Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
WSBC vs FFIN vs SFNC vs CBSH
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
WSBC vs FFIN vs SFNC vs CBSH — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $3.29B | $4.61B | $3.09B | $7.71B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.43B | $739M | $627M | $2.14B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $223M | $243M | $-398M | $566M |
| Gross Margin | 62.9% | 70.8% | 5.8% | 80.0% |
| Operating Margin | 19.7% | 36.8% | -84.2% | 34.2% |
| Forward P/E | 9.5x | 15.9x | 10.3x | 13.0x |
| Total Debt | $1.66B | $197M | $641M | $3.00B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $205M | $763M | $380M | $803M |
WSBC vs FFIN vs SFNC vs CBSH — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| WesBanco, Inc. (WSBC) | 100 | 159.7 | +59.7% |
| First Financial Ban… (FFIN) | 100 | 105.7 | +5.7% |
| Simmons First Natio… (SFNC) | 100 | 124.5 | +24.5% |
| Commerce Bancshares… (CBSH) | 100 | 105.1 | +5.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: WSBC vs FFIN vs SFNC vs CBSH
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
WSBC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.97, yield 4.1%
- Beta 0.97, yield 4.1%, current ratio 0.25x
- 51.4% NII/revenue growth vs SFNC's -56.7%
- Lower P/E (9.5x vs 15.9x), PEG 1.90 vs 3.05
FFIN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Rev growth 18.8%, EPS growth 12.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.95, Low D/E 12.3%, current ratio 0.09x
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs SFNC's 0.9% (lower = leaner)
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs SFNC's 0.9%
SFNC lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
CBSH is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 103.4% 10Y total return vs WSBC's 48.3%
- PEG 1.15 vs FFIN's 3.05
- NIM 3.4% vs SFNC's 2.9%
- Beta 0.70 vs SFNC's 1.02
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 51.4% NII/revenue growth vs SFNC's -56.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.5x vs 15.9x), PEG 1.90 vs 3.05 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs SFNC's 0.9% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.70 vs SFNC's 1.02 | |
| Dividends | 4.1% yield, 15-year raise streak, vs FFIN's 2.2% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +17.9% vs CBSH's -13.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs SFNC's 0.9% |
WSBC vs FFIN vs SFNC vs CBSH — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
WSBC vs FFIN vs SFNC vs CBSH — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
WSBC leads in 3 of 6 categories
FFIN leads 1 • SFNC leads 0 • CBSH leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — FFIN and SFNC each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CBSH is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.1B annually — 3.4x SFNC's $627M. FFIN is the more profitable business, keeping 30.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SFNC's -63.4%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.4B | $739M | $627M | $2.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $311M | $310M | -$497M | $796M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $223M | $243M | -$398M | $566M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $262M | $290M | $755M | $570M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +62.9% | +70.8% | +5.8% | +80.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +19.7% | +36.8% | -84.2% | +34.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +15.5% | +30.2% | -63.4% | +26.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +19.5% | +39.6% | +71.7% | +27.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +24.3% | -7.7% | +42.1% | +1.0% |
Valuation Metrics
WSBC leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.9x trailing earnings, CBSH trades at a 38% valuation discount to FFIN's 20.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), CBSH offers better value at 1.14x vs FFIN's 3.98x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.3B | $4.6B | $3.1B | $7.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4.7B | $4.0B | $3.4B | $9.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 15.13x | 20.76x | -7.24x | 12.86x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 9.54x | 15.92x | 10.35x | 13.01x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 3.02x | 3.98x | — | 1.14x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 15.25x | 14.17x | — | 12.87x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.29x | 6.23x | 4.93x | 3.60x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.76x | 2.89x | 0.84x | 1.91x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 11.74x | 15.73x | 6.88x | 13.01x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FFIN leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CBSH delivers a 15.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $15 in annual profit, vs $-12 for SFNC. FFIN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.12x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CBSH's 0.79x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), WSBC scores 8/9 vs SFNC's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +5.7% | +13.3% | -11.6% | +15.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.8% | +1.6% | -1.6% | +1.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.3% | +11.0% | -9.1% | +8.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +1.8% | +16.0% | -4.2% | +2.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 6 | 4 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.41x | 0.12x | 0.19x | 0.79x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.5B | -$566M | $261M | $2.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $205M | $763M | $380M | $803M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.7B | $197M | $641M | $3.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.62x | 1.48x | -1.01x | 1.97x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
WSBC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in WSBC five years ago would be worth $10,584 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,178 for FFIN. Over the past 12 months, WSBC leads with a +17.9% total return vs CBSH's -13.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WSBC at 18.2% vs CBSH's 6.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +3.7% | +8.5% | +14.6% | +1.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +17.9% | -3.2% | +16.7% | -13.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +65.2% | +29.1% | +53.4% | +20.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +5.8% | -28.2% | -15.4% | -12.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +48.3% | +145.4% | +25.2% | +103.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +18.2% | +8.9% | +15.3% | +6.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SFNC and CBSH each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CBSH is the less volatile stock with a 0.70 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SFNC's 1.02 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SFNC currently trades 96.3% from its 52-week high vs CBSH's 79.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.97x | 0.95x | 1.02x | 0.70x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $38.10 | $38.74 | $22.18 | $66.35 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $29.18 | $28.11 | $17.00 | $46.99 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +89.8% | +83.6% | +96.3% | +79.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 48.1 | 58.2 | 62.3 | 61.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 583K | 740K | 1.2M | 1.2M |
Analyst Outlook
WSBC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: WSBC as "Buy", FFIN as "Hold", SFNC as "Buy", CBSH as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 21.3% upside for WSBC (target: $42) vs 6.1% for SFNC (target: $23). For income investors, WSBC offers the higher dividend yield at 4.08% vs CBSH's 2.06%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $41.50 | $39.25 | $22.67 | $58.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 16 | 15 | 9 | 15 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +4.1% | +2.2% | +4.0% | +2.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 15 | 11 | 6 | 12 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.40 | $0.72 | $0.85 | $1.08 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +4.6% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +2.7% |
WSBC leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). FFIN leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
WSBC vs FFIN vs SFNC vs CBSH: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is WSBC or FFIN or SFNC or CBSH a better buy right now?
For growth investors, WesBanco, Inc.
(WSBC) is the stronger pick with 51. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -56. 7% for Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC). Commerce Bancshares, Inc. (CBSH) offers the better valuation at 12. 9x trailing P/E (13. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate WesBanco, Inc. (WSBC) a "Buy" — based on 16 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — WSBC or FFIN or SFNC or CBSH?
On trailing P/E, Commerce Bancshares, Inc.
(CBSH) is the cheapest at 12. 9x versus First Financial Bankshares, Inc. at 20. 8x. On forward P/E, WesBanco, Inc. is actually cheaper at 9. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Commerce Bancshares, Inc. wins at 1. 15x versus First Financial Bankshares, Inc. 's 3. 05x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — WSBC or FFIN or SFNC or CBSH?
Over the past 5 years, WesBanco, Inc.
(WSBC) delivered a total return of +5. 8%, compared to -28. 2% for First Financial Bankshares, Inc. (FFIN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FFIN returned +145. 4% versus SFNC's +25. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — WSBC or FFIN or SFNC or CBSH?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Commerce Bancshares, Inc.
(CBSH) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 70β versus Simmons First National Corporation's 1. 02β — meaning SFNC is approximately 45% more volatile than CBSH relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, First Financial Bankshares, Inc. (FFIN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 12% versus 79% for Commerce Bancshares, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — WSBC or FFIN or SFNC or CBSH?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), WesBanco, Inc.
(WSBC) is pulling ahead at 51. 4% versus -56. 7% for Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: First Financial Bankshares, Inc. grew EPS 12. 2% year-over-year, compared to -343. 8% for Simmons First National Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — WSBC or FFIN or SFNC or CBSH?
First Financial Bankshares, Inc.
(FFIN) is the more profitable company, earning 30. 2% net margin versus -63. 4% for Simmons First National Corporation — meaning it keeps 30. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FFIN leads at 36. 8% versus -84. 2% for SFNC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CBSH leads at 80. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is WSBC or FFIN or SFNC or CBSH more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Commerce Bancshares, Inc. (CBSH) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 15x versus First Financial Bankshares, Inc. 's 3. 05x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, WesBanco, Inc. (WSBC) trades at 9. 5x forward P/E versus 15. 9x for First Financial Bankshares, Inc. — 6. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for WSBC: 21. 3% to $41. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — WSBC or FFIN or SFNC or CBSH?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
WesBanco, Inc. (WSBC) offers the highest yield at 4. 1%, versus 2. 1% for Commerce Bancshares, Inc. (CBSH).
09Is WSBC or FFIN or SFNC or CBSH better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Commerce Bancshares, Inc.
(CBSH) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 70), 2. 1% yield, +103. 4% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CBSH: +103. 4%, SFNC: +25. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between WSBC and FFIN and SFNC and CBSH?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: WSBC is a small-cap high-growth stock; FFIN is a small-cap high-growth stock; SFNC is a small-cap income-oriented stock; CBSH is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.