Industrial - Machinery
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
XCH vs MNTN vs TTD vs BTBT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Advertising Agencies
Software - Application
Financial - Capital Markets
XCH vs MNTN vs TTD vs BTBT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Industrial - Machinery | Advertising Agencies | Software - Application | Financial - Capital Markets |
| Market Cap | $59M | $724M | $11.18B | $589M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $42M | $299M | $2.97B | $164M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-8M | $23M | $433M | $137M |
| Gross Margin | 47.6% | 80.0% | 77.8% | 61.9% |
| Operating Margin | -13.8% | 13.8% | 20.3% | 16.8% |
| Forward P/E | — | 8.9x | 21.2x | 9.2x |
| Total Debt | $10M | $0.00 | $436M | $14M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $27M | $210M | $658M | $95M |
XCH vs MNTN vs TTD vs BTBT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 25 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| XCHG Limited Americ… (XCH) | 100 | 65.2 | -34.8% |
| MNTN Inc. (MNTN) | 100 | 33.9 | -66.1% |
| The Trade Desk, Inc. (TTD) | 100 | 30.7 | -69.3% |
| Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) | 100 | 76.3 | -23.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: XCH vs MNTN vs TTD vs BTBT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
XCH is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- beta 0.76
- Lower volatility, beta 0.76, Low D/E 35.2%, current ratio 2.08x
- Beta 0.76, current ratio 2.08x
- Beta 0.76 vs BTBT's 3.37
MNTN is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (8.9x vs 9.2x)
TTD is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 6.8% 10Y total return vs BTBT's -60.4%
BTBT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 264.6%, EPS growth 225.0%
- 264.6% NII/revenue growth vs XCH's 9.6%
- 17.3% margin vs XCH's -17.9%
- 0.3% yield; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 264.6% NII/revenue growth vs XCH's 9.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.9x vs 9.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 17.3% margin vs XCH's -17.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.76 vs BTBT's 3.37 | |
| Dividends | 0.3% yield; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -9.0% vs MNTN's -65.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 19.0% ROA vs XCH's -20.6% |
XCH vs MNTN vs TTD vs BTBT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
XCH vs MNTN vs TTD vs BTBT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
MNTN leads in 1 of 6 categories
TTD leads 1 • BTBT leads 1 • XCH leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — MNTN and TTD and BTBT each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TTD is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.0B annually — 70.2x XCH's $42M. BTBT is the more profitable business, keeping 17.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to XCH's -17.9%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $42M | $299M | $3.0B | $164M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$7M | $52M | $693M | $166M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$8M | $23M | $433M | $137M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$7M | $20M | $837M | -$448M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +47.6% | +80.0% | +77.8% | +61.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -13.8% | +13.8% | +20.3% | +16.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -17.9% | +7.8% | +14.6% | +17.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -16.3% | +6.5% | +28.2% | -65.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +14.2% | +11.8% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +137.9% | -20.0% | +2.8% |
Valuation Metrics
MNTN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.2x trailing earnings, BTBT trades at a 65% valuation discount to TTD's 25.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, BTBT's 8.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than TTD's 15.5x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $59M | $724M | $11.2B | $589M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $43M | $514M | $11.0B | $508M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -5.00x | -105.52x | 25.81x | 9.15x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 8.94x | 21.21x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 1.96x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 15.16x | 15.54x | 8.49x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.41x | 2.50x | 3.86x | 3.60x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.01x | 15.28x | 4.56x | 0.56x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 12.83x | 14.05x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
TTD leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BTBT delivers a 21.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $21 in annual profit, vs $-40 for XCH. BTBT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to XCH's 0.35x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TTD scores 6/9 vs MNTN's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -40.5% | +8.3% | +16.9% | +21.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -20.6% | +6.6% | +7.3% | +19.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +18.9% | +21.3% | +6.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -58.4% | +12.2% | +19.2% | +8.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.35x | — | 0.18x | 0.03x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$16M | -$210M | -$222M | -$81M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $27M | $210M | $658M | $95M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $10M | $0 | $436M | $14M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -36.35x | 14.94x | 1591.47x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BTBT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TTD five years ago would be worth $3,552 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,359 for XCH. Over the past 12 months, BTBT leads with a -9.0% total return vs MNTN's -65.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BTBT at -7.1% vs XCH's -48.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -10.7% | -24.7% | -37.7% | -10.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -18.7% | -65.2% | -58.4% | -9.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -86.4% | -65.2% | -63.7% | -19.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -86.4% | -65.2% | -64.5% | -84.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -86.4% | -65.2% | +680.4% | -60.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -48.6% | -29.6% | -28.7% | -7.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — XCH and BTBT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
XCH is the less volatile stock with a 0.76 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BTBT's 3.37 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BTBT currently trades 40.2% from its 52-week high vs TTD's 25.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.57x | 1.17x | 1.03x | 3.41x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.50 | $32.49 | $91.45 | $4.55 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.55 | $7.71 | $19.74 | $1.25 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +40.0% | +28.3% | +25.7% | +40.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 43.7 | 42.2 | 52.8 | 69.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 39K | 644K | 20.4M | 18.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: TTD as "Buy", BTBT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 173.2% upside for BTBT (target: $5) vs 58.0% for TTD (target: $37). BTBT is the only dividend payer here at 0.31% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $20.64 | $37.12 | $5.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — | 46 | 2 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +0.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $0.01 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.4% | +12.3% | 0.0% |
MNTN leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). TTD leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
XCH vs MNTN vs TTD vs BTBT: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is XCH or MNTN or TTD or BTBT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Bit Digital, Inc.
(BTBT) is the stronger pick with 264. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 9. 6% for XCHG Limited American Depositary Share (XCH). Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) offers the better valuation at 9. 2x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate The Trade Desk, Inc. (TTD) a "Buy" — based on 46 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — XCH or MNTN or TTD or BTBT?
On trailing P/E, Bit Digital, Inc.
(BTBT) is the cheapest at 9. 2x versus The Trade Desk, Inc. at 25. 8x. On forward P/E, MNTN Inc. is actually cheaper at 8. 9x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — XCH or MNTN or TTD or BTBT?
Over the past 5 years, The Trade Desk, Inc.
(TTD) delivered a total return of -64. 5%, compared to -86. 4% for XCHG Limited American Depositary Share (XCH). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TTD returned +666. 1% versus XCH's -87. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — XCH or MNTN or TTD or BTBT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), XCHG Limited American Depositary Share (XCH) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
57β versus Bit Digital, Inc. 's 3. 41β — meaning BTBT is approximately 500% more volatile than XCH relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 35% for XCHG Limited American Depositary Share — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — XCH or MNTN or TTD or BTBT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Bit Digital, Inc.
(BTBT) is pulling ahead at 264. 6% versus 9. 6% for XCHG Limited American Depositary Share (XCH). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Bit Digital, Inc. grew EPS 225. 0% year-over-year, compared to -11. 1% for XCHG Limited American Depositary Share. Over a 3-year CAGR, XCH leads at 47. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — XCH or MNTN or TTD or BTBT?
Bit Digital, Inc.
(BTBT) is the more profitable company, earning 17. 3% net margin versus -28. 3% for XCHG Limited American Depositary Share — meaning it keeps 17. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TTD leads at 20. 3% versus -28. 5% for XCH. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TTD leads at 78. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is XCH or MNTN or TTD or BTBT more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, MNTN Inc.
(MNTN) trades at 8. 9x forward P/E versus 21. 2x for The Trade Desk, Inc. — 12. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BTBT: 173. 2% to $5. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — XCH or MNTN or TTD or BTBT?
In this comparison, BTBT (0.
3% yield) pays a dividend. XCH, MNTN, TTD do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is XCH or MNTN or TTD or BTBT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Trade Desk, Inc.
(TTD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 03), +666. 1% 10Y return). Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) carries a higher beta of 3. 41 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TTD: +666. 1%, BTBT: -61. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between XCH and MNTN and TTD and BTBT?
These companies operate in different sectors (XCH (Industrials) and MNTN (Communication Services) and TTD (Technology) and BTBT (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: XCH is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MNTN is a small-cap high-growth stock; TTD is a mid-cap high-growth stock; BTBT is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.