Apparel - Manufacturers
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
XELB vs ICON vs TRMD vs AEO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Marine Shipping
Oil & Gas Midstream
Apparel - Retail
XELB vs ICON vs TRMD vs AEO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Apparel - Manufacturers | Marine Shipping | Oil & Gas Midstream | Apparel - Retail |
| Market Cap | $12M | $2M | $3.36B | $2.82B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $5M | $6M | $1.29B | $5.50B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-22M | $-5M | $277M | $192M |
| Gross Margin | 100.0% | -0.7% | 47.2% | 33.0% |
| Operating Margin | -208.4% | -32.2% | 26.6% | 6.0% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 6.6x | 12.1x |
| Total Debt | $13M | $16M | $1.23B | $1.73B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1M | $946K | $272M | $239M |
XELB vs ICON vs TRMD vs AEO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jul 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Xcel Brands, Inc. (XELB) | 100 | 34.0 | -66.0% |
| Icon Energy Corp. (ICON) | 100 | 0.9 | -99.1% |
| TORM plc (TRMD) | 100 | 85.6 | -14.4% |
| American Eagle Outf… (AEO) | 100 | 75.5 | -24.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: XELB vs ICON vs TRMD vs AEO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
XELB plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
ICON is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 18.6%, EPS growth -118.1%, 3Y rev CAGR -3.8%
- 18.6% revenue growth vs XELB's -53.5%
- Beta 0.50 vs AEO's 2.08
TRMD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.54, yield 16.6%
- 5.9% 10Y total return vs AEO's 45.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.54, Low D/E 59.1%, current ratio 2.16x
- Beta 0.54, yield 16.6%, current ratio 2.16x
AEO lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 18.6% revenue growth vs XELB's -53.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (6.6x vs 12.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 21.4% margin vs XELB's -437.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.50 vs AEO's 2.08 | |
| Dividends | 16.6% yield, vs ICON's 15.5%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +113.4% vs ICON's -14.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 8.7% ROA vs XELB's -53.8%, ROIC 18.0% vs -33.6% |
XELB vs ICON vs TRMD vs AEO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
XELB vs ICON vs TRMD vs AEO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
TRMD leads in 3 of 6 categories
ICON leads 1 • XELB leads 0 • AEO leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TRMD leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AEO is the larger business by revenue, generating $5.5B annually — 1103.8x XELB's $5M. TRMD is the more profitable business, keeping 21.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to XELB's -4.4%. On growth, AEO holds the edge at +9.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $5M | $6M | $1.3B | $5.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$7M | -$492,000 | $555M | $546M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$22M | -$5M | $277M | $192M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$7M | -$24M | $242M | $25M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +100.0% | -0.7% | +47.2% | +33.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -2.1% | -32.2% | +26.6% | +6.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -4.4% | -79.7% | +21.4% | +3.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -132.8% | -3.9% | +18.7% | +0.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -41.5% | — | -7.8% | +9.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -4.2% | — | -43.0% | -7.4% |
Valuation Metrics
ICON leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 5.2x trailing earnings, TRMD trades at a 66% valuation discount to AEO's 15.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, TRMD's 5.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ICON's 9.1x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $12M | $2M | $3.4B | $2.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $24M | $17M | $4.3B | $4.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.25x | -7.35x | 5.21x | 15.27x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 6.62x | 12.06x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.23x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 9.12x | 5.07x | 7.99x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.41x | 0.29x | 2.15x | 0.51x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.19x | 0.13x | 1.54x | 1.73x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 14.38x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
TRMD leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TRMD delivers a 12.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $-131 for XELB. XELB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.47x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ICON's 1.36x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ICON scores 4/9 vs AEO's 2/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -131.3% | -23.9% | +12.9% | +12.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -53.8% | -8.3% | +8.7% | +4.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -33.6% | +0.8% | +18.0% | +8.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -39.4% | +1.0% | +22.8% | +10.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 2 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.47x | 1.36x | 0.59x | 1.02x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $12M | $15M | $954M | $1.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1M | $946,000 | $272M | $239M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $13M | $16M | $1.2B | $1.7B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -11.56x | -0.97x | 4.61x | 75.18x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TRMD leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TRMD five years ago would be worth $53,512 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,257 for ICON. Over the past 12 months, TRMD leads with a +113.4% total return vs ICON's -14.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TRMD at 16.3% vs ICON's -49.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +120.9% | +91.4% | +70.8% | -35.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +2.5% | -14.9% | +113.4% | +53.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -60.0% | -87.4% | +57.3% | +34.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -87.2% | -87.4% | +435.1% | -48.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -96.0% | -87.4% | +585.5% | +45.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -26.3% | -49.9% | +16.3% | +10.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ICON and TRMD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ICON is the less volatile stock with a 0.50 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AEO's 2.08 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TRMD currently trades 94.9% from its 52-week high vs ICON's 29.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.03x | 0.50x | 0.54x | 2.08x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $3.17 | $4.23 | $34.88 | $28.46 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.74 | $0.55 | $15.79 | $9.27 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +76.7% | +29.6% | +94.9% | +58.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 65.5 | 59.7 | 62.3 | 40.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 40K | 277K | 924K | 5.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — TRMD and AEO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: TRMD as "Buy", AEO as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 49.2% upside for AEO (target: $25) vs 5.7% for TRMD (target: $35). For income investors, TRMD offers the higher dividend yield at 16.56% vs ICON's 15.54%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $35.00 | $24.83 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — | 3 | 52 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +15.5% | +16.6% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.19 | $5.48 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.9% | +100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
TRMD leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). ICON leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
XELB vs ICON vs TRMD vs AEO: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is XELB or ICON or TRMD or AEO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Icon Energy Corp.
(ICON) is the stronger pick with 18. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -53. 5% for Xcel Brands, Inc. (XELB). TORM plc (TRMD) offers the better valuation at 5. 2x trailing P/E (6. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate TORM plc (TRMD) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — XELB or ICON or TRMD or AEO?
On trailing P/E, TORM plc (TRMD) is the cheapest at 5.
2x versus American Eagle Outfitters, Inc. at 15. 3x. On forward P/E, TORM plc is actually cheaper at 6. 6x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — XELB or ICON or TRMD or AEO?
Over the past 5 years, TORM plc (TRMD) delivered a total return of +435.
1%, compared to -87. 4% for Icon Energy Corp. (ICON). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TRMD returned +585. 5% versus XELB's -96. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — XELB or ICON or TRMD or AEO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Icon Energy Corp.
(ICON) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 50β versus American Eagle Outfitters, Inc. 's 2. 08β — meaning AEO is approximately 315% more volatile than ICON relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Xcel Brands, Inc. (XELB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 47% versus 136% for Icon Energy Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — XELB or ICON or TRMD or AEO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Icon Energy Corp.
(ICON) is pulling ahead at 18. 6% versus -53. 5% for Xcel Brands, Inc. (XELB). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: TORM plc grew EPS -15. 0% year-over-year, compared to -819. 6% for Xcel Brands, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TRMD leads at 36. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — XELB or ICON or TRMD or AEO?
TORM plc (TRMD) is the more profitable company, earning 39.
3% net margin versus -271. 2% for Xcel Brands, Inc. — meaning it keeps 39. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TRMD leads at 42. 3% versus -259. 2% for XELB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — XELB leads at 94. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is XELB or ICON or TRMD or AEO more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, TORM plc (TRMD) trades at 6.
6x forward P/E versus 12. 1x for American Eagle Outfitters, Inc. — 5. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AEO: 49. 2% to $24. 83.
08Which pays a better dividend — XELB or ICON or TRMD or AEO?
In this comparison, TRMD (16.
6% yield), ICON (15. 5% yield) pay a dividend. XELB, AEO do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is XELB or ICON or TRMD or AEO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, TORM plc (TRMD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
54), 16. 6% yield, +585. 5% 10Y return). Xcel Brands, Inc. (XELB) carries a higher beta of 2. 03 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TRMD: +585. 5%, XELB: -96. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between XELB and ICON and TRMD and AEO?
These companies operate in different sectors (XELB (Consumer Cyclical) and ICON (Industrials) and TRMD (Energy) and AEO (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: XELB is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ICON is a small-cap high-growth stock; TRMD is a small-cap deep-value stock; AEO is a small-cap deep-value stock. ICON, TRMD pay a dividend while XELB, AEO do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.