Financial - Credit Services
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
XYF vs QFIN vs LX vs FINV
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Financial - Credit Services
Financial - Credit Services
Financial - Credit Services
XYF vs QFIN vs LX vs FINV — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Financial - Credit Services | Financial - Credit Services | Financial - Credit Services | Financial - Credit Services |
| Market Cap | $254M | $3.75B | $147M | $2.90B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $5.87B | $17.17B | $14.20B | $13.07B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1.79B | $6.89B | $1.61B | $2.80B |
| Gross Margin | 66.6% | 61.8% | 35.4% | 79.3% |
| Operating Margin | 31.9% | 43.9% | 16.1% | 19.4% |
| Forward P/E | 0.3x | 0.5x | 0.3x | 0.6x |
| Total Debt | $341M | $1.65B | $5.27B | $34M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2.94B | $4.45B | $2.25B | $4.67B |
XYF vs QFIN vs LX vs FINV — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| X Financial (XYF) | 100 | 251.2 | +151.2% |
| Qfin Holdings, Inc. (QFIN) | 100 | 131.4 | +31.4% |
| LexinFintech Holdin… (LX) | 100 | 25.3 | -74.7% |
| FinVolution Group (FINV) | 100 | 336.8 | +236.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: XYF vs QFIN vs LX vs FINV
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
XYF carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.06, yield 6.7%
- Rev growth 79.2%, EPS growth 28.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.06, Low D/E 4.9%, current ratio 6.73x
- PEG 0.00 vs FINV's 0.19
QFIN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 16.1% 10Y total return vs FINV's -47.5%
- Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs FINV's 0.6% (lower = leaner)
- 9.3% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs FINV's 4.8%
- Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs FINV's 0.6%
LX lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
FINV is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- -35.3% vs LX's -70.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 79.2% NII/revenue growth vs FINV's 3.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (0.3x vs 0.6x), PEG 0.00 vs 0.19 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs FINV's 0.6% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.06 vs LX's 1.25, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 9.3% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs FINV's 4.8% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -35.3% vs LX's -70.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs FINV's 0.6% |
XYF vs QFIN vs LX vs FINV — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
XYF vs QFIN vs LX vs FINV — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
XYF leads in 2 of 6 categories
QFIN leads 1 • LX leads 0 • FINV leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
QFIN leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
QFIN is the larger business by revenue, generating $17.2B annually — 2.9x XYF's $5.9B. QFIN is the more profitable business, keeping 36.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LX's 7.7%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $5.9B | $17.2B | $14.2B | $13.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $2.1B | $8.0B | $1.8B | $3.3B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1.8B | $6.9B | $1.6B | $2.8B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $0 | $10.8B | $0 | $1.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +66.6% | +61.8% | +35.4% | +79.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +31.9% | +43.9% | +16.1% | +19.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +26.2% | +36.5% | +7.7% | +18.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +25.7% | +53.5% | +5.9% | +21.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +30.2% | -9.7% | +110.3% | -2.1% |
Valuation Metrics
XYF leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 0.2x trailing earnings, XYF trades at a 95% valuation discount to FINV's 3.9x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), XYF offers better value at 0.00x vs FINV's 1.13x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $254M | $3.8B | $147M | $2.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$128M | $3.3B | $590M | $2.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 0.19x | 2.15x | 2.16x | 3.85x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 0.30x | 0.47x | 0.35x | 0.65x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.00x | 0.11x | — | 1.13x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | -0.46x | 2.99x | 1.65x | 5.76x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.29x | 1.49x | 0.07x | 1.51x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.25x | 0.56x | 0.22x | 0.59x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 1.15x | 2.78x | 1.20x | 6.89x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — QFIN and FINV each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
QFIN delivers a 28.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $29 in annual profit, vs $15 for LX. FINV carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LX's 0.49x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LX scores 8/9 vs FINV's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +23.9% | +28.8% | +14.7% | +17.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +13.7% | +12.2% | +7.2% | +11.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +20.5% | +23.1% | +11.0% | +12.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +17.2% | +35.6% | +19.5% | +13.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 7 | 8 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.05x | 0.07x | 0.49x | 0.00x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$2.6B | -$2.8B | $3.0B | -$4.6B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2.9B | $4.5B | $2.3B | $4.7B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $341M | $1.7B | $5.3B | $34M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.18x | — | 153.26x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
XYF leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in XYF five years ago would be worth $15,210 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,364 for LX. Over the past 12 months, FINV leads with a -35.3% total return vs LX's -70.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors XYF at 24.1% vs QFIN's 0.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -5.4% | -22.5% | -31.8% | +3.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -53.3% | -63.6% | -70.4% | -35.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +90.9% | +0.6% | +8.1% | +45.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +52.1% | -19.1% | -66.4% | -2.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -81.1% | +16.1% | -74.1% | -47.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +24.1% | +0.2% | +2.6% | +13.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — XYF and FINV each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
XYF is the less volatile stock with a 1.06 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LX's 1.25 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FINV currently trades 47.0% from its 52-week high vs LX's 22.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.06x | 1.20x | 1.25x | 1.12x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $20.36 | $47.00 | $9.35 | $10.90 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.30 | $12.30 | $2.02 | $4.50 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +25.5% | +28.1% | +22.0% | +47.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 58.1 | 53.7 | 44.7 | 58.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 158K | 1.4M | 1.5M | 1.3M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — QFIN and FINV each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: QFIN as "Buy", LX as "Buy", FINV as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 113.1% upside for QFIN (target: $28) vs 16.0% for FINV (target: $6). For income investors, QFIN offers the higher dividend yield at 9.26% vs FINV's 4.80%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $28.15 | $3.50 | $5.94 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 4 | 12 | 4 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +6.7% | +9.3% | +6.9% | +4.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $2.39 | $8.32 | $0.97 | $1.67 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +10.5% | +11.6% | 0.0% | +3.3% |
XYF leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). QFIN leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 3 tied.
XYF vs QFIN vs LX vs FINV: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is XYF or QFIN or LX or FINV a better buy right now?
For growth investors, X Financial (XYF) is the stronger pick with 79.
2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 7% for FinVolution Group (FINV). X Financial (XYF) offers the better valuation at 0. 2x trailing P/E (0. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Qfin Holdings, Inc. (QFIN) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — XYF or QFIN or LX or FINV?
On trailing P/E, X Financial (XYF) is the cheapest at 0.
2x versus FinVolution Group at 3. 9x. On forward P/E, X Financial is actually cheaper at 0. 3x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: X Financial wins at 0. 00x versus FinVolution Group's 0. 19x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — XYF or QFIN or LX or FINV?
Over the past 5 years, X Financial (XYF) delivered a total return of +52.
1%, compared to -66. 4% for LexinFintech Holdings Ltd. (LX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: QFIN returned +16. 1% versus XYF's -81. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — XYF or QFIN or LX or FINV?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), X Financial (XYF) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
06β versus LexinFintech Holdings Ltd. 's 1. 25β — meaning LX is approximately 18% more volatile than XYF relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, FinVolution Group (FINV) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 49% for LexinFintech Holdings Ltd. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — XYF or QFIN or LX or FINV?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), X Financial (XYF) is pulling ahead at 79.
2% versus 3. 7% for FinVolution Group (FINV). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Qfin Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 60. 7% year-over-year, compared to 2. 5% for LexinFintech Holdings Ltd.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — XYF or QFIN or LX or FINV?
Qfin Holdings, Inc.
(QFIN) is the more profitable company, earning 36. 5% net margin versus 7. 7% for LexinFintech Holdings Ltd. — meaning it keeps 36. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: QFIN leads at 43. 9% versus 16. 1% for LX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FINV leads at 79. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is XYF or QFIN or LX or FINV more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, X Financial (XYF) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 00x versus FinVolution Group's 0. 19x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, X Financial (XYF) trades at 0. 3x forward P/E versus 0. 6x for FinVolution Group — 0. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for QFIN: 113. 1% to $28. 15.
08Which pays a better dividend — XYF or QFIN or LX or FINV?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Qfin Holdings, Inc. (QFIN) offers the highest yield at 9. 3%, versus 4. 8% for FinVolution Group (FINV).
09Is XYF or QFIN or LX or FINV better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, X Financial (XYF) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.
06), 6. 7% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (XYF: -81. 1%, LX: -74. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between XYF and QFIN and LX and FINV?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: XYF is a small-cap high-growth stock; QFIN is a small-cap deep-value stock; LX is a small-cap deep-value stock; FINV is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.