Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
WTBA vs MGYR vs NBTB vs CZWI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
WTBA vs MGYR vs NBTB vs CZWI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $408M | $115M | $2.35B | $203M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $198M | $58M | $867M | $90M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $35M | $11M | $169M | $14M |
| Gross Margin | 48.0% | 60.3% | 72.1% | 54.7% |
| Operating Margin | 20.9% | 23.6% | 25.3% | 7.0% |
| Forward P/E | 9.3x | 11.3x | 10.8x | 11.8x |
| Total Debt | $106M | $49M | $327M | $52M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $25M | $7M | $185M | $119M |
WTBA vs MGYR vs NBTB vs CZWI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| West Bancorporation… (WTBA) | 100 | 136.7 | +36.7% |
| Magyar Bancorp, Inc. (MGYR) | 100 | 242.5 | +142.5% |
| NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) | 100 | 143.9 | +43.9% |
| Citizens Community … (CZWI) | 100 | 286.8 | +186.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: WTBA vs MGYR vs NBTB vs CZWI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
WTBA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for value and quality.
- Lower P/E (9.3x vs 11.8x)
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs CZWI's 0.5% (lower = leaner)
- 4.1% yield, vs NBTB's 3.2%
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs CZWI's 0.5%
MGYR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and valuation efficiency is your priority.
- Rev growth 12.1%, EPS growth 26.8%
- PEG 0.35 vs CZWI's 2.32
- NIM 3.2% vs WTBA's 2.1%
- 12.1% NII/revenue growth vs CZWI's -9.4%
NBTB is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 0.89, yield 3.2%
CZWI is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 157.0% 10Y total return vs MGYR's 125.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.46, Low D/E 27.6%, current ratio 3015.31x
- Beta 0.46, yield 1.8%, current ratio 3015.31x
- +45.6% vs NBTB's +9.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 12.1% NII/revenue growth vs CZWI's -9.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.3x vs 11.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs CZWI's 0.5% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.28 vs WTBA's 0.93 | |
| Dividends | 4.1% yield, vs NBTB's 3.2% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +45.6% vs NBTB's +9.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs CZWI's 0.5% |
WTBA vs MGYR vs NBTB vs CZWI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
WTBA vs MGYR vs NBTB vs CZWI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
NBTB leads in 2 of 6 categories
MGYR leads 1 • CZWI leads 1 • WTBA leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NBTB leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NBTB is the larger business by revenue, generating $867M annually — 14.8x MGYR's $58M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 19.5% (NBTB) to 16.0% (CZWI).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $198M | $58M | $867M | $90M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $49M | $16M | $241M | $9M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $35M | $11M | $169M | $14M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $48M | $11M | $225M | $11M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +48.0% | +60.3% | +72.1% | +54.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +20.9% | +23.6% | +25.3% | +7.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +16.4% | +16.7% | +19.5% | +16.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +21.7% | +16.8% | +25.2% | +11.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +32.6% | +51.5% | +39.5% | +63.0% |
Valuation Metrics
MGYR leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 11.3x trailing earnings, MGYR trades at a 22% valuation discount to CZWI's 14.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), MGYR offers better value at 0.35x vs CZWI's 2.85x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $408M | $115M | $2.4B | $203M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $490M | $156M | $2.5B | $136M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 12.56x | 11.33x | 13.53x | 14.44x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 9.31x | — | 10.80x | 11.78x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.35x | 1.92x | 2.85x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 11.82x | 10.61x | 10.35x | 15.28x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.06x | 1.96x | 2.71x | 2.25x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.54x | 0.93x | 1.21x | 1.09x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 9.46x | 11.67x | 10.75x | 19.55x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NBTB leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
WTBA delivers a 13.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $14 in annual profit, vs $8 for CZWI. NBTB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MGYR's 0.41x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MGYR scores 7/9 vs CZWI's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +13.7% | +9.2% | +9.5% | +7.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.9% | +1.1% | +1.1% | +0.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.3% | +6.7% | +7.9% | +2.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +6.2% | +2.4% | +2.4% | +0.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 7 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.40x | 0.41x | 0.17x | 0.28x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $81M | $42M | $142M | -$67M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $25M | $7M | $185M | $119M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $106M | $49M | $327M | $52M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.44x | 0.66x | 1.05x | 0.16x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CZWI leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MGYR five years ago would be worth $17,310 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,704 for WTBA. Over the past 12 months, CZWI leads with a +45.6% total return vs NBTB's +9.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CZWI at 37.5% vs NBTB's 15.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +13.0% | +1.9% | +9.3% | +21.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +31.7% | +25.7% | +9.0% | +45.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +73.4% | +85.6% | +54.1% | +160.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +7.0% | +73.1% | +29.9% | +71.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +84.9% | +125.8% | +102.2% | +157.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +20.1% | +22.9% | +15.5% | +37.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — MGYR and NBTB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MGYR is the less volatile stock with a 0.28 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than WTBA's 0.93 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NBTB currently trades 96.1% from its 52-week high vs MGYR's 88.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.93x | 0.28x | 0.89x | 0.46x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $26.60 | $20.00 | $46.92 | $22.62 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $17.31 | $14.35 | $39.20 | $12.83 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +90.6% | +88.4% | +96.1% | +93.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 47.1 | 47.4 | 57.3 | 63.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 42K | 6K | 236K | 40K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — WTBA and NBTB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: WTBA as "Hold", NBTB as "Hold", CZWI as "Buy". For income investors, WTBA offers the higher dividend yield at 4.12% vs MGYR's 1.65%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | — | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $46.00 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 3 | — | 10 | 2 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +4.1% | +1.7% | +3.2% | +1.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 2 | 12 | 7 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.99 | $0.29 | $1.43 | $0.37 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.3% | +0.7% | +0.4% | +3.1% |
NBTB leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). MGYR leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
WTBA vs MGYR vs NBTB vs CZWI: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is WTBA or MGYR or NBTB or CZWI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Magyar Bancorp, Inc.
(MGYR) is the stronger pick with 12. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). Magyar Bancorp, Inc. (MGYR) offers the better valuation at 11. 3x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — WTBA or MGYR or NBTB or CZWI?
On trailing P/E, Magyar Bancorp, Inc.
(MGYR) is the cheapest at 11. 3x versus Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. at 14. 4x. On forward P/E, West Bancorporation, Inc. is actually cheaper at 9. 3x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: NBT Bancorp Inc. wins at 1. 53x versus Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. 's 2. 32x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — WTBA or MGYR or NBTB or CZWI?
Over the past 5 years, Magyar Bancorp, Inc.
(MGYR) delivered a total return of +73. 1%, compared to +7. 0% for West Bancorporation, Inc. (WTBA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CZWI returned +157. 0% versus WTBA's +84. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — WTBA or MGYR or NBTB or CZWI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Magyar Bancorp, Inc.
(MGYR) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 28β versus West Bancorporation, Inc. 's 0. 93β — meaning WTBA is approximately 233% more volatile than MGYR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 41% for Magyar Bancorp, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — WTBA or MGYR or NBTB or CZWI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Magyar Bancorp, Inc.
(MGYR) is pulling ahead at 12. 1% versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: West Bancorporation, Inc. grew EPS 35. 2% year-over-year, compared to 9. 0% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — WTBA or MGYR or NBTB or CZWI?
NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is the more profitable company, earning 19. 5% net margin versus 16. 0% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. — meaning it keeps 19. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NBTB leads at 25. 3% versus 7. 0% for CZWI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NBTB leads at 72. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is WTBA or MGYR or NBTB or CZWI more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 53x versus Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. 's 2. 32x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, West Bancorporation, Inc. (WTBA) trades at 9. 3x forward P/E versus 11. 8x for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. — 2. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — WTBA or MGYR or NBTB or CZWI?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
West Bancorporation, Inc. (WTBA) offers the highest yield at 4. 1%, versus 1. 7% for Magyar Bancorp, Inc. (MGYR).
09Is WTBA or MGYR or NBTB or CZWI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Magyar Bancorp, Inc.
(MGYR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 28), 1. 7% yield, +125. 8% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MGYR: +125. 8%, WTBA: +84. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between WTBA and MGYR and NBTB and CZWI?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.