Financial - Credit Services
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
WRLD vs NAVI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Financial - Credit Services
WRLD vs NAVI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Financial - Credit Services | Financial - Credit Services |
| Market Cap | $753M | $826M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $565M | $3.23B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $43M | $-60M |
| Gross Margin | 70.0% | 87.0% |
| Operating Margin | 28.1% | 77.1% |
| Forward P/E | 21.1x | 12.3x |
| Total Debt | $526M | $45.71B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $10M | $2.10B |
WRLD vs NAVI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| World Acceptance Co… (WRLD) | 100 | 224.9 | +124.9% |
| Navient Corporation (NAVI) | 100 | 118.1 | +18.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: WRLD vs NAVI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
WRLD is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth -1.5%, EPS growth 23.6%
- 266.2% 10Y total return vs NAVI's 15.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.27, current ratio 12.55x
NAVI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.92, yield 7.2%
- Beta 0.92, yield 7.2%, current ratio 0.41x
- Lower P/E (12.3x vs 21.1x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -1.5% NII/revenue growth vs NAVI's -23.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (12.3x vs 21.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.1% vs WRLD's 0.4% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.92 vs WRLD's 1.27 | |
| Dividends | 7.2% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +12.8% vs NAVI's -25.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.1% vs WRLD's 0.4% |
WRLD vs NAVI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
WRLD vs NAVI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NAVI leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NAVI is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.2B annually — 5.7x WRLD's $565M. WRLD is the more profitable business, keeping 15.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NAVI's -2.5%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $565M | $3.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $61M | $544M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $43M | -$60M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $252M | $323M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +70.0% | +87.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +28.1% | +77.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +15.9% | -2.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +44.3% | +13.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -107.8% | +9.7% |
Valuation Metrics
NAVI leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, WRLD's 7.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than NAVI's 17.8x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $753M | $826M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.3B | $44.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 9.17x | -10.85x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 21.15x | 12.29x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.26x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.53x | 17.81x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.33x | 0.26x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.87x | 0.36x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 3.01x | 1.87x |
Profitability & Efficiency
WRLD leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
WRLD delivers a 10.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $11 in annual profit, vs $-2 for NAVI. WRLD carries lower financial leverage with a 1.20x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NAVI's 19.05x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), WRLD scores 9/9 vs NAVI's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +10.8% | -2.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.0% | -0.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +12.1% | +3.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +16.3% | +5.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 9 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.20x | 19.05x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $516M | $43.6B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $10M | $2.1B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $526M | $45.7B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.13x | 0.21x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
WRLD leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in WRLD five years ago would be worth $11,135 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,915 for NAVI. Over the past 12 months, WRLD leads with a +12.8% total return vs NAVI's -25.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WRLD at 9.9% vs NAVI's -10.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +5.5% | -30.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +12.8% | -25.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +32.8% | -27.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +11.3% | -30.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +266.2% | +15.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +9.9% | -10.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — WRLD and NAVI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NAVI is the less volatile stock with a 0.92 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than WRLD's 1.27 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WRLD currently trades 80.6% from its 52-week high vs NAVI's 54.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.27x | 0.92x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $185.48 | $16.07 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $110.00 | $7.80 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +80.6% | +54.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 53.8 | 48.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 160K | 923K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates WRLD as "Hold" and NAVI as "Hold". NAVI is the only dividend payer here at 7.24% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $8.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 10 | 24 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +7.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.64 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +7.2% | +13.4% |
NAVI leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). WRLD leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). 1 tied.
WRLD vs NAVI: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is WRLD or NAVI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, World Acceptance Corporation (WRLD) is the stronger pick with -1.
5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -23. 7% for Navient Corporation (NAVI). World Acceptance Corporation (WRLD) offers the better valuation at 9. 2x trailing P/E (21. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate World Acceptance Corporation (WRLD) a "Hold" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — WRLD or NAVI?
On forward P/E, Navient Corporation is actually cheaper at 12.
3x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — WRLD or NAVI?
Over the past 5 years, World Acceptance Corporation (WRLD) delivered a total return of +11.
3%, compared to -30. 9% for Navient Corporation (NAVI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WRLD returned +266. 2% versus NAVI's +15. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — WRLD or NAVI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Navient Corporation (NAVI) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
92β versus World Acceptance Corporation's 1. 27β — meaning WRLD is approximately 37% more volatile than NAVI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, World Acceptance Corporation (WRLD) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 120% versus 19% for Navient Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — WRLD or NAVI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), World Acceptance Corporation (WRLD) is pulling ahead at -1.
5% versus -23. 7% for Navient Corporation (NAVI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: World Acceptance Corporation grew EPS 23. 6% year-over-year, compared to -168. 6% for Navient Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — WRLD or NAVI?
World Acceptance Corporation (WRLD) is the more profitable company, earning 15.
9% net margin versus -2. 5% for Navient Corporation — meaning it keeps 15. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NAVI leads at 77. 1% versus 28. 1% for WRLD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NAVI leads at 87. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is WRLD or NAVI more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Navient Corporation (NAVI) trades at 12.
3x forward P/E versus 21. 1x for World Acceptance Corporation — 8. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — WRLD or NAVI?
In this comparison, NAVI (7.
2% yield) pays a dividend. WRLD does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is WRLD or NAVI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Navient Corporation (NAVI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
92), 7. 2% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (NAVI: +15. 3%, WRLD: +266. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between WRLD and NAVI?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: WRLD is a small-cap deep-value stock; NAVI is a small-cap income-oriented stock. NAVI pays a dividend while WRLD does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.