Industrial - Machinery
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
XMTR vs TASK vs UPWK vs EXLS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Information Technology Services
Staffing & Employment Services
Information Technology Services
XMTR vs TASK vs UPWK vs EXLS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Industrial - Machinery | Information Technology Services | Staffing & Employment Services | Information Technology Services |
| Market Cap | $3.95B | $573M | $1.38B | $4.90B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $741M | $1.21B | $595M | $2.16B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-52M | $105M | $109M | $252M |
| Gross Margin | 39.3% | 35.5% | 103.0% | 38.5% |
| Operating Margin | -4.8% | 11.6% | 20.7% | 15.2% |
| Forward P/E | 117.0x | 4.6x | 7.4x | 14.1x |
| Total Debt | $349M | $298M | $381M | $404M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $15M | $212M | $298M | $146M |
XMTR vs TASK vs UPWK vs EXLS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Xometry, Inc. (XMTR) | 100 | 89.8 | -10.2% |
| TaskUs, Inc. (TASK) | 100 | 18.6 | -81.4% |
| Upwork Inc. (UPWK) | 100 | 18.2 | -81.8% |
| ExlService Holdings… (EXLS) | 100 | 147.5 | +47.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: XMTR vs TASK vs UPWK vs EXLS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
XMTR has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure.
- Rev growth 25.9%, EPS growth -18.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 21.7%
- 25.9% revenue growth vs UPWK's 2.4%
- +162.1% vs UPWK's -34.8%
TASK is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.18 vs EXLS's 0.58
- Lower P/E (4.6x vs 14.1x), PEG 0.18 vs 0.58
UPWK is the clearest fit if your priority is quality.
- 18.3% margin vs XMTR's -7.0%
EXLS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.67
- 221.4% 10Y total return vs XMTR's -10.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.67, Low D/E 44.2%, current ratio 2.56x
- Beta 0.67, current ratio 2.56x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 25.9% revenue growth vs UPWK's 2.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (4.6x vs 14.1x), PEG 0.18 vs 0.58 | |
| Quality / Margins | 18.3% margin vs XMTR's -7.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.67 vs XMTR's 1.94, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +162.1% vs UPWK's -34.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 14.8% ROA vs XMTR's -7.3%, ROIC 20.4% vs -5.7% |
XMTR vs TASK vs UPWK vs EXLS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
XMTR vs TASK vs UPWK vs EXLS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
UPWK leads in 1 of 6 categories
TASK leads 1 • EXLS leads 1 • XMTR leads 1 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
UPWK leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
EXLS is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.2B annually — 3.6x UPWK's $595M. UPWK is the more profitable business, keeping 18.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to XMTR's -7.0%. On growth, XMTR holds the edge at +35.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $741M | $1.2B | $595M | $2.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$21M | $204M | $150M | $410M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$52M | $105M | $109M | $252M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$11M | $88M | $224M | $297M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +39.3% | +35.5% | +103.0% | +38.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -4.8% | +11.6% | +20.7% | +15.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -7.0% | +8.7% | +18.3% | +11.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -1.5% | +7.3% | +37.7% | +13.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +35.9% | +10.3% | -100.0% | +13.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +66.7% | +13.0% | +29.6% | +7.5% |
Valuation Metrics
TASK leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 5.8x trailing earnings, TASK trades at a 72% valuation discount to EXLS's 20.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), TASK offers better value at 0.23x vs EXLS's 0.84x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4.0B | $573M | $1.4B | $4.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4.3B | $660M | $1.5B | $5.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -64.34x | 5.79x | 12.78x | 20.35x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 116.97x | 4.58x | 7.37x | 14.09x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.23x | — | 0.84x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 3.26x | 9.66x | 13.84x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 5.76x | 0.48x | 1.76x | 2.35x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 14.41x | 0.99x | 2.35x | 5.58x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 7.78x | 5.71x | 16.44x |
Profitability & Efficiency
EXLS leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
EXLS delivers a 27.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $27 in annual profit, vs $-19 for XMTR. EXLS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.44x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to XMTR's 1.26x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TASK scores 7/9 vs XMTR's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -18.8% | +21.2% | +17.9% | +27.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -7.3% | +10.3% | +8.5% | +14.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -5.7% | +16.3% | +14.3% | +20.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -7.5% | +16.7% | +16.2% | +23.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 7 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.26x | 0.50x | 0.60x | 0.44x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $334M | $86M | $83M | $257M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $15M | $212M | $298M | $146M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $349M | $298M | $381M | $404M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -20.58x | 7.12x | 146.13x | 11.80x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
XMTR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in EXLS five years ago would be worth $15,998 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,524 for UPWK. Over the past 12 months, XMTR leads with a +162.1% total return vs UPWK's -34.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors XMTR at 81.1% vs TASK's -6.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +25.1% | -12.3% | -46.5% | -24.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +162.1% | -28.3% | -34.8% | -31.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +493.8% | -18.1% | +32.0% | +4.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -10.2% | -67.8% | -74.8% | +60.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -10.2% | -67.8% | -49.9% | +221.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +81.1% | -6.4% | +9.7% | +1.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — XMTR and EXLS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
EXLS is the less volatile stock with a 0.67 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than XMTR's 1.94 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. XMTR currently trades 95.6% from its 52-week high vs TASK's 34.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.94x | 1.12x | 1.16x | 0.67x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $82.11 | $18.39 | $22.84 | $48.54 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $29.60 | $5.89 | $10.02 | $26.94 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +95.6% | +34.6% | +46.5% | +64.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 68.8 | 42.0 | 35.0 | 48.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 840K | 736K | 3.4M | 2.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — XMTR and EXLS each lead in 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: XMTR as "Buy", TASK as "Buy", UPWK as "Buy", EXLS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 118.1% upside for UPWK (target: $23) vs -18.1% for XMTR (target: $64).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $64.33 | $13.50 | $23.14 | $40.25 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 14 | 11 | 23 | 19 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 0 | — | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.2% | +4.8% | +9.8% | +6.7% |
UPWK leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). TASK leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
XMTR vs TASK vs UPWK vs EXLS: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is XMTR or TASK or UPWK or EXLS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Xometry, Inc.
(XMTR) is the stronger pick with 25. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 4% for Upwork Inc. (UPWK). TaskUs, Inc. (TASK) offers the better valuation at 5. 8x trailing P/E (4. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Xometry, Inc. (XMTR) a "Buy" — based on 14 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — XMTR or TASK or UPWK or EXLS?
On trailing P/E, TaskUs, Inc.
(TASK) is the cheapest at 5. 8x versus ExlService Holdings, Inc. at 20. 4x. On forward P/E, TaskUs, Inc. is actually cheaper at 4. 6x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: TaskUs, Inc. wins at 0. 18x versus ExlService Holdings, Inc. 's 0. 58x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — XMTR or TASK or UPWK or EXLS?
Over the past 5 years, ExlService Holdings, Inc.
(EXLS) delivered a total return of +60. 0%, compared to -74. 8% for Upwork Inc. (UPWK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: EXLS returned +221. 4% versus TASK's -67. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — XMTR or TASK or UPWK or EXLS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), ExlService Holdings, Inc.
(EXLS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 67β versus Xometry, Inc. 's 1. 94β — meaning XMTR is approximately 191% more volatile than EXLS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, ExlService Holdings, Inc. (EXLS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 44% versus 126% for Xometry, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — XMTR or TASK or UPWK or EXLS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Xometry, Inc.
(XMTR) is pulling ahead at 25. 9% versus 2. 4% for Upwork Inc. (UPWK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: TaskUs, Inc. grew EPS 120. 0% year-over-year, compared to -45. 4% for Upwork Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, XMTR leads at 21. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — XMTR or TASK or UPWK or EXLS?
Upwork Inc.
(UPWK) is the more profitable company, earning 14. 7% net margin versus -9. 0% for Xometry, Inc. — meaning it keeps 14. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: UPWK leads at 16. 4% versus -6. 6% for XMTR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — UPWK leads at 77. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is XMTR or TASK or UPWK or EXLS more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, TaskUs, Inc. (TASK) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 18x versus ExlService Holdings, Inc. 's 0. 58x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, TaskUs, Inc. (TASK) trades at 4. 6x forward P/E versus 117. 0x for Xometry, Inc. — 112. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for UPWK: 118. 1% to $23. 14.
08Which pays a better dividend — XMTR or TASK or UPWK or EXLS?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is XMTR or TASK or UPWK or EXLS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, ExlService Holdings, Inc.
(EXLS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 67), +221. 4% 10Y return). Xometry, Inc. (XMTR) carries a higher beta of 1. 94 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (EXLS: +221. 4%, XMTR: -10. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between XMTR and TASK and UPWK and EXLS?
These companies operate in different sectors (XMTR (Industrials) and TASK (Technology) and UPWK (Industrials) and EXLS (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: XMTR is a small-cap high-growth stock; TASK is a small-cap high-growth stock; UPWK is a small-cap deep-value stock; EXLS is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.