Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

XTLB vs AEYE vs ALKT vs NRXP vs MSFT

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
XTLB
XTL Biopharmaceuticals Ltd.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • IL
Market Cap$279K
5Y Perf.-82.8%
AEYE
AudioEye, Inc.

Software - Application

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$98M
5Y Perf.-68.9%
ALKT
Alkami Technology, Inc.

Software - Application

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.92B
5Y Perf.-62.3%
NRXP
NRx Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$85M
5Y Perf.-99.2%
MSFT
Microsoft Corporation

Software - Infrastructure

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$3.08T
5Y Perf.+64.6%

XTLB vs AEYE vs ALKT vs NRXP vs MSFT — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
XTLB logoXTLB
AEYE logoAEYE
ALKT logoALKT
NRXP logoNRXP
MSFT logoMSFT
IndustryBiotechnologySoftware - ApplicationSoftware - ApplicationBiotechnologySoftware - Infrastructure
Market Cap$279K$98M$1.92B$85M$3.08T
Revenue (TTM)$451K$40M$472M$242K$318.27B
Net Income (TTM)$-1M$-3M$-50M$-38M$125.22B
Gross Margin26.4%78.3%57.4%59.5%68.3%
Operating Margin-481.6%-7.9%-9.3%-63.0%46.8%
Forward P/E23.0x24.8x
Total Debt$138K$721K$354M$631K$112.18B
Cash & Equiv.$371K$5M$63M$8M$30.24B

XTLB vs AEYE vs ALKT vs NRXP vs MSFTLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

XTLB
AEYE
ALKT
NRXP
MSFT
StockApr 21May 26Return
XTL Biopharmaceutic… (XTLB)10017.2-82.8%
AudioEye, Inc. (AEYE)10031.1-68.9%
Alkami Technology, … (ALKT)10037.7-62.3%
NRx Pharmaceuticals… (NRXP)1000.8-99.2%
Microsoft Corporati… (MSFT)100164.6+64.6%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: XTLB vs AEYE vs ALKT vs NRXP vs MSFT

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: MSFT leads in 4 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. NRx Pharmaceuticals, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and recent price momentum and sentiment. ALKT also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
XTLB
XTL Biopharmaceuticals Ltd.
The Healthcare Pick

XTLB lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: healthcare exposure
AEYE
AudioEye, Inc.
The Technology Pick

Among these 5 stocks, AEYE doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: technology exposure
ALKT
Alkami Technology, Inc.
The Growth Play

ALKT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 32.9%, EPS growth -12.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 29.5%
  • Better valuation composite
Best for: growth exposure
NRXP
NRx Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
The Growth Leader

NRXP is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth and momentum is your priority.

  • 101.1% revenue growth vs XTLB's -173.2%
  • +50.2% vs XTLB's -52.3%
Best for: growth and momentum
MSFT
Microsoft Corporation
The Income Pick

MSFT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.

  • Dividend streak 19 yrs, beta 0.85, yield 0.8%
  • 7.8% 10Y total return vs AEYE's 96.5%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.85, Low D/E 32.7%, current ratio 1.35x
  • Beta 0.85, yield 0.8%, current ratio 1.35x
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthNRXP logoNRXP101.1% revenue growth vs XTLB's -173.2%
ValueALKT logoALKTBetter valuation composite
Quality / MarginsMSFT logoMSFT39.3% margin vs NRXP's -157.3%
Stability / SafetyMSFT logoMSFTBeta 0.85 vs AEYE's 2.18
DividendsMSFT logoMSFT0.8% yield; 19-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)NRXP logoNRXP+50.2% vs XTLB's -52.3%
Efficiency (ROA)MSFT logoMSFT19.2% ROA vs NRXP's -489.9%

XTLB vs AEYE vs ALKT vs NRXP vs MSFT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

XTLBXTL Biopharmaceuticals Ltd.

Segment breakdown not available.

AEYEAudioEye, Inc.
FY 2024
Enterprise
100.0%$15M
ALKTAlkami Technology, Inc.
FY 2025
SaaS Subscription Services
95.0%$422M
Implementation Services
2.8%$13M
Service, Other
2.1%$9M
NRXPNRx Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
FY 2025
Therapy
100.0%$854,000
MSFTMicrosoft Corporation
FY 2025
Server Products And Cloud Services
34.9%$98.4B
Microsoft Three Six Five Commercial Products And Cloud Services
31.2%$87.8B
Gaming
8.3%$23.5B
Linked In Corporation
6.3%$17.8B
Windows
6.1%$17.3B
Search Advertising
4.9%$13.9B
Dynamics Products And Cloud Services
2.8%$7.8B
Other (3)
5.4%$15.2B

XTLB vs AEYE vs ALKT vs NRXP vs MSFT — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLMSFTLAGGINGNRXP

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

MSFT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

MSFT is the larger business by revenue, generating $318.3B annually — 1315177.7x NRXP's $242,000. MSFT is the more profitable business, keeping 39.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NRXP's -157.3%. On growth, ALKT holds the edge at +28.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricXTLB logoXTLBXTL Biopharmaceut…AEYE logoAEYEAudioEye, Inc.ALKT logoALKTAlkami Technology…NRXP logoNRXPNRx Pharmaceutica…MSFT logoMSFTMicrosoft Corpora…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$451,000$40M$472M$242,000$318.3B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$1M-$504,000-$12M-$31M$192.6B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$1M-$3M-$50M-$38M$125.2B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$0$2M$44M-$12M$72.9B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+26.4%+78.3%+57.4%+59.5%+68.3%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-4.8%-7.9%-9.3%-63.0%+46.8%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-2.3%-7.6%-10.6%-157.3%+39.3%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-3.7%+5.5%+9.4%-49.0%+22.9%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+7.9%+28.9%+18.3%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+20.0%+29.0%-22.7%-80.0%+23.4%
MSFT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — XTLB and ALKT each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
MetricXTLB logoXTLBXTL Biopharmaceut…AEYE logoAEYEAudioEye, Inc.ALKT logoALKTAlkami Technology…NRXP logoNRXPNRx Pharmaceutica…MSFT logoMSFTMicrosoft Corpora…
Market CapShares × price$279,464$98M$1.9B$85M$3.08T
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$46,464$93M$2.2B$78M$3.17T
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-0.26x-31.44x-39.07x-2.30x30.43x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.22.99x24.77x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.62x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple19.46x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.62x2.42x4.33x69.60x10.94x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.05x20.31x5.16x9.02x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF46.49x43.06x
Evenly matched — XTLB and ALKT each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

MSFT leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

MSFT delivers a 33.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $33 in annual profit, vs $-48 for AEYE. XTLB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ALKT's 0.98x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MSFT scores 6/9 vs ALKT's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricXTLB logoXTLBXTL Biopharmaceut…AEYE logoAEYEAudioEye, Inc.ALKT logoALKTAlkami Technology…NRXP logoNRXPNRx Pharmaceutica…MSFT logoMSFTMicrosoft Corpora…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-25.5%-47.8%-14.0%+33.1%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-17.7%-9.5%-5.9%-4.9%+19.2%
ROICReturn on invested capital-54.1%-42.4%-8.6%+24.9%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-50.7%-17.7%-9.3%+29.7%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–934356
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.03x0.15x0.98x0.33x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$233,000-$5M$290M-$7M$81.9B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$371,000$5M$63M$8M$30.2B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$138,000$721,000$354M$631,000$112.2B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-13.31x-2.79x-3.73x-24.18x55.65x
MSFT leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

Evenly matched — ALKT and NRXP and MSFT each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in MSFT five years ago would be worth $17,377 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $96 for NRXP. Over the past 12 months, NRXP leads with a +50.2% total return vs XTLB's -52.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ALKT at 13.3% vs NRXP's -20.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricXTLB logoXTLBXTL Biopharmaceut…AEYE logoAEYEAudioEye, Inc.ALKT logoALKTAlkami Technology…NRXP logoNRXPNRx Pharmaceutica…MSFT logoMSFTMicrosoft Corpora…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+5.8%-21.0%-20.8%+17.6%-12.0%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-52.3%-34.1%-39.0%+50.2%-4.5%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-48.4%+17.1%+45.5%-50.3%+37.6%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-81.5%-57.7%-53.8%-99.0%+73.8%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-87.9%+96.5%-58.2%-96.8%+776.0%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-19.8%+5.4%+13.3%-20.8%+11.2%
Evenly matched — ALKT and NRXP and MSFT each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — NRXP and MSFT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

MSFT is the less volatile stock with a 0.85 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AEYE's 2.18 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NRXP currently trades 80.2% from its 52-week high vs XTLB's 24.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricXTLB logoXTLBXTL Biopharmaceut…AEYE logoAEYEAudioEye, Inc.ALKT logoALKTAlkami Technology…NRXP logoNRXPNRx Pharmaceutica…MSFT logoMSFTMicrosoft Corpora…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.64x2.18x1.23x1.89x0.85x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$10.28$16.39$31.66$3.84$555.45
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$1.05$5.31$14.11$1.62$356.28
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+24.7%+48.0%+56.8%+80.2%+74.7%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10046.266.556.265.057.9
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded2.4M195K1.7M924K32.5M
Evenly matched — NRXP and MSFT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

MSFT leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: ALKT as "Buy", MSFT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 34.2% upside for MSFT (target: $557) vs 22.4% for ALKT (target: $22). MSFT is the only dividend payer here at 0.78% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricXTLB logoXTLBXTL Biopharmaceut…AEYE logoAEYEAudioEye, Inc.ALKT logoALKTAlkami Technology…NRXP logoNRXPNRx Pharmaceutica…MSFT logoMSFTMicrosoft Corpora…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$22.00$556.88
# AnalystsCovering analysts1281
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.8%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises1119
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$3.23
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%+0.6%
MSFT leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

MSFT leads in 3 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 3 categories are tied.

Best OverallMicrosoft Corporation (MSFT)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

XTLB vs AEYE vs ALKT vs NRXP vs MSFT: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is XTLB or AEYE or ALKT or NRXP or MSFT a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Alkami Technology, Inc.

(ALKT) is the stronger pick with 32. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 14. 5% for AudioEye, Inc. (AEYE). Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) offers the better valuation at 30. 4x trailing P/E (24. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Alkami Technology, Inc. (ALKT) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — XTLB or AEYE or ALKT or NRXP or MSFT?

On forward P/E, Alkami Technology, Inc.

is actually cheaper at 23. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — XTLB or AEYE or ALKT or NRXP or MSFT?

Over the past 5 years, Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) delivered a total return of +73.

8%, compared to -99. 0% for NRx Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (NRXP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MSFT returned +776. 0% versus NRXP's -96. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — XTLB or AEYE or ALKT or NRXP or MSFT?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

85β versus AudioEye, Inc. 's 2. 18β — meaning AEYE is approximately 155% more volatile than MSFT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, XTL Biopharmaceuticals Ltd. (XTLB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 98% for Alkami Technology, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — XTLB or AEYE or ALKT or NRXP or MSFT?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Alkami Technology, Inc.

(ALKT) is pulling ahead at 32. 9% versus 14. 5% for AudioEye, Inc. (AEYE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: NRx Pharmaceuticals, Inc. grew EPS 43. 9% year-over-year, compared to -12. 2% for Alkami Technology, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ALKT leads at 29. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — XTLB or AEYE or ALKT or NRXP or MSFT?

Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) is the more profitable company, earning 36.

1% net margin versus -23. 4% for NRx Pharmaceuticals, Inc. — meaning it keeps 36. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MSFT leads at 45. 6% versus -1324. 4% for NRXP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AEYE leads at 78. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is XTLB or AEYE or ALKT or NRXP or MSFT more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Alkami Technology, Inc.

(ALKT) trades at 23. 0x forward P/E versus 24. 8x for Microsoft Corporation — 1. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MSFT: 34. 2% to $556. 88.

08

Which pays a better dividend — XTLB or AEYE or ALKT or NRXP or MSFT?

In this comparison, MSFT (0.

8% yield) pays a dividend. XTLB, AEYE, ALKT, NRXP do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is XTLB or AEYE or ALKT or NRXP or MSFT better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

85), 0. 8% yield, +776. 0% 10Y return). NRx Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (NRXP) carries a higher beta of 1. 89 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MSFT: +776. 0%, NRXP: -96. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between XTLB and AEYE and ALKT and NRXP and MSFT?

These companies operate in different sectors (XTLB (Healthcare) and AEYE (Technology) and ALKT (Technology) and NRXP (Healthcare) and MSFT (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: XTLB is a small-cap quality compounder stock; AEYE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ALKT is a small-cap high-growth stock; NRXP is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MSFT is a mega-cap quality compounder stock. MSFT pays a dividend while XTLB, AEYE, ALKT, NRXP do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

XTLB

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $20B
  • Gross Margin > 15%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

AEYE

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Gross Margin > 46%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ALKT

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 14%
  • Gross Margin > 34%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

NRXP

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 35%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

MSFT

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 9%
  • Net Margin > 23%
Run This Screen

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.