Grocery Stores
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
WMK vs PTLO vs SYY vs USFD vs PFGC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Restaurants
Food Distribution
Food Distribution
Food Distribution
WMK vs PTLO vs SYY vs USFD vs PFGC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Grocery Stores | Restaurants | Food Distribution | Food Distribution | Food Distribution |
| Market Cap | $1.75B | $315M | $34.91B | $19.16B | $14.57B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $5.01B | $738M | $83.57B | $39.68B | $66.75B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $101M | $16M | $1.74B | $677M | $329M |
| Gross Margin | 23.1% | 29.0% | 18.5% | 17.4% | 11.9% |
| Operating Margin | 2.3% | 6.1% | 3.6% | 3.1% | 1.2% |
| Forward P/E | 8.9x | 20.3x | 15.9x | 18.2x | 19.9x |
| Total Debt | $172M | $999M | $14.49B | $5.72B | $8.00B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $117M | $20M | $1.07B | $41M | $79M |
WMK vs PTLO vs SYY vs USFD vs PFGC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Weis Markets, Inc. (WMK) | 100 | 125.6 | +25.6% |
| Portillo's Inc. (PTLO) | 100 | 11.5 | -88.5% |
| Sysco Corporation (SYY) | 100 | 94.8 | -5.2% |
| US Foods Holding Co… (USFD) | 100 | 250.6 | +150.6% |
| Performance Food Gr… (PFGC) | 100 | 205.0 | +105.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: WMK vs PTLO vs SYY vs USFD vs PFGC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
WMK has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.06, Low D/E 12.7%, current ratio 1.93x
- Beta 0.06, yield 1.9%, current ratio 1.93x
- Lower P/E (8.9x vs 19.9x)
- Beta 0.06 vs PTLO's 1.35, lower leverage
PTLO ranks third and is worth considering specifically for quality.
- 2.1% margin vs PFGC's 0.5%
SYY is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.
- Dividend streak 37 yrs, beta 0.47, yield 2.8%
- 2.8% yield, 37-year raise streak, vs WMK's 1.9%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
- 6.4% ROA vs PTLO's 1.0%, ROIC 15.7% vs 3.0%
USFD is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 4.1%, EPS growth 45.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 5.0%
- +25.7% vs PTLO's -61.4%
PFGC is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 249.2% 10Y total return vs USFD's 248.8%
- 8.6% revenue growth vs PTLO's 3.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 8.6% revenue growth vs PTLO's 3.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.9x vs 19.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 2.1% margin vs PFGC's 0.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.06 vs PTLO's 1.35, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.8% yield, 37-year raise streak, vs WMK's 1.9%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +25.7% vs PTLO's -61.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.4% ROA vs PTLO's 1.0%, ROIC 15.7% vs 3.0% |
WMK vs PTLO vs SYY vs USFD vs PFGC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
WMK vs PTLO vs SYY vs USFD vs PFGC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
SYY leads in 2 of 6 categories
PTLO leads 1 • USFD leads 1 • WMK leads 0 • PFGC leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PTLO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SYY is the larger business by revenue, generating $83.6B annually — 113.2x PTLO's $738M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 2.1% (PTLO) to 0.5% (PFGC). On growth, PFGC holds the edge at +6.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $5.0B | $738M | $83.6B | $39.7B | $66.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $210M | $75M | $4.0B | $1.6B | $1.0B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $101M | $16M | $1.7B | $677M | $329M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $24M | -$9M | $2.0B | $848M | $1.0B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +23.1% | +29.0% | +18.5% | +17.4% | +11.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +2.3% | +6.1% | +3.6% | +3.1% | +1.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +2.0% | +2.1% | +2.1% | +1.7% | +0.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +0.5% | -1.2% | +2.4% | +2.1% | +1.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +4.6% | +3.5% | +4.7% | +2.8% | +6.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +48.7% | -111.2% | -13.4% | +6.1% | -27.0% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — WMK and PTLO each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 16.1x trailing earnings, PTLO trades at a 62% valuation discount to PFGC's 42.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, WMK's 7.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than PTLO's 16.1x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.7B | $315M | $34.9B | $19.2B | $14.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.8B | $1.3B | $48.3B | $24.8B | $22.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 19.37x | 16.15x | 19.54x | 29.55x | 42.53x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 8.93x | 20.34x | 15.88x | 18.20x | 19.88x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.36x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.94x | 16.11x | 11.58x | 14.67x | 14.65x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.35x | 0.43x | 0.43x | 0.49x | 0.23x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.34x | 0.62x | 19.23x | 4.64x | 3.24x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 362.58x | — | 19.60x | 19.98x | 20.69x |
Profitability & Efficiency
SYY leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SYY delivers a 80.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $81 in annual profit, vs $3 for PTLO. WMK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.13x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SYY's 7.81x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), USFD scores 7/9 vs PTLO's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +7.5% | +3.2% | +80.7% | +15.3% | +7.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +5.0% | +1.0% | +6.4% | +4.8% | +1.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.4% | +3.0% | +15.7% | +9.3% | +5.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +6.0% | +3.7% | +19.0% | +12.0% | +7.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 3 | 5 | 7 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.13x | 2.01x | 7.81x | 1.33x | 1.79x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $55M | $980M | $13.4B | $5.7B | $7.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $117M | $20M | $1.1B | $41M | $79M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $172M | $999M | $14.5B | $5.7B | $8.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 1.78x | 4.35x | 3.94x | 1.69x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
USFD leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in USFD five years ago would be worth $21,415 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,498 for PTLO. Over the past 12 months, USFD leads with a +25.7% total return vs PTLO's -61.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors USFD at 31.2% vs PTLO's -40.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +10.8% | -5.0% | +1.9% | +16.4% | +5.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -18.3% | -61.4% | +6.4% | +25.7% | +11.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -4.1% | -78.4% | +4.0% | +125.7% | +51.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +44.1% | -85.0% | -3.9% | +114.1% | +69.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +76.5% | -85.0% | +82.2% | +248.8% | +249.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -1.4% | -40.0% | +1.3% | +31.2% | +14.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — WMK and USFD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
WMK is the less volatile stock with a 0.06 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PTLO's 1.35 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. USFD currently trades 85.1% from its 52-week high vs PTLO's 32.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.06x | 1.35x | 0.47x | 0.50x | 0.60x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $90.23 | $13.55 | $91.69 | $102.13 | $109.05 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $60.13 | $4.27 | $68.19 | $66.89 | $77.44 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +78.4% | +32.2% | +79.5% | +85.1% | +85.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 57.1 | 31.9 | 41.7 | 51.0 | 59.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 142K | 1.5M | 4.7M | 2.2M | 1.7M |
Analyst Outlook
SYY leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PTLO as "Hold", SYY as "Buy", USFD as "Buy", PFGC as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 58.7% upside for PTLO (target: $7) vs 20.5% for PFGC (target: $112). For income investors, SYY offers the higher dividend yield at 2.80% vs WMK's 1.93%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $6.92 | $90.44 | $108.33 | $111.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 12 | 30 | 25 | 25 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.9% | — | +2.8% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — | 37 | 0 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.37 | — | $2.04 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +8.0% | 0.0% | +3.6% | +5.1% | +0.5% |
SYY leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Analyst Outlook). PTLO leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.
WMK vs PTLO vs SYY vs USFD vs PFGC: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is WMK or PTLO or SYY or USFD or PFGC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Performance Food Group Company (PFGC) is the stronger pick with 8.
6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 0% for Portillo's Inc. (PTLO). Portillo's Inc. (PTLO) offers the better valuation at 16. 1x trailing P/E (20. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Sysco Corporation (SYY) a "Buy" — based on 30 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — WMK or PTLO or SYY or USFD or PFGC?
On trailing P/E, Portillo's Inc.
(PTLO) is the cheapest at 16. 1x versus Performance Food Group Company at 42. 5x. On forward P/E, Weis Markets, Inc. is actually cheaper at 8. 9x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — WMK or PTLO or SYY or USFD or PFGC?
Over the past 5 years, US Foods Holding Corp.
(USFD) delivered a total return of +114. 1%, compared to -85. 0% for Portillo's Inc. (PTLO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PFGC returned +249. 2% versus PTLO's -85. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — WMK or PTLO or SYY or USFD or PFGC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Weis Markets, Inc.
(WMK) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 06β versus Portillo's Inc. 's 1. 35β — meaning PTLO is approximately 2208% more volatile than WMK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Weis Markets, Inc. (WMK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 13% versus 8% for Sysco Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — WMK or PTLO or SYY or USFD or PFGC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Performance Food Group Company (PFGC) is pulling ahead at 8.
6% versus 3. 0% for Portillo's Inc. (PTLO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: US Foods Holding Corp. grew EPS 45. 5% year-over-year, compared to -41. 3% for Portillo's Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, PTLO leads at 7. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — WMK or PTLO or SYY or USFD or PFGC?
Portillo's Inc.
(PTLO) is the more profitable company, earning 2. 6% net margin versus 0. 5% for Performance Food Group Company — meaning it keeps 2. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PTLO leads at 7. 0% versus 1. 3% for PFGC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PTLO leads at 39. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is WMK or PTLO or SYY or USFD or PFGC more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Weis Markets, Inc.
(WMK) trades at 8. 9x forward P/E versus 20. 3x for Portillo's Inc. — 11. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PTLO: 58. 7% to $6. 92.
08Which pays a better dividend — WMK or PTLO or SYY or USFD or PFGC?
In this comparison, SYY (2.
8% yield), WMK (1. 9% yield) pay a dividend. PTLO, USFD, PFGC do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is WMK or PTLO or SYY or USFD or PFGC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Weis Markets, Inc.
(WMK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 06), 1. 9% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (WMK: +76. 5%, PTLO: -85. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between WMK and PTLO and SYY and USFD and PFGC?
These companies operate in different sectors (WMK (Consumer Defensive) and PTLO (Consumer Cyclical) and SYY (Consumer Defensive) and USFD (Consumer Defensive) and PFGC (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: WMK is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PTLO is a small-cap deep-value stock; SYY is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; USFD is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; PFGC is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. WMK, SYY pay a dividend while PTLO, USFD, PFGC do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.