Insurance - Diversified
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
XZO vs TREE vs UPST vs SOFI vs LC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Financial - Conglomerates
Financial - Credit Services
Financial - Credit Services
Financial - Credit Services
XZO vs TREE vs UPST vs SOFI vs LC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Insurance - Diversified | Financial - Conglomerates | Financial - Credit Services | Financial - Credit Services | Financial - Credit Services |
| Market Cap | $1.25B | $523M | $2.66B | $20.28B | $1.88B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $196M | $1.12B | $1.08B | $4.77B | $1.33B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $56M | $181M | $49M | $481M | $136M |
| Gross Margin | 49.2% | 94.3% | 95.2% | 75.1% | 64.7% |
| Operating Margin | 37.0% | 7.3% | 5.1% | 11.0% | 25.0% |
| Forward P/E | 13.7x | 6.8x | 12.9x | 26.4x | 9.3x |
| Total Debt | $7M | $435M | $1.85B | $1.82B | $16M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $305M | $81M | $657M | $4.93B | $918M |
XZO vs TREE vs UPST vs SOFI vs LC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Dec 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| LendingTree, Inc. (TREE) | 100 | 13.8 | -86.2% |
| Upstart Holdings, I… (UPST) | 100 | 68.3 | -31.7% |
| SoFi Technologies, … (SOFI) | 100 | 127.8 | +27.8% |
| LendingClub Corpora… (LC) | 100 | 154.2 | +54.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: XZO vs TREE vs UPST vs SOFI vs LC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
XZO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 62.0%, EPS growth 135.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 61.3%
- 62.0% revenue growth vs LC's 15.0%
- 28.7% margin vs UPST's 5.0%
TREE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for value and stability.
- Lower P/E (6.8x vs 26.4x)
- Beta 1.63 vs UPST's 2.87, lower leverage
- 21.8% ROA vs SOFI's 1.1%, ROIC 9.0% vs 3.6%
UPST lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
SOFI is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 51.7% 10Y total return vs UPST's -5.5%
LC ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 2.32
- Lower volatility, beta 2.32, Low D/E 1.1%, current ratio 466.38x
- Beta 2.32, current ratio 466.38x
- NIM 5.4% vs SOFI's 4.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 62.0% revenue growth vs LC's 15.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (6.8x vs 26.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 28.7% margin vs UPST's 5.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.63 vs UPST's 2.87, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +46.3% vs UPST's -47.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 21.8% ROA vs SOFI's 1.1%, ROIC 9.0% vs 3.6% |
XZO vs TREE vs UPST vs SOFI vs LC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
XZO vs TREE vs UPST vs SOFI vs LC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
XZO leads in 1 of 6 categories
TREE leads 1 • SOFI leads 1 • LC leads 1 • UPST leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
XZO leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SOFI is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.8B annually — 24.3x XZO's $196M. XZO is the more profitable business, keeping 28.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to UPST's 5.0%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $196M | $1.1B | $1.1B | $4.8B | $1.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $75M | $120M | $68M | $760M | $287M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $56M | $181M | $49M | $481M | $136M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $49M | $73M | -$146M | -$2.6B | -$2.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +49.2% | +94.3% | +95.2% | +75.1% | +64.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +37.0% | +7.3% | +5.1% | +11.0% | +25.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +28.7% | +13.5% | +5.0% | +10.1% | +10.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +25.2% | +5.4% | -15.4% | -83.5% | -2.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +2.3% | -169.2% | -56.7% | +3.2% |
Valuation Metrics
TREE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 3.5x trailing earnings, TREE trades at a 94% valuation discount to UPST's 61.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, LC's 2.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than UPST's 48.7x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.3B | $523M | $2.7B | $20.3B | $1.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $953M | $877M | $3.9B | $17.2B | $973M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 15.82x | 3.50x | 61.87x | 40.77x | 14.16x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 13.67x | 6.75x | 12.94x | 26.41x | 9.32x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 4.31x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 8.75x | 8.46x | 48.73x | 22.58x | 2.45x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 5.77x | 0.47x | 2.48x | 4.25x | 1.40x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.92x | 1.85x | 3.75x | 1.90x | 1.29x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 12.84x | 8.62x | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — XZO and TREE each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TREE delivers a 86.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $86 in annual profit, vs $6 for SOFI. LC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to UPST's 2.32x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), XZO scores 7/9 vs SOFI's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +30.9% | +86.0% | +6.6% | +5.9% | +9.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +18.7% | +21.8% | +1.7% | +1.1% | +1.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +9.0% | +1.7% | +3.6% | +17.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +78.9% | +13.2% | +2.4% | +1.2% | +3.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 6 | 5 | 3 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.03x | 1.52x | 2.32x | 0.17x | 0.01x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$298M | $354M | $1.2B | -$3.1B | -$902M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $305M | $81M | $657M | $4.9B | $918M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $7M | $435M | $1.9B | $1.8B | $16M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 4.45x | 1.66x | 0.45x | 0.67x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SOFI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in LC five years ago would be worth $13,455 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,258 for TREE. Over the past 12 months, LC leads with a +46.3% total return vs UPST's -47.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SOFI at 46.9% vs XZO's -3.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -11.3% | -26.7% | -39.3% | -42.1% | -14.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -11.3% | -3.9% | -47.4% | +13.2% | +46.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -11.3% | +114.0% | +69.9% | +216.7% | +128.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -11.3% | -77.4% | -69.7% | +5.6% | +34.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -11.3% | -43.7% | -5.5% | +51.7% | -13.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -3.9% | +28.9% | +19.3% | +46.9% | +31.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — XZO and TREE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TREE is the less volatile stock with a 1.63 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than UPST's 2.87 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. XZO currently trades 77.2% from its 52-week high vs UPST's 31.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | — | 1.63x | 2.87x | 2.54x | 2.32x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $17.82 | $77.35 | $87.30 | $32.73 | $21.67 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $13.10 | $32.65 | $23.96 | $12.74 | $9.70 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +77.2% | +48.8% | +31.9% | +48.6% | +75.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 41.5 | 34.9 | 42.9 | 43.3 | 51.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 203K | 304K | 4.7M | 64.2M | 2.0M |
Analyst Outlook
LC leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: TREE as "Buy", UPST as "Buy", SOFI as "Hold", LC as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 82.7% upside for TREE (target: $69) vs 36.5% for SOFI (target: $22).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $69.00 | $38.29 | $21.70 | $22.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 23 | 22 | 27 | 29 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.3% | 0.0% |
XZO leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). TREE leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
XZO vs TREE vs UPST vs SOFI vs LC: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is XZO or TREE or UPST or SOFI or LC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Exzeo Group, Inc.
(XZO) is the stronger pick with 62. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 15. 0% for LendingClub Corporation (LC). LendingTree, Inc. (TREE) offers the better valuation at 3. 5x trailing P/E (6. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate LendingTree, Inc. (TREE) a "Buy" — based on 23 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — XZO or TREE or UPST or SOFI or LC?
On trailing P/E, LendingTree, Inc.
(TREE) is the cheapest at 3. 5x versus Upstart Holdings, Inc. at 61. 9x. On forward P/E, LendingTree, Inc. is actually cheaper at 6. 8x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — XZO or TREE or UPST or SOFI or LC?
Over the past 5 years, LendingClub Corporation (LC) delivered a total return of +34.
5%, compared to -77. 4% for LendingTree, Inc. (TREE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SOFI returned +51. 7% versus TREE's -43. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — XZO or TREE or UPST or SOFI or LC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), LendingTree, Inc.
(TREE) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 63β versus Upstart Holdings, Inc. 's 2. 87β — meaning UPST is approximately 76% more volatile than TREE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, LendingClub Corporation (LC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 2% for Upstart Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — XZO or TREE or UPST or SOFI or LC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Exzeo Group, Inc.
(XZO) is pulling ahead at 62. 0% versus 15. 0% for LendingClub Corporation (LC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: LendingTree, Inc. grew EPS 443. 3% year-over-year, compared to 0. 0% for SoFi Technologies, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — XZO or TREE or UPST or SOFI or LC?
Exzeo Group, Inc.
(XZO) is the more profitable company, earning 38. 1% net margin versus 5. 0% for Upstart Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 38. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: XZO leads at 48. 8% versus 5. 1% for UPST. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — UPST leads at 95. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is XZO or TREE or UPST or SOFI or LC more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, LendingTree, Inc.
(TREE) trades at 6. 8x forward P/E versus 26. 4x for SoFi Technologies, Inc. — 19. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TREE: 82. 7% to $69. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — XZO or TREE or UPST or SOFI or LC?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is XZO or TREE or UPST or SOFI or LC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, LendingTree, Inc.
(TREE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding. LendingClub Corporation (LC) carries a higher beta of 2. 32 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TREE: -43. 7%, LC: -13. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between XZO and TREE and UPST and SOFI and LC?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: XZO is a small-cap high-growth stock; TREE is a small-cap high-growth stock; UPST is a small-cap high-growth stock; SOFI is a mid-cap high-growth stock; LC is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.