Financial - Credit Services
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
XYF vs QFIN vs FINV vs LX vs CNF
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Financial - Credit Services
Financial - Credit Services
Financial - Credit Services
Financial - Mortgages
XYF vs QFIN vs FINV vs LX vs CNF — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Financial - Credit Services | Financial - Credit Services | Financial - Credit Services | Financial - Credit Services | Financial - Mortgages |
| Market Cap | $254M | $3.75B | $2.90B | $147M | $1M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $5.87B | $17.17B | $13.07B | $14.20B | $626M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1.79B | $6.89B | $2.80B | $1.61B | $-51M |
| Gross Margin | 66.6% | 61.8% | 79.3% | 35.4% | 87.0% |
| Operating Margin | 31.9% | 43.9% | 19.4% | 16.1% | -11.2% |
| Forward P/E | 0.3x | 0.5x | 0.6x | 0.3x | 4.5x |
| Total Debt | $341M | $1.65B | $34M | $5.27B | $4.22B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2.94B | $4.45B | $4.67B | $2.25B | $338M |
XYF vs QFIN vs FINV vs LX vs CNF — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| X Financial (XYF) | 100 | 251.2 | +151.2% |
| Qfin Holdings, Inc. (QFIN) | 100 | 131.4 | +31.4% |
| FinVolution Group (FINV) | 100 | 336.8 | +236.8% |
| LexinFintech Holdin… (LX) | 100 | 25.3 | -74.7% |
| CNFinance Holdings … (CNF) | 100 | 8.9 | -91.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: XYF vs QFIN vs FINV vs LX vs CNF
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
XYF is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Rev growth 79.2%, EPS growth 28.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.06, Low D/E 4.9%, current ratio 6.73x
- PEG 0.00 vs FINV's 0.19
- Beta 1.06, yield 6.7%, current ratio 6.73x
QFIN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.20, yield 9.3%
- 16.1% 10Y total return vs FINV's -47.5%
- NIM 14.3% vs CNF's 0.6%
- Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs CNF's 1.0% (lower = leaner)
FINV ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- -35.3% vs LX's -70.4%
Among these 5 stocks, LX doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
CNF is the clearest fit if your priority is stability.
- Beta 0.09 vs LX's 1.25
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 79.2% NII/revenue growth vs CNF's -60.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (0.3x vs 0.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs CNF's 1.0% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.09 vs LX's 1.25 | |
| Dividends | 9.3% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs FINV's 4.8%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -35.3% vs LX's -70.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs CNF's 1.0% |
XYF vs QFIN vs FINV vs LX vs CNF — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
XYF vs QFIN vs FINV vs LX vs CNF — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
QFIN leads in 1 of 6 categories
CNF leads 1 • XYF leads 1 • FINV leads 0 • LX leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
QFIN leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
QFIN is the larger business by revenue, generating $17.2B annually — 27.4x CNF's $626M. QFIN is the more profitable business, keeping 36.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CNF's -73.1%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $5.9B | $17.2B | $13.1B | $14.2B | $626M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $2.1B | $8.0B | $3.3B | $1.8B | $198M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1.8B | $6.9B | $2.8B | $1.6B | -$51M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $0 | $10.8B | $1.5B | $0 | $0 |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +66.6% | +61.8% | +79.3% | +35.4% | +87.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +31.9% | +43.9% | +19.4% | +16.1% | -11.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +26.2% | +36.5% | +18.2% | +7.7% | -73.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +25.7% | +53.5% | +21.9% | +5.9% | +12.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +30.2% | -9.7% | -2.1% | +110.3% | -8.5% |
Valuation Metrics
CNF leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 0.2x trailing earnings, XYF trades at a 95% valuation discount to FINV's 3.9x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), XYF offers better value at 0.00x vs FINV's 1.13x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $254M | $3.8B | $2.9B | $147M | $1M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$128M | $3.3B | $2.2B | $590M | $571M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 0.19x | 2.15x | 3.85x | 2.16x | -0.02x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 0.30x | 0.47x | 0.65x | 0.35x | 4.49x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.00x | 0.11x | 1.13x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | -0.46x | 2.99x | 5.76x | 1.65x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.29x | 1.49x | 1.51x | 0.07x | 0.01x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.25x | 0.56x | 0.59x | 0.22x | 0.00x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 1.15x | 2.78x | 6.89x | 1.20x | 0.09x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — QFIN and FINV each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
QFIN delivers a 28.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $29 in annual profit, vs $-1 for CNF. FINV carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CNF's 1.18x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LX scores 8/9 vs CNF's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +23.9% | +28.8% | +17.4% | +14.7% | -1.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +13.7% | +12.2% | +11.2% | +7.2% | -0.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +20.5% | +23.1% | +12.9% | +11.0% | -0.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +17.2% | +35.6% | +13.8% | +19.5% | -0.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 7 | 5 | 8 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.05x | 0.07x | 0.00x | 0.49x | 1.18x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$2.6B | -$2.8B | -$4.6B | $3.0B | $3.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2.9B | $4.5B | $4.7B | $2.3B | $338M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $341M | $1.7B | $34M | $5.3B | $4.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.18x | — | — | 153.26x | -0.14x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
XYF leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in XYF five years ago would be worth $15,210 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $915 for CNF. Over the past 12 months, FINV leads with a -35.3% total return vs LX's -70.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors XYF at 24.1% vs CNF's -50.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -5.4% | -22.5% | +3.6% | -31.8% | -46.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -53.3% | -63.6% | -35.3% | -70.4% | -56.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +90.9% | +0.6% | +45.1% | +8.1% | -88.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +52.1% | -19.1% | -2.3% | -66.4% | -90.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -81.1% | +16.1% | -47.5% | -74.1% | -95.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +24.1% | +0.2% | +13.2% | +2.6% | -50.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — FINV and CNF each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CNF is the less volatile stock with a 0.09 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LX's 1.25 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FINV currently trades 47.0% from its 52-week high vs LX's 22.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.06x | 1.20x | 1.12x | 1.25x | 0.09x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $20.36 | $47.00 | $10.90 | $9.35 | $8.80 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.30 | $12.30 | $4.50 | $2.02 | $2.36 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +25.5% | +28.1% | +47.0% | +22.0% | +36.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 58.1 | 53.7 | 58.4 | 44.7 | 44.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 158K | 1.4M | 1.3M | 1.5M | 5K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — QFIN and FINV each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: QFIN as "Buy", FINV as "Buy", LX as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 113.1% upside for QFIN (target: $28) vs 16.0% for FINV (target: $6). For income investors, QFIN offers the higher dividend yield at 9.26% vs FINV's 4.80%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $28.15 | $5.94 | $3.50 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 4 | 4 | 12 | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +6.7% | +9.3% | +4.8% | +6.9% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 1 | 4 | 2 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $2.39 | $8.32 | $1.67 | $0.97 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +10.5% | +11.6% | +3.3% | 0.0% | +23.7% |
QFIN leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). CNF leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.
XYF vs QFIN vs FINV vs LX vs CNF: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is XYF or QFIN or FINV or LX or CNF a better buy right now?
For growth investors, X Financial (XYF) is the stronger pick with 79.
2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -60. 9% for CNFinance Holdings Limited (CNF). X Financial (XYF) offers the better valuation at 0. 2x trailing P/E (0. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Qfin Holdings, Inc. (QFIN) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — XYF or QFIN or FINV or LX or CNF?
On trailing P/E, X Financial (XYF) is the cheapest at 0.
2x versus FinVolution Group at 3. 9x. On forward P/E, X Financial is actually cheaper at 0. 3x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: X Financial wins at 0. 00x versus FinVolution Group's 0. 19x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — XYF or QFIN or FINV or LX or CNF?
Over the past 5 years, X Financial (XYF) delivered a total return of +52.
1%, compared to -90. 9% for CNFinance Holdings Limited (CNF). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: QFIN returned +16. 1% versus CNF's -95. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — XYF or QFIN or FINV or LX or CNF?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), CNFinance Holdings Limited (CNF) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
09β versus LexinFintech Holdings Ltd. 's 1. 25β — meaning LX is approximately 1269% more volatile than CNF relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, FinVolution Group (FINV) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 118% for CNFinance Holdings Limited — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — XYF or QFIN or FINV or LX or CNF?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), X Financial (XYF) is pulling ahead at 79.
2% versus -60. 9% for CNFinance Holdings Limited (CNF). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Qfin Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 60. 7% year-over-year, compared to -122. 3% for CNFinance Holdings Limited. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — XYF or QFIN or FINV or LX or CNF?
Qfin Holdings, Inc.
(QFIN) is the more profitable company, earning 36. 5% net margin versus -73. 1% for CNFinance Holdings Limited — meaning it keeps 36. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: QFIN leads at 43. 9% versus -11. 2% for CNF. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CNF leads at 87. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is XYF or QFIN or FINV or LX or CNF more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, X Financial (XYF) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 00x versus FinVolution Group's 0. 19x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, X Financial (XYF) trades at 0. 3x forward P/E versus 4. 5x for CNFinance Holdings Limited — 4. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for QFIN: 113. 1% to $28. 15.
08Which pays a better dividend — XYF or QFIN or FINV or LX or CNF?
In this comparison, QFIN (9.
3% yield), LX (6. 9% yield), XYF (6. 7% yield), FINV (4. 8% yield) pay a dividend. CNF does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is XYF or QFIN or FINV or LX or CNF better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, CNFinance Holdings Limited (CNF) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
09)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CNF: -95. 8%, LX: -74. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between XYF and QFIN and FINV and LX and CNF?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: XYF is a small-cap high-growth stock; QFIN is a small-cap deep-value stock; FINV is a small-cap deep-value stock; LX is a small-cap deep-value stock; CNF is a small-cap quality compounder stock. XYF, QFIN, FINV, LX pay a dividend while CNF does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.