Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
WTBA vs IROQ vs FBIZ vs MGYR vs MOFG
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
WTBA vs IROQ vs FBIZ vs MGYR vs MOFG — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $408M | $89M | $473M | $115M | $1.02B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $198M | $48M | $279M | $58M | $206M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $35M | $5M | $51M | $11M | $58M |
| Gross Margin | 48.0% | 54.7% | 57.3% | 60.3% | 29.4% |
| Operating Margin | 20.9% | 12.2% | 21.6% | 23.6% | -40.8% |
| Forward P/E | 9.3x | 19.4x | 9.1x | 11.3x | 13.8x |
| Total Debt | $106M | $73M | $259M | $49M | $117M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $25M | $20M | $31M | $7M | $205M |
WTBA vs IROQ vs FBIZ vs MGYR vs MOFG — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| West Bancorporation… (WTBA) | 100 | 136.7 | +36.7% |
| IF Bancorp, Inc. (IROQ) | 100 | 173.5 | +73.5% |
| First Business Fina… (FBIZ) | 100 | 342.7 | +242.7% |
| Magyar Bancorp, Inc. (MGYR) | 100 | 242.5 | +142.5% |
| MidWestOne Financia… (MOFG) | 100 | 241.4 | +141.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: WTBA vs IROQ vs FBIZ vs MGYR vs MOFG
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
WTBA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for quality and dividends.
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs MOFG's 0.7% (lower = leaner)
- 4.1% yield, vs FBIZ's 2.1%
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs MOFG's 0.7%
IROQ is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 6.6%, EPS growth 140.4%
- Beta 0.04 vs MOFG's 1.29
FBIZ ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 13 yrs, beta 0.81, yield 2.1%
- 161.7% 10Y total return vs MGYR's 125.8%
- NIM 3.3% vs WTBA's 2.1%
- Lower P/E (9.1x vs 13.8x)
MGYR is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and valuation efficiency.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.28, Low D/E 41.3%, current ratio 13.39x
- PEG 0.35 vs FBIZ's 0.36
- Beta 0.28, yield 1.7%, current ratio 13.39x
- 12.1% NII/revenue growth vs MOFG's -23.1%
MOFG is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +77.6% vs IROQ's +10.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 12.1% NII/revenue growth vs MOFG's -23.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.1x vs 13.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs MOFG's 0.7% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.04 vs MOFG's 1.29 | |
| Dividends | 4.1% yield, vs FBIZ's 2.1% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +77.6% vs IROQ's +10.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs MOFG's 0.7% |
WTBA vs IROQ vs FBIZ vs MGYR vs MOFG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
WTBA vs IROQ vs FBIZ vs MGYR vs MOFG — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
MGYR leads in 1 of 6 categories
FBIZ leads 1 • MOFG leads 1 • WTBA leads 0 • IROQ leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MGYR leads this category, winning 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FBIZ is the larger business by revenue, generating $279M annually — 5.8x IROQ's $48M. FBIZ is the more profitable business, keeping 18.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MOFG's -29.3%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $198M | $48M | $279M | $58M | $206M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $49M | $7M | $49M | $16M | $74M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $35M | $5M | $51M | $11M | $58M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $48M | $4M | $53M | $11M | $79M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +48.0% | +54.7% | +57.3% | +60.3% | +29.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +20.9% | +12.2% | +21.6% | +23.6% | -40.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +16.4% | +8.9% | +18.0% | +16.7% | -29.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +21.7% | +13.5% | +21.9% | +16.8% | +29.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +32.6% | +115.0% | +12.9% | +51.5% | +113.6% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — FBIZ and MGYR each lead in 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.4x trailing earnings, FBIZ trades at a 52% valuation discount to IROQ's 19.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), MGYR offers better value at 0.35x vs FBIZ's 0.37x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $408M | $89M | $473M | $115M | $1.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $490M | $142M | $702M | $156M | $929M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 12.56x | 19.38x | 9.36x | 11.33x | -13.93x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 9.31x | — | 9.15x | — | 13.77x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.37x | 0.35x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 11.82x | 21.69x | 11.61x | 10.61x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.06x | 1.84x | 1.69x | 1.96x | 4.94x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.54x | 1.02x | 1.25x | 0.93x | 1.50x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 9.46x | 13.65x | 7.74x | 11.67x | 16.74x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FBIZ leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FBIZ delivers a 14.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $14 in annual profit, vs $6 for IROQ. MOFG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.21x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to IROQ's 0.89x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FBIZ scores 8/9 vs MOFG's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +13.7% | +6.0% | +14.1% | +9.2% | +10.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.9% | +0.6% | +1.2% | +1.1% | +0.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.3% | +2.9% | +7.0% | +6.7% | -9.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +6.2% | +3.9% | +2.6% | +2.4% | -9.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 7 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.40x | 0.89x | 0.70x | 0.41x | 0.21x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $81M | $53M | $229M | $42M | -$88M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $25M | $20M | $31M | $7M | $205M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $106M | $73M | $259M | $49M | $117M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.44x | 0.26x | 0.42x | 0.66x | 0.67x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MOFG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FBIZ five years ago would be worth $23,086 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,704 for WTBA. Over the past 12 months, MOFG leads with a +77.6% total return vs IROQ's +10.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MOFG at 39.0% vs WTBA's 20.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +13.0% | -1.6% | +7.1% | +1.9% | +30.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +31.7% | +10.9% | +21.0% | +25.7% | +77.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +73.4% | +82.2% | +136.5% | +85.6% | +168.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +7.0% | +25.6% | +130.9% | +73.1% | +72.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +84.9% | +59.5% | +161.7% | +125.8% | +109.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +20.1% | +22.1% | +33.2% | +22.9% | +39.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — IROQ and MOFG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
IROQ is the less volatile stock with a 0.04 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MOFG's 1.29 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MOFG currently trades 99.2% from its 52-week high vs MGYR's 88.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.93x | 0.04x | 0.81x | 0.28x | 1.29x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $26.60 | $29.00 | $60.54 | $20.00 | $49.69 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $17.31 | $23.21 | $45.90 | $14.35 | $26.52 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +90.6% | +91.6% | +93.7% | +88.4% | +99.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 47.1 | 34.4 | 49.1 | 47.4 | 74.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 42K | 44K | 39K | 6K | 0 |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — WTBA and FBIZ each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: WTBA as "Hold", FBIZ as "Buy", MOFG as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 18.1% upside for FBIZ (target: $67) vs -36.6% for MOFG (target: $31). For income investors, WTBA offers the higher dividend yield at 4.12% vs IROQ's 1.54%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | — | Buy | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $67.00 | — | $31.25 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 3 | — | 10 | — | 8 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +4.1% | +1.5% | +2.1% | +1.7% | +2.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | 13 | 2 | 5 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.99 | $0.41 | $1.19 | $0.29 | $0.97 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.3% | 0.0% | +0.3% | +0.7% | +0.0% |
MGYR leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). FBIZ leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.
WTBA vs IROQ vs FBIZ vs MGYR vs MOFG: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is WTBA or IROQ or FBIZ or MGYR or MOFG a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Magyar Bancorp, Inc.
(MGYR) is the stronger pick with 12. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -23. 1% for MidWestOne Financial Group, Inc. (MOFG). First Business Financial Services, Inc. (FBIZ) offers the better valuation at 9. 4x trailing P/E (9. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate First Business Financial Services, Inc. (FBIZ) a "Buy" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — WTBA or IROQ or FBIZ or MGYR or MOFG?
On trailing P/E, First Business Financial Services, Inc.
(FBIZ) is the cheapest at 9. 4x versus IF Bancorp, Inc. at 19. 4x. On forward P/E, First Business Financial Services, Inc. is actually cheaper at 9. 1x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — WTBA or IROQ or FBIZ or MGYR or MOFG?
Over the past 5 years, First Business Financial Services, Inc.
(FBIZ) delivered a total return of +130. 9%, compared to +7. 0% for West Bancorporation, Inc. (WTBA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FBIZ returned +161. 7% versus IROQ's +59. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — WTBA or IROQ or FBIZ or MGYR or MOFG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), IF Bancorp, Inc.
(IROQ) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 04β versus MidWestOne Financial Group, Inc. 's 1. 29β — meaning MOFG is approximately 3578% more volatile than IROQ relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, MidWestOne Financial Group, Inc. (MOFG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 21% versus 89% for IF Bancorp, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — WTBA or IROQ or FBIZ or MGYR or MOFG?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Magyar Bancorp, Inc.
(MGYR) is pulling ahead at 12. 1% versus -23. 1% for MidWestOne Financial Group, Inc. (MOFG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: IF Bancorp, Inc. grew EPS 140. 4% year-over-year, compared to -366. 2% for MidWestOne Financial Group, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — WTBA or IROQ or FBIZ or MGYR or MOFG?
First Business Financial Services, Inc.
(FBIZ) is the more profitable company, earning 18. 0% net margin versus -29. 3% for MidWestOne Financial Group, Inc. — meaning it keeps 18. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MGYR leads at 23. 6% versus -40. 8% for MOFG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MGYR leads at 60. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is WTBA or IROQ or FBIZ or MGYR or MOFG more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, First Business Financial Services, Inc.
(FBIZ) trades at 9. 1x forward P/E versus 13. 8x for MidWestOne Financial Group, Inc. — 4. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FBIZ: 18. 1% to $67. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — WTBA or IROQ or FBIZ or MGYR or MOFG?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
West Bancorporation, Inc. (WTBA) offers the highest yield at 4. 1%, versus 1. 5% for IF Bancorp, Inc. (IROQ).
09Is WTBA or IROQ or FBIZ or MGYR or MOFG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, IF Bancorp, Inc.
(IROQ) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 04), 1. 5% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (IROQ: +59. 5%, MOFG: +109. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between WTBA and IROQ and FBIZ and MGYR and MOFG?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: WTBA is a small-cap deep-value stock; IROQ is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FBIZ is a small-cap deep-value stock; MGYR is a small-cap deep-value stock; MOFG is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.