Financial - Credit Services
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
WRLD vs PRAA
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Financial - Credit Services
WRLD vs PRAA — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Financial - Credit Services | Financial - Credit Services |
| Market Cap | $751M | $819M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $565M | $1.24B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $43M | $-305M |
| Gross Margin | 70.0% | 99.2% |
| Operating Margin | 28.1% | 33.9% |
| Forward P/E | 21.1x | 26.4x |
| Total Debt | $526M | $32M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $10M | $104M |
WRLD vs PRAA — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| World Acceptance Co… (WRLD) | 100 | 224.2 | +124.2% |
| PRA Group, Inc. (PRAA) | 100 | 62.4 | -37.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: WRLD vs PRAA
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
WRLD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- beta 1.27
- 255.0% 10Y total return vs PRAA's -32.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.27, current ratio 12.55x
PRAA is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 10.4%, EPS growth -5.4%
- 10.4% NII/revenue growth vs WRLD's -1.5%
- +56.9% vs WRLD's +13.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 10.4% NII/revenue growth vs WRLD's -1.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (21.1x vs 26.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs PRAA's 0.7% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.27 vs PRAA's 1.82 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +56.9% vs WRLD's +13.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs PRAA's 0.7% |
WRLD vs PRAA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
WRLD vs PRAA — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PRAA leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PRAA is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.2B annually — 2.2x WRLD's $565M. WRLD is the more profitable business, keeping 15.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PRAA's -24.6%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $565M | $1.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $61M | $431M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $43M | -$305M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $252M | -$90M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +70.0% | +99.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +28.1% | +33.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +15.9% | -24.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +44.3% | -7.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -107.8% | +2.1% |
Valuation Metrics
PRAA leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, PRAA's 1.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than WRLD's 7.5x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $751M | $819M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.3B | $746M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 9.15x | -2.73x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 21.09x | 26.45x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.26x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.51x | 1.73x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.33x | 0.66x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.87x | 0.80x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 3.00x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
WRLD leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
WRLD delivers a 10.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $11 in annual profit, vs $-26 for PRAA. PRAA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to WRLD's 1.20x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), WRLD scores 9/9 vs PRAA's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +10.8% | -26.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.0% | -5.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +12.1% | +11.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +16.3% | +8.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 9 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.20x | 0.03x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $516M | -$72M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $10M | $104M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $526M | $32M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.13x | 0.06x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
WRLD leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in WRLD five years ago would be worth $11,164 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,316 for PRAA. Over the past 12 months, PRAA leads with a +56.9% total return vs WRLD's +13.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WRLD at 9.8% vs PRAA's -14.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +5.1% | +21.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +13.4% | +56.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +32.4% | -38.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +11.6% | -46.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +255.0% | -32.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +9.8% | -14.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — WRLD and PRAA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
WRLD is the less volatile stock with a 1.27 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PRAA's 1.82 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PRAA currently trades 94.4% from its 52-week high vs WRLD's 80.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.27x | 1.82x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $185.48 | $22.55 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $110.00 | $10.25 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +80.4% | +94.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 46.6 | 62.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 158K | 447K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates WRLD as "Hold" and PRAA as "Hold".
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $26.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 10 | 13 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +7.2% | +2.4% |
PRAA leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). WRLD leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). 1 tied.
WRLD vs PRAA: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is WRLD or PRAA a better buy right now?
For growth investors, PRA Group, Inc.
(PRAA) is the stronger pick with 10. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 5% for World Acceptance Corporation (WRLD). World Acceptance Corporation (WRLD) offers the better valuation at 9. 1x trailing P/E (21. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate World Acceptance Corporation (WRLD) a "Hold" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — WRLD or PRAA?
On forward P/E, World Acceptance Corporation is actually cheaper at 21.
1x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — WRLD or PRAA?
Over the past 5 years, World Acceptance Corporation (WRLD) delivered a total return of +11.
6%, compared to -46. 8% for PRA Group, Inc. (PRAA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WRLD returned +255. 0% versus PRAA's -32. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — WRLD or PRAA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), World Acceptance Corporation (WRLD) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
27β versus PRA Group, Inc. 's 1. 82β — meaning PRAA is approximately 43% more volatile than WRLD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, PRA Group, Inc. (PRAA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 120% for World Acceptance Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — WRLD or PRAA?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), PRA Group, Inc.
(PRAA) is pulling ahead at 10. 4% versus -1. 5% for World Acceptance Corporation (WRLD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: World Acceptance Corporation grew EPS 23. 6% year-over-year, compared to -535. 2% for PRA Group, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — WRLD or PRAA?
World Acceptance Corporation (WRLD) is the more profitable company, earning 15.
9% net margin versus -24. 6% for PRA Group, Inc. — meaning it keeps 15. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PRAA leads at 33. 9% versus 28. 1% for WRLD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PRAA leads at 99. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is WRLD or PRAA more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, World Acceptance Corporation (WRLD) trades at 21.
1x forward P/E versus 26. 4x for PRA Group, Inc. — 5. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — WRLD or PRAA?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is WRLD or PRAA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, World Acceptance Corporation (WRLD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.
27), +255. 0% 10Y return). PRA Group, Inc. (PRAA) carries a higher beta of 1. 82 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (WRLD: +255. 0%, PRAA: -32. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between WRLD and PRAA?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: WRLD is a small-cap deep-value stock; PRAA is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.