Rental & Leasing Services
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
WSC vs URI vs MGRC vs TREX vs H
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Rental & Leasing Services
Rental & Leasing Services
Construction
Travel Lodging
WSC vs URI vs MGRC vs TREX vs H — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Rental & Leasing Services | Rental & Leasing Services | Rental & Leasing Services | Construction | Travel Lodging |
| Market Cap | $4.22B | $59.14B | $2.81B | $4.12B | $16.28B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.27B | $16.36B | $947M | $1.18B | $6.22B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-68M | $2.51B | $155M | $191M | $-34M |
| Gross Margin | 48.4% | 36.3% | 45.9% | 39.2% | 17.6% |
| Operating Margin | 20.3% | 24.7% | 25.5% | 22.1% | 9.2% |
| Forward P/E | 22.1x | 20.1x | 17.7x | 24.0x | 53.0x |
| Total Debt | $4.14B | $16.48B | $528M | $229M | $4.80B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $15M | $459M | $295K | $4M | $788M |
WSC vs URI vs MGRC vs TREX vs H — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| WillScot Holdings C… (WSC) | 100 | 174.7 | +74.7% |
| United Rentals, Inc. (URI) | 100 | 679.7 | +579.7% |
| McGrath RentCorp (MGRC) | 100 | 205.0 | +105.0% |
| Trex Company, Inc. (TREX) | 100 | 65.2 | -34.8% |
| Hyatt Hotels Corpor… (H) | 100 | 309.4 | +209.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: WSC vs URI vs MGRC vs TREX vs H
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Among these 5 stocks, WSC doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
URI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 4.9%, EPS growth -0.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 11.4%
- 14.8% 10Y total return vs MGRC's 401.5%
- PEG 0.78 vs TREX's 7.16
- Lower P/E (20.1x vs 53.0x)
MGRC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 36 yrs, beta 0.87, yield 1.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.87, Low D/E 42.7%, current ratio 1.36x
- Beta 0.87, yield 1.7%, current ratio 1.36x
- 16.4% margin vs WSC's -3.0%
TREX ranks third and is worth considering specifically for efficiency.
- 12.3% ROA vs WSC's -1.2%, ROIC 16.4% vs 7.4%
H is the clearest fit if your priority is growth.
- 117.0% revenue growth vs WSC's -4.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 117.0% revenue growth vs WSC's -4.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (20.1x vs 53.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 16.4% margin vs WSC's -3.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.87 vs WSC's 2.06, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.7% yield, 36-year raise streak, vs H's 0.4%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +46.0% vs TREX's -30.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 12.3% ROA vs WSC's -1.2%, ROIC 16.4% vs 7.4% |
WSC vs URI vs MGRC vs TREX vs H — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
WSC vs URI vs MGRC vs TREX vs H — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
WSC leads in 1 of 6 categories
TREX leads 1 • URI leads 1 • MGRC leads 1 • H leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — WSC and MGRC and H each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
URI is the larger business by revenue, generating $16.4B annually — 17.3x MGRC's $947M. MGRC is the more profitable business, keeping 16.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to WSC's -3.0%. On growth, H holds the edge at +108.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.3B | $16.4B | $947M | $1.2B | $6.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $735M | $6.5B | $350M | $309M | $899M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$68M | $2.5B | $155M | $191M | -$34M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $579M | $1.5B | $196M | $263M | $63M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +48.4% | +36.3% | +45.9% | +39.2% | +17.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +20.3% | +24.7% | +25.5% | +22.1% | +9.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -3.0% | +15.3% | +16.4% | +16.3% | -0.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +25.5% | +9.1% | +20.7% | +22.3% | +1.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.0% | +7.2% | +1.6% | +1.0% | +108.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -34.8% | +5.6% | -4.3% | +3.6% | +95.0% |
Valuation Metrics
WSC leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 18.0x trailing earnings, MGRC trades at a 26% valuation discount to URI's 24.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), URI offers better value at 0.94x vs TREX's 6.58x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4.2B | $59.1B | $2.8B | $4.1B | $16.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $8.3B | $75.2B | $3.3B | $4.3B | $20.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -80.34x | 24.45x | 18.00x | 22.00x | -315.69x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 22.07x | 20.14x | 17.66x | 23.95x | 52.98x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.94x | 2.04x | 6.58x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.08x | 10.61x | 9.50x | 13.53x | 22.90x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.85x | 3.67x | 2.97x | 3.51x | 2.28x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.96x | 6.80x | 2.28x | 4.05x | 4.45x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 5.72x | 89.34x | 13.29x | 30.60x | 102.39x |
Profitability & Efficiency
TREX leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
URI delivers a 27.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $28 in annual profit, vs $-7 for WSC. TREX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.22x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to WSC's 4.84x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MGRC scores 6/9 vs WSC's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -7.1% | +27.9% | +12.8% | +18.8% | -0.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -1.2% | +8.4% | +6.6% | +12.3% | -0.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.4% | +12.4% | +10.5% | +16.4% | +5.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +9.2% | +15.6% | +11.3% | +23.2% | +4.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 4 | 6 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 4.84x | 1.84x | 0.43x | 0.22x | 1.31x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $4.1B | $16.0B | $528M | $225M | $4.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $15M | $459M | $295,000 | $4M | $788M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $4.1B | $16.5B | $528M | $229M | $4.8B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.19x | 5.72x | 8.35x | — | 1.28x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
URI leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in URI five years ago would be worth $27,803 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,599 for TREX. Over the past 12 months, URI leads with a +46.0% total return vs TREX's -30.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors URI at 41.4% vs WSC's -18.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +20.0% | +12.0% | +9.6% | +9.3% | +3.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -11.0% | +46.0% | +6.3% | -30.8% | +38.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -46.6% | +182.8% | +32.7% | -30.4% | +46.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -19.5% | +178.0% | +49.0% | -64.0% | +114.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +144.8% | +1482.5% | +401.5% | +239.9% | +254.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -18.9% | +41.4% | +9.9% | -11.4% | +13.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — MGRC and H each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MGRC is the less volatile stock with a 0.87 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than WSC's 2.06 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. H currently trades 94.4% from its 52-week high vs TREX's 56.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.06x | 1.19x | 0.87x | 1.47x | 1.39x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $31.88 | $1021.47 | $128.41 | $68.78 | $180.53 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $14.91 | $647.05 | $94.99 | $29.77 | $121.94 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +73.1% | +92.4% | +89.0% | +56.9% | +94.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 68.4 | 69.4 | 50.3 | 51.3 | 59.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.2M | 557K | 213K | 1.7M | 785K |
Analyst Outlook
MGRC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: WSC as "Buy", URI as "Buy", MGRC as "Buy", TREX as "Hold", H as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 22.5% upside for MGRC (target: $140) vs 1.6% for WSC (target: $24). For income investors, MGRC offers the higher dividend yield at 1.70% vs H's 0.35%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $23.67 | $1037.13 | $140.00 | $44.50 | $190.80 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 13 | 40 | 5 | 31 | 49 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.2% | +0.8% | +1.7% | — | +0.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 4 | 36 | 2 | 3 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.28 | $7.18 | $1.94 | — | $0.60 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.4% | +3.3% | 0.0% | +1.3% | +2.0% |
WSC leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). TREX leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
WSC vs URI vs MGRC vs TREX vs H: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is WSC or URI or MGRC or TREX or H a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Hyatt Hotels Corporation (H) is the stronger pick with 117.
0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -4. 8% for WillScot Holdings Corporation (WSC). McGrath RentCorp (MGRC) offers the better valuation at 18. 0x trailing P/E (17. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate WillScot Holdings Corporation (WSC) a "Buy" — based on 13 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — WSC or URI or MGRC or TREX or H?
On trailing P/E, McGrath RentCorp (MGRC) is the cheapest at 18.
0x versus United Rentals, Inc. at 24. 5x. On forward P/E, McGrath RentCorp is actually cheaper at 17. 7x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: United Rentals, Inc. wins at 0. 78x versus Trex Company, Inc. 's 7. 16x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — WSC or URI or MGRC or TREX or H?
Over the past 5 years, United Rentals, Inc.
(URI) delivered a total return of +178. 0%, compared to -64. 0% for Trex Company, Inc. (TREX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: URI returned +1483% versus WSC's +144. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — WSC or URI or MGRC or TREX or H?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), McGrath RentCorp (MGRC) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
87β versus WillScot Holdings Corporation's 2. 06β — meaning WSC is approximately 138% more volatile than MGRC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Trex Company, Inc. (TREX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 22% versus 5% for WillScot Holdings Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — WSC or URI or MGRC or TREX or H?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Hyatt Hotels Corporation (H) is pulling ahead at 117.
0% versus -4. 8% for WillScot Holdings Corporation (WSC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: United Rentals, Inc. grew EPS -0. 2% year-over-year, compared to -293. 3% for WillScot Holdings Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, H leads at 29. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — WSC or URI or MGRC or TREX or H?
McGrath RentCorp (MGRC) is the more profitable company, earning 16.
6% net margin versus -2. 3% for WillScot Holdings Corporation — meaning it keeps 16. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MGRC leads at 25. 9% versus 7. 8% for H. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — WSC leads at 46. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is WSC or URI or MGRC or TREX or H more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, United Rentals, Inc. (URI) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 78x versus Trex Company, Inc. 's 7. 16x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, McGrath RentCorp (MGRC) trades at 17. 7x forward P/E versus 53. 0x for Hyatt Hotels Corporation — 35. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MGRC: 22. 5% to $140. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — WSC or URI or MGRC or TREX or H?
In this comparison, MGRC (1.
7% yield), WSC (1. 2% yield), URI (0. 8% yield), H (0. 4% yield) pay a dividend. TREX does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is WSC or URI or MGRC or TREX or H better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, United Rentals, Inc.
(URI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 19), 0. 8% yield, +1483% 10Y return). WillScot Holdings Corporation (WSC) carries a higher beta of 2. 06 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (URI: +1483%, WSC: +144. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between WSC and URI and MGRC and TREX and H?
These companies operate in different sectors (WSC (Industrials) and URI (Industrials) and MGRC (Industrials) and TREX (Industrials) and H (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: WSC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; URI is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; MGRC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TREX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; H is a mid-cap high-growth stock. WSC, URI, MGRC pay a dividend while TREX, H do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.