REIT - Retail
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
WSR vs NTST vs NNN vs EPRT vs O
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Retail
REIT - Retail
REIT - Diversified
REIT - Retail
WSR vs NTST vs NNN vs EPRT vs O — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Retail | REIT - Retail | REIT - Retail | REIT - Diversified | REIT - Retail |
| Market Cap | $975M | $1.73B | $8.44B | $6.79B | $57.74B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $165M | $176M | $936M | $593M | $5.92B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $50M | $185K | $387M | $257M | $1.12B |
| Gross Margin | 56.8% | 92.4% | 81.4% | 84.7% | 68.6% |
| Operating Margin | 33.0% | 27.7% | 63.3% | 65.0% | 29.3% |
| Forward P/E | 49.2x | 65.8x | 21.7x | 24.1x | 37.6x |
| Total Debt | $644M | $0.00 | $4.82B | $2.52B | $32.85B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $5M | $14M | $5M | $60M | $435M |
WSR vs NTST vs NNN vs EPRT vs O — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Aug 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whitestone REIT (WSR) | 100 | 295.2 | +195.2% |
| NETSTREIT Corp. (NTST) | 100 | 112.7 | +12.7% |
| NNN REIT, Inc. (NNN) | 100 | 125.2 | +25.2% |
| Essential Propertie… (EPRT) | 100 | 185.0 | +85.0% |
| Realty Income Corpo… (O) | 100 | 103.1 | +3.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: WSR vs NTST vs NNN vs EPRT vs O
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
WSR has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in momentum and efficiency.
- +53.5% vs EPRT's +2.6%
- 4.3% ROA vs NTST's 0.0%, ROIC 3.7% vs 2.1%
NTST is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 30.0%, EPS growth 150.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 28.2%
- 30.0% FFO/revenue growth vs WSR's 3.4%
NNN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value and dividends is your priority.
- Lower P/E (21.7x vs 37.6x), PEG 1.94 vs 72.19
- 5.3% yield, 9-year raise streak, vs O's 5.2%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
EPRT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 189.7% 10Y total return vs WSR's 88.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.01, Low D/E 59.9%, current ratio 6.13x
- PEG 1.01 vs NNN's 1.94
- Beta 0.01, yield 3.7%, current ratio 6.13x
O is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 14 yrs, beta 0.11, yield 5.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 30.0% FFO/revenue growth vs WSR's 3.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (21.7x vs 37.6x), PEG 1.94 vs 72.19 | |
| Quality / Margins | 43.3% margin vs NTST's 0.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.01 vs WSR's 0.27, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 5.3% yield, 9-year raise streak, vs O's 5.2%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +53.5% vs EPRT's +2.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.3% ROA vs NTST's 0.0%, ROIC 3.7% vs 2.1% |
WSR vs NTST vs NNN vs EPRT vs O — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
WSR vs NTST vs NNN vs EPRT vs O — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
WSR leads in 3 of 6 categories
NTST leads 1 • NNN leads 0 • EPRT leads 0 • O leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NTST leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
O is the larger business by revenue, generating $5.9B annually — 35.8x WSR's $165M. EPRT is the more profitable business, keeping 43.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NTST's 0.1%. On growth, NTST holds the edge at +27.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $165M | $176M | $936M | $593M | $5.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $91M | $133M | $867M | $548M | $4.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $50M | $185,000 | $387M | $257M | $1.1B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $51M | $106M | $464M | -$151M | $4.1B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +56.8% | +92.4% | +81.4% | +84.7% | +68.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +33.0% | +27.7% | +63.3% | +65.0% | +29.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +30.5% | +0.1% | +41.4% | +43.3% | +18.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +31.0% | +59.9% | +49.6% | -25.5% | +68.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +9.3% | +27.7% | +4.1% | +24.1% | +12.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +10.6% | +110.6% | -2.0% | -3.4% | +17.9% |
Valuation Metrics
WSR leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 20.0x trailing earnings, WSR trades at a 92% valuation discount to NTST's 258.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), WSR offers better value at 0.43x vs O's 72.19x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $975M | $1.7B | $8.4B | $6.8B | $57.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.6B | $1.7B | $13.3B | $9.3B | $90.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 19.98x | 258.38x | 21.43x | 24.53x | 52.92x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 49.17x | 65.77x | 21.68x | 24.08x | 37.60x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.43x | 4.42x | 1.92x | 1.03x | 72.19x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 18.04x | 12.53x | 15.81x | 17.93x | 21.99x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 6.06x | 8.85x | 9.11x | 12.08x | 10.04x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.12x | 1.20x | 1.89x | 1.50x | 1.40x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 19.21x | 15.76x | 12.65x | 17.82x | 14.45x |
Profitability & Efficiency
WSR leads this category, winning 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
WSR delivers a 11.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $11 in annual profit, vs $0 for NTST. EPRT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.60x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to WSR's 1.39x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), WSR scores 7/9 vs NNN's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +11.1% | +0.0% | +8.8% | +6.3% | +2.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.3% | +0.0% | +4.1% | +3.8% | +1.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.7% | +2.1% | +4.8% | +4.4% | +1.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +4.8% | +2.1% | +6.4% | +5.8% | +2.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 6 | 4 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.39x | — | 1.09x | 0.60x | 0.82x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $639M | -$14M | $4.8B | $2.5B | $32.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $5M | $14M | $5M | $60M | $435M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $644M | $0 | $4.8B | $2.5B | $32.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.52x | — | 2.93x | 3.17x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
WSR leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in WSR five years ago would be worth $23,259 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,744 for NTST. Over the past 12 months, WSR leads with a +53.5% total return vs EPRT's +2.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WSR at 33.6% vs O's 4.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +38.5% | +17.6% | +15.3% | +5.5% | +9.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +53.5% | +34.7% | +12.8% | +2.6% | +15.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +138.7% | +28.7% | +14.8% | +38.0% | +13.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +132.6% | +17.4% | +17.8% | +46.1% | +18.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +88.5% | +42.4% | +37.5% | +189.7% | +45.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +33.6% | +8.8% | +4.7% | +11.3% | +4.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — WSR and EPRT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
EPRT is the less volatile stock with a 0.01 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than WSR's 0.27 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WSR currently trades 99.8% from its 52-week high vs EPRT's 90.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.27x | 0.08x | 0.16x | 0.01x | 0.11x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $19.01 | $21.30 | $46.03 | $34.73 | $67.94 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $11.43 | $15.24 | $38.90 | $28.95 | $54.38 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.8% | +97.0% | +96.4% | +90.4% | +91.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 82.3 | 52.4 | 55.9 | 46.6 | 40.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 476K | 1.2M | 1.5M | 2.0M | 5.6M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — NNN and O each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: WSR as "Hold", NTST as "Buy", NNN as "Hold", EPRT as "Buy", O as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 16.2% upside for EPRT (target: $37) vs -3.8% for WSR (target: $18). For income investors, NNN offers the higher dividend yield at 5.31% vs EPRT's 3.70%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Hold | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $18.25 | $22.03 | $46.06 | $36.50 | $66.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 16 | 18 | 29 | 22 | 34 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +4.0% | +5.3% | +3.7% | +5.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 3 | 0 | 9 | 7 | 14 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.83 | $2.36 | $1.16 | $3.23 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.2% | +0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
WSR leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). NTST leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.
WSR vs NTST vs NNN vs EPRT vs O: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is WSR or NTST or NNN or EPRT or O a better buy right now?
For growth investors, NETSTREIT Corp.
(NTST) is the stronger pick with 30. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 4% for Whitestone REIT (WSR). Whitestone REIT (WSR) offers the better valuation at 20. 0x trailing P/E (49. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate NETSTREIT Corp. (NTST) a "Buy" — based on 18 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — WSR or NTST or NNN or EPRT or O?
On trailing P/E, Whitestone REIT (WSR) is the cheapest at 20.
0x versus NETSTREIT Corp. at 258. 4x. On forward P/E, NNN REIT, Inc. is actually cheaper at 21. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Essential Properties Realty Trust, Inc. wins at 1. 01x versus Realty Income Corporation's 72. 19x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — WSR or NTST or NNN or EPRT or O?
Over the past 5 years, Whitestone REIT (WSR) delivered a total return of +132.
6%, compared to +17. 4% for NETSTREIT Corp. (NTST). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: EPRT returned +189. 7% versus NNN's +37. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — WSR or NTST or NNN or EPRT or O?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Essential Properties Realty Trust, Inc.
(EPRT) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 01β versus Whitestone REIT's 0. 27β — meaning WSR is approximately 1762% more volatile than EPRT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Essential Properties Realty Trust, Inc. (EPRT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 60% versus 139% for Whitestone REIT — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — WSR or NTST or NNN or EPRT or O?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), NETSTREIT Corp.
(NTST) is pulling ahead at 30. 0% versus 3. 4% for Whitestone REIT (WSR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: NETSTREIT Corp. grew EPS 150. 0% year-over-year, compared to -3. 7% for NNN REIT, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, NTST leads at 28. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — WSR or NTST or NNN or EPRT or O?
Essential Properties Realty Trust, Inc.
(EPRT) is the more profitable company, earning 45. 0% net margin versus 3. 5% for NETSTREIT Corp. — meaning it keeps 45. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: EPRT leads at 64. 5% versus 25. 7% for NTST. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NTST leads at 99. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is WSR or NTST or NNN or EPRT or O more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Essential Properties Realty Trust, Inc. (EPRT) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 01x versus Realty Income Corporation's 72. 19x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, NNN REIT, Inc. (NNN) trades at 21. 7x forward P/E versus 65. 8x for NETSTREIT Corp. — 44. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for EPRT: 16. 2% to $36. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — WSR or NTST or NNN or EPRT or O?
In this comparison, NNN (5.
3% yield), O (5. 2% yield), NTST (4. 0% yield), EPRT (3. 7% yield) pay a dividend. WSR does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is WSR or NTST or NNN or EPRT or O better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Essential Properties Realty Trust, Inc.
(EPRT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 01), 3. 7% yield, +189. 7% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (EPRT: +189. 7%, WSR: +88. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between WSR and NTST and NNN and EPRT and O?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: WSR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NTST is a small-cap high-growth stock; NNN is a small-cap income-oriented stock; EPRT is a small-cap high-growth stock; O is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. NTST, NNN, EPRT, O pay a dividend while WSR does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.