Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
XNCR vs RCUS vs MGNX vs HALO vs ALNY
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
XNCR vs RCUS vs MGNX vs HALO vs ALNY — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $903M | $2.50B | $186M | $7.68B | $39.48B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $93M | $236M | $150M | $1.40B | $4.29B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-172M | $-369M | $-75M | $317M | $577M |
| Gross Margin | 94.4% | 90.7% | — | 81.9% | 80.9% |
| Operating Margin | -144.7% | -168.6% | -48.7% | 58.4% | 17.5% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | — | 8.1x | 44.2x |
| Total Debt | $188M | $99M | $37M | $0.00 | $1.28B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $54M | $222M | $57M | $134M | $1.66B |
XNCR vs RCUS vs MGNX vs HALO vs ALNY — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Xencor, Inc. (XNCR) | 100 | 40.7 | -59.3% |
| Arcus Biosciences, … (RCUS) | 100 | 79.1 | -20.9% |
| MacroGenics, Inc. (MGNX) | 100 | 15.3 | -84.7% |
| Halozyme Therapeuti… (HALO) | 100 | 268.6 | +168.6% |
| Alnylam Pharmaceuti… (ALNY) | 100 | 218.8 | +118.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: XNCR vs RCUS vs MGNX vs HALO vs ALNY
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
XNCR lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
RCUS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if momentum is your priority.
- +209.6% vs HALO's -7.1%
Among these 5 stocks, MGNX doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
HALO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- beta 0.56
- 5.7% 10Y total return vs ALNY's 411.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.56, current ratio 4.66x
- Beta 0.56, current ratio 4.66x
ALNY ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 65.2%, EPS growth 206.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 53.0%
- 65.2% revenue growth vs RCUS's -4.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 65.2% revenue growth vs RCUS's -4.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.1x vs 44.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 22.7% margin vs XNCR's -185.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.56 vs XNCR's 1.99 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +209.6% vs HALO's -7.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 12.5% ROA vs RCUS's -35.3%, ROIC 73.4% vs -64.1% |
XNCR vs RCUS vs MGNX vs HALO vs ALNY — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
XNCR vs RCUS vs MGNX vs HALO vs ALNY — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
HALO leads in 4 of 6 categories
XNCR leads 0 • RCUS leads 0 • MGNX leads 0 • ALNY leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HALO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ALNY is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.3B annually — 46.2x XNCR's $93M. HALO is the more profitable business, keeping 22.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to XNCR's -185.7%. On growth, MGNX holds the edge at +132.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $93M | $236M | $150M | $1.4B | $4.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$127M | -$391M | -$73M | $945M | $677M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$172M | -$369M | -$75M | $317M | $577M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$189M | -$489M | -$83M | $645M | $641M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +94.4% | +90.7% | — | +81.9% | +80.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -144.7% | -168.6% | -48.7% | +58.4% | +17.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -185.7% | -156.4% | -49.9% | +22.7% | +13.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -2.0% | -2.1% | -55.5% | +46.2% | +15.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -100.0% | -39.3% | +132.5% | +51.6% | +96.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -159.1% | +10.5% | +8.0% | -2.1% | +4.4% |
Valuation Metrics
HALO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 25.5x trailing earnings, HALO trades at a 80% valuation discount to ALNY's 127.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, HALO's 8.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ALNY's 70.2x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $903M | $2.5B | $186M | $7.7B | $39.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.0B | $2.4B | $166M | $7.5B | $39.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -9.93x | -7.54x | -2.49x | 25.46x | 127.00x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | 8.09x | 44.18x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 1.11x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | 8.34x | 70.17x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 7.19x | 10.11x | 1.25x | 5.50x | 10.63x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.44x | 4.22x | 3.34x | 165.47x | 50.50x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | 11.91x | 84.84x |
Profitability & Efficiency
HALO leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HALO delivers a 6.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $6 in annual profit, vs $-120 for MGNX. RCUS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.16x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ALNY's 1.62x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ALNY scores 6/9 vs RCUS's 0/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -23.7% | -69.0% | -120.2% | +6.5% | +98.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -20.5% | -35.3% | -29.9% | +12.5% | +11.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -16.3% | -64.1% | -18.8% | +73.4% | +33.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -21.6% | -42.1% | -34.7% | +38.2% | +15.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.30x | 0.16x | 0.66x | — | 1.62x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $134M | -$123M | -$20M | -$134M | -$379M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $54M | $222M | $57M | $134M | $1.7B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $188M | $99M | $37M | $0 | $1.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.98x | -13.38x | — | 46.08x | 2.02x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
HALO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ALNY five years ago would be worth $22,537 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $924 for MGNX. Over the past 12 months, RCUS leads with a +209.6% total return vs HALO's -7.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HALO at 29.1% vs MGNX's -25.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -17.5% | +6.5% | +82.6% | -7.3% | -26.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +54.1% | +209.6% | +97.3% | -7.1% | +7.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -55.0% | +24.9% | -59.4% | +115.3% | +40.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -68.9% | -18.6% | -90.8% | +37.0% | +125.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +4.5% | +45.9% | -84.4% | +570.7% | +411.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -23.4% | +7.7% | -25.9% | +29.1% | +12.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — RCUS and HALO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HALO is the less volatile stock with a 0.56 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than XNCR's 1.99 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. RCUS currently trades 86.3% from its 52-week high vs ALNY's 59.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.99x | 1.95x | 1.93x | 0.56x | 0.71x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $18.69 | $28.72 | $3.88 | $82.22 | $495.55 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $6.92 | $7.06 | $1.19 | $47.50 | $245.96 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +65.9% | +86.3% | +75.8% | +79.3% | +59.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 54.7 | 60.5 | 45.1 | 52.4 | 43.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 865K | 1.2M | 1.1M | 1.4M | 1.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: XNCR as "Buy", RCUS as "Buy", MGNX as "Buy", HALO as "Buy", ALNY as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 162.6% upside for XNCR (target: $32) vs 20.2% for HALO (target: $78).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $32.33 | $30.00 | $6.00 | $78.33 | $445.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 27 | 18 | 22 | 27 | 52 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +4.5% | 0.0% |
HALO leads in 4 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics. 1 category is tied.
XNCR vs RCUS vs MGNX vs HALO vs ALNY: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is XNCR or RCUS or MGNX or HALO or ALNY a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(ALNY) is the stronger pick with 65. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -4. 3% for Arcus Biosciences, Inc. (RCUS). Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc. (HALO) offers the better valuation at 25. 5x trailing P/E (8. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Xencor, Inc. (XNCR) a "Buy" — based on 27 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — XNCR or RCUS or MGNX or HALO or ALNY?
On trailing P/E, Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc.
(HALO) is the cheapest at 25. 5x versus Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. at 127. 0x. On forward P/E, Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc. is actually cheaper at 8. 1x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — XNCR or RCUS or MGNX or HALO or ALNY?
Over the past 5 years, Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(ALNY) delivered a total return of +125. 4%, compared to -90. 8% for MacroGenics, Inc. (MGNX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HALO returned +570. 7% versus MGNX's -84. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — XNCR or RCUS or MGNX or HALO or ALNY?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc.
(HALO) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 56β versus Xencor, Inc. 's 1. 99β — meaning XNCR is approximately 257% more volatile than HALO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Arcus Biosciences, Inc. (RCUS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 16% versus 162% for Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — XNCR or RCUS or MGNX or HALO or ALNY?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(ALNY) is pulling ahead at 65. 2% versus -4. 3% for Arcus Biosciences, Inc. (RCUS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. grew EPS 206. 9% year-over-year, compared to -25. 4% for Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ALNY leads at 53. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — XNCR or RCUS or MGNX or HALO or ALNY?
Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc.
(HALO) is the more profitable company, earning 22. 7% net margin versus -142. 9% for Arcus Biosciences, Inc. — meaning it keeps 22. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HALO leads at 58. 4% versus -156. 3% for RCUS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RCUS leads at 96. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is XNCR or RCUS or MGNX or HALO or ALNY more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc.
(HALO) trades at 8. 1x forward P/E versus 44. 2x for Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. — 36. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for XNCR: 162. 6% to $32. 33.
08Which pays a better dividend — XNCR or RCUS or MGNX or HALO or ALNY?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is XNCR or RCUS or MGNX or HALO or ALNY better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc.
(HALO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 56), +570. 7% 10Y return). MacroGenics, Inc. (MGNX) carries a higher beta of 1. 93 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (HALO: +570. 7%, MGNX: -84. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between XNCR and RCUS and MGNX and HALO and ALNY?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: XNCR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; RCUS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MGNX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; HALO is a small-cap high-growth stock; ALNY is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.