REIT - Hotel & Motel
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
XHR vs BKNG vs EXPE vs ABNB
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Travel Services
Travel Services
Travel Services
XHR vs BKNG vs EXPE vs ABNB — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Hotel & Motel | Travel Services | Travel Services | Travel Services |
| Market Cap | $1.55B | $132.72B | $29.58B | $84.21B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.08B | $27.69B | $15.17B | $12.65B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $67M | $6.15B | $1.56B | $2.52B |
| Gross Margin | -5.8% | 100.0% | 88.8% | 82.9% |
| Operating Margin | 10.4% | 34.3% | 14.7% | 20.5% |
| Forward P/E | 50.3x | 16.3x | 13.0x | 28.3x |
| Total Debt | $1.43B | $19.29B | $6.67B | $2.07B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $140M | $17.20B | $6.98B | $6.56B |
XHR vs BKNG vs EXPE vs ABNB — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Dec 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Xenia Hotels & Reso… (XHR) | 100 | 110.8 | +10.8% |
| Booking Holdings In… (BKNG) | 100 | 192.3 | +92.3% |
| Expedia Group, Inc. (EXPE) | 100 | 190.9 | +90.9% |
| Airbnb, Inc. (ABNB) | 100 | 95.7 | -4.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: XHR vs BKNG vs EXPE vs ABNB
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
XHR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 1.05, yield 3.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.05, current ratio 2.34x
- Beta 1.05, yield 3.3%, current ratio 2.34x
- 3.3% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs EXPE's 0.6%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
BKNG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 13.4%, EPS growth -4.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 16.3%
- 250.7% 10Y total return vs EXPE's 130.6%
- 13.4% revenue growth vs XHR's 3.8%
- 22.2% margin vs XHR's 6.2%
EXPE is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (13.0x vs 28.3x)
ABNB lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 13.4% revenue growth vs XHR's 3.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (13.0x vs 28.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 22.2% margin vs XHR's 6.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.74 vs EXPE's 1.47 | |
| Dividends | 3.3% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs EXPE's 0.6%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +54.1% vs BKNG's -16.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 21.1% ROA vs XHR's 2.4% |
XHR vs BKNG vs EXPE vs ABNB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
XHR vs BKNG vs EXPE vs ABNB — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
BKNG leads in 1 of 6 categories
EXPE leads 1 • ABNB leads 1 • XHR leads 1 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BKNG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BKNG is the larger business by revenue, generating $27.7B annually — 25.5x XHR's $1.1B. BKNG is the more profitable business, keeping 22.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to XHR's 6.2%. On growth, ABNB holds the edge at +17.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.1B | $27.7B | $15.2B | $12.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $243M | $10.2B | $3.1B | $2.6B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $67M | $6.2B | $1.6B | $2.5B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $97M | $9.0B | $4.9B | $4.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -5.8% | +100.0% | +88.8% | +82.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +10.4% | +34.3% | +14.7% | +20.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +6.2% | +22.2% | +10.3% | +19.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +9.0% | +32.6% | +32.1% | +36.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.2% | +16.2% | +14.7% | +17.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -100.0% | +2.4% | +96.8% | +4.0% |
Valuation Metrics
EXPE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 25.8x trailing earnings, EXPE trades at a 26% valuation discount to ABNB's 34.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, EXPE's 10.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ABNB's 31.3x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.6B | $132.7B | $29.6B | $84.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.8B | $134.8B | $29.3B | $79.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 26.30x | 25.87x | 25.77x | 34.85x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 50.25x | 16.32x | 13.02x | 28.35x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.16x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 11.96x | 13.41x | 10.22x | 31.33x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.44x | 4.93x | 2.01x | 6.88x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.38x | — | 13.10x | 10.67x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 17.27x | 14.61x | 9.51x | 18.12x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ABNB leads this category, winning 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
EXPE delivers a 68.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $69 in annual profit, vs $6 for XHR. ABNB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.25x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to EXPE's 2.62x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), XHR scores 7/9 vs ABNB's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +5.5% | — | +68.7% | +31.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.4% | +21.1% | +6.0% | +10.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.2% | — | +40.2% | +50.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +4.0% | +75.4% | +23.9% | +26.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 6 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.21x | — | 2.62x | 0.25x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.3B | $2.1B | -$307M | -$4.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $140M | $17.2B | $7.0B | $6.6B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.4B | $19.3B | $6.7B | $2.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.79x | 7.21x | 16.35x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — XHR and BKNG and EXPE each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BKNG five years ago would be worth $18,762 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $9,289 for ABNB. Over the past 12 months, XHR leads with a +54.1% total return vs BKNG's -16.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors EXPE at 40.2% vs ABNB's 3.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +18.4% | -19.4% | -10.5% | +5.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +54.1% | -16.8% | +52.8% | +14.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +44.1% | +65.4% | +175.6% | +11.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -3.4% | +87.6% | +46.9% | -7.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +44.8% | +250.7% | +130.6% | -2.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +13.0% | +18.3% | +40.2% | +3.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — XHR and BKNG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BKNG is the less volatile stock with a 0.74 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than EXPE's 1.47 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. XHR currently trades 97.7% from its 52-week high vs BKNG's 3.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.05x | 0.74x | 1.47x | 1.33x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $17.23 | $5129.83 | $303.80 | $147.25 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $11.21 | $150.62 | $148.55 | $110.81 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +97.7% | +3.3% | +83.2% | +95.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 61.9 | 42.4 | 50.2 | 56.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 659K | 8.7M | 1.9M | 3.5M |
Analyst Outlook
XHR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: XHR as "Hold", BKNG as "Buy", EXPE as "Hold", ABNB as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 35.3% upside for BKNG (target: $232) vs 1.0% for XHR (target: $17). For income investors, XHR offers the higher dividend yield at 3.31% vs EXPE's 0.60%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $17.00 | $231.72 | $272.35 | $145.44 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 10 | 71 | 75 | 44 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.3% | +0.9% | +0.6% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 4 | 2 | 2 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.56 | $1.53 | $1.52 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +7.8% | +4.9% | +6.5% | +4.5% |
BKNG leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). EXPE leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
XHR vs BKNG vs EXPE vs ABNB: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is XHR or BKNG or EXPE or ABNB a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Booking Holdings Inc.
(BKNG) is the stronger pick with 13. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 8% for Xenia Hotels & Resorts, Inc. (XHR). Expedia Group, Inc. (EXPE) offers the better valuation at 25. 8x trailing P/E (13. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Booking Holdings Inc. (BKNG) a "Buy" — based on 71 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — XHR or BKNG or EXPE or ABNB?
On trailing P/E, Expedia Group, Inc.
(EXPE) is the cheapest at 25. 8x versus Airbnb, Inc. at 34. 9x. On forward P/E, Expedia Group, Inc. is actually cheaper at 13. 0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — XHR or BKNG or EXPE or ABNB?
Over the past 5 years, Booking Holdings Inc.
(BKNG) delivered a total return of +87. 6%, compared to -7. 1% for Airbnb, Inc. (ABNB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BKNG returned +250. 7% versus ABNB's -2. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — XHR or BKNG or EXPE or ABNB?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Booking Holdings Inc.
(BKNG) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 74β versus Expedia Group, Inc. 's 1. 47β — meaning EXPE is approximately 98% more volatile than BKNG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Airbnb, Inc. (ABNB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 25% versus 3% for Expedia Group, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — XHR or BKNG or EXPE or ABNB?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Booking Holdings Inc.
(BKNG) is pulling ahead at 13. 4% versus 3. 8% for Xenia Hotels & Resorts, Inc. (XHR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Xenia Hotels & Resorts, Inc. grew EPS 326. 7% year-over-year, compared to -4. 2% for Booking Holdings Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, BKNG leads at 16. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — XHR or BKNG or EXPE or ABNB?
Airbnb, Inc.
(ABNB) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 5% net margin versus 5. 8% for Xenia Hotels & Resorts, Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BKNG leads at 34. 5% versus 9. 9% for XHR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BKNG leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is XHR or BKNG or EXPE or ABNB more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Expedia Group, Inc.
(EXPE) trades at 13. 0x forward P/E versus 50. 3x for Xenia Hotels & Resorts, Inc. — 37. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BKNG: 35. 3% to $231. 72.
08Which pays a better dividend — XHR or BKNG or EXPE or ABNB?
In this comparison, XHR (3.
3% yield), BKNG (0. 9% yield), EXPE (0. 6% yield) pay a dividend. ABNB does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is XHR or BKNG or EXPE or ABNB better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Booking Holdings Inc.
(BKNG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 74), 0. 9% yield, +250. 7% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (BKNG: +250. 7%, ABNB: -2. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between XHR and BKNG and EXPE and ABNB?
These companies operate in different sectors (XHR (Real Estate) and BKNG (Consumer Cyclical) and EXPE (Consumer Cyclical) and ABNB (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: XHR is a small-cap income-oriented stock; BKNG is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; EXPE is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; ABNB is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. XHR, BKNG, EXPE pay a dividend while ABNB does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.