (WHLRD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Dollar Tree, Inc. grew EPS 142. 3% year-over-year, compared to -58. 0% for The Kroger Co.. Over a 3-year CAGR, WHLRD leads at 9. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — WHLRD or WMT or KR or DLTR or DG?
Wheeler Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc.
(WHLRD) is the more profitable company, earning 8. 7% net margin versus 0. 7% for The Kroger Co. — meaning it keeps 8. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: WHLRD leads at 36. 4% versus 1. 3% for KR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — DLTR leads at 36. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is WHLRD or WMT or KR or DLTR or DG more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Walmart Inc. (WMT) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 3. 62x versus Dollar Tree, Inc. 's 17. 36x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, The Kroger Co. (KR) trades at 11. 9x forward P/E versus 39. 9x for Walmart Inc. — 28. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for DG: 26. 9% to $140. 26.
08Which pays a better dividend — WHLRD or WMT or KR or DLTR or DG?
In this comparison, KR (2.
2% yield), DG (2. 1% yield), WMT (0. 8% yield), WHLRD (0. 2% yield) pay a dividend. DLTR does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is WHLRD or WMT or KR or DLTR or DG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Kroger Co.
(KR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 66), 2. 2% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KR: +97. 9%, DLTR: +28. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between WHLRD and WMT and KR and DLTR and DG?
These companies operate in different sectors (WHLRD (Real Estate) and WMT (Consumer Defensive) and KR (Consumer Defensive) and DLTR (Consumer Defensive) and DG (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: WHLRD is a small-cap quality compounder stock; WMT is a large-cap quality compounder stock; KR is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; DLTR is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; DG is a mid-cap deep-value stock. WMT, KR, DG pay a dividend while WHLRD, DLTR do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.